Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin July 23, 2010

Forward this e-mail to your friends! 

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link: 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–> http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–> http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

**********************************************************

Come learn from Nathan J.’s mentor who will do all your deals for you…

this Saturday at 3 PM ET, NOON PST:

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/331982995

**********************************************************
Existing homes sales fall

According to the National Association of Realtors (NAR), existing homes sales fell 5.1% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.37 million units in June from 5.66 million in May, but are 9.8% higher than the 4.89 million-unit pace in June 2009. Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the market shows uncharacteristic yet understandable swings as buyers responded to the tax credits. “June home sales still reflect a tax credit impact with some sales not closed due to delays, which will show up in the next two months,” he said. “Broadly speaking, sales closed after the home buyer tax credit will be significantly lower compared to the credit-induced spring surge. Only when jobs are created at a sufficient pace will home sales return to sustainable healthy levels.”  AR President Vicki Cox Golder, owner of Vicki L. Cox & Associates in Tucson, Ariz., said softer home sales expected this summer don’t tell the whole story. “Despite these market swings, total annual home sales are rising above 2009 and we’re looking for overall gains again this year as well as in 2011,” she said. “Conditions have become more balanced in much of the country, which is good for both buyers and sellers. However, consumers find it even more challenging to navigate the transaction process, especially for distressed properties, which only underscores the value Realtors® bring to buyers and sellers in this market.”

Most Americans think things will get worse

A nationwide survey from Citigroup shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that the economy has yet to hit bottom, meaning a double-dip recession is expected.  The quarterly report, conducted by Hart Research Associates, revealed that 62 percent of people asked were still not counting on a rebound, which is 3-point decline from the March reading and almost as bad as last September’s result of 63 percent.  The survey also showed that Americans’ expectations for when the economy will stabilize for their households have been pushed further into the future. Nearly two thirds think that their households will not see a stable financial situation for at least two or three years, it said.  On the positive side, Americans’ views on current economic conditions and the outlook for their own personal financial situations are improving or holding steady, the survey said.  Twenty-four percent said that the local economy where they live is good or excellent, which is up from 19 percent in March, the report said.  “The big question is, could the gloomy news become a self-fulfilling prophesy, prompting consumers to restrain their spending, thus hurting the economic recovery?” he added.

Inventories up, sales down

A NAR practitioner survey shows that first-time buyers purchased 43% of homes in June, down from 46% in May. Investors accounted for 13% of sales in June, little changed from 14% in May; the remaining purchases were by repeat buyers. All-cash sales were at 24% in June compared with 25% in May.  Total housing inventory at the end of June rose 2.5% to 3.99 million existing homes available for sale, which represents an 8.9-month supply at the current sales pace, up from an 8.3-month supply in May. Single-family home sales fell 5.6% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.70 million in June from a level of 4.98 million in May, but are 8.5% above the 4.33 million pace in June 2009. The median existing single-family home price was $184,200 in June, up 1.3% from a year ago.  Single-family median existing-home prices were higher in 10 out of 19 metropolitan statistical areas reported in June in comparison with June 2009. In addition, existing single-family home sales rose in 12 of the 19 areas from a year ago while two were unchanged.  Existing condominium and co-op sales slipped 1.5% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 670,000 in June from 680,000 in May, but are 20.5% higher than the 556,000-unit pace in June 2009. The median existing condo price was $180,100 in June.

Bush did it … another perspective

In office 18 months, Obama is still running against the policies of George W. Bush and cites “nearly a decade of not paying for key policies and programs” such as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, big tax cuts and a costly Medicare prescription drug program.  Bush came to office with a $236 billion budget surplus in 2001, says Obama. “The day I took office, eight years later, America faced a record $1.3 trillion deficit.”  But blaming the country’s economic woes on Bush tax cuts and spending is a stretch.  It ignores the fact that as recently as 2007, the budget deficit was just $162 billion — long after Bush’s tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 kicked in and spending on the two wars and on the Medicare program was in place.  Furthermore, the projected surplus reflected a continuation of the bubble economy of the late 1990s, when the stock market was soaring, high-tech businesses were on a roll and corporate profits were surging. Those surpluses would have evaporated no matter who became president in 2001.  The rise in the annual deficit from $162 billion in 2007 to over $1 trillion now is largely due to collapsing tax revenues from the recession that began in December 2007, and stimulus and bailout spending by both Bush and Obama, said Brian Riedl, a budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation.  The Bush tax cuts and other policies are “a convenient scapegoat for past and future budget woes,” he said, but can’t be blamed for today’s trillion-dollar deficits — or future ones.  “Over the next 10 years, virtually 100 percent of the rising deficits” will be driven by “entitlement” programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and interest payments on the $13.2 trillion national debt, Riedl said.

Olick – don’t be fooled

“Don’t be fooled by the little uptick in home prices in today’s Existing Home Sales report from the National Association of Realtors.  Even the always glass-is-half-full chief economist Lawrence Yun made clear several times in the briefing before the report’s release, that he expects home prices to come under significant pressure over the coming months, as inventories rise.  The report today showed inventories up 2.5 percent to 3.99 million units. At the current sales pace, that represents an 8.9 month supply. The current sales pace ticked down 5 percent in June, even though those numbers are still under the sway of the home buyer tax credit (remember, EHS represent closings in June, so contracts likely signed in April before the credit expired).  But more importantly, the Pending Home Sales Index, which represents contracts signed, fell off a cliff in May, down 30 percent, indicating that closings will be way off as well.  Bottom line, experts who follow housing are having a hell of a time predicting just where home prices are headed nationally.”

“A new monthly report, Macro Markets Home Price Expectations, a venture by price guru Robert Shiller, found that the results for 2010 vary widely, anywhere from plus 4.9 percent to minus 12 percent. “In July 60 percent of the panelists projected negative home price growth for 2010,” writes Shiller in the report. The longer-term results, however, were less optimistic.  “Although still positive, the average outlook for five-year cumulative home price appreciation fell in July for the second consecutive month, and is now in single-digit territory,” writes Terry Loebs, MacroMarkets Managing Director. “This new consensus suggests a less robust housing recovery scenario – one that, all other things equal, would result in U.S. household wealth by year-end 2014 being about $500 billion less than the level implied by the average of panelist responses just two months ago.”

Now for our real estate education section…

Friday File – 15 Minute Short Sales Resolution…is Your LinkedIn Profile a Liability?

For this week’s 15 minute short sale resolution, it’s time to take a critical look at your LinkedIn profile…specifically, your professional headline.

Face it, if you are like most people, yours probably leaves a lot to be desired. In fact, it might just be a liability if you tend to use it like most people. Find out how you measure up and how to transform your LinkedIn profile from a lackluster liability to a lightning fast lead with this quick quiz:

Question: Do you have a professional headline?

Response: If not, it’s time to get one…NOW!

Actionable Item: Assuming you have a LinkedIn professional headline, continue to the following questions…

1. Did you include a title in your professional headline?

and/or

2. Did you include the name of your company?

Response: Your headline probably needs work!

Gotcha right? Yes, traditional wisdom holds that you should include your name or the name of your company in the headline but is this always true? Let’s examine the wisdom of this little gem for someone named “Joe Smith”. Great name, easy to remember…even easier to forget. Oh yeah, and shared by a zillion others of the same name.

Likewise, title is meaningless. Are you a big title in a little company or a little title in a big company. Perhaps you have some really odd title that tells the reader next to nothing. See the point? Plain and simple, titles and names don’t always mean a lot. So, what should you do to make a great professional title?

3. Explain what you do and why the reader will care. Use a bit of flair and keep it short and simple. Use the WIIFM approach to explain “What’s in it for me?” to the reader. Not sure how to write a great professional headline? Check out our free webinar or other social media marketing for real estate and short sales to learn more.

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin
**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2010.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com (subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************
About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

    * As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
      foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
      100 short sale & REO closings each month
   * Long-time authority on real estate investing
      and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
      portfolio of nearly 100 high-value, high-profit
     properties
    * Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
     running 4 different offices, supporting over
     400 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
     thousands of investors make money in the
     biggest market opportunity ever!
    * Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
      seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
      in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
      Wealth Building
    * Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
    * Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
–

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin July 22, 2010 

Forward this e-mail to your friends! 

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link: 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/ 

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–> http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–> http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

**********************************************************

Come learn from Nathan J.’s mentor who will do all your deals for you…

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/331982995

**********************************************************
Failed HAMP may benefit from HAFA

With the amount of canceled trial modifications in the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) passing permanent conversions, some are anticipating that the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) program will be more effective in keeping homeowners out of foreclosure.  As you’ll recall, HAFA was designed to give borrowers who failed to make those payments a chance at a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.  Based on survey data of the eight largest HAMP participants, the Treasury found that 45% of the canceled trials from HAMP are in an alternate modification. More failed HAMP modifications could enter HAFA after falling into delinquency after the conversion into permanent status.

For modifications that have been permanent for more than six months, 6% have fallen into 60-plus day delinquency again. The default rate, or the percentage of modified loans that are now 90 or more days delinquent, is less than 2% at six months after the conversion. Cary Sternberg, president of Excellen REO, an asset management firm and subsidiary of Titanium Solutions, said that HAMP was designed for those who want to stay in their home, but as prices continue to deteriorate, more homeowners are looking for a way out, either through short sale or deed-in-lieu.  “Then comes HAFA. In recognition of the fact that some borrowers simply could not make payments even if the payment were lower, a more dignified exit strategy was created,” Sternberg said.  “It is too early to tell what the success rate of the HAFA program will be, but I am betting it will be far better than HAMP,” Sternberg said. “HAMP is a Band-Aid, HAFA is an exit strategy.”

Dodd-Frank Act bad for business

Surprise!  The Dodd-Frank Act signed yesterday by President Barack Obama could have a range of unintended consequences on the mortgage securitization market, according to various commentaries.  Standard & Poor’s (S&P) president Deven Sharma warned the legislation could expose rating agencies to greater liability for — and lawsuits over — ratings of mortgage-backed deals.  According to Barclays Capital analyst Joseph Astorina, Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings and S&P “have instinctively pulled back from the new issue securitization market until they are better able to asses this new liability.”  The law’s reforms concerning securitization are designed to remove the incentive of the “originate-to-distribute” model, according to a client alert from law firm K&L Gates. 

Other “unintended” consequences cannot be known until the legislation is enforced, noted accounting firm Deloitte in commentary.  “By way of example, a driving element of the law has been to address the ‘too big to fail’ issue, reducing the risk that large firms might take excessive risk because they are in effect guaranteed to be bailed out in the event of a failure,” the firm said. “But because this is an extremely complicated problem, no one actually knows what the consequences of the new law will be — the new systemic regulator will probably make this a central issue as it sharpens its mandate in the coming months.”

Jobless claims up

The Labor Department says there were 464,000 initial jobless claims filed in the week ended July 17, up 37,000 from a revised 427,000 the previous week.  The number of claims was much higher than expected. A consensus estimate of economists surveyed by Briefing.com expected new claims to rise to 445,000.  The 4-week moving average of initial claims, which is calculated to smooth out volatility, was 456,000, up 1,250 from the previous week’s revised average of 454,750.  The government also said 4,487,000 people filed continuing claims in the week ended July 10, the most recent data available. That’s down 223,000 from the preceding week’s upwardly revised 4,710,000 claims.  Economists surveyed by Briefing.com expected ongoing claims to edge lower to 4,600,000 from the unrevised 4,681,000 in the previous week.  The 4-week moving average for ongoing claims fell by 21,500 to 4,567,000 from the preceding week’s revised 4,588,500.

Commercial real estate coming back?

Analysts have been warning for months that commercial real estate could be the next shoe to drop in the subprime mortgage collapse that came to a head in 2008, but there may be some good signs in the thawing of securitization markets and indications that investors are ready to come to auction when properties are on the block.  Marc Halle, managing director of real estate investments for Prudential Financial executives, acknowledged that distressed conditions are likely to intensify in the market but does not expect to see “wholesale foreclosures.” Instead, real estate investment trusts could become a more attractive asset class in a slowing economy as interest rates stay low and REIT dividends remain solid.  The banks are expected to launch $1.4 billion in two offerings of commercial mortgage-backed securities, according to a report Wednesday in the Wall Street Journal, which cited sources familar with the planned sales. 

The offerings pale in comparison to the more than $1 trillion coming due in maturing debt over the next five years, but offer some glimpse that Wall Street may be getting back on board.  Uncertainty among borrowers regarding whether banks will go back to more normalized lending practices is at the root of criticism against the Frank-Dodd financial regulations that President Obama signed Wednesday.  Banking analyst Dick Bove, at Rochdale Securities, said there is a persistent rumor that the Federal Reserve is looking at loosening capital requirements. Bove, a harsh critic of the new law, said that would be a welcome development.  “It demonstrates that the Fed understands that it must help the banks so that the banks can help the economy,” Bove said in a note to clients. “It implies that the Fed will not be very hasty in putting into effect the onerous rules being mandated by the banking legislation. If the Fed truly understands this, the outlook for banking and, more importantly, the economy is beginning to change in a positive manner.”  Banks themselves have been voicing some slightly encouraging sentiment regarding the direction of commercial real estate.

20% of Americans suffered major economic loss

The new Economic Security Index, constructed by Yale political scientist Jacob Hacker and a team of researchers, estimates that 20% of Americans suffered a significant economic loss last year – the highest level in the past 25 years.  The Index looks at the interaction of three key variables that have a direct bearing on a person’s economic security: income loss, medical expenses and debt.  The ESI defines people as economically insecure when their situation meets two criteria. First, within a year’s time they have lost 25% or more of their available gross income. Available gross income is the money they have left over after paying for medical costs and debt. Second, they don’t have enough in an emergency fund or other liquid reserves to make up the difference.  According to the index, which tracks Census Bureau data since 1985, 12.2% of Americans were economically insecure in 1985. By 2009, Hacker and his team estimate that 20.4% of Americans could be classified that way. The actual number of people affected increased by more than half, from 28 million in 1985 to roughly 46 million by 2007, the last year for which hard numbers were available.  In the past, some economists, such as Stephen Rose of the moderate-progressive think tank The Third Way, have conducted research that counters the broadly negative view about how the middle class has fared economically over the years.

Now for our real estate education section…

How to Price Any Property for Maximum Profits

Although the classic definition of the “right price” is whatever a willing buyer is willing to pay a willing seller (yes, we know it’s redundant), pricing is also a value proposition. In order to price a property for maximum profits, it’s essential to understand how to communicate and evaluate the value proposition to both the buyer and the bank.

What to Measure

1. Capacity – Any given area or builder has a set capacity. The more less capacity, the higher the price assuming demand is in place. During the height of the real estate boom, savvy builders capitalized on desirable locale’s by creating a sense of urgency related to capacity…often to the detriment of the eventual buyers who later learned there was a glut of unsold condo’s or other properties waiting in the sideline. However, despite the recent decline in real estate, many markets and specific neighborhoods remain highly desirable with limited capacity.

2. First Offering – Closely related to capacity is the concept of “first offering”. Face it, everyone likes something that is “brand new” but have you ever stopped to ask yourself why? A new house or neighborhood is somewhat “unproven” but the excitement of being “first” tends to create anticipation that can be tapped into. Take a note from developers that routinely price high to create a sense of value, then discount to provide customers a sense of a “good deal”.

3. Enhanced Value – Everyone likes to feel like they are appreciated and nothing says “appreciation” like a free upgrade or other valuable service. Make a list of amenities included in the sale of the property and/or consider including a few low-cost additional enhancements. Popular ones include free lawn-care for a year, electronic device or home warranty.

What to Exclude

1. Acquisition Cost – Without a doubt, this is one of the most common mistakes made by novice investors; the tendency to use acquisition cost as a basis for the sales price of a property. As millions of Americans have learned, what you pay for a property may have little to no bearing on the eventual price of a property….good and bad. Although the media is filled with horror stories about people that paid too much for a property (of more often…obtained bad financial terms), there are equally impressive numbers of people that made a lot of money after paying very little for a property. Price the property based upon value…not acquisition cost.

2. Expenses – If acquisition cost is the most common errors, surely expenses are the next. The tendency to add up the cost of repairs, insurance, broker and agent fees, taxes and other expenses in order to derive a figure is outdated at best and limiting at worst. Again, price the property based upon perceived value rather than cost or expenses. It’s often possible to perform inexpensive upgrades that dramatically alter the appearance (and desirability) of a property for very little investment. Don’t deny yourself the benefit of a fully priced property if in fact, it’s possible to price higher.

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin
**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2010.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com (subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************
About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

    * As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
      foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
      100 short sale & REO closings each month
   * Long-time authority on real estate investing
      and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
      portfolio of nearly 100 high-value, high-profit
     properties
    * Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
     running 4 different offices, supporting over
     400 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
     thousands of investors make money in the
     biggest market opportunity ever!
    * Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
      seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
      in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
      Wealth Building
    * Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
    * Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
–

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin July 21, 2010 

Forward this e-mail to your friends! 

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link: 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/ 

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–> http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–> http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

**********************************************************

Come learn from Nathan J.’s mentor who will do all your deals for you…

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/331982995

**********************************************************
HAMP still a failure

An increase in foreclosures, combined with the recent drop in housing sales, could send home prices plummeting again.  Some 91,118 people in trial modifications were canceled in June, bringing the total to 520,814 since the program began in the spring of 2009. More than 60% of those who dropped out last month had been in trials for at least half a year.  Homeowners usually are kicked out of the mortgage modification program because they don’t make the required payments, meet the qualifications, or submit the needed paperwork. Once their trials are canceled, about 45% of homeowners receive alternate modifications, often one from their loan servicer.

Some 8.9% had foreclosure proceedings started against them and 1.3% lost their home in foreclosure.  Only 364,077 troubled borrowers remain in the trial phase, some 38,728 of whom entered the program in June. Nearly 166,000 have been in trials for at least six months.  51,205 troubled homeowners received long-term mortgage modifications in June, bringing the total to 389,198.  8,823 homeowners had their permanent modifications canceled, 195 of whom paid off their loans.  “I feel like a broken record, but HAMP continues to perform very poorly,” said John Taylor, head of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, an advocacy group. “The permanent modification numbers are simply too low, while foreclosure filings continue above 300,000 for the 16th month in a row.” 

Unemployment bill passes

A bill that pushes back the deadline to file for extended unemployment benefits until the end of November passed a key procedural hurdle in the Senate yesterday. The vote was 60-40, the minimum margin needed to end debate on the measure.  Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, Republicans of Maine, switched sides to support the bill. Carte Goodwin, the newly appointed Democratic senator from West Virginia who replaced the late Robert Byrd, gave his party the 60th vote.  Democrats had stripped the unemployment insurance measure down to the bare essentials for Tuesday’s vote, a do-over of a tally taken late last month. The Senate could put its final stamp of approval on the bill on Wednesday, after which it would go back to the House. It is expected to pass both chambers and be sent to President Obama for his signature. Final passage in the Senate requires just 51 votes. 

Democrats tout the economy-boosting effect of unemployment checks since most beneficiaries spend them immediately. But the numbers amount to less than one-quarter of 1% of the size of the $14.6 trillion economy, and are far smaller than last year’s $862 billion stimulus legislation, which appears to have done little good for the economy.  Republicans say they do favor the benefits but insist they be paid for with spending cuts elsewhere in the government’s $3.7 trillion budget. As Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell puts it, “What we do not support—and we make no apologies for—is borrowing tens of billions of dollars to pass this bill at a time when the national debt is spinning completely out of control.”

Loan demand up

The Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending July 16, 2010, increased 7.6% on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 19.5% compared with the previous week, which included the Independence Day holiday.  The Refinance Index increased 8.6% from the previous week and was the highest Refinance Index observed in the survey since the week ending May 15, 2009. The increase in total refinance applications was driven by a 10.7% increase in conventional refinance applications, while government refinance applications decreased by 4.2%. 

The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 3.4% from one week earlier, driven by an 8.0% increase in government purchase applications. Conventional purchase applications were essentially flat, increasing just 0.3% from last week. The unadjusted Purchase Index increased 15.3% compared with the previous week and was 35.7% lower than the same week one year ago.  “As rates on 30- and 15-year fixed-rate mortgages declined to the lowest levels recorded in the survey, refinance activity increased last week.  The refinance index is up almost 30% over the past 4 weeks, but is still well below the peak seen last spring,” said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics.  “Refinance borrowers, aiming for the lowest possible rate, are getting conventional loans.  The strength in purchase applications comes from government loans, likely indicating that prospective buyers are drawn by the lower downpayment requirements.”

Michael Boskin – Obama’s economic fish stories

“President Obama says “every economist who’s looked at it says that the Recovery Act has done its job”—i.e., the stimulus bill has turned the economy around. That’s nonsense. Opinions differ widely and many leading economists believe that its impact has been small. Why? The expectation of future spending and future tax hikes to pay for the stimulus and Mr. Obama’s vast expansion of government are offsetting the direct short-run expansionary effect. That is standard in all macroeconomic theories.  So, as I and others warned in 2008, the permanent government expansion and higher tax rate agenda is a classic example of what not to do during bad economic times. Worse yet, all the subsidies, bailouts, regulations and mandates are forcing noncommercial decisions on the economy, which now awaits literally thousands of new diktats as a result of things like ObamaCare and the financial reform bill. The uncertainty is impeding investment and hiring. 

The president does not say that economists agree that the high future taxes to finance the stimulus will hurt the economy. (The University of Chicago’s Harald Uhlig estimates $3.40 of lost output for every dollar of government spending.) Either the president is not being told of serious alternative viewpoints, or serious viewpoints are defined as only those that support his position. In either case, he is being ill-served by his staff. Mr. Obama’s economic statements are increasingly divorced not only from competing viewpoints but from those of his own economic advisers. It is surprising how many numerically challenged pronouncements come from this most scripted and political of White Houses. One slip is eventually forgiven, but when a pattern emerges, no one believes it is an accident. For example, on the anniversary of the stimulus bill, Mr. Obama declared, “It is largely thanks to the Recovery Act that a second Depression is no longer a possibility.” Yet his Council of Economic Advisers just estimated the stimulus bill’s effect on GDP at its trough was 1%-2%.  On his recent “Recovery Tour,” Mr. Obama boasted, “The stimulus bill prevented the unemployment rate from “getting up to . . . 15%.” But the president’s own chief economic adviser, Christina Romer, has estimated that the stimulus bill reduced peak unemployment by one percentage point—i.e., since the unemployment rate peaked at 10.1%, it prevented the unemployment rate from rising to just over 11%. So Mr. Obama claims that the stimulus bill was several times more potent than his chief economic adviser estimates.  The president badly needs to make more realistic pronouncements. No one expects him to say his policies have failed (although most have delivered far less than claimed at large cost). A little candor about the results of experimentation in uncharted waters would go a long way. But at the very least, his staff needs to avoid putting these exaggerations on the teleprompter. It undermines confidence and raises concerns about competence. It’s doing nobody any good—not the economy and certainly not Mr. Obama.”

Wall Street Journal – reasons for a flat housing market

Even falling interest rates aren’t enough to whet consumer appetites for housing. Last week, the average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was quoted at 4.57%, according to Freddie Mac, the lowest since its survey began in 1971. But demand for home-purchase mortgages sits near 14-year lows, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, down 44% over the past two months.  Economists aren’t singling out one reason for the stalling housing market. A variety of factors have led to flagging confidence, they say, including sluggish labor markets, global economic turmoil and falling stock prices.  While the housing downturn dragged the economy into a recession nearly three years ago, now it is the economy that is pulling down housing, says economist Patrick Newport at IHS Global Insight.

Without sustained job growth, the housing market likely won’t improve. That in turn will ricochet across manufacturing, retail and other trades heavily dependent on home building and consumer spending.  The government last fall extended tax credits worth up to $8,000 to home buyers who signed contracts by April 30, causing sales to surge early this year. Those buyers had until June 30 to close their sales until Congress, concerned that the backlog of sales wouldn’t close in time, extended the deadline through September.  Analysts long expected the withdrawal of a federal tax credit, which had juiced sales, to lead to a slower-than-usual summer.  “It’s the magnitude that’s been the issue,” says Douglas Duncan, chief economist at Fannie Mae. “The drop-off in activity has surpassed expectations.”  Affordability gains have been offset for many buyers by tighter lending standards, particularly for “jumbo” loans that are too large for government backing. Banks are requiring down payments of 20% and more and strong credit scores because they must hold jumbo loans in their portfolios. 

More broadly, the housing market faces two big problems: too many homes and falling demand. More than seven million borrowers are 30 days or more past due on their mortgage payments or in some stage of foreclosure. Rising foreclosures will keep pressure on prices as banks put more homes on the market.  Last month, nearly 39,000 borrowers received government-backed loan modifications, but more than 90,000 borrowers fell out of the program, the Obama administration said on Tuesday.  Moreover, the pool of potential buyers remains constrained by the unprecedented number of homeowners who are underwater, or who owe more than their homes are worth.  To add to it all, mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are starting to push more repossessed homes onto the market. The companies owned 164,000 homes at the end of March, up 80% from a year ago.  Finally, unrealistic sellers have flooded the market” after reports of bidding wars and home-price increases earlier in the year.

Tenant Act extended to 2014

The financial reform bill passed by Congress will extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act (PTFA) through the end of 2014.  PTFA, originally enacted in May 2009, allows renters whose landlords have lost their properties to foreclosure the right to stay in the home for 90 days after the foreclosure or through the term of their lease. Without the new extension in the financial reform bill, the law would have expired at the end of 2012.  The new law also clarifies the date of a notice of foreclosure as the date of a completed title transfer: “The date of a notice of foreclosure shall be deemed to be the date on which complete title to a property is transferred to a successor entity or person as a result of an order of a court or pursuant to provisions in a mortgage, deed of trust, or security deed.’’ 

When the PTFA was enacted last year, it completely changed the way REO evictions are conducted, said Robert Jackson, president and managing attorney at the Irvine, Calif.-based Jackson and Associates law firm, while speaking last month at REO Expo 2010.  Under the Dodd-Frank bill, any lease or tenancy created prior to the change of title as a result of foreclosure is protected by PTFA, according to The National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC), a tenant-advocacy group that supports the changes.  Whether the PTFA has caused tenants to sign long-term leases immediately before a foreclosure — tying up disposition of a property — is a subject of concern for the default servicing industry.

Now for our real estate education section… 

Mortgage Overhaul & What is Means for You

By the time you are reading this, the new 2300 page financial reform bill is likely to be making the headlines. The Senate has already approved the new bill and President Obama is expected to sign it into law this week ..despite the fact that many of the provision related to specific regulations have yet to even be written. If that sounds faintly disturbing, don’t worry…your concern is noted and shared by many experts through the nation. However, there are sweeping changes that are already apparent despite the lack of specific details.

Although broad in scope, home buyers and sellers are likely to be among the first impacted by the new provisions. They represent one of the most comprehensive – top to bottom  changes to the finance, valuation, types of mortgage products offered and how lenders are compensated to take place in decades. In fact, there are even new rules for investors that provide capital for the purchase of mortgages.

A few of the most important points likely to make immense impact to buyers, sellers and investors is the language dealing with any type of mortgage outside of the “traditional” or “plain vanilla” category. Unfortunately, regulators have yet to fully define what will constitute a “traditional” mortgage under the new plan but it is clear that the line will be drawn to reduce the number of sub-prime borrowers as well as offerings of owner finance and other alternative forms of finance. Experts predict an immediate severe impact on many minority and low income borrowers; many who have already been impacted by far less severe measures. For example, according to FHA, rejection rates for African American and Latino borrowers have substantially increased among non-FHA loans.

The new FDIC and other regulatory oversight standards contained in the bill are expected to provide safer mortgage(s) instruments but at a higher cost and more stringent requirements for both banks and individuals. It is estimated that only five banks currently control more than 65% of the current mortgage market; the new bill is expected to further consolidate this trend by favoring big banks over small. In part, this is due to the belief that big banks are easier to regulate. However, at the same time, new controls and rules regulating private investors are also expected to take another two to three years to fully define…leading many to believe the bulk of mortgages will still be backed by the United States government for the foreseeable future.

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin
**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2010.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com (subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************
About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

    * As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
      foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
      100 short sale & REO closings each month
   * Long-time authority on real estate investing
      and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
      portfolio of nearly 100 high-value, high-profit
     properties
    * Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
     running 4 different offices, supporting over
     400 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
     thousands of investors make money in the
     biggest market opportunity ever!
    * Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
      seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
      in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
      Wealth Building
    * Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
    * Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
–

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin July 20, 2010 

Forward this e-mail to your friends! 

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link: 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/ 

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–> http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–> http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

**********************************************************

Fix A Flip Re Opens … If you want your deals funded beyond 1 day,

this is the webinar you need to be on this TONIGHT at 8:30 PM ET, 5:30 PM PST:

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/618365627

**********************************************************
Housing starts down

The Commerce Department says housing starts dropped 5.0% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 549,000 units, the lowest level since October.  It was the second straight month of decline in activity and was well below market expectations for a 580,000-unit rate.  May’s housing starts were previously reported as a 10.0% drop, but are now revised down to show a 14.9% decline.  Compared to June last year, starts were down 5.8%, the biggest decline since November.  Driving the June decline was a more than 20% drop in the volatile condominium and apartment market. Construction of single-family homes, the biggest part of the market, was down slightly by 0.7%.  The only positive sign in the report was an unexpected 2.1% rise in applications for building permits to a 586,000-unit pace in June. 

That followed a 5.9% drop in May and compared to analysts’ expectations for a slip to 570,000 units.  Still, the slumping job market and competition from foreclosed properties have forced builders to limit construction, especially after tax credits that spurred sales expired at the end of April.  “Despite record low mortgage rates, housing is at risk of a double dip unless job growth strengthens soon,” said Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets.  Economists had had predicted that construction would fall to a rate of 580,000 and had projected that building permits would sink to a rate of 570,000, according to Thomson Reuters.  In a typical economic recovery, the construction sector provides much of the fuel. But not this time. While developers have cut back on construction and the number of new homes on the market has fallen dramatically, they still must compete against foreclosed homes selling at deep discounts. 

Consumers will pay for new rules

Up until recently, bankers have remained mum on particular reform measures, saying that regulators will first need to write specific rules.  But Bank of America broke ranks on Friday, detailing the impact of several provisions, including the so-called Durbin amendment, named after sponsor Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., which will limit the fees banks collect from debit card swipes.  Bank of America executives said the new rule would reduce fees earned from debit cards anywhere between 60% and 80% starting in the second half of 2011. This year, the company said it expects to produce $2.9 billion in revenue from that business.  “We now fear that the Durbin bill could have a great negative impact on bank revenue than we had originally estimated,” BMO analyst Lana Chan wrote in a note to clients Monday. 

Even though BoA is hit hard, , the biggest hit was expected to fall on major regional players such as Regions Financial, KeyBank and Fifth Third. Each institution generated over 3% of their overall revenue from interchange fees last year, compared to Bank of America’s 2%, according to Chan.  Analysts suggested that perhaps the company most exposed to the new measure was the Minnesota-based lender TCF Financial.  In 2009, more than 10% of its revenue came from interchange. FBR’s Paul Miller projected Monday that TCF’s earnings could fall by as much as 40 cents a share as a result.  Banks have not been sitting idly by. A number of major financial institutions have reportedly started to eliminate free checking accounts, as well as imposing new or higher fees, ultimately putting the cost of the forthcoming new laws on the consumer.  “That is probably what is going to happen here,” said TCF Financial CEO Bill Cooper said during a conference call with investors last week.  The bad news is that the Durbin rule is just one small piece of an ongoing effort to rewrite the rules of the road for the financial services by this administration and congress.

Olick – Jumbo loans are back

“After several years of stagnation in high-end housing, thanks to the disappearance of the jumbo market, things are moving yet again.  A quick check on Bankrate.com shows the 30-year fixed jumbo at around 5.50%, and Citibank last week reported applications for jumbos up 30% just over the last 60 days.  “It is the overall weak economy driving the 10 year lower, which is the proxy for most mortgage loans,” says FBR’s Paul Miller. “This is still probably the best of the best getting loans at these low rates, but Jumbo activity is still very, very low.” Miller says it’s good for the market, but only “marginally better,” as banks are desperate to find good loans to put on their books.  But how long will it last? Probably only as long as investors remain nervous about the economy.  “Preliminary signs of life in the secondary market are a good indication that the narrower spread between jumbo and conforming loans will stick around,” says Bankrate.com’s Greg McBride. “However, the level of mortgage rates will hinge more than anything on the demand for Treasuries.”  Bank of America tells me that applications and fundings for jumbo loans rose over 10% from May to June. They say they’ve always been the leader in jumbos, which could be why Citi is getting more aggressive.”

Home Builder Confidence Plummets

Builders have been feeling increasingly pessimistic of late. The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) said yesterday that its monthly reading of builders’ sentiment about the housing market sank to 14 — the lowest level since March 2009. Readings below 50 indicate negative sentiment about the market.  “We continue to see a lull in home buying activity following the expiration of the federal home buyer tax credit program, as many of the sales that would have occurred this summer were likely pulled forward to meet that program’s deadline,” said NAHB chairman Bob Jones, a homebuilder in Bloomfield Hills, Mich., in a press statement. “In addition, builders are reporting continuing consumer hesitancy regarding home purchases due to uncertainty in the overall economy and job markets.” 

Paul Dales, a US economist at the Toronto-based Capitol Economics concurred that the tax credit’s expiration is impacting the housing market.  “It is becoming increasing clear that without the government’s artificial support, the US housing market is struggling to stand on its own two feet,” Dales wrote in commentary Monday. ” The fall in the NAHB housing index…shows that demand for new homes has weakened further.”  Specific factors contributing to the negative view include hesitation on the part of homebuyers, tight consumer credit and continuing competition from foreclosed and distressed properties, according to NAHB chief economist David Crowe.

Now for our real estate education section…

Mortgage Overhaul & What is Means for You

By the time you are reading this, the new 2300 page financial reform bill is likely to be making the headlines. The Senate has already approved the new bill and President Obama is expected to sign it into law this week ..despite the fact that many of the provision related to specific regulations have yet to even be written. If that sounds faintly disturbing, don’t worry…your concern is noted and shared by many experts through the nation. However, there are sweeping changes that are already apparent despite the lack of specific details.

Although broad in scope, home buyers and sellers are likely to be among the first impacted by the new provisions. They represent one of the most comprehensive – top to bottom  changes to the finance, valuation, types of mortgage products offered and how lenders are compensated to take place in decades. In fact, there are even new rules for investors that provide capital for the purchase of mortgages.

A few of the most important points likely to make immense impact to buyers, sellers and investors is the language dealing with any type of mortgage outside of the “traditional” or “plain vanilla” category. Unfortunately, regulators have yet to fully define what will constitute a “traditional” mortgage under the new plan but it is clear that the line will be drawn to reduce the number of sub-prime borrowers as well as offerings of owner finance and other alternative forms of finance. Experts predict an immediate severe impact on many minority and low income borrowers; many who have already been impacted by far less severe measures. For example, according to FHA, rejection rates for African American and Latino borrowers have substantially increased among non-FHA loans.

The new FDIC and other regulatory oversight standards contained in the bill are expected to provide safer mortgage(s) instruments but at a higher cost and more stringent requirements for both banks and individuals. It is estimated that only five banks currently control more than 65% of the current mortgage market; the new bill is expected to further consolidate this trend by favoring big banks over small. In part, this is due to the belief that big banks are easier to regulate. However, at the same time, new controls and rules regulating private investors are also expected to take another two to three years to fully define…leading many to believe the bulk of mortgages will still be backed by the United States government for the foreseeable future.

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin
**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2010.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches 

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com (subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************
About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

    * As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
      foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
      100 short sale & REO closings each month
   * Long-time authority on real estate investing
      and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
      portfolio of nearly 100 high-value, high-profit
     properties
    * Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
     running 4 different offices, supporting over
     400 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
     thousands of investors make money in the
     biggest market opportunity ever!
    * Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
      seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
      in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
      Wealth Building
    * Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
    * Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
–