Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 3, 2012
Forward this e-mail to your friends!
Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/
*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>
http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>
http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
************************************************************
Home prices declined almost 5% in 2011
Home prices decreased 4.7% in 2011 compared to the year before, marking the fifth consecutive year-end decrease in the CoreLogic home price index. Excluding distressed sales, home prices decreased 0.9% last year, which CoreLogic said gives an indication “of the impact of distressed sales on home prices in 2011.” Home sales last year also show month-over-month declines. December showed the fifth consecutive monthly decline with a drop of 1.4%, but rose 0.2% when distressed sales were removed from the equation.
The December decline followed a much larger drop of 4.3% in November, compared to November 2010. “While overall prices declined by almost 5% in 2011, nondistressed prices showed only a small decrease. Until distressed sales in the market recede, we will see continued downward pressure on prices,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic. While national statistics may be bleak, a few states posted increases in the price of homes last year. Montana came in first with 4.4% appreciation with distressed sales included, followed by Vermont (+4%), South Dakota (+3.1%), Nebraska (+2.5%) and New York (+1.7%). Illinois had the biggest 2011 decline in prices, 11.3%, followed by Nevada at 10.6%. Nevada’s peak-to-current decrease stands at 60% (including distressed homes), compared with a national decrease of 33.7%.
Employment up
The pace of job creation surged in January, with the US economy generating 243,000 new positions while the unemployment rate dropped to 8.3%, according to government data released today. Both numbers were far better than consensus, which expected a growth of 150,000 jobs and a steady unemployment rate of 8.5%. The overall work week remained unchanged at 34.5 hours while wages rose an average of four cents an hour to $23.29. The closely watched labor-force participation number, which can skew the unemployment rate, fell to 63.7%, the lowest since May 1983. The number of those working part-time for economic reasons rose 1.2%. Job gains have been concentrated primarily in the service sector, particularly in retail and the food and beverage industries. Warehousing, manufacturing, mining and health care also have participated. True to form, services were responsible for 162,000 of the January swell, with manufacturing payrolls growing 50,000. Government cuts subtracted 14,000 from the total. The total number of unemployed fell below 13 million for the first time since February 2009, while the total amount of employed Americans rose to 141.6 million, an increase of 847,000 from December. The unemployment rate was last this low in February 2009. The so-called real unemployment rate, which measures discouraged workers as well and is referred to as the U-6, nudged lower to 15.1%.
Long-term unemployment, though, remains a problem, with the duration dropping from a near-record 40.8 weeks to 40.1 weeks. Also, the level of discouraged workers surged, rising 7% to its highest level since December 2010. Job growth remains one of the two missing pieces of the recovery puzzle, even though the rate has been on a steady trek lower. In December, the economy created 203,000 jobs and the unemployment rate slipped to 8.5%, well off its 10.1% cycle peak. The monthly jobs report generally draws considerable trader reaction, which as of late has been all negative.
Olick – rent vs own riles government policy
“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage giants under government conservatorship, together owned 182,212 foreclosed properties as of the end of September. While they aggressively market and sell these homes to investors and owner-occupants alike, the numbers are still too high; these number could go far higher, as foreclosures previously stalled by paperwork issues come back into process. That’s why the federal regulator overseeing the two is launching a bulk sale program, offering investors the chance to buy foreclosed properties at a discount, as long as those investors turn the properties into viable rentals for a specified number of years. ‘This rental period could provide relief for local housing markets that continue to be depressed by the volume of foreclosed properties, and provide additional rental options to certain markets,’ according to a release from the regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).
The FHFA launched the initial phase of pre-qualification. Investors must prove they have ‘(a) the financial wherewithal to acquire the assets; (b) sufficient experience and knowledge in financial and business matters to analyze and bear the risks of the investment opportunity; and (c) agreement to keep certain information about the REO [Real Estate Owned, i.e. bank owned] and related matters confidential.’ That last part is to keep the prices competitive as the market starts to improve. Giving investors the opportunity to help clear the massive amount of distress in the housing market is crucial. The inventory of foreclosed properties is large, getting larger, and making it impossible for the overall market to achieve price stability. Witness a report today from CoreLogic which shows that home prices in December fell 4.7% year-over-year including sales of distressed properties. Excluding those properties, home prices fell less than one%.
Some, however, think the program is a negative: ‘People are brainwashed to think foreclosures are a bad thing for the housing market. Perhaps four years ago when a million loans all went into default and Foreclosure at the same time but not today. Today, 1st timers and investors — with an insatiable appetite for foreclosures, REO resales, and short sales — are the bedrock of this housing market.’ – Mark Hanson, Mortgage Analyst
‘Foreclosed homes are already meeting strong demand from investors when they come to market. We think these buyers are willing to pay a relatively full price, as they know the specific locations, and a large number of buyers have the ability to bid on the individual homes (doesn’t require significant capital)… Additionally, it will be difficult/expensive for investors to scale up operations given the broad geographic dispersion of properties vs. more traditional rental units, potentially limiting participation.’ – Dan Oppenheim, Credit-Suisse
Oppenheim also asks a valid question as to why the government would offer discounts to large investors buying in bulk, but not to individual investors buying perhaps a single property. There are plenty of Americans out there salivating over incredibly low-priced homes; rental income could be as much of a boon to them as perhaps a tax cut or a refinance. It was interesting yesterday, during his speech touting a proposed new government mortgage refinance program, President Obama, caught up in the moment, exclaimed, ‘No more renting!’ Putting aside the public relations blunder that was, given the fact that the FHFA had announced its REO to rent program not two hours before, it just drove home the conflict our government has between what it thinks Americans want to hear and what our economic reality dictates.
A few simple facts: There is not enough buyer demand to meet the number of homes for sale. A huge number of the homes for sale are empty, foreclosed properties. Too many Americans either cannot afford to buy a home or do not have the credit necessary to finance a home. Too many Americans cannot afford to sell their current homes in order to move or step up to a larger home. Rental demand is therefore strong and getting stronger. While homeownership may be a tenet of the ‘American Dream,’ renting is today’s actuality for a growing number of Americans. Whether it is large investor bulk programs or single investor incentives, adding to rental supply, thereby lowering rents, while at the same time clearing the market of foreclosed properties is a win. It may not be as politically palatable as offering ‘responsible’ borrowers a veiled tax credit in the form of a mortgage refinance, but it is good medicine for what ails housing.”
Pension threat for market investors
It’s no secret that the financial crisis and resulting malaise has taken its toll on bank stocks, commodities and Treasury yields. But it may be have triggered another ripple – one that has gone somewhat unnoticed. Pension funds have become seriously underfunded. According to a recent report from Credit Suisse some of the nation’s largest companies owe their pensions more than 25% of their market cap (after taxes). Although the problem is complex, at its core is simple math. Many firms forecast returns of 8% annually, and that just hasn’t happened. This developing situation is potentially market moving because it could require companies to make larger contributions – much larger. And if contributions ‘do’ go up, the money will have to come from someplace on the balance sheet.
“A pension accounting change at UPS will result in $527 million after tax charge in 2011,” says Joe Terranova. “And Sunoco said they have to contribute $80 million into their pension funds.” In other words, the need to fund pensions could drag down profits and, in turn, share price. In fact, the pension liability at AK Steel was cited by BofA as a reason behind their recent decision to downgrade the stock to ‘Underperform’ from ‘Neutral.” “I think in 2012 it will be a recurring issue,” Terranova says. John Ehrhardt of Milliman confirms the thesis. He tells us that investors should expect record numbers of earnings charges in 2012. “Record low interest rates result in historically high liabilities and the only remaining lever may be employer contributions.” And according to Ehrhardt this may be just the tip of the iceberg. “These companies are going to need 20-30% returns to fill the kinds of gaps we’re talking about.”
WSJ – Ally financial swings to loss
Ally Financial Inc., the US government-owned auto lender, swung to a $250 million net loss in the fourth quarter after taking a charge for regulatory penalties stemming from foreclosure matters. The Detroit-based lender, which provides financing for General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC dealers and customers, continued to make money from its auto-lending operations, but the results were weighed down again by its mortgage unit, which is saddled with lawsuits over foreclosures and soured mortgage investments. The loss compares to a year-ago profit of $79 million. It had a core pretax loss, which reflects results from continuing operations before taxes and other expenses, of $24 million, down from $526 million. Excluding a $270 million foreclosure-related charge, core pretax income would have been $246 million.
“One of our key priorities remains aggressively addressing the risks related to the mortgage business and taking steps to protect the key franchises at Ally,” Michael Carpenter, the company’s chief executive, said in a statement. “This will be critical to advance plans to repay the US taxpayer.” Ally, which was formerly owned by GM, is one of at least five major mortgage servicers in discussions with state and federal regulators over a potential settlement of “robo-signing” and other alleged foreclosure offenses. Regulators are close to finalizing a deal worth as much as $25 billion that could also include Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. On Tuesday, Ally said it would record the $270 million charge in the fourth quarter for penalties from regulators and other government agencies related to foreclosure issues.
The charge was mainly related to its mortgage subsidiary, Residential Capital, which has been the subject of bankruptcy speculation for several months. The charge caused a temporary decline in ResCap’s tangible net worth below $250 million, breaching debt covenants of some of its lenders, Ally said. Ally has been trying to scale back its mortgage operations as it focuses on building up its auto business and online retail bank. In November, the company said it would significantly curtail its correspondent lending operations, which comprise the bulk of its mortgage originations.
See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin
**************
Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.
http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com
(subscribe to this newsletter)
*************************************************
About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.
* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month
* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties
* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!
* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!
* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building
* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
