Building edged up in March
The Commerce Department said yesterday that construction spending ticked up 0.1 per cent. The small March gain left construction spending at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $808.1 billion. That’s 6 per cent above a 12-year low of $762.6 billion hit last March. Still, the level of spending is roughly half of what economists consider to be healthy. “The weakness in construction spending in March was entirely in public spending,” said John Ryding, an analyst at RDQ Economics, in a note to clients. Still, even with the increase in private construction spending, the trend over the last three months is weak, Ryding noted. “We look for some gradual improvement in private construction spending in 2012, but structures investment is not a material factor in our growth forecast for this year,” he said.
Government construction activity fell 1.1 per cent to the slowest pace since February 2007, the report said. Spending by state and local governments dropped to the weakest level since November 2006, while spending by the federal government rose 3.8 per cent to a rate of $28.9 billion. Spending on private nonresidential projects rose 0.7 per cent. Work on office buildings, hotels and transportation projects rose. Spending in the category that includes shopping centres fell. Private residential activity rose 0.7 per cent. The increase was driven by more construction of single-family homes. Even with the gains, home construction continues to slump five years after the housing bubble burst. Sales of new homes fell 7.1 per cent in March, the largest decline in more than a year. Though new-home sales represent less than 10 per cent of the housing market, they have an outsize impact on the economy. Each home built creates an average of three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in tax revenue, according to the National Association of Home Builders. Business spending on construction projects, such as office buildings and shopping centres, is also sluggish. The government reported last week that it fell in the January-March quarter, the second consecutive quarterly decline. The economy grew at an annual rate of 2.2 per cent in first quarter. Stronger consumer spending offset slower business investment and less growth in government spending. Economists expect construction spending to remain sluggish this year. Tighter credit could keep businesses from receiving loans for building projects. And lawmakers are likely to keep pressure on government spending, which could hamper public works projects.
Private sector employment sluggish
Private-sector employment increased by just 119,000 in April, according a report from ADP that puts a dent into the notion that the jobs market is on the path to a solid recovery. The report was well below forecasts of 170,000 and comes after a string of stronger numbers. ADP said service-sector jobs rose by 123,000, but construction fell by 5,000, falling for the first time since September 2011. Manufacturing also lost 5,000, while goods-producing dropped 4,000. Financial services added 13,000 jobs. Employment additions again were strongest in small businesses, which added 58,000 positions, and weakest in big business, which saw a net of just 4,000 new jobs. The March number was revised downward from 209,000 to 201,000, according to the report, which is done in conjunction with Macroeconomic Advisors.
MBA – mortgage applications up
Mortgage applications increased 0.1% from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending April 27, 2012. The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 0.1% on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 0.4% compared with the previous week. The Refinance Index decreased 0.7% from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 2.9% from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index increased 3.7% compared with the previous week and was 3.0% higher than the same week one year ago. The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 0.09%. The four week moving average is down 1.77% for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 0.75% for the Refinance Index. The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 72.6% of total applications from 73.4% the previous week. The government share of purchase applications remained steady at 37.0%, a slight increase from a couple of weeks ago when the share was 36.4%. The government share of purchase applications over the last three weeks has been at the lowest level since 2009. During the month of March, the investor share of applications for home purchase was at 5.7%, a slight decrease from 6.1% in February. This change was led by a decline in the West South Central region. In addition, the share of purchase mortgages for second homes remained constant at 5.8%.
US has to deleverage
The US government will have to follow its citizens and corporates in deleveraging its balance sheet, Bob Baur, chief global economist, Principal Global Investors, said today. “It’s no question that we’re going to see more deleveraging. Households are in much better shape and companies have improved their balance sheets dramatically. It’s the government that needs to deleverage,” he said. He added that some deleveraging had begun at the state level, but had yet to reach central government. The US government, which pumped trillions of dollars into bailouts of the banking and automobile sector and buying mortgage-backed securities to help lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has more than $15 trillion in debt – the ceiling for borrowing is set at $16.4 trillion. It is also facing demographic problems such as an aging population and subsequent rising Medicare bill, which might handicap the speed at which it can reduce its debt.
Olick – where are the foreclosures?
“The number of homes entering the foreclosure process rose in March, up 8.1%, according to a new report from lender Processing Services, but the volume is down more than 30% from a year ago. Analysts had expected this number to skyrocket immediately following the $25 billion settlement between banks and state governments over fraudulent mortgage servicing. Foreclosures sales, which are the final stage of the foreclosure process, not sales of bank-owned homes, dropped precipitously in March to their lowest point in over two years. They dropped most sharply — 14% month-to-month — in states where a judge is not required in the foreclosure process (so-called non-judicial states). Again, that is contrary to expectations, but could be yet another stall in the system, as banks try to modify more loans to meet some of the terms of the servicing settlement. The foreclosure sales decline also appears to be exclusively in private and portfolio loans, which again points to the settlement. That low pace of foreclosure sales is keeping foreclosure inventory, or loans in the foreclosure process, at near historic highs, according to LPS. That number may be heading lower, however, as banks ramp up the short sale process.
Short sales, when the bank allows the home to be sold for less than the value of the mortgage, are in fact now outpacing sales of bank-owned homes in many markets, according to a new report from RealtyTrac. Short sales rose by 15% in the fourth quarter of 2011 from the previous year, while sales of REO’s (bank-owned homes) dropped 12%. Short sales outpaced REO sales in several markets, including Los Angeles, Miami, and Phoenix, according to RealtyTrac. Georgia, where foreclosure inventories are surging, saw a 113% jump in short sales. The process, once avoided widely due to its lengthy lag time, is already speeding up, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac both recently announced new guidelines to reduce short sale timelines. ‘Lenders are increasingly recognizing that short sales may be a better alternative for them than foreclosure,’ notes RealtyTrac’s Daren Blomquist. ‘This trend began in markets with stronger demand and where the distressed inventory tends to be newer homes (Phoenix, Los Angeles, Las Vegas), but the trend appears to be spreading to other markets like Atlanta and Detroit.’ Look for a special report on the Atlanta housing market on CNBC and CNBC.com Thursday.”
People renouncing US citizenship to escape taxes
About 1,780 expatriates gave up their nationality at US embassies last year, up from 235 in 2008, according to Andy Sundberg, secretary of Geneva’s Overseas American Academy, citing figures from the government’s Federal Register. The embassy in Bern, the Swiss capital, redeployed staff to clear a backlog as Americans queued to relinquish their passports. The US, the only nation in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that taxes citizens wherever they reside, is searching for tax cheats in offshore centers, including Switzerland, as the government tries to curb the budget deficit. Shunned by Swiss and German banks and facing tougher asset-disclosure rules under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, more of the estimated 6 million Americans living overseas are weighing the cost of holding a US passport. Renunciations are higher in Switzerland because American expatriates expect extra scrutiny of their affairs after the UBS case and as the US probes 11 other Swiss financial firms for aiding offshore tax evasion, said Martin Naville, head of the Swiss-American Chamber of Commerce in Zurich.
“Every dollar you save, you lose to the US tax man,” said tax lawyer Ledvina. “That’s one reason why people give up citizenship.” The 2010 Fatca law requires banks to withhold 30% from “certain US-connected payments” to some accounts of American clients who don’t disclose enough information to the IRS. “There is incredible frustration at the audacity and imperial overreach of this law,” said David Kuenzi, a tax adviser at Thun Financial Advisors in Madison, Wisconsin, referring to Fatca. Failure to file the 8938 form can result in a fine of as much as $50,000. Clients can also be penalized half the amount in an undeclared foreign bank account under the Banks Secrecy Act of 1970. “It’s a big brother concept,” said Brent Lipschultz, a partner at New York-based accounting firm EisnerAmper. The implementation of Fatca from next year comes after UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank, paid a $780 million penalty in 2009 and handed over data on about 4,700 accounts to settle a tax- evasion dispute with the US Whistle-blower Birkenfeld was sentenced to 40 months in a US prison in 2009 after informing the government and Senate about his American clients at the Geneva branch of Zurich-based UBS.
Pushback against ideology in principal reduction debate
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Acting Director Edward DeMarco pushed back against Democratic lawmakers yesterday, claiming the agency decision on principal reduction will be based on analytics not ideology. Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and John Tierney, D-Mass., sent a letter earlier in the morning to DeMarco. They pointed to internal documents at Fannie Mae showing the government-sponsored enterprise and its regulator approved but then quickly closed a pilot principal forgiveness program in 2010 that could have saved the firm $410 million. DeMarco expressed disappointment in the letter and said since 2009, the FHFA approved multiple pilot programs for principal forgiveness, but the approvals did not indicate a “pre-determined view.”
“The fact that FHFA continues to consider principal-forgiveness alternatives, including recent HAMP program changes initiated by the Treasury Department, belies any ideological tilt on our part, but rather a strict analytical-based approach to gathering and evaluating data to determine what options best fit within the legal constraints that fall upon this agency as conservator for the enterprises,” DeMarco said in the letter. DeMarco said while many pilot programs were developed, “there was not full agreement to proceed at the enterprises or their counterparties,” which in this instance was Citigroup. The pilot program in question involves 1,200 mortgages originated by Citi for shared appreciation and 1,000 Fannie-guaranteed loans for principal forgiveness, according to the internal documents reviewed by HousingWire. The program would have been partly rolled out in the second quarter of 2011, according to several of the internal emails.
In an early April speech, DeMarco showed preliminary FHFA analysis on new principal-reduction incentives. The expanded HAMP effort could save Fannie and Freddie Mac $1.7 billion but would cost taxpayers a net $2.8 billion. He also outlined how principal forbearance was a substitute for a shared-appreciation program. The FHFA delayed its decision on approving the GSEs to do principal reductions, but DeMarco said in the letter that this is a decision meant for Congress. “Such a policy question, especially as it has to do with public funds being taken from one group of citizens to provide a benefit to another group of citizens, should be determined by Congress,” DeMarco wrote. “In the absence of clear legislative direction, however, FHFA will continue to make determinations in how best to accomplish both of these goals after careful analysis of the facts and other information available to us and the multiple legal responsibilities placed upon us.”
