Posts tagged as:

commerce department

Highlights as of March 2012

by admin on May 8, 2012

CoreLogic – less than 1% decrease in housing prices

CoreLogic today released its March Home Price Index (HPI) report which shows that nationally home prices, including distressed sales, declined on a year-over-year basis by 0.6% in March 2012 compared to March 2011. On a month-over-month basis, home prices, including distressed sales, increased by 0.6% in March 2012 compared to February 2012, the first month-over-month increase since July 2011.  Excluding distressed sales, month-over-month prices increased for the third month in a row. The CoreLogic HPI also shows that year-over-year prices, excluding distressed sales, rose by 0.9% in March 2012 compared to March 2011. Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions.  “This spring the housing market is responding to an improving balance between real estate supply and demand which is causing stabilization in house prices,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic. “Although this has been the case in each of the last two years, the difference this year is that stabilization is occurring without the support of tax credits and in spite of a declining share of REO sales.”  “While housing prices remain flat nationally, in many markets tighter inventories are beginning to lift home prices,” said Anand Nallathambi, president and chief executive officer of CoreLogic. “This is true in Phoenix, New York and Washington, for example, which all reflect higher home price values than a year ago. A continuation of this trend will be good for our industry across US markets.”

Highlights as of March 2012

-  Including distressed sales, the five states with the highest appreciation were:  Wyoming (+5.9%), West Virginia (+5.3%), Arizona (+5.1%), North Dakota (+4.7%) and Florida (+4.5%).

-  Including distressed sales, the five states with the greatest depreciation were: Delaware (-10.6%), Illinois (-8.3%), Alabama (-8.0%), Georgia (-7.3%) and Nevada (-5.8%).

-  Excluding distressed sales, the five states with the highest appreciation were: Idaho (+5.4%), North Dakota (+5.1%), South Carolina (+4.7%), Montana (+3.5%) and Kansas (+3.4%).

-  Excluding distressed sales, the five states with the greatest depreciation were: Delaware (-7.6%), Alabama (-4.1%), Nevada (-3.9%), Vermont (-3.9%) and Rhode Island (-2.9%).

-  Including distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the national HPI (from April 2006 to March 2012) was -33.7%. Excluding distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the HPI for the same period was -24.5%.

-  The five states with the largest peak-to-current declines including distressed transactions are Nevada (-59.9%), Arizona (-48.6%), Florida (-48.1%), Michigan (-45.1%) and California (-42.7%).

-  Of the top 100 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) measured by population, 57 are showing year-over-year declines in March, eight fewer than in February.

Business confidence lackluster

While the National Federation of Independent Business’ Small Business Optimism Index rose two points in April to 94.5, the index is back to the same level it had been in February 2011.  “It’s positive from last month,” said NFIB chief economist William Dunkelberg. “But we’re in the same place as a year ago, so a whole year has gone by and we don’t go anywhere.”  In areas like capital outlays, indications are that while things are slowly improving, it’s “nothing to write home about,” said Dunkelberg. The Index now stands at 54%, far above the 44% in August 2010, but below the average rate of 60%.  “In the smallest businesses, we’re seeing improvement,” said Dunkelberg, “but it’s going on under the government’s radar. It will take a while before it registers” in the national picture, he said, pointing to the job creation number in particular. “Hopefully this time they will not deteriorate again.” and that’s pretty much the hope for all 10 categories in the index, many of which have, over the course of the past few years, seen ups and downs.  “We keep getting these head fakes, like last year, and we’re wondering if [the index] will do it again,” said Dunkelberg, referring to March 2011, when the survey took a dip, and then continued a downward trend throughout the spring and summer, only starting to rise again last October. “Last year, it kept getting worse; this time March took a dive, then came back.”

Regulations stifle mortgage market

Rulemakings will dominate the mortgage industry this year as the sector continues its “slow, bumpy road to recovery,” keynote speakers said as the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) secondary conference got into full swing Monday in New York City.  The rulemaking surrounding the Qualified Mortgage — or QM, repurchase requests, national servicing settlements and government-sponsored enterprise reform will dominate the year, said David Stevens, president and CEO of the MBA. But despite the attention to those four key areas, the MBA is tracking some 100 rulemakings in the Dodd-Frank Act.  Monday’s opening session was part feel-good, part dire warning as speakers struck a balance between the good and the bad in the current marketplace.  An opening video, for example, provided the feel-good atmosphere. It showed an MBA member’s recollections of his immigrant father buying a tract home in the New York burrough of Queens after World World II.

Mitch Kider, with Washington, D.C.-based law firm Weiner Brodsky Sidman Kider PC, recounted the reverence his father felt for the bank that provided the Federal Housing Administration loan that made it all possible.  “The people that work in this industry are working there because their heads and their hearts are in the right place,” he said. “As mortgage bankers, you are doing wonderful things for society.”  Stevens brought things back to earth by voicing borrower trepidation to buy homes, lender concern over burdensome regulations and investor mistrust of the process.  Borrowers, especially those on the margins, could be negatively impacted if the qualified mortgage rule — what he called “the holy grail of who gets access to a mortgage” — is too narrowly defined.  The need for more clarity in the system, for borrowers, lenders, mortgage servicers and investors, was a recurring theme from opening speakers.  On GSE reform, Stevens urged the industry do what it can without Congress, where he predicted a continued logjam.  “We need to take control of our own destiny,” he said.

Lewis Ranieri, chairman and founding partner of Ranieri Parnters, widely considered a pioneer of modern mortgage finance, said the industry must be aware of those would not be content to fix the capital market but who believe the capital markets “are not simply broken … but are profoundly the wrong thing to do.”  If it doesn’t stay aware, the industry may end of with a fundamental rewrite of the way it does business, where everything resides on the balance sheet, he said.  Two mortgage businesses came to him recently about a possible sale due to the tough regulatory environment, Ranieri said.  “I truly believe the future of our industry is decided in the next eight months,” he said. “There is a regulatory movement that isn’t just trying to fix, it’s trying to change.”  Richard Dorfman, managing director of the Securities Industry and Financial Market Association, or SIFMA, said it falls on the industry to define the issues in ways that resonate with consumers.  Instead of complaining that Dodd-Frank is a burden to the banks, regulations should be defined in ways that show how they limit mortgage access to potential homebuyers, for example, he said.  “Consumers must be served, and they can and will be served by this industry,” he said. “There is no doubt in my mind.”

Krugman’s ideas “reckless” and “silly”

The president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Richard Fisher, rejected the idea that higher inflation would spur the economy on Monday.  Saying the last thing businesses needed in this economy was uncertainty, Fisher sided with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in his public feud with Paul Krugman, the leftwing economist and New York Times columnist.  Called “The Battle of the Beards” by The Washington Post, the back-and-forth between the two economists began when Krugman called on the Fed to raise inflation targets, a move Bernanke called “reckless.”  “I would say that Ben Bernanke’s guilty of understatement. It would be more than reckless. It’s a silly thing to recommend,” Fisher said.  “I understand the argumentation from Krugman’s standpoint, from his perspective. He’s just trying to broaden the window to try to make things normal if we were to go below the 2% rate. That’s our long-term target. I believe we’re going to stick with it. I personally feel that this is something that is ultra-critical for our credibility.”

Olick – $150,000 off?

“A select group of struggling mortgage borrowers are about to get an offer that sounds too good to be true. Executives at Bank of America say they will begin mailing 200,000 letters offering certain customers mortgage principal reduction.  ‘If people get these things and toss them, they won’t be eligible,’ says Ron Sturzenegger, the Bank of America executive charged with providing solutions to borrowers in need of mortgage assistance.  But the offer is real, and eligible borrowers could get as much as $150,000 knocked off the balance of their mortgages. It is all part of the $25 billion settlement reached this year between federal and state agencies and the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers over fraudulent foreclosure document processing (so-called ‘robo-signing’).  Bank of America, in a deal with state attorneys general and the US Department of Justice, committed $11 billion to mortgage principal reduction, but executives say they will go beyond that if enough borrowers respond to their offer. Five thousand borrowers have already received a collective $700 million in principal reduction through a pilot program for those already in a modification negotiation. The 200,000 borrowers being targeted now may have already exhausted modification options or may have yet to contact the lender.

Executives say borrowers receiving the letters are eligible, but they still have to prove they qualify. In order to be eligible, a borrower must be 60 days late on the mortgage payment as of Jan. 31, 2012. The borrower has to owe more on the mortgage than the home is currently worth, commonly known as being ‘underwater’ on the mortgage, and the borrower’s loan must either be owned by Bank of America or serviced by Bank of America for an investor who is allowing the modifications.  In order to qualify for the modification, the borrower must answer the letter with full documentation of income, showing that under the terms of the modification they can still make the monthly payment. A borrower with no income would therefore not qualify. A borrower’s current monthly payment must be  more than 25% of gross income, and the borrower must show they are unable to afford that.  ‘If you can afford to make your monthly payment and are choosing not to, you will not get this principal modification,’ says Sturzenegger.  If the borrower qualifies, Bank of America will bring the monthly mortgage payment down to 25% of the borrower’s gross income. That could mean principal forgiveness well over $100,000, as there is no limit to the amount of the mortgage. If enough borrowers respond, it could cost Bank of America far more than it committed to in the settlement.  ‘Yes, we have the capability to go well beyond the $11 billion,’ adds Sturzenegger.

If the borrower qualifies, Bank of America will bring the monthly mortgage payment down to 25% of the borrower’s gross income. That could mean principal forgiveness well over $100,000, as there is no limit to the amount of the mortgage. If enough borrowers respond, it could cost Bank of America far more than it committed to in the settlement.  ‘Yes, we have the capability to go well beyond the $11 billion,’ adds Sturzenegger.  Bank executives say that before choosing which borrowers will get the offer, they performed a net present value test on each loan, making sure that the principal reduction modification would net Bank of America or the investor who owns the loan more than foreclosing on the home. ‘It has to be fair to the investor as well,’ says Sturzenegger.  Not all of the 200,000 borrowers who receive the letters are expected to respond. Executives say there is a level of fatigue among delinquent borrowers who have already received several notices or who may have gone through a failed modification process already. Some borrowers simply don’t want to stay in their homes, while others may think the offer is a scam.  ‘They have been contacted by a lot of other people, and this offer may appear too good to be true,’ says Sturzenegger.

That’s why Bank of America is sending the letters by certified mail and trying to make the language as simple as possible. A sample letter obtained by CNBC shows a bring red box in the top corner labeled, ‘IMPORTANT’ and simple language stating, ‘Qualifying customers may reduce their monthly payment by an average of 35%.’  Some 6,500 letters should be arriving in mailboxes across the country this week, with a wave of new letters going out every week until the end of the summer, when all 200,000 should have been mailed. Bank of America is staggering the mailings in order to handle the expected response. The bank has staffed up to handle the task, with 50,000 employees manning servicing desks, but the process will clearly take a lot of time. That’s why Bank of America has suspended any foreclosure actions against these 200,000 borrowers until the process is complete. There are currently 5.59 million US loans that are either delinquent or in the foreclosure process, according to Lender Processing Services. Bank of America services one million of those loans, but many of them are owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Their regulator, Edward DeMarco of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has yet to agree to principal reduction in loan modifications, despite harsh criticism from some lawmakers on Capitol Hill and increasing pressure from the White House.”

Consumer credit on the rise

US consumer credit shot up during March at the fastest rate since late 2001 as credit-card use, and student and car loans ballooned, data from the Federal Reserve showed yesterday.  Total consumer credit grew by $21.36 billion — more than twice the $9.8 billion rise that Wall Street economists surveyed by Reuters had forecast. That followed a revised $9.27 billion increase in outstanding credit February.  It was the largest surge in consumer credit for any month since November 2001, when it climbed by $28 billion, according to the Fed’s statistics.  The increase in March was concentrated in nonrevolving credit, which includes student and car loans. It climbed by $16.17 billion following a revised $11.62-billion gain in February.  Concern about student-loan levels has increased in an environment where newly graduating students face difficulty finding a job and keeping up on payments.  Congress is currently considering how to prevent a low interest rate for student loans from doubling on July 1 and is expected to find a way to do so, if only to avoid irritating young voters ahead of November’s presidential elections.  But so-called revolving, or credit-card debt, also gained strongly in March. It rose $5.18 billion in a sharp reversal from February when this category of credit use contracted by $2.35 billion.

NAHB – 100 markets on the improving list

The list of housing markets showing measurable and sustained improvement held virtually unchanged in May at 100, down from 101 in April, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/First American Improving Markets Index (IMI), released yesterday. The number of states represented on the list also held firm from the previous month, at 35 (including the District of Columbia).  The index identifies metropolitan areas that have shown improvement from their respective troughs in housing permits, employment and house prices for at least six consecutive months. While 83 metros held onto their previous places on the IMI and 17 new ones were added to the list in May, 18 metros dropped from the list, for a net loss of one. Metros newly added to the list in May include such geographically diverse places as Phoenix, Ariz.; Bowling Green, Ky.; Bend, Ore.; and Lubbock, Texas.  “The fact that there are 100 markets in 34 states and the District of Columbia represented on the improving list illustrates that all housing markets are local, and that the national headlines often don’t apply to what’s happening in a specific metropolitan area,” said NAHB Chairman Barry Rutenberg, a home builder from Gainesville, Fla. “In places where employment is firming up along with demand for new homes, the main factors weighing down the housing market continue to be access to credit (for both builders and buyers) and the difficulty of obtaining accurate appraisals on new construction.”

“The overall number of markets on the IMI continued to plateau this month, with more than a quarter of all US metros still showing signs of improvement,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Many of these are relatively small markets in terms of their population and building volume, which is why their improvement is barely registering on the national scale as of yet. Moreover, we are seeing some shifting of markets on and off the list primarily due to small seasonal house price changes in areas that have had flat, stable prices rather than a boom-and-bust cycle.”  “The fact that the number of improving metros continued to hold its own with 100 entries in May shows that there are many places across the country where confidence and consumers are returning to the housing market,” observed Kurt Pfotenhauer, vice chairman of First American Title Insurance Company.  The IMI is designed to track housing markets throughout the country that are showing signs of improving economic health. The index measures three sets of independent monthly data to get a mark on the top improving Metropolitan Statistical Areas. The three indicators that are analyzed are employment growth from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, house price appreciation from Freddie Mac, and single-family housing permit growth from the US Census Bureau. NAHB uses the latest available data from these sources to generate a list of improving markets. A metropolitan area must see improvement in all three areas for at least six months following their respective troughs before being included on the improving markets list.

{ 0 comments }

Mortgage rates at record lows

by admin on May 4, 2012

WSJ – still waiting for the wave

For at least the last six months or so, a lot of people were talking about a “new wave” of foreclosures threatening to smother the U.S. housing market in gloom once again.  The reasoning was that because of the “robo-signing” scandal, and the subsequent foreclosure freezes, a huge number of foreclosures had been put on pause, and that the banks would eventually have to deal with their delinquent borrowers, and foreclosures would re-start in a big way.  According to data released this week by LPS Applied Analytics and CoreLogic, the waters are still relatively calm: no big waves on the horizon just yet.  LPS’s March “Mortgage Monitor” report shows that while foreclosure inventory remains near-historic highs, and newly started foreclosures are up 8.1% on a monthly basis, they’re still 31.1% below where they were in March 2011. Delinquencies are down 8.8%. The number of borrowers who are either in foreclosure, or 90 days behind on their mortgage payments is down, too, by 6.7%.

CoreLogic’s monthly foreclosure report, released Tuesday, has similar results.  March of this year saw 69,000 completed foreclosures, compared with 85,000 in March 2011, CoreLogic said. Delinquency rates remain unchanged, at their lowest levels since July 2009, in the thick of the financial crisis. And in some of the most troubled markets for foreclosures in the past, like Nevada, Arizona and California, delinquency rates are actually improving, a promising sign for the stability of those markets.  “What we’re seeing so far in the data, it doesn’t amount to a flood. There are regional bursts of activity here and there, but not that wave of foreclosures that people were expecting,” said Herb Blecher, senior vice president at LPS Applied Analytics.

One reason for the low numbers could be February’s $25 billion foreclosure-servicing settlement.  It requires banks to spend $17 billion to help homeowners, receiving different “credits” depending on the type of relief. About $10 billion of that amount must go towards writing down loan balances for borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure. Banks can also get credit for “short sales” — those that allow the borrower to sell the property for less than the total mortgage amount.  With all of this going on, it may take time for banks to sort through their books to figure out which borrowers are eligible for relief. As a result, one of the former believers in the looming foreclosure wave isn’t so sure anymore.  Of course, things could get worse. With millions of potentially troubled loans in the so-called “shadow inventory,” a big wave could always hit.  But for now, it’s fairly calm waters. Leave the Dramamine at home.

Job growth flat

April’s job report lived up to muted expectations, with the economy creating a meager 115,000 jobs during the month as the unemployment rate fell to 8.1 percent.  Job creation in the private sector was slightly better at 130,000, but overall the report painted a picture of a jobs market that had gotten a boost from unseasonably warm winter weather but now has cooled.  The service sector again accounted for most of the job creation, growing 101,000 while manufacturing added just 16,000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Governments cut a net 15,000 jobs for the month. The average work week was unchanged at 34.5 hours.  Though the headline number indicated job creation, the total employment level for the month actually fell 169,000. The disparity likely emanates from a drop in the labor force participation rate — or the level of Americans actively looking for jobs or otherwise employed — from 63.8 percent to 63.6 percent, its lowest level since December 1981.  The amount of discouraged workers swelled from 865,000 to 968,000, an increase of 12 percent. Those working part-time for economic reasons surged 181,000 to more than 7.8 million.  Temp jobs grew by 21,000 for April while retail added 29,000. Hospitality and leisure employment rose 20,000 — and is up 576,000 since February 2010 — while health care added 19,000.

Wall Street economists had been expecting the Bureau of Labor Statistics report to show 170,000 new jobs created and the unemployment rate holding steady at 8.2 percent.  The unemployment rate, which estimates the total percentage of jobless Americans but does not count those not actively looking for work, was last this low in January 2009, when President Obama took office. Total job creation, though, remains narrowly negative for the president and likely will be a contentious interview as Obama seeks a second term.  The miss in total job creation led to a negative reaction on Wall Street, with stock market futures indicating a lower open.  An alternative measure of unemployment which counts those who have stopped looking for work held steady at 14.5 percent.  Long-term unemployment remains a problem, though it eased somewhat in April. The total amount of those out of a job for more than 27 weeks dipped from 5.3 million to 5.1 million, while the average duration of unemployment fell from 39.4 weeks to 39.1 weeks.  “This remains a weak economy, and the job counts in March and April — which have come in at considerably below 200,000 per month — may perhaps continue right through the summer,” said Kathy Bostjancic, director of macroeconomic analysis at The Conference Board.

BOA downgrades could cost billions

Bank of America Corp (BOA) would have been required to post $5.1 billion in collateral under derivatives contracts as of March 31 if major ratings agencies had downgraded its debt by two notches, the bank said in a quarterly filing yesterday.  The bank’s estimate comes as one of three major ratings agencies, Moody’s Investors Service Inc, has said it’s considering a possible downgrade of the company’s long-term debt rating, as well as its banking subsidiary’s long-term and short-term debt ratings. Moody’s is reviewing 17 financial institutions with global capital markets operations.  Credit ratings are opinions on a company’s creditworthiness used by counterparties to determine its ability to repay loans and price the risk. Downgrades can also trigger counterparties to require banks to post additional collateral under derivatives contracts or to terminate contracts.  Moody’s is expected to conclude its review between early May and the end of June, according to the filing. The agency has offered guidance that a downgrade to the bank’s ratings, if any, would likely be one notch, the filing said.

A one-notch downgrade would have required the company to post $2.7 billion in collateral, the filing said. The bank’s estimates contemplate a downgrade by all three major ratings agencies and quantify the impact for a historical point in time.  In addition, under a one-notch downgrade of certain ratings, the derivative liability that would be subject to termination by counterparties was $3.3 billion as of March 31, against which Bank of America has already posted $2.5 billion of collateral, the filing said. Under a two-notch downgrade, the derivative liability subject to termination was an additional $5 billion, against which the bank has already posted $4.7 billion of collateral.

Obama to make drilling harder

The Obama administration wants to clamp down on shale gas drilling on public lands and set standards that proponents of tougher regulation hope will provide a blueprint for drilling oversight nationwide.  Industry sources said the Interior Department could propose a new rule on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, as early as today.  Fracking has been essential to unlocking the nation’s massive shale gas reserves, but critics argue that the practice has polluted water and hurt the environment.  The administration has said it supports shale oil and gas development, but has also called for strong oversight.  Administration officials have said they hope the rules could provide a template for states, which handle most of the regulation of fracking.  The Bureau of Land Management estimates that companies use the fracking technique on about 90 percent of wells drilled on federal lands.

Mortgage rates at record lows

Mortgage rates are continuing to plumb record lows, as signs of slowing economic growth raised doubts about the strength of the economic recovery.  Rates on the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 3.84% for the week ending May 3, down from 3.88% last week and 4.71% a year ago, according to the most recent Freddie Mac survey of conforming rates, released on Thursday.  Fifteen-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 3.07%, down from 3.12% last week and 3.89% a year ago. Rates on five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 2.85%, unchanged from last week and down from 3.47% a year ago. And one-year Treasury-indexed ARMs also hit a record low at 2.7%, down from 2.74% last week and 3.14% a year ago.  To obtain the rates, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage required payment of an average 0.8 point, while the 15-year fixed-rate mortgage and the 5-year ARM required an average 0.7 point. The 1-year ARM required an average 0.6 point. A point is 1% of the mortgage amount, charged as prepaid interest.

Two GOP congressmen:  no principal reductions

Two Republican Congressmen advised Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco to oppose principal reductions for GSE-backed loans.  The letter, submitted by House government oversight committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Rep. Patrick McHenry, came two days after Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and John Tierney, D-Mass., sent a letter to DeMarco in support of principal reduction.  In that letter, the Democratic congressmen pointed out Fannie Mae records show the GSE and its regulator approved and then quickly shut down a pilot principal forgiveness program in 2010 that could have saved the company approximately $410 million.  But Reps. Issa and McHenry conveyed a different message in their latest letter to DeMarco, saying FHFA “occupies a unique position in our system of government in which its independence rests upon the need for technical expertise free from coercive influences.”

Issa and McHenry said it was regretful DeMarco was caught in the middle, but urged him not to be bullied and to continue to recognize the potential cost of a principal reduction to taxpayers. They even cited a letter DeMarco previously sent to Rep. Cummings in which he estimated principal forgiveness on all first-lien underwater mortgages owned by the enterprises would require funding of nearly $100 billion to pay down the mortgages backing the homes. They also pointed out that DeMarco recently said the net cost of write-downs to the taxpayer could amount to $2.1 billion.  In addition, Issa and McHenry warned DeMarco about the prospect of using HAMP funds to subsidize the performance of principal reductions, writing that it “contravenes Congressional intent with respect to TARP and HAMP.”  The two congressmen also warned that such an action could turn into a back-door bailout for banks holding second liens on enterprise-owned or guaranteed properties.  ”As you know, the principal modification on a first-lien mortgage improves the position of a subordinate lien holder to the degree that the second lien is more likely to be repaid,” the congressmen wrote. “Even where the second lien is modified similar to the first lien, as in HAMP, the second lien holder benefits by sharing in any overall losses with the first lien holder.”  The pair claim such a set-up would allow second-lien holders to potentially recover more than they would have in a default.

{ 0 comments }

Florida foreclosure limbo

by admin on April 30, 2012

Florida foreclosure limbo

Banks that made reckless home loans in south Florida have been tiptoeing away from foreclosures in a tactic designed to cut their losses. The result: Orphaned, dilapidated homes dot the landscape from Kendall to Lake Worth.  There are no owners willing to claim and care for them.  A months-long Sun Sentinel investigation of property code violations involving abandoned homes uncovered case after case in which banks launched foreclosure lawsuits but then stalled or avoided taking ownership. In effect, the banks legally sidestepped responsibility for the empty homes, causing great harm to neighborhoods.  The real estate industry calls such properties “bank walkaways.” They are no longer maintained by their legal owners, whether they were investors bailing out of unwise deals or families in financial ruin who decamped.  Nor are they being tended to by lenders, which have halted foreclosure proceedings because the remaining equity in the properties is deemed inadequate to cover the banks’ costs to reclaim title and maintain, refurbish and sell them.  The practice has contributed to South Florida’s foreclosure “limbo” problem in which thousands of vacant homes are stuck in unsettled court proceedings for years.

Spending down, income up

A Commerce Department report showed that personal spending increased 0.3% in the month, well down from the 0.9% jump in spending the month before. That was much weaker than the 0.5% gain in spending forecast by economists surveyed by Briefing.com.  Income increased a little faster, rising 0.4%, which was an improvement from the 0.2% rising the previous month. It was the first time since December that income growth outpaced spending increases, as consumers dipped into savings the previous two months in order to deal with rising prices, such as increases in gasoline prices.  But inflation moderated in March, and it allowed consumers to increase their savings again. The report showed that the savings rate, which compares after-tax income to the level of spending, edged up to 3.8% from 3.7% in February. That means the average family was saving $38 out of every $1,000 in take-home pay in the month.

ResCap bankruptcy could cost $1.2 billion

A bankruptcy filing on the ResCap mortgage unit could cost parent company Ally Financial between $400 million and $1.25 billion, according to a financial disclosure by the bank Friday.  “If a ResCap bankruptcy were to occur, we could incur significant charges, substantial litigation could result, and repayment of our credit exposure to ResCap could be at risk,” according to the filing.  On April 17, Ally disclosed the troubled mortgage unit missed an interest payment on its debt and would be considered in default if it wasn’t made within 30 days. More than $473 million on the debt is outstanding.  The unit actually forged a $191 million profit in the first quarter. But according to the filing Friday, Ally estimates the losses from litigation matters and repurchase obligations could reach as high as $4 billion over time.  Barclays Capital analysts predicted the unit could be placed into bankruptcy within one to two months, and outlined why selling the servicing rights would be critical for investors in ResCap issued mortgage-backed securities.  The unit has stopped lending to real estate developers and homebuilders in the US, according to the Ally filing Friday.

Student loans are a hot potato

In the political campaigns still taking shape, President Barack Obama, Republican challenger Mitt Romney and lawmakers of both parties say they want to protect college students from a sharp increase in interest rates on federally subsidized loans.  Agree, they might, and act they surely will. But first, they settled effortlessly into a rollicking good political brawl.  In less than 72 hours, what might have looked like a relatively simple matter mushroomed into a politically charged veto showdown that touched on the economy and health care, tax cuts and policies affecting women. Accusatory campaign commercials to follow, no doubt.  “This is beneath us. This is beneath the dignity of this House and the dignity of the public trust that we enjoy,” protested House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio as Democrats maneuvered for position on the student loan bill.

“It shouldn’t be a Republican or a Democratic issue. This is an American issue,” Obama said in North Carolina last week as he broached the topic of legislation in a move to gain support students in the fall election. He urged his listeners to tweet their lawmakers and urge them to block an increase in interest rates on federally subsidized loans issued beginning July 1.  There was partisan pop behind Obama’s message, though.  Over two days of campaign-style appearances on college campuses, he quoted one unnamed Republican lawmaker as saying she had “very little tolerance for people who tell me they graduate with debt because there’s no reason for that.” Another GOP lawmaker likened student loans to “stage three cancer of socialism,” he said. Both Republicans quickly said they had been quoted out of context. 

Within a day, Romney told reporters he agreed on the need to prevent the rate increase, while conceding nothing to Obama in the search for political advantage. “I support extending the temporary relief on interest rates for students,” he said, and cited “extraordinarily poor conditions in the job market” in a jab at the president’s handling of the economy.  Congressional Democrats announced they would write legislation to prevent a doubling of the current 3.4% interest rate, and cover the $6 billion cost by requiring more wealthy individuals to pay Social Security and Medicare payroll tax.  It was a not-so-subtle reprise of a campaign perennial, the allegation that Republicans want to cut programs benefiting those who aren’t rich to protect tax cuts for those who are.  “Let’s be honest,” said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. “The only reason Democrats have proposed this particular solution to the problem is to get Republicans to oppose it, to make us cast a vote they think will make us look bad to the voters they need to win the next election.”  He then accused Democrats of wanting to pay for the legislation “by raiding Social Security and Medicare, and by making it even harder for small businesses to hire.”

TARP exec pleads guilty to fraud

Reginald Harper, former CEO of First Community Bank of Hammond, La., pleaded guilty to defrauding the firm out of millions of dollars in phony mortgages.  Harper faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. His sentencing is scheduled for Sept. 13. First Community applied for and was approved for $3.3 million in Troubled Asset Relief Program bailouts in 2008 but withdrew its application afterward.  Four years prior, Harper loaned $2 million to real estate developer Troy Foquet in 2004 to build out parcels of real estate, according to the charges.  Once it became difficult to find qualified homebuyers, Harper would loan potential buyers money to make it appear to the mortgage lender the borrower had more cash than they actually did. He also used “straw” buyers to obtain mortgages, which were used to pay off the original loans to Foquet.  Foquet also paid Harper with insufficient checks, which were credited as a loan payment in order to avoid reporting the delinquency.  Foquet pleaded guilty to the charges in March.  Executives had the choice of writing off losses on bad loans or covering up those losses through fraud,” said Special Inspector General for TARP Director Christy Romero. “Harper chose the latter and concealed the status of the loans from others at First Community Bank, from the bank’s regulators and in the bank’s TARP application.”

{ 0 comments }

Foreclosures up in half of all American cities

by admin on April 26, 2012

June 15 is the short sale day

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the nation’s two largest mortgage backers, will implement their new short sale guidelines on June 15. The changes require mortgage servicers to make a decision within 30 days of receiving a short sale offer. They also must consider requests for pre-approved short sales within that same timeframe.  If the lender needs more than 30 days, it must give borrowers weekly status updates and a decision within 60 days of the initial application. This extension gives lenders more time to determine the value of the property or to get the approval of a mortgage insurer.  The moves are aimed at streamlining the short sale process, which often takes months to complete. Faster response times could help thousands of homeowners. Short sale transactions can get so complicated that many prospective buyers won’t even consider making an offer on a short sale property. And many of those who bid often walk away from the offer because lenders take so long to make a decision.  ”Short sales are more complex than routine home sales since they may involve multiple parties and long-distance negotiating,” said Tracy Mooney, a Freddie Mac senior vice president. The new rules “are intended to help make the decision process more transparent and timely.”

Banks have also caught on to the benefit of approving short sales. Foreclosures take more time for the bank to recoup their money, and it costs upwards of $50,000 to process a foreclosure. But in the wake of the robosigning scandal, banks are more apt to help and even encourage a homeowner to pursue via a short sale.  In addition to the benefits of the bank, the homeowner comes out much better in the long run.  Along with a new home, their credit has been salvaged to a respectable level as opposed to letting a home go due to foreclosure. With a foreclosure it can take up to seven years for your credit to show signs of improvement.

Jobless claims stay high, jobs stall

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 388,000, the Labor Department said today. The prior week’s figure was revised up to 389,000 from the previously reported 386,000.  The four-week moving average for new claims, a closely followed measure of labor market trends, rose 6,250 to 381,750, its highest since the week that ended Jan. 7.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast new claims falling to 375,000 last week. The reading was the latest example of fizzling momentum in the labor market recovery. New claims fell sharply during early winter but the improvement has largely stalled in recent weeks.  The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid rose 3,000 to 3.315 million in the week ended April 14.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits fell 45,930 to 2.73 million in the week ended April 7, the latest week for which data is available.  A total of 6.68 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 87,160 from the prior week.  Employers added 120,000 new jobs to their payrolls in March, the least since October, after averaging 246,000 jobs per month over the prior three months.  Many economists believe a mild winter boosted payrolls growth earlier in the year and view recent stagnation as payback for those gains.

Foreclosures up in half of all American cities

More than half of US major cities showed an increase in foreclosures since the end of last year, according to RealtyTrac.  Mortgage servicers put a freeze on the process in 2010 to correct affidavit problems and resolve investigations from federal regulators and the state attorneys general. A $25 billion settlement approved in March brought new standards and relief requirements for struggling homeowners.  As servicers adjusted, foreclosures began to increase in different areas of the country during the first quarter.  Filings increased in 26 of 50 largest cities, led by Pittsburgh, where foreclosures jumped 49% from the previous three months.  Some cities still showed continued declines from the end of last year. Filings dropped 28% in Portland, Ore. and fell 26% in Las Vegas. Servicers put Vegas filings on pause since a new state law took effect bringing new affidavit requirements and stronger enforcement for violations. As a result, Stockton,

California held the highest metro foreclosure rate in the first quarter, where one in every 60 homes received a filing.  Vegas dropped all the way to eighth on a 61% decline from the first three months of last year, but it wasn’t the only city with filings well below year-ago levels.  Of the 50 major cities, 33 reported filings were down from the first quarter of 2011. Vegas showed the largest drop over that time, followed by a 53% decrease in Seattle and a 51% drop in Austin, Texas.  “First quarter metro foreclosure trends were a mixed bag,” said Brandon Moore,CEO of RealtyTrac. “While the majority of metro areas continued to show foreclosure activity down from a year ago, more than half reported increasing foreclosure activity from the previous quarter — an early sign that long-dormant foreclosures are coming out of hibernation in many local markets.”

Fed doing more harm than good?

The Federal Reserve is doing more harm to the US economy than good by keeping interest rates artificially low and continuing its “monetary medicine”, Peter Boockvar, portfolio manager and equity strategist at Miller Tabak said.  “Bernanke has put the US economy over the past bunch of years into monetary Fantasyland,” Boockvar said today. “When you have rates at zero, when you have an expanded balance sheet of about $3 trillion, the economy is not real.”  Boockvar’s comments followed the Fed’s policy statement on Wednesday that it would hold its key interest rate near zero. The Fed also indicated the economy would have to improve before it changes its policy. A 9-1 vote accompanied the statement, which renewed the pledge to keep rates low through 2014.  Boockvar said the Fed’s policy of keeping rates at zero misallocates capital and does not create a firm foundation for growth because “the cost of money is artificial.  It’s on monetary medicine, painkillers you can say,” he said. “The Fed to me is an impediment, not a boost, and they should just stop what they are doing.”  The Fed’s quantitative easing or bond-buying over the past several years has coincided with gains in stock markets, but it has also stoked fears of inflation and worries the Fed won’t be able to exit without causing turmoil in the bond markets and a jump in interest rates.  “At some point, the extraordinary policy (of bond buying) has to be reversed and it’s going to be a complete mess when it happens,” Boockvar said. “If they (the Fed) think they’re going to do it orderly, I have a big problem with that belief.”

NAR – recovery is here!

Pending home sales increased in March and are well above a year ago, another signal the housing market is recovering, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR).  The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, rose 4.1% to 101.4 in March from an upwardly revised 97.4 in February and is 12.8% above March 2011 when it was 89.9.  The data reflects contracts but not closings.  The index is now at the highest level since April 2010 when it reached 111.3.  The PHSI in the Northeast slipped 0.8% to 78.2 in March but is 21.1% above March 2011.  In the Midwest the index declined 0.9% to 93.3 but is 16.9% higher than a year ago.  Pending home sales in the South rose 5.9% to an index of 114.1 in March and are 10.6% above March 2011.  In the West the index increased 8.7% in March to 108.0 and is 9.0% above a year ago.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist and incorrigible optimist, said 2012 is expected to be a year of recovery for housing.  Of course, he said that about 2010 and 2011 as well, but who’s counting?  “First quarter sales closings were the highest first quarter sales in five years.  The latest contract signing activity suggests the second quarter will be equally good, ” he said.  “The housing market has clearly turned the corner.  Rising sales are bringing down inventory and creating much more balanced conditions around the county, which means home prices will be rising in more areas as the year progresses.”

Olick – noisy numbers or recovery?

“The spring housing numbers aren’t coming in along expectations.  That can’t be, right?  Unemployment has been easing, mortgage delinquencies falling, and affordability is off the charts. That means housing should be bouncing back with verve and vigor this Spring, except it’s not.  It’s not crashing again, it’s just bouncing along a bottom, which means the recovery, as we’ve been warning all along, becomes increasingly local.  Let’s look at some data out this week:  Sales of new homes dropped, but only after a large upward revision in February. That of course leads everyone to blame the weather.  S&P/Case-Shiller’s home price index reached new lows, but the amount of the annual drop was smaller than the previous month, so that’s an improvement, sort of.  Mortgage applications fell, even as the rate on the thirty year fixed hit a new low on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s weekly survey. Refis fell hard and purchase applications rose a little, although the four week moving average is down.  Zillow.com reports that home values rose from February to March (0.5%), ‘marking the largest monthly increase since May 2006, before home values peaked.’ That led analysts there to exclaim the headline: ‘Majority of Markets Covered by Zillow Home Value Forecast to Hit Bottom by Late 2012.’  Trulia.com released a report which mixes three indicators, construction starts, existing home sales and delinquency and foreclosure rates in order to gauge the housing recovery. Apparently it slipped backward in March ‘after a few strides forward.’  Then Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said, ‘The ongoing weakness in the housing market still represents a headwind to economic recovery.’

No wonder economists at Freddie Mac concluded in its April forecast that the data are, ‘noisy.’ Then they too blamed it all on the weather.  So what are we to think, and how are we to play housing, here at the almost, sort of, bottom in some markets but not in others?  ‘Investor demand will drive many markets this spring and summer,’ says David Stiff, chief economist at Fiserv. ‘This means that, at the moment, the MBA purchase application index is a less reliable predictor of sales activity.’  Stiff says he thinks the housing market has bottomed out, but that won’t be obvious until next year. He also makes clear that the recovery will be driven by investors, and investors largely buy in the lower cost markets.  The one truth I heard in all the heated talk of housing today came from CNBC’s Jim Cramer, with whom I often disagree. He said, ‘aggregate numbers make you no money.’ He was talking specifically about housing.”

{ 0 comments }

Understanding the Multifamily Applicant Risk Index (MAR Index)

by admin on April 19, 2012

Foreclosure backlog looms

RealtyStore has completed a new study of the foreclosure status in three major housing markets, finding the amount of pending listings exceeds the amount of active foreclosures listed for sale by a margin of over 2 to 1. This shadow inventory of foreclosed homes illustrates the significant overhang of foreclosure listings that are anticipated to be unleashed on the housing in the wake of resolving the so-called foreclosure robo-signing situation in late 2010. The study was conducted for Cook County, IL (including metro Chicago), Miami-Dade County, FL (including metro Miami) and Maricopa County, AZ (including metro Phoenix).  Foreclosure counts in each location were tabulated by owner, including bank or lender owned homes, foreclosures owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and HUD homes. Although Arizona had previously been one of the hardest hit areas for foreclosure activity, Cook County, IL shows a near equal total amount of foreclosed homes. Miami-Dade foreclosures number at roughly half the count of either other market.

The breakdown of active foreclosure listings vs pending, or shadow inventory, foreclosures listings was consistent across each market surveyed. On average, 29% of total foreclosures across the counties are currently listed for sale. Cook County, IL foreclosures were most heavily represented with active listings, with 32% of its foreclosures presently being marketed to buyers, and 68% of foreclosures pending listing. Maricopa County, AZ foreclosure listings for sale represent only 25% of recorded foreclosures in the county, with 75% of local foreclosures yet to be listed for re-sale. Miami-Dade, FL currently offers 29% of its total foreclosures on the market for re-sale, with 71% of its foreclosure inventory awaiting listing on the market.  According to RealtyStore, median list prices of foreclosures for sale in Cook, Maricopa and Miami-Dade counties continue to run below average home prices. Cook County foreclosures are listed at a median price of just $72,650 and an average price of $95,997. Miami-Dade foreclosures list at a median price of $106,900 and average $145,059, while Maricopa lists foreclosed homes slightly higher with a median of $109,900 and the average foreclosure listed at a price of $168,744.

The foreclosure median list prices come in at 56% and 42% below the median sales prices of single-family homes selling in metro-Chicago and Miami, respectively, as reported by the NAR in Q4, 2011. Metro-Phoenix posts a smaller price gap at 7%, suggesting foreclosure saturation may be peaking in Maricopa County.  Individual foreclosure listings continue to cover all portions of the pricing spectrum, ranging from as low as $5,900 for a single family foreclosed home in Chicago, IL to as high as a foreclosed estate in Paradise Valley, AZ listed at $5,700,000.

Jobless claims up

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits slipped 2,000 to a seasonally adjusted 386,000, the Labor Department said. But the prior week’s figure was revised up to 388,000 from the previously reported 380,000.  The four-week moving average for new claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends, rose 5,500 to 374,750.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 370,000 last week.  The claims data covered the week for April’s nonfarm payrolls survey. The four-week average of new applications rose marginally between the March and April survey periods, suggesting not much change in labor market conditions.  Employers added 120,000 new jobs to their payrolls in March, the least since October, after averaging 246,000 jobs per month over the prior three months. Most economists have viewed the pull-back in job growth as payback after the weather-induced gains in the previous months.  The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid rose 26,000 to 3.30 million in the week ended April 7.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits fell 19,419 to 2.78 million in the week ended March 31, the latest week for which data is available.  A total of 6.77 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 187,807 from the prior week.

CoreLogic – First Quarter 2012 Multifamily Applicant Risk Index Report

CoreLogic today announced that CoreLogic SafeRent, provider of the nation’s leading suite of screening and risk management services designed for the multifamily housing industry, released its first quarter 2012 multifamily applicant risk (MAR) index report. The first quarter MAR Index value increased one point from the fourth quarter 2011 and three points from a year ago, indicating an increase in national renter credit quality and slightly better applicant pool.  The MAR Index for first quarter 2012 is based exclusively on applicant traffic credit quality scores from the CoreLogic SafeRent statistical lease screening model (Registry ScorePLUS) and is updated quarterly to provide property owners and managers with a benchmark against which to evaluate their applicant credit quality trends against market based MAR Index trends. This comparison indicates the relative strength of their property portfolio to attract and secure applicants with higher credit quality and an increased likelihood of fulfilling lease obligations.

When comparing applicants for one- versus two-bedroom units, the first quarter 2012 MAR Index is slightly higher for one-bedroom units at 102, compared with 101 for two-bedroom units.  Regionally, the South and Midwest reflected the lowest MAR Index, each with values of 98, a one point increase from the fourth quarter 2011. The Northeast continues to maintain the highest MAR Index with a value of 111.  The three Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) with the steepest decreases in the MAR Index were Cincinnati-Middletown, Ohio, Ky., Ind.; Columbus, Ohio; and Birmingham-Hoover, Ala.; each with decreases of three points. The three MSAs with the greatest increases in the MAR Index were Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Ill., Ind., Wis.; Denver-Aurora, Colo.; and Salt Lake City, Utah; each with increases of four points. 

Understanding the Multifamily Applicant Risk Index (MAR Index)

The MAR Index is published quarterly by CoreLogic SafeRent. It provides trends of national and regional traffic credit quality scores whereby a lower index value indicates an applicant pool with a higher risk of not fulfilling lease obligations. A MAR Index value of 100 indicates that market conditions are equal to the national mean for the index’s base period of 2004. A MAR Index value greater than 100 indicates market conditions with reduced average risk of default relative to the index’s base period mean. A value less than 100 indicates market conditions with increased average risk of default relative to the index’s base period mean. The MAR Index is derived from the statistical screening model from CoreLogic SafeRent, which is the multifamily industry’s only screening model that is both empirically derived and statistically validated. The statistical screening model was developed from historical resident lease performance data to specifically evaluate the potential risk of a resident’s future lease performance. The model generates scores for each applicant indicating the relative risk of the applicant not fulfilling lease obligations. A lower score indicates a more risky applicant.

BOA tops estimates

Bank of America (BOA) reported lower first-quarter profit as the second-largest US bank took accounting charges related to its debt, but results topped analysts’ estimates as credit quality improved.  The bank reported charges of $4.8 billion related to changes in the value of its debt, partially offset by gains of $3.4 billion from equity investments and debt-related transactions.  Excluding debt valuation adjustments, it earned 31 cents a share.  First-quarter net income was $653 million, or 3 cents a share, down from $2.05 billion, or 17 cents per share, a year earlier.  Revenue declined to $22.3 billion from $26.9 billion.  The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank took a loan-loss provision of $2.4 billion, compared with $3.8 billion a year ago.  In its capital markets operations, Bank of America reported sales and trading revenue of $3.8 billion, up from $1.5 billion in the fourth quarter but down from $4.6 billion a year ago.

California foreclosure reform moves forward

Seven bills reforming some foreclosure rules passed committees in the California state legislature this week.  The bills were introduced in February. One set of bills extends protections to tenants, giving them 90 days before eviction after the foreclosure sale of the property. Another increases penalties to banks that fail to maintain blighted homes.  Servicers would be required to provide documentation to the borrower establishing its right to foreclose before the filing first step in the process, under other passed bills. Evidence of ownership and chain of title must also be shown to the borrower.  Two other bills charge servicers a $25 fee for every notice of default recording. The money will fund investigations for California AG Kamala Harris. Another piece of legislation passed by committee allows Harris to convene a grand jury to investigate financial crimes in different jurisdictions.  “All Californians have been impacted by the toll the mortgage and foreclosure process has taken on our neighborhoods,” Harris said. “Our California Homeowner Bill of Rights will provide relief for homeowners, tenants and communities. I thank the authors and supporters of these important bills.”

{ 0 comments }

← Older Entries