Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 2, 2012
Forward this e-mail to your friends!
Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/
*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>
http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>
http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
************************************************************
Foreclosure deal deadline postponed
The deadline for states to decide whether to join a proposed nationwide foreclosure settlement with banks was delayed to Feb. 6 from Feb. 3, the Iowa Attorney General’s Office said. States were given more time to evaluate the proposal, which may total $25 billion, after at least one asked for a delay, Geoff Greenwood, a spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, said yesterday in a phone interview. Miller is helping to lead negotiations. State and federal officials have been negotiating an agreement with mortgage servicers that would provide mortgage relief to homeowners and set requirements for how banks conduct foreclosures.
State officials are reviewing the agreement with Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Ally Financial Inc., and are being asked to sign on. Greenwood declined to name the state that asked for more time or comment on state support for the deal. Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto said in a Jan. 27 letter to Miller, the Justice Department and US Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan that she needed answers to 38 questions to evaluate the deal. The deadline was changed as Oregon Attorney General John Kroger said today in a statement that he would sign on to the settlement, joining Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, who also supports it. Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden has said he won’t sign on to the settlement.
Job cuts jump in January
The number of job cuts announced by employers jumped 28% in January, led by retailers and financial firms, according to the latest report by global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Still, job losses announced last month were the lowest on record for a January, the month that typically sees the greatest number of layoffs, the firm said. Employers last month said they planned to cut 53,486 positions, compared with 41,785 job cuts announced in December. The January job cuts were 39% higher than during the same period a year earlier, when employers said they planned 38,519 cuts. Retailers and financial firms saw the greatest cuts, losing 12,426 and 7,611 jobs, respectively.
Challenger said the retail job losses were not related to seasonal hiring, and instead were the result of restructurings, store closings, and other cost-cutting measures. The financial sector saw the most job losses since September, when 31,167 cuts were announced. Challenger noted that most of those layoffs came from. Government job cuts continued to dwindle for a second straight month, with just 3,021 layoffs announced in January. “Of course, it is far too early to say whether we will continue to see low job-cut figures in government. It is highly unlikely, considering that many cities and states continue to struggle with budget deficits,” Challenger said in a statement. “And, then there is the federal level of government, which remains under intense pressure to cut costs. As a result, we expect government layoffs to be heavy again this year.”
LPS – house prices slow decline
Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS), today announced that its LPS Applied Analytics division updated its home price index (LPS HPI) with residential sales concluded during November 2011. The LPS HPI summarizes home price trends nationwide by tracking sales each month in more than 13,500 ZIP codes. Within each ZIP code, the LPS HPI tracks five price levels from low to high. “Since the post-bubble drop in home prices eased in January of 2009, we’ve generally seen that prices for homes in the lowest 20% of local markets in the metropolitan areas covered by the LPS HPI now differ by more than the highest 20% from their levels 10 years ago,” said Kyle Lundstedt, managing director of LPS Applied Analytics. “In those metropolitan areas where lowest-priced homes have increased in value, the differences between the high and low ends of the market have usually shrunk; where they have decreased in value, the differences have grown.”
The LPS HPI national average home price for transactions during November 2011 was $199,000 – a decline of 0.6% during the month relative to October 2011, reaching a price level not seen since October 2002 (Figure 1, Table 1). This is the fifth consecutive month of price decreases. The partial data available for December suggests further price declines of approximately 0.8%. LPS reported partial data from November transactions in its December release, which proved a reasonable indicator for November’s performance: it showed a preliminary 0.5% estimated decline, compared to the 0.6% for the full month’s data. LPS HPI average national home prices continue the downward trend begun after the market peak in June 2006, when the total value of US housing inventory covered by the LPS HPI stood at $10.8 trillion. Since that peak, the value has declined 30.6% to $7.5 trillion. During the period of most rapid price declines, from June 2007 through December 2008, the LPS HPI national average home price dropped $56,000 from $282,000, which corresponds to an average annual decline of 13.8%. Since December 2008, prices have fallen more slowly, interrupted by brief seasonal intervals of rising prices. During this period of more slowly declining prices, the national average home price has fallen approximately $26,000 from $226,000.
The November national average price is down 3.4% from the average price at the beginning of the year. Home prices in November were consistent with the seasonal pattern that has been occurring since 2009. Each year, prices have risen in the spring, but have reverted in autumn to a downward trend that has not only erased the gains, but has led to an average 4.4% annual drop in prices to date. The national average home price has declined 4.8% over the most recent year to November 2011. Price changes were largely consistent across the country during November, increasing in 13% of the ZIP codes in the LPS HPI. Higher-priced homes had somewhat smaller declines: 0.55% for the top 20% of homes (prices above $311,000), compared to 0.60% for the bottom 20% (below $100,000). The highest-priced homes, the top 1% (prices above $839,000), declined 0.47%.
Claims and productivity both easing
New US claims for unemployment benefits fell last week, a government report showed today, pointing to more healing in the nations battered jobs market. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 367,000, the Labor Department said. The prior week’s figure was revised up to 379,000 from the previously reported 377,000. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 375,000. Claims have been lower than 400,000 for eight of the last 10 weeks, holding below a level associated with labor market healing. The four-week moving average for initial claims, a trend measure that smooths out volatility, fell 2,000 to 375,750. A Labor Department official said there was nothing unusual in the state-level data and that no state had been estimated. Job growth has gained momentum in recent months and the unemployment rate dropped to a near three-year low of 8.5% in December. The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid fell 130,000 to 3.437 million in the week ended January 21, the lowest since September 2008. Economists had forecast so-called continuing claims at 3.55 million. The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits rose 100,392 to 3.022 million in the week ended January 14, the latest week for which data is available. A total of 7.67 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, little changed from the prior week.
Meanwhile, productivity increased at a 0.7% annual rate, the Labor Department said today. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast productivity, which measures hourly output per worker, rising at a 0.8% rate. Productivity rose at a 1.9% pace in the third quarter. Over the entire year, productivity rose 0.7%, the slowest since 2008. Hourly compensation rose at a 1.9% rate in the last three months of the year after contracting in the previous two quarters. That is well below the US inflation rate, with consumer prices rising 3.0% in the 12 months through December. Subdued wage growth supports the US Federal Reserve’s view of a low inflation environment. This likely gives the US central bank more room to try to boost growth and tackle stubbornly high unemployment. Though productivity has slowed after growing rapidly as the economy emerged from the 2007-09 recession, businesses have maintained the bulk of the gains made during the recovery. Businesses, estimated to be sitting on a cash pile of about $2 trillion, continue to hold the line on costs. Unit labor costs rose at a 1.2% rate in the fourth quarter. Economists had expected fourth-quarter unit labor costs would increase at a 0.8% rate.
WSJ – GOP discusses Obama’s mortgage plan
President Barack Obama, in announcing a program to help struggling homeowners refinance their mortgages, is betting this plan will fare better than his administration’s earlier efforts to fix the housing market. But House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) questioned why this program would work when others have failed. “One more time? One more time? How many times have we done this?” he asked reporters. “I don’t know why anyone would think that this next idea is going to work.” He added that the previous programs have led to a delay in “the clearing of the market,” or letting housing prices hit bottom by allowing foreclosures to happen more rapidly. Republicans see additional government intervention as doing little to improve the housing situation. Mitt Romney, the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination, said in October that the government should not try to stop foreclosures but let the housing market “hit the bottom.” He has argued that Mr. Obama’s housing policies have failed.
The government already has programs that allow some homeowners who are current on their payments to refinance at lower interest rates, even if they owe more than their homes are worth or wouldn’t otherwise qualify. Those programs are limited to borrowers with mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The latest proposal would extend that option to all homeowners, allowing borrowers who are current on payments to refinance into new loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration. That requires congressional approval, partly because it would cost money. Economists said the latest proposal—at least on paper—is more ambitious than previous plans because it would allow more borrowers to qualify. Until now, policy makers and elected officials have been hesitant to take bolder steps because the political will simply isn’t there, analysts said. Many of those solutions would mean spending more money or forcing banks and investors to take bigger losses. Instead, policy makers tried to steer a middle course. Many have worried that rewarding irresponsible behavior would create a “moral hazard” that might encourage more defaults.
The hitch is that the programs were designed to make sure they didn’t help borrowers who took on more debt than they could afford. And that “made these programs very complicated,” said David Stevens, chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Association who spent two years as a top Obama administration housing official. Using the FHA to refinance at-risk borrowers isn’t a new idea. The Bush administration and Congress passed a program in 2008 called for Hope for Homeowners that also employed the agency to refinance at-risk homeowners. It included many restrictions and resulted in just a few hundred refinanced loans. The Obama administration rolled out a similar initiative without Congress two years ago. It resulted in around 700 refinances. “The banks decided not to participate,” said Peter Swire, a former housing adviser to Mr. Obama. “So now the administration is looking for another way to achieve the same goals.”
US still risks recession
In the United States, the manufacturing sector grew at its fastest pace in seven months in January as new orders improved, but Jim Walker, Founder and Managing Director of independent research firm, Asianomics, said that the US economy is going to face a slowdown this year owing to fiscal tightening.
“There’s going to be a significant slowdown in fiscal expenditure in the US, they’re going to have to control the fiscal side much more as the year goes on,” he said. On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to freeze wages for federal civilian workers until 2013, a move that will save taxpayers $26 billion. According to Walker, pullbacks in government spending will cut between 1 and 1.5% from US GDP in 2012. Walker also believes corporate investment is likely to slow after the federal depreciation allowance expired at the end of 2011. In a report for clients released in December, Walker said there was a 55% chance of a US recession.
He also argued that US consumers were due for another “period of reckoning”, despite improving consumer confidence and spending numbers. He listed a litany of reasons: “Home prices are still falling (on a mild deflation path), equity prices are still off their highs of the year, household credit outstanding is still contracting, real hourly compensation growth is still negative, employment growth is still sub par – and up until November – consumer confidence was fast approaching the recession lows of 2008.” Walker is much more bearish on Europe, which he says is destined for a recession, with GDP contracting 2 to 5% in 2012. He expects further monetary easing from global central banks, which he says will boost precious metals, most notably silver. But he says investors should short the Euro and avoid industrial metals such as copper, which will suffer from a global downturn.
Atlanta lags in housing recovery
Housing prices continue to fall nationwide, despite a few modest signs of improvement. But not all markets are equal. A sprawling Southern metropolis, Atlanta has become one of the biggest laggards in the economic recovery. In November, prices of single-family homes were down close to 12% compared with a year earlier, the largest decline among major metropolitan areas, according to data released on Tuesday in the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller Home Price Index. Home prices regionally are now below their levels of 2000, making Atlanta one of only four metro areas to have experienced such a slide. The price of entry-level housing in the area — the lowest tier of the market, valued at just under $96,600 — fell by close to a third last year.
Even though the national economy shows signs of strengthening, the beleaguered housing market remains a significant drag on the recovery. Across a group of 20 metropolitan areas measured by S&P/Case-Shiller, prices of single-family homes were 3.7% lower in November compared with a year earlier, with average prices at their 2003 levels. Economists say prices are unlikely to hit a nadir until at least late spring. Tom Porcelli, chief United States economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York, projects that average prices could slip by as much as 5% nationally this year because of the large amount of distressed properties for sale and a shortage of buyers. Although Mr. Porcelli describes a “generally better outlook on housing” than he has over the last few years, he added, “we still have a long way to go.”
The reasons for Atlanta’s housing woes are both representative of the nation’s troubles and special to this former boomtown, where housing appreciated handsomely, though not to the lofty heights of Las Vegas, Miami and New York. Where the region once attracted thousands of prospective home buyers drawn by plentiful jobs and more affordable living, that influx has dwindled. Local unemployment, at 9.2%, is slightly higher than the national rate, in part because one in every four jobs lost was connected to real estate, a much higher rate than in the rest of the country. Those jobs have yet to return, while even people with work are having trouble qualifying for loans. The region, plagued by mortgage fraud and developers who dotted the exurban landscape with large luxury homes that never sold, is inundated with foreclosed properties. In fact, Atlanta has the most government-owned foreclosed properties for sale of any large city, according to the Federal Reserve.
See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin
**************
Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.
http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com
(subscribe to this newsletter)
*************************************************
About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.
* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month
* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties
* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!
* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!
* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building
* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
