bank of america

Olick – short sales up, prices down

“Buyer traffic is strong, supply of homes for sale is low, and yet home prices continue to defy the usual formula, falling again in March. Prices usually rise as supply shrinks, but demand is still too low to make those historical ‘norms’ compute, not to mention that the type of supply available is largely distressed.  Foreclosures and short sales accounted for 47.7% of sales, in a three month running average measured by Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance. That’s the 25th month in a row that distressed sales have topped 40% of the market.  ‘With nearly half of the market being distressed, we’re a long way from a return to a normal market,’ said Thomas Popik, research director at Campbell Surveys. ‘Agents responding to our survey say that homeowners with well-maintained properties in good locations are very reluctant to list at today’s prices. That’s why inventory is low–and also why forced REO and short sales are such a big proportion of the remaining market.’  Home prices for non-distressed properties fell 5.7% in March year-over-year, according to the survey. Prices for ‘damaged’ REO (bank-owned properties) fell 5.7% and for move-in ready REO fell 2.5% during the same period. The real sticker shock is in short sales. Prices of those homes fell 14.3% from March of 2011.

Short sales have been ramping up of late, as banks attempt to comply with the so-called ‘robo-signing’ mortgage settlement. Those are part of the losses the banks are required to take in the $25 billion deal. Over the past six months, short sales have moved from 17.8% of all sales to 19.9%, according to the Campbell/IMF survey. They now represent the number one segment for distressed properties.  That share is likely to grow, as the conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), last week announced it was directing the two mortgage giants to ‘develop enhanced and aligned strategies for facilitating short sales, deeds-in-lieu and deeds-for-lease in order to help more homeowners avoid foreclosure.’ It includes a requirement that mortgage servicers review and respond to short sale requests within thirty days.  Lengthy timelines have long been the biggest complaint in the short sale sector.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hold hundreds of thousands of distressed loans, and accelerating the process will surely move the numbers up quickly, although the rules don’t go into effect until June 1. The FHFA is requiring the two make final decisions on these sales within 60 days. Previously, short sales could take up to a year and even beyond, with buyers often dropping out in frustration.  ‘This could put short-term downward pressure on home prices, as short sales by their nature occur more quickly than foreclosures,’ writes Jaret Seiberg, analyst at Guggenheim Partners. ‘That could raise questions about the status of the housing recovery, which could be negative for those with housing exposure. That would include homebuilders, mortgage lenders and mortgage insurers.’  On the plus side, short sales tend to sell at higher prices than foreclosures. It appears, however, that regardless of the FHFA edict, banks are already ramping up the short sales. Some began doing so in the aftermath of the robo-signing scandal, as foreclosures stalled. Even now, foreclosures falling as short sales rise. The good news is that sales of distressed properties are rising, but the headlines will likely focus more on the falling prices, than the much-needed clearing of these homes.”

No QE expectations

Wall Street is not expecting additional quantitative easing (QE) from the Federal Reserve at its meeting this week but increasingly believes in the Fed’s promise to keep interest rates low until late 2014, according to the latest CNBC Fed Survey.  Just a third of the 53 economists, fund managers, and strategists who responded to the CNBC survey see additional QE from the Fed in the next 12 months, unchanged from the March survey. And just a quarter expect Operation Twist to be extended beyond its expiration in June.  The survey found that 49% now believe the Fed will keep interest rates “exceptionally low” through late 2014, up from just 40% in March. The same percentage, however, disagree, showing that while there has been improvement, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has not yet made believers of all investors.  James Paulsen of Wells Capital Management called on the Fed “to move beyond its crisis mindset and appropriately normalize policy to reflect the maturation of the US economic cycle from crisis to recovery. Failure to do so soon risks creating another crisis — an inflation crisis!”  In fact, 42% of respondents agreed with the statement that the Fed’s forecast that it will keep interest rates low through 2014 is a mistake that could undermine the Fed’s credibility; 38% said it’s a good decision that has helped drive down interest rates.

Home prices drop

Home prices dropped in February in most major US cities  for a sixth straight month, a sign that modest sales gains haven’t been  enough to boost prices.  The Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller home-price index shows that prices dropped in February from January in 16 of the 20 cities it tracks.  The steepest declines were in Atlanta, Chicago and Cleveland. Prices rose in Phoenix, San Diego and Miami. They were unchanged in Dallas.  The declines partly reflect typical offseason sales. The month-to-month prices aren’t adjusted for seasonal factors.  Still, prices fell in 15 of the 20 cities in February compared with the same month in 2011. That indicates that the housing market remains far from healthy despite the best winter for sales in five years.

Bloom – economy stuck in “Death Valley”

Having raised hopes of a self-sustaining recovery, the US economy has disappointed and finds itself stuck in “Death Valley”, says David Bloom, the global head of the FX strategy team at HSBC.  He believes the data is neither weak enough to guarantee a third round of quantitative easing nor strong enough to convince the market the Federal Reserve is about to end its extraordinary measures.  “At this stage the economy worsened markedly, eventually leading the Fed to its commitment to keep rates low for an extended time period. The point is that we are now neither at the stage where the economy has deteriorated markedly, nor are we seeing the economy improve to the extent where the Fed is certain not to add stimulus” said Bloom in a research note.  With the market looking for clues on what the Fed will do next when Ben Bernanke holds a press conference on Wednesday, Bloom believes euro/dollar is stuck in a tight range as a game of chicken and egg is played out in the euro zone.  “We have the uncertainty of the French and Greek elections and the recent blow-out in Spanish bond yields. Meanwhile, the ECB (European Central Bank) is sending out signals that it is reluctant to engage in another LTRO (long-term refinancing operation). Once again a game of chicken is being played out in the euro zone,” said Bloom.  So until we get confirmation of which direction the US economy is heading into or evidence that investors are negative on the euro area as a whole and not just Spain, Bloom believes the euro will remain on the sidelines despite volatility elsewhere.

WSJ – ready for another Dodd-Frank spat?

Get ready for another spat over Dodd-Frank mortgage lending rules.  It’s been more than a year since regulators unveiled the first set of proposed (and yet-to-be completed) mortgage rules resulting from the 2010 financial overhaul law.  Now a new consumer regulator is hashing out a separate rule that will define what kind of loans mortgage lenders will be able to make.  At issue is a part of the Dodd-Frank law, known as the “qualified mortgage” rule. It is designed to protect consumers from the kind of risky lending practices that shook the financial system in 2008.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), also created by the Dodd-Frank law, has the difficult task of completing these rules, which were initially proposed by the Federal Reserve last year. The idea is to provide an incentive for the industry to make safer loans, and ensure that they lenders consider a borrower’s ability to repay the loan.  Loans made under the qualified-mortgage standard will receive a degree of protection from lawsuits, though the level of that shield is a matter of intense debate.  In a speech last week, Raj Date, the consumer bureau’s deputy director, gave some broad outlines of the consumer bureau’s thinking:  “We want to ensure that consumers are not sold mortgages they do not understand and cannot afford. We want to minimize compliance burden where possible, in part through the careful definition of those lower-risk “qualified mortgages.” We want to ensure that, as the market stabilizes over time, every segment of prudent loans has the benefit of sufficient investor appetite and a competitive market.”

It’s a daunting challenge, given that the mortgage-lending market has contracted since the housing market went bust. Mortgage lenders have tightened their standards dramatically, eliminating most of the problem loans that helped cause the housing market’s woes. Many argue that tight lending is hampering the economic recovery, so a misstep by the CFPB could harm the housing market further.  The Dodd-Frank law mandates that the mortgage rule exclude certain exotic varieties of loans that fed the housing boom — such as “option” adjustable-rate mortgages, which only require low minimum payments and allow the principal balance to increase, and “interest-only” loans, which don’t require principal payments for several years.

Other pieces are much less clear. One key issue that’s been debated in policy circles is how much limits the mortgage rule should place on the amount of debt that consumers can take on.  One joint proposal between an industry group and three consumer organizations attempts to solve this problem.  It says that qualified mortgages should automatically include any loans made to borrowers who are spending no more than 43% of their pretax income on all debt, including home loans, credit card debt and car loans. Loans could be allowed up to a 50% debt-to-income ratio if the borrower’s housing costs only comprise 31% of income, or if the borrower demonstrates stable income or cash reserves.

Still, it remains to be seen whether the consumer bureau will accept this approach. And many in the lending and real estate industry say they are worried that the regulator will enact requirements that could crimp lending.  One big concern, particularly for small lenders, is that the rule will lack the industry’s top priority — a shield against lawsuits for loans that meet guidelines set out by the consumer bureau.  Without those legal protections “lending is going to become more conservative,” said Bill Cosgrove, chief executive of Union National Mortgage Co. in Strongsville, Ohio. “That is a problem. It’s a problem for the housing recovery.”  Richard Cordray, the consumer bureau’s director, told lawmakers last month that the legal protections sought by the industry wouldn’t necessarily choke off lawsuits, although reducing litigation is one of the bureau’s goals. “We don’t want this to be punted into the courts,” Mr. Cordray said.  Consumer groups say they aren’t trying to spark a barrage of lawsuits against the mortgage industry. Instead, they argue that the threat of litigation will give lenders an incentive to comply with the new lending rules.

Illinois prices turn around

Median home prices in Illinois snapped a 20-month streak of price declines in March, a turnaround coinciding with the start of the spring selling season.  The statewide median price in March came in at $130,000, even with March 2011, according to the Illinois Association of Realtors. It’s the first time the state’s median price hasn’t decreased since June 2010.  “There’s no doubt that these are strong numbers to open the spring selling season,” said IAR President Loretta Alonzo. “To see such good sales numbers, coupled with a measure of price stability is encouraging news no matter what side of a real estate transaction you happen to be on.”  Illinois home sales posted the best March sales numbers since 2007. Home sales (including single-family homes and condominiums) in the month totaled 9,575, expanding 21.1% from 7,904 home sales a year earlier.  In the nine-county Chicago Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area, 6,590 homes were sold in March, up 23.8% from March 2011 sales of 5,323 homes. The median price in March was $151,850 in the Chicago PMSA, down 3.9% compared to a year earlier when it was $158,000.  “Sales volumes are up, time-on-the-market levels are down significantly from a year ago and prices appear to be stabilizing in Illinois although continuing to fall in Chicago,” said Geoffrey Hewings, director of the Regional Economics Applications Laboratory at the University of Illinois.  “Further, in the last month there was a more even spread of sales prices compared to previous months where homes sold for less than $200,000 dominated the market,” Hewings added.

Hiring going up?

The National Association of Business Economics’ (NABE) industry survey found that 39 percent of respondents expect hiring will pick up in their companies and industries during the next six months, up from 27 percent in January.  Some 48 percent of respondents expect hiring will hold steady. While that is down from 64 percent in January, it still underscores the slow pace of recovery in the labor market following the 2007-2009 recession.  The survey was conducted between March 20 and April 10.  The NABE surveyed 55 members from companies and trade organizations. Not all responded to every question.  The uptick in demand for labor could be leading companies to offer bigger paychecks. Some 44 percent of respondents said wages and salaries were rising, up from 26 percent in January.  The poll also showed 63 percent of respondents expected U.S. gross domestic product to grow between 2.1 and 3 percent in the fourth quarter from a year earlier.  In the NABE’s previous poll released in January, 60 percent of respondents expected growth in that range.

Olick – Phoenix turns around

“Mike Ripson hasn’t built a home in three years, but he is about to. He has been sitting on one hundred sixty acres of land just outside Phoenix, Arizona, which he intends to divide into 121 one-acre lots.  ‘Now’s the time because we’ve been studying the marketplace, and we noticed beginning late last summer, early fall, that for homes priced less than $100,000, the market was becoming very tight,’ says Ripson, whose company is celebrating its ten year anniversary this week.  ‘Over the last several months that price point has increased such that today, homes priced less than 300,000 dollars, there’s less than a thirty-day supply in the marketplace,’ Ripson adds.  The supply of homes for sale in the Phoenix area is down 42 percent from a year ago, and foreclosures are down 52 percent, according to Michael Orr, of the Real Estate Center at ASU. That is bringing demand back to the builders.  Ripson is building about 40 miles outside of Phoenix in Wittmann, where there is less competition from foreclosures.  ‘To give you an example, within a five mile radius of where we sit here at Sonoran Acres, two months ago there were 18 homes on the market. Today there’s only one,’ says Ripson.  That’s why he re-opened his model home two weeks ago, and immediately saw high buyer traffic. He filed permits for two new homes, which he expects to sell in the next few weeks, thanks to his low, $200,000 price point. 

Closer in to Phoenix, prices are a bit lower, thanks to a higher supply of distressed properties, but those properties are selling fast as well, as large scale and institutional investors flood the market.  ‘I really think we’re at the top of the first inning in terms of this opportunity, and there will be ebbs and flows, ups and downs, people will come in and come out,’ says Justin Chang, principal at Colony Capital, which intends to invest over a billion dollars in distressed properties this year.  ‘But if you’re looking to build a business over the next five to seven years, this is the first inning, and we’re pretty excited about it,’ Chang goes on to say.  Colony has a history of investing in commercial real estate, but about a year ago they saw the potential as well in the single family rental market. They began building an infrastructure, and started buying homes last month from banks, the government and at auction.  They own 170 homes in three states so far and intend to close on fifty more this week. They spend $3,000 to $5,000 rehabbing each home and readying it to rent. Their team is entirely internal, which they say saves them extra costs.  ‘We’ve got our internal team doing acquisitions, we’ve got our internal team doing the rehab and we’ve got an internal team doing the property management. These are employees,’ explains Jay McKee, COO of Colony American Homes.  ‘We have 120 people on our payroll, W-2 employees, right now doing this work. A lot of other folks are doing it by outsourcing to third parties,’ says McKee. ‘We think by doing it in house, we can do it without markups.’

At a Colony home in Laveen, AZ, a suburb of Phoenix, workers were installing new appliances into a former foreclosure, as the old ones had been stolen. Nearby, a large development from Pulte Homes advertised new construction starting at $100,000. McKee is not concerned.  ‘There are people who cannot buy those homes, and those are our clients. The people that lost their home to foreclosure, are repairing their credit, or just decided they don’t want to be owners of properties anymore, they’re our client,’ confirms McKee.  Colony is considering a program to help their renters become buyers, much like some rent-to-own programs being considered by banks and the government. Colony has also been pre-approved to bid on Fannie Mae foreclosures through a new pilot program by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).  ‘We really understand what they want to accomplish, and we think we can be good partners,’ says Chang. ‘The pilot programs that are out there now are very smart, and I hope they are the first of many.  Colony is just one of a growing cadre of investment teams buying distressed real estate to rent. Chang expects to see returns of anywhere from 15 to 25 percent on his investment. Cash flow is almost immediate. He says he can rehab a home in three days and have it rented in less than a month. 85 percent of Colony’s homes are already rented.  As for competition in the space, which Chang calls a pioneering asset class, he’s not concerned.  ‘The opportunity is so vast that there’s room for a lot of companies,’ Chang says. ‘Eight to ten million homes will be foreclosed over next 3-5 years. That’s $800 billion in capital required. Fifty other firms could do it, and it still would be a drop in the bucket. We’re really just a small part of the game at this point.’”

Gas prices down

The average retail price of a gallon of gasoline in the United States declined for the first time since mid-December, dropping 5.44 cents over the past two weeks, the nationwide Lundberg Survey showed.  The national average for a gallon of regular gasoline fell to $3.9127 on April 20, from $3.9671 on April 6, according to the survey of gasoline retailers in the continental United States.  Still, drivers are paying 3.27 cents more for a gallon than they did a year ago.  “The decline began in California about six weeks ago,” survey editor Trilby Lundberg said, adding that prices peaked there on March 9 at $4.3162 and fell in subsequent surveys by nearly 15 percent to $4.1669.  Drivers in Chicago continued to pay the most at the pump — $4.26 per gallon — even though prices fell nearly 19 cents from April 6.  Prices in Tulsa, Oklahoma, remained lowest at $3.52 per gallon.  “If crude oil does not shoot back up we may find another price decline of 5-10 cents in the coming weeks,” Lundberg said.  Average diesel prices fell 4.15 cents to $4.1735 compared with two weeks earlier.

California Bay area sales up

March home sales in California’s Bay Area reached their highest level for the month in five years, the result of lower prices, low interest rates and an improving economy.  About 7,700 new and resale houses and condos sold in the nine-county Bay Area in March, up 34.9% from 5,702 in February, and up 9.1% from 7,051 a year earlier, according to San Diego-based DataQuick.  The February to March sales jump is normal for the season, but the latter’s sales count was the highest for the month since 8,317 homes were sold in 2007. Since 1988, March sales have ranged from 4,898 in 2008 to 12,645 in 2004, with an average of 8,812.  “This is the time of year when buying patterns usually start to normalize,” said DataQuick President John Walsh. “And while the changes we’re seeing are incremental, they’re incremental in a positive direction. That said, there’s a long way to go.”  The median price paid for all new and resale houses and condos sold in the Bay Area in March totaled $358,000, a 10.2% increase from $325,000 in February, but down 0.6% from $360,000 in March 2011. 

To put these figures in perspective, the low point of the current real estate cycle fell to $290,000 in March 2009, while the peak rose to $665,000 in June/July 2007.  Statewide median home prices posted their first year-over-year increase in 16 months. The California Association of Realtors members said tight inventory (4.1 months) throughout the state and particularly robust sales in the San Francisco Bay area helped fuel the price increase.  “Two of the big issues to watch closely are how fast distressed properties are being put on the market, and the availability of, or lack of availability of, mortgage financing,” DataQuick’s Walsh said.  Distressed property sales, according to the firm, made up 44.3% of the resale market, down from 48.8% in February and 48.2% a year earlier.  Foreclosure resales accounted for 24.9% of resales in March, falling from 26.4% in February, and down from 31.5% in the year-ago period. Foreclosure resales averaged about 10% over the past 17 years.  Short sales made up 19.4% of Bay Area resales in the month, down from 22.4% in the previous month and up from 16.7% a year earlier.

Freddie and Fannie join the short sale hurrah

In an effort to make the short sale process more transparent, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are updating their timelines and also requiring servicers to provide weekly updates when decisions take more than 30 days after the receipt of a complete application for a short sale under the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA) initiative or Freddie Mac’s traditional requirements. All decisions must be made within 60 days.  Today’s announcement marks the newest part of the Servicing Alignment Initiative (SAI) Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae launched in 2011 at the direction of their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to set consistent servicing and delinquency management requirements. Last year Freddie Mac completed 45,623 short sales, a 140% increase since the housing crisis began.

Facts:

-  Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s new short sale timelines require servicers to make a decision within 30 days of receiving either 1) an offer on a property  under Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s traditional short sale program or 2) a completed Borrower Response Package (BRP) requesting consideration for a short sale under HAFA or Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s traditional short sale program.  (BRPs are standardized assistance applications developed as part of the Servicing Alignment Initiative.)

-  If more than 30 days are needed, borrowers must receive weekly status updates and a decision no later than 60 days from the date the complete BRP is received.  This will help servicers who may need more time to obtain a broker price opinion or a private mortgage insurer’s approval on a BRP or property offer.

-  In the event a servicer makes a counteroffer, the borrower is expected to respond within five business days. The servicer must then respond within 10 business days of receiving the borrower’s response.

-  Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will use the new timelines to evaluate servicer compliance with the SAI and its own servicing requirements.

-  Freddie Mac completed 45,623 short sales in 2011, a 140% increase since 2009.  Overall, Freddie Mac has also helped more than 615,000 distressed borrowers avoid foreclosure since the housing crisis began.

Whitney reverses call on Citigroup

Meredith Whitney, who made the prescient call in 2007 that Citigroup would cut its dividend, has now upgraded the very stock that brought her celebrity status among equity analysts during the credit crisis.  Shares of Citigroup yesterday rallied as news of the upgrade to a “hold” from “underperform” spread beyond Whitney’s direct clients. The stock is up 34% so far on the year.  “C shares continue to trade well below tangible book value (70%), despite relatively lower mortgage and European exposures than its large-cap bank brethren,” wrote Whitney, who founded Meredith Whitney Advisory Group in 2009. “On the capital question, we believe C will handily make its capital target of +8% by the end of 2012.”  Whitney had a “Sell” or “Underperform” rating on Citigroup since starting coverage on the stock at her new firm in April 2009.  At the end of October 2007, while working for Oppenheimer & Co., Whitney made waves by predicting that Citigroup might have to cut its dividend payout to raise capital.  The call drew the scorn of the company and fellow analysts, but turned out to be right after Citigroup cut its dividend in January of 2008 as more of the subprime mortgage securities that Whitney had warned about went sour on the company.

Mortgage applications up

Mortgage applications increased 6.9% from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending April 13, 2012.   The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 6.9% on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 6.5% compared with the previous week.  The Refinance Index increased 13.5% from the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 11.2% from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 10.4% compared with the previous week and was 13.9% lower than the same week one year ago.  The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 1.60%.  The four week moving average is down 0.52% for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 2.36% for the Refinance Index.  The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 75.2% of total applications from 70.5% the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 5.3% from 5.5% of total applications from the previous week.

“Renewed concerns about sovereign debt in Europe led to a drop in rates last week, with the 30-year rate tying our survey low, reached in early February.  Refinance activity picked up in response, increasing 13.5% for the week.  Participants in our survey indicated that about 32% of this refinance volume was for HARP loans,” said Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s Chief Economist and SVP of Research and Education.  “While purchase activity declined sharply for the week, this was mostly due to a 23% drop in applications for FHA purchase loans.  This drop follows big increases in the demand for FHA loans over several weeks in anticipation of the FHA mortgage insurance premium increases that went into effect last week.  This was the largest weekly drop in the government purchase index since the expiration of the first-time homebuyer tax credit in May 2010.  The demand for conventional purchase loans was down only slightly.”  The average loan size of all loans for home purchase in the US was $233,381 in March 2012, up from $225,463 in February 2012. The average loan size for a refinance was $214,593, down from $222,048 in February.  The largest purchase loans were made in the Pacific region at $ 337,227. The largest refinance loans were also made in the Pacific region at $ 290,711.

Spain bail-out; not if – when

Economic experts watching Spain don’t know how much money will be needed or precisely when, but some are near certain that Madrid will eventually seek a multi-billion euro bailout for its banks, and perhaps even for the state itself.  Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has repeatedly said Spain doesn’t need or want an international bailout, and the European Union, which along with the IMF has already rescued Greece, Ireland and Portugal, also dismisses such talk.  But economists believe that Spanish banks will have to turn to the euro zone’s rescue fund, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), for help in covering losses caused by a property market crash which has yet to end.  Madrid is likely to hold out for some time. “The underlying picture in Spain is dramatic, but is it dramatic in the way that it needs a bailout package tomorrow? No,” Brzeski said. “But if you look ahead, let’s say the next six months, I would not be surprised if they (the banks) have to get some kind of European support.”  Market concerns about the euro zone’s fourth largest economy have deepened in the past week. Yields on the government’s 10-year bonds, which reflect the risk investors attach to owning Spanish debt, have risen above 6%, a level that has proved a trigger point for other troubled euro zone countries.  At the moment the EU is backing Madrid. Jean-Claude Juncker, who chairs the Eurogroup of euro zone finance ministers, said Spain was taking the necessary steps to get its economy back on track, despite a recession and unemployment at 24%.

“As I look at my screen and Spain 10-year yields are up at 6% – things are starting to get worrying again,” said Peter Westaway, chief economist for Europe at Vanguard, an investment management firm overseeing $1.8 trillion in assets.  “If they go up to 6.5 to 7%, that could become very problematic, and if Italy started to go back above Spain again, then that would be really serious.”  Spain has one thing on its side. It has already raised nearly half the 86 billion euros it needs to borrow from financial markets this year, sucking up some of the 1 trillion euros of cheap three-year loans that the European Central Bank has pumped into the euro zone banking sector.  This means the government could hang on for months before having to turn to the EU for help with its own funding needs.  However, that still leaves the banks. One of the critical “unknowables’ for Spain is just how bad a situation its banks are in. The Spanish housing market, once a driver of the economy, has been in turmoil for more than four years, but prices still haven’t fallen as much as economists think is needed to squeeze the air out of the bubble.  Only when prices have bottomed will assessors be able to calculate how just much bad mortgage debt is sitting on the banks’ balance sheets, and therefore how much extra capital the sector requires to return it to health.

Olick – a tale of two housing markets

The numbers are in, the analysts are out, and given the volatility of this particular economic indicator, the spin is at full speed:  “Good News on Housing Permits More Than Offsets the Bad News on Starts”— HIS Global Insight;  “Housing Starts Decline Again” – Capital Economics;  “March Multifamily Starts Down; Permits Continue Upward Trend”— KBW;  “March Construction Numbers Aren’t As Bad as They Look”— Trulia.com;  “Housing Starts Lacking Consumer Confidence” — Sageworks Inc.  Here’s the problem: We are living a tale of two housing markets, single and multi-family. Depending on what kind of builder or investor you are, you’re going to see the housing starts numbers differently. Let’s weed through it first:  Total starts fell 5.8%, driven by a nearly 20% drop in multi-family. Single family was essentially flat month-to-month. But remember, multi-family is a very volatile number and can swing 20-30% monthly due to large local projects. Yes, they are both ahead from last year, but 2011 was the worst year in the history of US home building.  “The further fall in housing starts in March means that about a third of the past year’s improvement in homebuilding has now been undone. But the continued rise in building permits is an encouraging sign which suggests that housing starts will improve again later this year,” writes Paul Diggle at Capital Economics.

Building permits are always seen as a better indicator of construction, or at least more dependable and less influenced by weather. Single family permits dropped 3.5% month to month, but multi-family surged ahead 24% to the highest level in four years.  “The pickup in multifamily construction is taking place most noticeably in the South and West—again, not a big surprise—since 46 of the 50 fastest-growing metro-area populations from 2010 to 2011 were in the South or West, according to the Census Bureau,” writes IHS Global Insight’s Patrick Newport.  Clearly we’re still seeing big demand in the multi-family sector, but single family is still faltering.  “Single family is more of a restocking issue,” said Morgan Stanley’s Oliver Chang on CNBC. “In order to meet baseline demand, they [builders] have to build.”  Chang says real growth in single family demand just isn’t there, due to a still tightening credit market. On the flip side, he claims that distressed housing has stabilized and distressed home prices have bottomed; that’s because investors largely use cash. 

So if there’s all this demand for single family rentals, and investors are rushing to get in, is there still enough demand for all this multi-family construction?  “Bottom line, with the secular decline in home ownership, multi-family construction will be where it’s at for a few years but still only make up about 30% of total starts. Single family starts still have the intense competition with foreclosures and now rent seekers,” writes Peter Boockvar of Miller Tabak.  So why, as we asked yesterday after the disappointing builder sentiment report, did single family starts, permits and sentiment rise through the fall and the winter only to slam on the breaks? Newport calls that one a “head scratcher,” and adds, “If the builders have gotten ahead of the game, single-family construction will go through a demoralizing slowdown later this year.”

Is gold headed down?

For the past decade, gold has been an incredible investment, rising from under $300 per ounce to as high as $1,900 per ounce before retreating to around $1,650 in recent trading.  For the bulls, gold’s recent drop is nothing more than a temporary setback on its inexorable march toward $2,000 and beyond. The case for gold rests primarily on factors familiar to anyone who’s even remotely familiar with the metal: easy money from central banks around the world and rising demand from emerging economies, notably China and India. But all good things must come to an end and Yoni Jacobs, chief investment strategist at Chart Prophet, believes gold’s best days are behind it. In fact, Yoni believes there’s a bubble in precious metals that’s about to collapse as detailed in his book, Gold Bubble: Profiting from Gold’s Impending Collapse.  While tipping his hat to the bullish arguments and sympathetic to reasons why people own gold, Jacobs says the metal’s inability to rally despite Europe’s ongoing crisis and renewed tensions in the Middle East are negative signs. “The froth is coming off,” he says.

Technically, the strategist cites heavy volume during gold’s sell-off last September and the negative divergence between gold and gold miners as warning signs. In the past six months, the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is down 20% while the Gold ETF (GLD) is essentially flat.  Furthermore, gold is vulnerable to the global economic slowdown, he says, noting China just reported its slowest quarter in three years.   Finally, Jacobs cites “over-speculation” in gold, its “parabolic increase” in recent years, the “mass publicity” the metal has received, and the extreme emotions of its advocates as signs of it being in bubble territory.  Based on historical trends and technical patterns, Jacobs predicts gold will fall below the key $1,000 per ounce level on its way to the $700 area. He recommends shorting the GLD or GDX or buying out-of-the-money puts on gold as a way to profit from gold’s demise.

WSJ – GOP Senators say no to write-downs

Two US Senate Republicans are urging the Treasury Department to cancel its plans to subsidize debt forgiveness for troubled homeowners, saying the money would be better off reducing the federal debt.  In a letter sent Tuesday to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Sens. David Vitter (R., La.) and Jim DeMint (R., S.C.) criticized an Obama administration plan to encourage mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce borrowers’ loan balances. Earlier this year, the administration announced it would use money from the 2008 financial industry rescue to encourage those write-downs.  The letter adds further heat to an intense political debate over whether the two government-controlled companies should reverse their policy and allow loan write-downs.  The two companies, which buy up loans and package them into investments, and their federal regulator have been facing pressure from Democrats and the Obama administration, which want to see write-downs. Republicans, however, are concerned that doing so will encourage borrowers to intentionally default.  In their letter, Messrs. Vitter and DeMint also argue that big banks that hold second mortgages such as home equity loans will benefit from write-downs. The plan “will pay off the mega banks with taxpayer cash in exchange for reducing the principal balance on some mortgages,” the lawmakers wrote. “We write to urge you, on behalf of the taxpayers, to reconsider and, instead, return this money to the Treasury to pay down the national debt.”

Half a decade into the deepest US housing crisis since the 1930s, many Americans are hoping the crisis is finally nearing its end.  House sales are picking up across most of the country, the plunge in prices is slowing and attempts by lenders to claim back properties from struggling borrowers dropped by more than a third in 2011, hitting a four-year low.  But a painful part two of the slump looks set to unfold: Many more US homeowners face the prospect of losing their homes this year as banks pick up the pace of foreclosures.  “We are right back where we were two years ago. I would put money on 2012 being a bigger year for foreclosures than 2010,” said Mark Seifert, executive director of Empowering & Strengthening Ohio’s People (ESOP), a counseling group with 10 offices in Ohio.  “Last year was an anomaly, and not in a good way,” he said.  In 2011, the “robo-signing” scandal, in which foreclosure documents were signed without properly reviewing individual cases, prompted banks to hold back on new foreclosures pending a settlement.  Five major banks eventually struck that settlement with 49 US states in February. Signs are growing the pace of foreclosures is picking up again, something housing experts predict will again weigh on home prices before any sustained recovery can occur.

 Mortgage servicing provider Lender Processing Services reported in early March that US foreclosure starts jumped 28% in January.  More conclusive national data is not yet available. But watchdog group, 4closurefraud.org which helped uncover the “robo-signing” scandal, says it has turned up evidence of a large rise in new foreclosures between March 1 and 24 by three big banks in Palm Beach County in Florida, one of the states hit hardest by the housing crash.  Although foreclosure starts were 50% or more lower than for the same period in 2010, those begun by Deutsche Bank were up 47% from 2011. Those of Wells Fargo’s rose 68% and Bank of America’s, including BAC Home Loans Servicing, jumped nearly seven-fold — 251 starts versus 37 in the same period in 2011. Bank of America said it does not comment on data provided by other sources. Wells Fargo and Deutsche Bank did not comment. 

Housing experts say localized warning signs of a new wave of foreclosure are likely to be replicated across much of the United States.  Online foreclosure marketplace RealtyTrac estimated that while foreclosures dropped slightly nationwide in February from January and from February 2011, they rose in 21 states and jumped sharply in cities like Tampa (64%), Chicago (43%) and Miami (53%).  RealtyTrac CEO Brandon Moore said the “numbers point to a gradually rising foreclosure tide as some of the barriers that have been holding back foreclosures are removed.”

One big difference to the early years of the housing crisis, which was dominated by Americans saddled with the most toxic subprime products — with high interest rates where banks asked for no money down or no proof of income — is that today it’s mostly Americans with ordinary mortgages whose ability to meet payment have been hit by the hard economic times.  “The subprime stuff is long gone,” said Michael Redman, founder of 4closurefraud.org. “Now the folks being affected are hardworking, everyday Americans struggling because of the economy.”

Crackdown on tax havens

As regulators clamp down on money flows around the globe, governments, even those that prided themselves on the strength of their secrecy laws, like Switzerland, are facing pressure to share banking information and change their policies.  Now, private banks and wealth managers are scrambling to convert so-called black money — assets that have not been disclosed — into accounts that are above board.  The shift may provide opportunities for the industry. As more funds become legitimate, analysts say financial institutions will be able to sell extra wealth management products to affluent people and enter markets that had previously been off limits.  “There’s much less black money now than three years ago,” said Jean Schaffner, head of the Luxembourg tax practice at the law firm Allen & Overy. “It’s in the banks’ interests for clients to come forward with their money.”  For decades, Western governments tolerated offshore tax havens, places where the wealthy could park millions away from the gaze of their domestic authorities. Switzerland, in particular, developed a reputation as a place where the wealthy could rely on secrecy laws.  But the tide began to turn in 2008, particularly after the financial crisis prompted many governments to act in concert.  As Switzerland and other locales tightened their financial controls, many people initially flocked to other tax havens like Singapore and Hong Kong, which still offer some of the world’s most secret accounts. But these places, too, are facing new pressures.

NAHB – 101 improving housing markets

The list of housing markets showing measurable improvement expanded slightly to include 101 metropolitan areas in April, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/First American Improving Markets Index (IMI), released today. Thirty-five states (including the District of Columbia) are now represented by at least one market on the list. The index identifies metropolitan areas that have shown improvement from their respective troughs in housing permits, employment and house prices for at least six consecutive months. The 101 markets on the April IMI represent a net gain of two from March, with 13 metros being added and 11 markets slipping from the list while 88 markets retained their places on it. Among the new entrants, areas as diverse as Rome, Ga.; Coeur d’Alene, Idaho; Greenville, N.C.; Brownsville, Texas; St. George, Utah; and Huntington, W.Va., are now represented on the IMI.  The IMI is designed to track housing markets throughout the country that are showing signs of improving economic health. The index measures three sets of independent monthly data to get a mark on the top improving Metropolitan Statistical Areas.

The three indicators that are analyzed are employment growth from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, house price appreciation from Freddie Mac, and single-family housing permit growth from the US Census Bureau. NAHB uses the latest available data from these sources to generate a list of improving markets. A metropolitan area must see improvement in all three areas for at least six months following their respective troughs before being included on the improving markets list.  A complete list of all 101 metropolitan areas currently on the IMI, and separate breakouts of metros newly added to or dropped from the list in April, is available at: www.nahb.org/imi.

Job improvement slows

US payrolls rose far less than expected in March, keeping the door open for further monetary policy support from the Federal Reserve, even as the unemployment rate fell to a three-year low of 8.2%.  Employers added 120,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department said on Friday, the smallest increase since October.  Economists polled by Reuters had expected nonfarm employment to increase 203,000 and the unemployment rate to hold at 8.3%.  The slowdown in employment growth last month likely reflected the fading boost from unseasonably warm winter weather. It supported the caution on the labor market from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke last week.  Bernanke expressed doubts the recent job gains could be sustained, and March’s weak report was in line with expectations that economic growth slowed to an annual pace of 2% in the first quarter from the 3% rate in the October-December period. 

The weakness in hiring last month was concentrated in the vast private services sector, which added only 90,000 after increasing payrolls by 204,000 in February. Retail employment fell dropped 33,800 after falling 28,600 the prior month.  Construction hiring fell 7,000, the second straight monthly decline. Temporary help fell 7,500 after rising 54,900 in February.  However, manufacturing enjoyed another month of strong job gains, with factories adding 37,000 new positions, helped by carmakers trying to meet pent-up demand for motor vehicles. Factory jobs increased by 31,000 in February.  Government employment edged down 1,000 after rising 7,000 in February. Despite the weak employment gains last month, average hourly earnings rose 5 cents.  The workweek dipped to 34.5 hours from 34.6 hours in February.

WSJ – Fed in favor of the banks’ foreclosure-rental approach

Last month, Bank of America Corp. announced a plan to allow homeowners at risk of foreclosure to hand over deeds to their houses and sign leases that will let them rent the houses back from the bank at a market rate.  In addition, Fannie Mae is selling 2,500 homes in eight metropolitan areas around the country. The government-controlled mortgage firm is selling the $320 million portfolio to investors, who would be required to turn them into rental properties.  The Federal Reserve set out new polices for banks that decide to rent out foreclosed homes, endorsing a strategy for managing the huge number of distressed properties that have piled up during the housing bust. The central bank said in a six-page policy statement Thursday that the Fed’s regulations permit the rental of foreclosed properties to tenants “in light of the extraordinary market conditions that currently prevail.” The policy clarified that banks that would otherwise be required to sell off the properties more quickly can turn to rental as a strategy. 

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and other central bank officials have spoken publicly about the need to encourage banks to rent out foreclosures. “With home prices falling and rents rising, it could make sense in some markets to turn some of the foreclosed homes into rental properties,” Mr. Bernanke said in a February speech.  The central bank said that banks holding large numbers of foreclosures should establish detailed policies for renting foreclosures, including a process to determine whether the properties are safe to occupy and meet local building code requirements.  The Fed said banks should set up criteria by which properties are picked to be rental properties. The banks should establish plans that “describe the general conditions under which the organization believes a rental approach is likely to be successful,” the central bank said.