Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin June 1, 2011
Forward this e-mail to your friends!
Then they can subscribe directly at the following link: http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/
*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>
http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>
http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
************************************************************
Home prices set record – for being low
Home prices fell below the 2009 housing bust bottom in the first quarter, dropping 4.2% from the prior three months, according to the S&P Case-Shiller national home price index. The 20-city composite index was at 138.16, falling below the 2009 low of 139.26. It was the third straight quarterly drop for the index, which was down 5.1% from a year earlier. National prices are now down 32.7% from their peak set five years ago. The S&P/Case-Shiller national home price index covers 80% of the housing market. “This month’s report is marked by the confirmation of a double-dip in home prices across much of the nation,” said David Blitzer, spokesman for Standard and Poor’s. The housing market went through a brief recovery period starting in mid-2009. Home prices recovered nearly 5% of their earlier losses. After homebuyer tax credits, which were in effect during the rebound, expired last April, the slump resumed. “The rebound in prices seen in 2009 and 2010 was largely due to the first-time home buyers tax credit,” said Blitzer. “Excluding the results of that policy, there has been no recovery or even stabilization in home prices during or after the recent recession.” A separate S&P/Case-Shiller index covering 20 major cities also dropped during March, its eighth straight monthly decline. This is the second month of the post-recession double dip for the 20-city index. Prices peaked in July 2006 and then fell steadily through April 2009. They then went on a winning streak that ran through last June and prices, adjusted for seasonal differences, have plunged every month since.
Santorim – job creation needs a new team
Potential Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum pointed to nationalized health care and over-regulation as two examples of ways in which the White House has contributed to the prolonged slowdown. “When you have a president who’s just fixated on centralizing more power in Washington, D.C., making crony capitalism decisions as to who the winners are and who the losers are, that’s going to have an impact on our economic growth and those jobs,” said Santorum, a former two-term senator from Pennsylvania. For Santorum, a likely GOP candidate who has failed to gain much traction in the popularity polls so far, the weak recovery provides fertile ground for criticism. “This is a president who is a true believer,” he said. “This is not someone who is just incompetent in managing the economy, but this is someone who believes in a different paradigm in how the economy is going to function and he is going to stick with that paradigm whether it works or not.” Santorum said he is in favor less regulation, though not abolishing it completely, and pledged to attack the spending problems in Washington. He is perhaps the only of the GOP aspirants who fully endorses the deficit reduction plan put forth by Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan. The proposal is the most aggressive plan yet in Washington to take on entitlement programs, essentially privatizing Medicare and making Medicaid a block grant program to be administered by individual states.
WSJ – backroom mortgage deals
Here’s a lesson for the government and Ally Financial in particular: With bank investors fretting about the potential costs of soured-mortgage claims, it is best to get the details out in the open. That’s the opposite of how Ally and Freddie Mac handled a payment last year of $325 million by the firm to the mortgage company to settle mortgage-repurchase claims. Neither Ally, General Motors’ former financing arm now majority-owned by the government, nor government-owned Freddie disclosed the amount of the settlement when it occurred. The fact that a deal was struck at all was only disclosed by Ally and Freddie in quarterly securities filings. The $325 million payment has now come to light only in an exhibit tucked deep within an amended offering document recently filed by Ally as part of a planned sale of shares to the public. And that disclosure only happened after prompting by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This episode underscores the challenge for bank investors trying to assess risks posed by demands that banks repurchase soured mortgages. Concerns over legal risk, along with fears of a weakening economic outlook, have weighed on bank shares of late. Admittedly, for Ally, this settlement, like one it struck with Fannie Mae last December for $462 million, isn’t a huge financial blow. The company already had reserved for the potential repurchase expense and, in 2010, had net income of $1.07 billion. The problem is the lack of detailed disclosure. Even now, neither company has disclosed the amount of loans covered by the settlement. That makes it hard for investors to know how to interpret the deal and how tough a negotiating stance the government took. The government’s role is central. It controls Freddie and Fannie, which guaranteed trillions of dollars in loans originated by banks and, with their value sinking, have demanded that banks repurchase billions of dollars of them. And investors have to question how the government is balancing the need to lessen taxpayer losses at Fannie and Freddie against a desire to avoid actions that may destabilize banks, like playing hardball on soured-loan repurchases.
This has broad implications. Fannie and Freddie’s regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, is nearly a year into an inquiry of private-label mortgage securities sold by banks to investors, including Fannie and Freddie. While banks already have settled some claims for repurchases of soured mortgages with Fannie and Freddie, the FHFA could decide banks need to repurchase more. Bank of America, for example, has $222 billion in at-risk, private-label securities that weren’t covered by past settlements with Fannie and Freddie. The bank hasn’t said how much of these are owned by Fannie or Freddie. Understanding the economics and rationale behind settlements such as the Ally deal are, therefore, important for both bank investors and taxpayers. The lack of disclosure cuts both ways. In January, some members of Congress questioned whether mortgage settlements with BofA and between Ally and Fannie actually were back-door bailouts. In other words, the deals may have been too favorable to the banks. The FHFA’s response that the deals were in Fannie’s and Freddie’s best interests hasn’t resolved the uncertainty. It said detailed information concerning the agreements is proprietary. That may be the case for normal companies. But Fannie and Freddie, which have received $138 billion in taxpayer funds, aren’t normal. As Democratic U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters said in a letter to the FHFA, loan-repurchase agreements involving them are “a matter of critical importance to the public interest,” and so “transparency is therefore essential.” It’s bad enough the government is influencing the market in so many ways. The least it can do is be clear about its actions.
Food prices to double?
The prices of staple crops will more than double in 20 years, unless fundamental changes are made to the international food system, warns the international charity Oxfam. The report forecasts that prices for key staples such as maize will increase by between 120 and 180 percent by 2030, with up to half of this increase being prompted by reductions in supply caused by climate change. Soft commodity prices have risen dramatically in 2011 as poor weather conditions in key producing regions have caused a fall in yields and key exporters, including Russia and Ukraine, put in place export bans to curb domestic inflation. Higher oil prices have also impacted on the soft commodity market, as input costs for fuel and fertilizer rise. These factors have rattled the global grain markets and led to surges in core grain prices over the last year, resulting in the knock-on effects of inflated food prices for consumers and inflationary pressures in both the developed and developing world. Oxfam claimed that by 2050, demand for food would rise by 70 percent, while production would not keep up with demand, with growth rates actually declining.
Reverse mortgages performing well
The National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NRMLA)/RiskSpan Reverse Mortgage Market Index (RMMI) estimates the value of home equity held by seniors aged 62 and older to be $3.3 trillion as of the end of 2010. The index has tracked reverse mortgage market opportunity since 2000 by analyzing and reporting on trends in senior home values and home equity levels. The impact of falling home prices on aggregate senior equity levels has been partially offset by the demographic growth of the senior population and its lower mortgage debt levels relative to the rest of the population. The level of senior home equity has fallen by 18 percent from peak levels, compared to a 31 percent decline for the total population of homeowners. “This data shows us that the home equity is still an important component of total wealth for seniors. As such, this equity will be increasingly important to help seniors fund longevity as they outlive the generations before them,” said Peter Bell, president of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NRMLA).
National home prices and mortgage debt levels indicate a stabilizing of the RMMI. After a slight uptick in the third quarter, housing prices fell again in the fourth quarter, according to Federal Housing Finance Authority (FHFA) index data. The RMMI fell to 157.7 in the fourth quarter of 2010 (the RMMI is indexed to Q1 2000), 0.3 percent lower than the preceding quarter’s level and 18 percent below the fourth quarter of 2006 peak. Based on RiskSpan’s analysis of FHFA and U.S. Census Bureau data, the aggregate value of senior housing fell by $15 billion to $4.3 trillion, while senior mortgage debt levels fell by $4 billion, resulting in an $11 billion reduction in the level of senior home equity.
See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin
**************
Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2010.
All Rights Reserved.
http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com
(subscribe to this newsletter)
*************************************************
About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.
* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month
* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties
* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!
* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!
* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building
* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
