The best inventory on the market in metro Detroit — where foreclosures and short sales account for 36% of the listings — attracts multiple bids and pushed the median sales price to $70,000 last month, up 18.6% from $59,000 in April 2011, according to Realcomp, a Farmington Hills-based multiple listing service.  Its members reported 4,351 closed sales in April, which is down by 2.2% from the 4,439 homes and condos that sold in the same month a year ago.  Sales gains were seen in Macomb County, up 8.9% to 922, and Oakland County, up 1.5% to 1,448. Pulling down the metro area results were Livingston County, with a 9.5% drop to 182 homes sold in April, followed by Wayne County, with a 9% decline to 1,789 home sales from 1,965 last April.  All four counties included in the metro Detroit stats — Livingston, Oakland, Macomb and Wayne — saw median sales price increases in April. Here’s the breakdown:

-  Livingston: $150,000, up 7.1% from $140,000.

-  Macomb: $72,500, up 13.3% from $64,000.

-  Oakland: $114,500, up 9% from $105,000.

-  Wayne: $38,000, up 27.1% from $29,900.

The Detroit area, which is defined as Detroit, Hamtramck, Harper Woods and Highland Park, saw median prices rise to $9,000, up 2.3% from a year ago, but sales dropped 22% to 539 in April.  Nearly half, or 48%, of sales last month were cash sales and homes were selling an average of three days faster with 87 days on market, Realcomp said.  Inventories dropped 18.3% in April to 26,896 homes for sale in the entire multiple listing service compared with 32,910 in April 2011. The MLS includes metro Detroit plus parts of the Thumb and Genesee County.

Retail sales up slightly

Sales at US retailers barely rose in April as the boost from an unseasonably warm winter faded, pointing to some loss of momentum in consumer spending early in the second quarter.  Retail sales edged up 0.1%, held back by a decline in receipts from building materials and clothing stores, the Commerce Department said on Tuesday. That was the smallest gain since December when sales were flat.  Other data showed manufacturing remained resilient, with a gauge of factory activity in New York state bouncing higher this month as new orders and shipments rose.  The New York Federal Reserve said its Empire State general business conditions index jumped to 17.09 in May from 6.56 in April, outpacing economists’ expectations of 8.50.  “Growth is there, but it’s not that convincing,” said David Sloan, senior economist at 4CAST in New York.  March’s sales were revised slightly down to show a 0.7% rise rather than the previously reported 0.8% increase. Economists polled by Reuters had expected retail sales to gain 0.2% last month.  In the 12 months to April, sales rose 6.4%.

Olick – Obama’s “responsible” homeowners

“As part of his ‘To Do List,’ President Barack Obama visited Val and Paul Keller on Friday. The White House described them as ‘responsible’ homeowners who owe more on their mortgage than their Nevada home is currently worth.  They owe $168,000 on their mortgage, but their Reno home is currently valued at $100,000.  The president is doing so to, ‘help demonstrate a concrete and tangible example as to why this broader push [to refinance] is so important not only for millions of Americans but for our economy,’ said Shaun Donovan, secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in a conference call with reporters before the event.  During that call, Donovan used the words ‘responsible homeowners’ more than a dozen times, in describing whom the administration’s proposed refinance programs should help.  It is not the Kellers’ fault that home prices in Reno are down 52% from the peak, right? The Kellers bought their house 14 years ago, and they have not been late on a mortgage payment, according to Donovan. They were able to take advantage of the newly expanded government refinance program through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for severely underwater borrowers, and they are in fact putting some of their savings on the monthly mortgage toward paying down principal.  But were they responsible? 

The Kellers bought their home before the height of the housing boom. The trouble I’m having understanding this whole scenario is that the median home price in Reno is actually 7% higher today than it was 14 years ago. If the Kellers had a ‘responsible’ loan, that would be a 30-year fixed, in which case they should have paid at least some principal on the loan over the last 14 years. And didn’t these ‘responsible’ borrowers, the Kellers, put some money down on the home?  We went looking: According to Washoe County records, the Kellers purchased their home in June 1998 for $127,000. So why do they have, according to the White House, a $168,000 mortgage?  White House officials now confirm to CNBC that the Kellers did a cash-out refinance in 2007, when their home had appreciated to $250,000. Again, it’s not illegal, but are these the ‘responsible’ borrowers that the administration is looking to help? They took out a $178,000 loan, using the $51,000 to pay down debt on the family construction business, so Paul could retire. Had they not taken that money out, and continued paying on the original mortgage, they would not be underwater today.  ‘This is a family, first and foremost, that has met their responsibility, remained on time with their mortgage and used their equity in their home in a way that so many Americans do, to send their kids to college, support a small business or save for retirement,’ said Donovan, whom we contacted after learning of the refinance. ‘They deserve the chance to benefit from these record low interest rates because they have met their responsibilities.’

Another administration official familiar with the Kellers’ case says the couple were responsible because despite the incredible runup in home prices, they did not take all the equity out of the house. ‘She did not use her home as an ATM in the sense that we saw during the crisis, because she didn’t cash out all of the equity leaving her no cushion. She had a 71% LTV (loan to value ratio), or 30% equity in her home. That is by almost any definition a very responsible position to be in,’ he added. In the past, Obama has criticized borrowers, who at the peak of the housing bubble, pulled money out, referring to it as using their house as an ATM.  LTV, Donovan and the other administration official claim, is not a minor issue. So it seems they are defining ‘responsible’ as a borrower who maintains an equity cushion in the house, even when that house price has nearly doubled in just eight years.  ‘This was truly 100 year flood, and so lots of people who had 20, 30, 40% equity in their homes now find themselves underwater,’ says the White House official, who also commends the Kellers for not walking away from their mortgage.”

Europe barely dodges formal recession

Stronger-than-expected growth in Germany was enough to help the European Union and the 17-nation eurozone avoid falling into recession for the second time since 2009 during the first three months of this year.  Initial readings on gross domestic product, the broadest measure of an economy’s health, released Tuesday showed Germany’s economy grew 0.5% in the first quarter, an improvement from the decline of 0.2% at the end of 2011.  The forecast had been for growth of only 0.1% for Germany, the continent’s largest economy, and there were some fears that it could report a drop in GDP for the second straight quarter, the common definition of an economy in recession.  The growth in Germany was enough to have GDP in the 27-nation EU and the 17-nation eurozone that uses the common currency both remain unchanged compared to the previous quarter, following a 0.3% decline on that basis at the end of last year. Economists had forecast that both would fall into recession with another quarter of falling GDP.

Decline in foreclosure activity in California hurting the market

The pace of foreclosures in California is slowing to a crawl, according to figures for the month of April compiled by foreclosure information company ForeclosureRadar Inc. of Discovery Bay.  In California, Notice of Default filings were down 69.8% from the peak in March 2009, and 15.8% from April 2011.  Foreclosure sales also declined, however, foreclosure investors purchased a record percentage of the limited inventory that was actually sold. California investors purchased 41.3% of foreclosure sales last month, the report says.  The low number of sales, combined with record% purchased on the courthouse steps left very little to become Bank Owned (REO). This further depletes the inventory of Bank Owned homes as REO sales continue to outpace the addition of new inventory, says ForeclosureRadar.

Despite investors purchasing a higher percentage of foreclosure sales, margins have rapidly declined in recent months. In California the discount between market value and winning bid have on average declined to 12.3%. This leaves investors who intend to resell their purchases with record low profits after eviction, repairs, and closing costs.  “Foreclosure declines would be wonderful news if they were being driven by a true market recovery in which hundreds of thousands were no longer unable to make payments, and millions were no longer upside down,” says Sean O’Toole, founder and CEO of Foreclosure Radar.  “That is not the reality today. Instead we are seeing unprecedented government intervention into the foreclosure process leaving underwater homeowners in limbo, while stealing opportunity from investors and first time buyers,” he says.  “California’s pending legislation, which is similar to laws we previously saw enacted in Nevada, will almost certainly bring foreclosure activity to a near halt there if passed. The reality is that these laws don’t solve anything as they fail to address the real problem – negative equity – while instead they punish real estate professionals, homebuyers, and investors far more than the banks they were aimed at.”

Fed governor Duke wants certainty

Federal Reserve Gov. Elizabeth Duke on Tuesday urged policymakers to finalize regulations and rules to provide more certainty for the housing market.   Establishing regulations and deciding on the future of government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will help reduce the uncertainty contributing to tight mortgage lending, Duke said in remarks prepared for a National Association of Realtors conference on Tuesday. She did not discuss monetary policy in her remarks.  “The most important solution that I am suggesting today is that policymakers move forward with the difficult decisions that will affect the future of the mortgage market,” Duke said. “If lenders tighten more than is warranted, it will hamper the recovery of the housing market and, in doing so, restrain economic growth.”  Duke did not make specific policy recommendations, but she stressed that questions around the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac must be resolved. More than three years after the government took the two mortgage giants into conservatorship, there still is no consensus about how they should be structured and what the government’s role should be, potentially discouraging private companies, Duke said.  “Private capital might be reluctant to enter the market until the future parameters of government support are resolved,” she said.

Duke did note some encouraging signs in the housing market, including a slowdown in the pace of home prices’ decline and an edging up in housing starts and permits. And she expressed confidence that as the economy slowly improves, some elements of the housing market will strengthen, as confidence increases.  Lenders seem to be reluctant now to make loans in part because of concerns over the higher cost of servicing delinquent loans and worries over regulations still being shaped, Duke said.  “Collectively, these uncertainties about the future are likely contributing significantly to the tight lending standards in the mortgage market today,” she said. The Federal Reserve will use its “best judgment to weigh the cost and availability of credit against consumer protection, investor clarity, and financial stability as it writes rules,” she said.  Duke stressed that lenders need clarity to shape business models and plan for the future.  “I don’t want to diminish the importance of any individual policy decision, but I do believe that the most important prescription for the housing market is for these decisions to be made and the path for the future of housing finance to be set,” she said.

NAHB – builder confidence up in May

Builder confidence in the market for newly built, single-family homes gained five points in May from a downwardly revised reading in the previous month to reach a level of 29 on the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI), released today. This is the index’s strongest reading since May of 2007.  Derived from a monthly survey that NAHB has been conducting for 25 years, the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index gauges builder perceptions of current single-family home sales and sales expectations for the next six months as “good,” “fair” or “poor.” The survey also asks builders to rate traffic of prospective buyers as “high to very high,” “average” or “low to very low.” Scores from each component are then used to calculate a seasonally adjusted index where any number over 50 indicates that more builders view conditions as good than poor.  Each of the index’s components rebounded from declines in the previous month. The component gauging current sales conditions and the component gauging traffic of prospective buyers each rose five points in May to 30 and 23, respectively, with the traffic component hitting its highest level since April of 2007. The component gauging sales expectations in the next six months rose three points to 34.  Three out of four regions registered improving builder sentiment in May. This included a six-point gain to 32 in the Northeast, and five-point gains to 27 and 28 in the Midwest and South, respectively. The West posted a two-point decline, to 29.

CoreLogic today released its March Home Price Index (HPI) report which shows that nationally home prices, including distressed sales, declined on a year-over-year basis by 0.6% in March 2012 compared to March 2011. On a month-over-month basis, home prices, including distressed sales, increased by 0.6% in March 2012 compared to February 2012, the first month-over-month increase since July 2011.  Excluding distressed sales, month-over-month prices increased for the third month in a row. The CoreLogic HPI also shows that year-over-year prices, excluding distressed sales, rose by 0.9% in March 2012 compared to March 2011. Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions.  “This spring the housing market is responding to an improving balance between real estate supply and demand which is causing stabilization in house prices,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic. “Although this has been the case in each of the last two years, the difference this year is that stabilization is occurring without the support of tax credits and in spite of a declining share of REO sales.”  “While housing prices remain flat nationally, in many markets tighter inventories are beginning to lift home prices,” said Anand Nallathambi, president and chief executive officer of CoreLogic. “This is true in Phoenix, New York and Washington, for example, which all reflect higher home price values than a year ago. A continuation of this trend will be good for our industry across US markets.”

Highlights as of March 2012

-  Including distressed sales, the five states with the highest appreciation were:  Wyoming (+5.9%), West Virginia (+5.3%), Arizona (+5.1%), North Dakota (+4.7%) and Florida (+4.5%).

-  Including distressed sales, the five states with the greatest depreciation were: Delaware (-10.6%), Illinois (-8.3%), Alabama (-8.0%), Georgia (-7.3%) and Nevada (-5.8%).

-  Excluding distressed sales, the five states with the highest appreciation were: Idaho (+5.4%), North Dakota (+5.1%), South Carolina (+4.7%), Montana (+3.5%) and Kansas (+3.4%).

-  Excluding distressed sales, the five states with the greatest depreciation were: Delaware (-7.6%), Alabama (-4.1%), Nevada (-3.9%), Vermont (-3.9%) and Rhode Island (-2.9%).

-  Including distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the national HPI (from April 2006 to March 2012) was -33.7%. Excluding distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the HPI for the same period was -24.5%.

-  The five states with the largest peak-to-current declines including distressed transactions are Nevada (-59.9%), Arizona (-48.6%), Florida (-48.1%), Michigan (-45.1%) and California (-42.7%).

-  Of the top 100 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) measured by population, 57 are showing year-over-year declines in March, eight fewer than in February.

Business confidence lackluster

While the National Federation of Independent Business’ Small Business Optimism Index rose two points in April to 94.5, the index is back to the same level it had been in February 2011.  “It’s positive from last month,” said NFIB chief economist William Dunkelberg. “But we’re in the same place as a year ago, so a whole year has gone by and we don’t go anywhere.”  In areas like capital outlays, indications are that while things are slowly improving, it’s “nothing to write home about,” said Dunkelberg. The Index now stands at 54%, far above the 44% in August 2010, but below the average rate of 60%.  “In the smallest businesses, we’re seeing improvement,” said Dunkelberg, “but it’s going on under the government’s radar. It will take a while before it registers” in the national picture, he said, pointing to the job creation number in particular. “Hopefully this time they will not deteriorate again.” and that’s pretty much the hope for all 10 categories in the index, many of which have, over the course of the past few years, seen ups and downs.  “We keep getting these head fakes, like last year, and we’re wondering if [the index] will do it again,” said Dunkelberg, referring to March 2011, when the survey took a dip, and then continued a downward trend throughout the spring and summer, only starting to rise again last October. “Last year, it kept getting worse; this time March took a dive, then came back.”

Regulations stifle mortgage market

Rulemakings will dominate the mortgage industry this year as the sector continues its “slow, bumpy road to recovery,” keynote speakers said as the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) secondary conference got into full swing Monday in New York City.  The rulemaking surrounding the Qualified Mortgage — or QM, repurchase requests, national servicing settlements and government-sponsored enterprise reform will dominate the year, said David Stevens, president and CEO of the MBA. But despite the attention to those four key areas, the MBA is tracking some 100 rulemakings in the Dodd-Frank Act.  Monday’s opening session was part feel-good, part dire warning as speakers struck a balance between the good and the bad in the current marketplace.  An opening video, for example, provided the feel-good atmosphere. It showed an MBA member’s recollections of his immigrant father buying a tract home in the New York burrough of Queens after World World II.

Mitch Kider, with Washington, D.C.-based law firm Weiner Brodsky Sidman Kider PC, recounted the reverence his father felt for the bank that provided the Federal Housing Administration loan that made it all possible.  “The people that work in this industry are working there because their heads and their hearts are in the right place,” he said. “As mortgage bankers, you are doing wonderful things for society.”  Stevens brought things back to earth by voicing borrower trepidation to buy homes, lender concern over burdensome regulations and investor mistrust of the process.  Borrowers, especially those on the margins, could be negatively impacted if the qualified mortgage rule — what he called “the holy grail of who gets access to a mortgage” — is too narrowly defined.  The need for more clarity in the system, for borrowers, lenders, mortgage servicers and investors, was a recurring theme from opening speakers.  On GSE reform, Stevens urged the industry do what it can without Congress, where he predicted a continued logjam.  “We need to take control of our own destiny,” he said.

Lewis Ranieri, chairman and founding partner of Ranieri Parnters, widely considered a pioneer of modern mortgage finance, said the industry must be aware of those would not be content to fix the capital market but who believe the capital markets “are not simply broken … but are profoundly the wrong thing to do.”  If it doesn’t stay aware, the industry may end of with a fundamental rewrite of the way it does business, where everything resides on the balance sheet, he said.  Two mortgage businesses came to him recently about a possible sale due to the tough regulatory environment, Ranieri said.  “I truly believe the future of our industry is decided in the next eight months,” he said. “There is a regulatory movement that isn’t just trying to fix, it’s trying to change.”  Richard Dorfman, managing director of the Securities Industry and Financial Market Association, or SIFMA, said it falls on the industry to define the issues in ways that resonate with consumers.  Instead of complaining that Dodd-Frank is a burden to the banks, regulations should be defined in ways that show how they limit mortgage access to potential homebuyers, for example, he said.  “Consumers must be served, and they can and will be served by this industry,” he said. “There is no doubt in my mind.”

Krugman’s ideas “reckless” and “silly”

The president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Richard Fisher, rejected the idea that higher inflation would spur the economy on Monday.  Saying the last thing businesses needed in this economy was uncertainty, Fisher sided with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in his public feud with Paul Krugman, the leftwing economist and New York Times columnist.  Called “The Battle of the Beards” by The Washington Post, the back-and-forth between the two economists began when Krugman called on the Fed to raise inflation targets, a move Bernanke called “reckless.”  “I would say that Ben Bernanke’s guilty of understatement. It would be more than reckless. It’s a silly thing to recommend,” Fisher said.  “I understand the argumentation from Krugman’s standpoint, from his perspective. He’s just trying to broaden the window to try to make things normal if we were to go below the 2% rate. That’s our long-term target. I believe we’re going to stick with it. I personally feel that this is something that is ultra-critical for our credibility.”

Olick – $150,000 off?

“A select group of struggling mortgage borrowers are about to get an offer that sounds too good to be true. Executives at Bank of America say they will begin mailing 200,000 letters offering certain customers mortgage principal reduction.  ‘If people get these things and toss them, they won’t be eligible,’ says Ron Sturzenegger, the Bank of America executive charged with providing solutions to borrowers in need of mortgage assistance.  But the offer is real, and eligible borrowers could get as much as $150,000 knocked off the balance of their mortgages. It is all part of the $25 billion settlement reached this year between federal and state agencies and the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers over fraudulent foreclosure document processing (so-called ‘robo-signing’).  Bank of America, in a deal with state attorneys general and the US Department of Justice, committed $11 billion to mortgage principal reduction, but executives say they will go beyond that if enough borrowers respond to their offer. Five thousand borrowers have already received a collective $700 million in principal reduction through a pilot program for those already in a modification negotiation. The 200,000 borrowers being targeted now may have already exhausted modification options or may have yet to contact the lender.

Executives say borrowers receiving the letters are eligible, but they still have to prove they qualify. In order to be eligible, a borrower must be 60 days late on the mortgage payment as of Jan. 31, 2012. The borrower has to owe more on the mortgage than the home is currently worth, commonly known as being ‘underwater’ on the mortgage, and the borrower’s loan must either be owned by Bank of America or serviced by Bank of America for an investor who is allowing the modifications.  In order to qualify for the modification, the borrower must answer the letter with full documentation of income, showing that under the terms of the modification they can still make the monthly payment. A borrower with no income would therefore not qualify. A borrower’s current monthly payment must be  more than 25% of gross income, and the borrower must show they are unable to afford that.  ‘If you can afford to make your monthly payment and are choosing not to, you will not get this principal modification,’ says Sturzenegger.  If the borrower qualifies, Bank of America will bring the monthly mortgage payment down to 25% of the borrower’s gross income. That could mean principal forgiveness well over $100,000, as there is no limit to the amount of the mortgage. If enough borrowers respond, it could cost Bank of America far more than it committed to in the settlement.  ‘Yes, we have the capability to go well beyond the $11 billion,’ adds Sturzenegger.

If the borrower qualifies, Bank of America will bring the monthly mortgage payment down to 25% of the borrower’s gross income. That could mean principal forgiveness well over $100,000, as there is no limit to the amount of the mortgage. If enough borrowers respond, it could cost Bank of America far more than it committed to in the settlement.  ‘Yes, we have the capability to go well beyond the $11 billion,’ adds Sturzenegger.  Bank executives say that before choosing which borrowers will get the offer, they performed a net present value test on each loan, making sure that the principal reduction modification would net Bank of America or the investor who owns the loan more than foreclosing on the home. ‘It has to be fair to the investor as well,’ says Sturzenegger.  Not all of the 200,000 borrowers who receive the letters are expected to respond. Executives say there is a level of fatigue among delinquent borrowers who have already received several notices or who may have gone through a failed modification process already. Some borrowers simply don’t want to stay in their homes, while others may think the offer is a scam.  ‘They have been contacted by a lot of other people, and this offer may appear too good to be true,’ says Sturzenegger.

That’s why Bank of America is sending the letters by certified mail and trying to make the language as simple as possible. A sample letter obtained by CNBC shows a bring red box in the top corner labeled, ‘IMPORTANT’ and simple language stating, ‘Qualifying customers may reduce their monthly payment by an average of 35%.’  Some 6,500 letters should be arriving in mailboxes across the country this week, with a wave of new letters going out every week until the end of the summer, when all 200,000 should have been mailed. Bank of America is staggering the mailings in order to handle the expected response. The bank has staffed up to handle the task, with 50,000 employees manning servicing desks, but the process will clearly take a lot of time. That’s why Bank of America has suspended any foreclosure actions against these 200,000 borrowers until the process is complete. There are currently 5.59 million US loans that are either delinquent or in the foreclosure process, according to Lender Processing Services. Bank of America services one million of those loans, but many of them are owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Their regulator, Edward DeMarco of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has yet to agree to principal reduction in loan modifications, despite harsh criticism from some lawmakers on Capitol Hill and increasing pressure from the White House.”

Consumer credit on the rise

US consumer credit shot up during March at the fastest rate since late 2001 as credit-card use, and student and car loans ballooned, data from the Federal Reserve showed yesterday.  Total consumer credit grew by $21.36 billion — more than twice the $9.8 billion rise that Wall Street economists surveyed by Reuters had forecast. That followed a revised $9.27 billion increase in outstanding credit February.  It was the largest surge in consumer credit for any month since November 2001, when it climbed by $28 billion, according to the Fed’s statistics.  The increase in March was concentrated in nonrevolving credit, which includes student and car loans. It climbed by $16.17 billion following a revised $11.62-billion gain in February.  Concern about student-loan levels has increased in an environment where newly graduating students face difficulty finding a job and keeping up on payments.  Congress is currently considering how to prevent a low interest rate for student loans from doubling on July 1 and is expected to find a way to do so, if only to avoid irritating young voters ahead of November’s presidential elections.  But so-called revolving, or credit-card debt, also gained strongly in March. It rose $5.18 billion in a sharp reversal from February when this category of credit use contracted by $2.35 billion.

NAHB – 100 markets on the improving list

The list of housing markets showing measurable and sustained improvement held virtually unchanged in May at 100, down from 101 in April, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/First American Improving Markets Index (IMI), released yesterday. The number of states represented on the list also held firm from the previous month, at 35 (including the District of Columbia).  The index identifies metropolitan areas that have shown improvement from their respective troughs in housing permits, employment and house prices for at least six consecutive months. While 83 metros held onto their previous places on the IMI and 17 new ones were added to the list in May, 18 metros dropped from the list, for a net loss of one. Metros newly added to the list in May include such geographically diverse places as Phoenix, Ariz.; Bowling Green, Ky.; Bend, Ore.; and Lubbock, Texas.  “The fact that there are 100 markets in 34 states and the District of Columbia represented on the improving list illustrates that all housing markets are local, and that the national headlines often don’t apply to what’s happening in a specific metropolitan area,” said NAHB Chairman Barry Rutenberg, a home builder from Gainesville, Fla. “In places where employment is firming up along with demand for new homes, the main factors weighing down the housing market continue to be access to credit (for both builders and buyers) and the difficulty of obtaining accurate appraisals on new construction.”

“The overall number of markets on the IMI continued to plateau this month, with more than a quarter of all US metros still showing signs of improvement,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Many of these are relatively small markets in terms of their population and building volume, which is why their improvement is barely registering on the national scale as of yet. Moreover, we are seeing some shifting of markets on and off the list primarily due to small seasonal house price changes in areas that have had flat, stable prices rather than a boom-and-bust cycle.”  “The fact that the number of improving metros continued to hold its own with 100 entries in May shows that there are many places across the country where confidence and consumers are returning to the housing market,” observed Kurt Pfotenhauer, vice chairman of First American Title Insurance Company.  The IMI is designed to track housing markets throughout the country that are showing signs of improving economic health. The index measures three sets of independent monthly data to get a mark on the top improving Metropolitan Statistical Areas. The three indicators that are analyzed are employment growth from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, house price appreciation from Freddie Mac, and single-family housing permit growth from the US Census Bureau. NAHB uses the latest available data from these sources to generate a list of improving markets. A metropolitan area must see improvement in all three areas for at least six months following their respective troughs before being included on the improving markets list.

Buying a home may never get any cheaper than this. Several housing experts are predicting that this year will be the last chance for bargain hunters to cash in on the best deals of the weak housing market.  With home prices down 34% nationally since 2006 and mortgage rates at historic lows, homes have never been more affordable — but it won’t stay this way for much longer.  Stuart Hoffman, chief economist for PNC Financial Services, said he expects home prices to flatten out by the third quarter and start climbing by next year.  A number of factors will help bolster the housing market, he said, including a decline in the number of foreclosures and continued job growth. In addition, homebuyers will have better access to mortgages as they get their finances in order and improve their credit scores. 

Some economists, like Trulia’s Jed Kolko, expect home prices to pick up even more quickly. Trulia’s data shows that the national average for asking prices already increased 1.4% in the first quarter of 2012, compared with the last three months of 2011.  “This is a strong indicator that we will start seeing home price indexes, like the S&P/Case-Shiller, start to report home price increases this summer,” he said.  Prospective homebuyers who’ve been sitting on the fence shouldn’t worry if they aren’t quite ready to make the leap. Analysts are predicting that the initial price gains will be modest, at least, in most markets.  Hoffman, for example, is forecasting a 2% increase in 2013 compared with 2012. Meanwhile David Stiff, chief economist for Fiserv, predicts that prices will turn in the last quarter of 2012 and will rise 4.2% for the 12 months through September 2013.

Job cuts up

Planned job cuts increased by 7.1% to 40,559 in April from March, the latest job cut report released by outplacement firm Challenger, Gray&Christmas showed today.  From the same month a year ago, job cuts were up 11.2% and so far this year the number of job cuts has increased by 9.8% to 183,653.  But despite the year-on-year increase, the monthly average in the first four months of this year is below the 12-month average of last year, the report pointed out.  April’s job cuts were led by the education sector, with a total of 9,027 planned cuts, up 142% from March as school districts continue to be under pressure to cut costs amid massive state and local budget deficits. But the pace of downsizing in the sector fell 32% from a year ago, the report added.  Consumer products companies have been the main job cutters for the year, having announced 20,134 planned job cuts through April, 257% more than the cuts announced by this point last year. 

“Even at its best, job creation is falling well short of what is needed to make a substantial dent in unemployment,” John Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said in a statement.  “While some would like to attribute the lack of hiring to uncertainty and regulatory roadblocks, the fact is that demand for goods and services simply has not reached a level that warrants accelerated hiring,” Challenger added.  He added that state and local governments, as well as the federal government, were still “in cost-cutting mode,” consumer spending remained soft and although business spending was improving, it was not nearly enough to make up for the shortfall in consumer and government spending.

LPS – foreclosures down

The March Mortgage Monitor report released by Lender Processing Services, Inc. shows that while March foreclosure starts increased a modest 8.1% since last month, overall, they were still down more than 31% year-over-year. Also in March, first-time foreclosure starts hit a five-month high. However, despite the increase, the number of first-time foreclosure starts in March was still far below those seen throughout much of 2011 and all of the previous three years.  As reported in LPS’ First Look, the national foreclosure inventory stayed relatively stable in March, remaining at the historically high levels maintained since the end of 2010. This national performance masks underlying differences between judicial states, where foreclosure inventory levels stand at 6.5%, and non-judicial states, where foreclosure inventory levels are more than 2.5 times lower at 2.45%.

The March data also showed that mortgage delinquencies have continued to decline, reaching their lowest level since August 2008, with seriously delinquent inventory (loans more than 90 days delinquent) declining in both judicial and non-judicial foreclosure states. Likewise, the rate of new problem loans (seriously delinquent loans that were current six months ago) continues to improve nationally, in both judicial and non-judicial states. At the same time, the LPS March mortgage performance data did show that foreclosure sales continued to behave somewhat erratically, dropping to their lowest level since December 2010, and most sharply in non-judicial states.  On the origination front, the data showed that February mortgage originations rebounded somewhat from their January lows, and that, despite slightly higher interest rates, prepayments increased in March. Mortgage prepayment activity – a key indicator of mortgage refinances – increased broadly, across all investor categories.

As reported in LPS’ First Look release, other key results from LPS’ latest Mortgage Monitor report include: 

Total US loan delinquency rate:​  7.09 % ​

Month-over-month change in delinquency rate:​  -6.3 %​

Total US foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate:​  4.14 %​

Month-over-month change in foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate:​  -0.1 %​

States with highest percentage of non-current* loans:​  FL, MS, NJ, NV, IL​

States with the lowest percentage of non-current* loans:​  MT, AK, SD, WY, ND​

*Non-current totals combine foreclosures and delinquencies as a% of active loans in that state.

Jobless claims down slightly

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 27,000 to a seasonally adjusted 365,000, the Labor Department said. That was the biggest weekly drop since early May last year.  The prior week’s figure was revised up to 392,000 from the previously reported 388,000. The four-week moving average for new claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends, edged up 750 to 383,500 – the highest level since December.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 380,000 last week.  The data has no bearing on the government’s closely watched employment report for April, to be released on Friday. Employers are expected to have added 170,000 new jobs to their payrolls last month, a step up from March’s 120,000 tally, according to a Reuters survey.  However, there is a downside risk to this forecast as initial claims were elevated for much of April. An independent survey on Wednesday showed private employers added only 119,000 jobs last month, the fewest in seven months, and well below economists’ expectations for a gain of 177,000 positions.  Nonfarm payrolls had averaged 246,000 jobs per month between December and February. Most economists have viewed the pull-back in job growth as payback after the weather-induced gains in the previous months.

The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid dropped 53,000 to 3.28 million in the week ended April 21.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits slipped 4,772 to 2.72 million in the week ended April 14, the latest week for which data is available. The number of people on extended benefits declined 57,528 to 354,883.  Nine states lost eligibility for extended benefits beginning that week and five others reduced the duration of emergency compensation.  A total of 6.60 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 85,523 from the prior week.

WSJ – Beazer homes surges in home sales

Beazer Homes USA Inc. reported a narrower fiscal-second-quarter loss Wednesday as the builder recorded a surge in home closings and sounded a hopeful note for the months ahead.  The Atlanta-based company, one of the largest home builders in the US, said its closings climbed 50% in the latest period to 844 homes. New orders, meanwhile, climbed 29% to 1,512 homes.  The results come as the US housing market has begun to show signs of emerging from the worst downturn in generations, albeit in fits and starts, as buyers get back into the game. With several home builders reporting increased sales and orders in recent weeks, many industry-watchers now think the hard-hit sector is set for a rebound.  “We remain hopeful, but cautious, about the prospects for a sustained market recovery, as a number of factors continue to pose challenges for prospective home buyers,” Chief Executive Allan Merrill said Wednesday in a statement accompanying the results.

For the quarter ended March 31, Beazer posted a loss of $39.9 million, or 51 cents a share, compared with a year-earlier loss of $53.8 million, or 73 cents a share.  The latest period included charges of $1.2 million for inventory impairments and $2.7 million tied to the refinancing of debt. The year-earlier period included charges of $17.8 million for inventory impairments.  Revenue surged 52% to $191.6 million. Analysts expected a loss of 43 cents a share on $192 million in revenue.  The average sales price rose to $224,700 from $216,300, while home-building gross margin narrowed to 10.9% from 12.4% in the prior year. Several of Beazer’s peers are seeing improved margins.  The builder’s cancellation rate rose to 22.5% from 20%, indicating more deals are unraveling before completion. “Given that most peers had declining cancellation rates, we were surprised” by the increase, wrote David Goldberg, a builder analyst with Credit Suisse, in a client note.

Retail slows

Retailers are reporting sales gains for April that show a slowdown in spending from the previous month as cooler weather, an early Easter and renewed worries about the economy dampened shoppers’ enthusiasm to buy.  As merchants report their sales figures Thursday, Costco Wholesale Corp. and Target Corp. posted gains that were smaller than Wall Street expected. Teen retailer Wet Seal Inc. posted a bigger-than-expected sales drop.  The figures are based on revenue at stores open at least a year. That metric is considered a key indicator of a retail health because it measures growth at established locations while excluding results from stores recently opened or closed.

Freddie earns $577 million

Freddie Mac reported net income of $577 million in the first quarter before it made a $1.8 billion dividend repayment to the Treasury Department.  The government-sponsored enterprise and one of the largest mortgage financiers in the country drew $19 million from the Treasury as part of its ongoing conservatorship bailout.  Net income for the quarter dropped from a $676 million gain one year ago because of higher derivative losses and lower net interest income.  Higher valuations of the mortgage bonds Freddie holds available for sale pushed total comprehensive income to $1.78 billion in the first quarter. The $1.8 billion repayment to the Treasury offset this total, forcing the remaining to be drawn from the government.  Freddie financed over $114 billion in mortgages during the first quarter, up from $105 billion one year ago.  Roughly 87% of its business was refinancing. More than 416,000 borrowers refinanced their Freddie-guaranteed home loan in the first three months of 2012, but the company said it is still too early to estimate how many will ultimately qualify for the expanded Home Affordable Refinance Program.

CoreLogic today released its National Foreclosure Report for March, which provides monthly data on completed foreclosures, foreclosure inventory and 90+ day delinquency rates. There were 69,000 completed foreclosures in March 2012 compared to 85,000 in March 2011 and 66,000* in February 2012. Through the first quarter of 2012, there were 198,000 completed foreclosures compared to 232,000 through the first quarter of 2011. Since the start of the financial crisis in September 2008, there have been approximately 3.5 million completed foreclosures.   Approximately 1.4 million homes, or 3.4% of all homes with a mortgage, were in the national foreclosure inventory as of March 2012 compared to 1.5 million, or 3.5%, in March 2011 and 1.4 million, or 3.4%, in February 2012. The number of loans in the foreclosure inventory decreased by nearly 100,000, or 6.0%, in March 2012 compared to March 2011.   

The share of borrowers nationally that were more than 90 days late on their mortgage payment, including homes in foreclosure and real estate owned (REO) assets, fell to 7.0% in March 2012 from 7.5% in March 2011, and remained unchanged from 7.0% in February 2012.  Also in March, the inventory of REO assets held by servicers nationwide grew more slowly than the pace of REO sales, as measured by the distressed clearing ratio.  The distressed clearing ratio is calculated by dividing the number of REO sales by the number of completed foreclosures. The higher the distressed clearing ratio, the faster the pace of REO sales relative to the pace of completed foreclosures.  The distressed clearing ratio for March 2012 was 0.81, up from 0.76 in February 2012.

 Highlights as of March 2012

-  The five states with the largest number of completed foreclosures for the 12 months ending in March 2012 were:  California (150,000), Florida (92,000), Michigan (62,000), Arizona (58,000) and Texas (57,000). These five states account for 49.1% of all completed foreclosures nationally.

-  The% of homeowners nationally who were more than 90 days late on their mortgage payments, including homes in foreclosure and REO, was 7.0% for March 2012 compared to 7.5% for March 2011, and 7.0% in February 2012.   

-  The five states with the highest foreclosure rates were:  Florida (12.1%), New Jersey (6.6%), Illinois (5.4%), Nevada (4.9%) and New York (4.9%).

-  The five states with the lowest foreclosure rates were:  Wyoming (0.7%), Alaska (0.8%), North Dakota (0.8%), Nebraska (1.1%) and South Dakota (1.4%).

-  Of the top 100 markets, measured by Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) population, 35 are showing an increase in the year-over-year foreclosure rate in March 2012, two more than in February 2012 when 33 of the top CBSAs were showing an increase in the year-over-year foreclosure rate.   

*February data was revised.  Revisions are standard, and to ensure accuracy CoreLogic incorporates newly released data to provide updated results.

BOA to cut 400 jobs

Bank of America (BOA) is planning to cut up to 400 jobs in its investment banking, corporate banking, and sales and trading units, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the situation.  An expected sale of the bank’s non-US wealth-management operations in Asia, Latin America, and Europe would eliminate up to 2,000 jobs, the Journal reported.  Reuters reported on April 17 that Bank of America was looking to sell its wealth-management units outside the US for as much as $3 billion.  BOA declined to comment on the Journal report.  Last spring, the bank announced a cost-cutting program called Project New BAC that aims to eliminate 30,000 consumer banking and technology jobs over the next few years.  The bank has said it expects to wrap up plans for the second phase of the program, which focuses on investment banking, commercial banking, and related support jobs in May. The second phase is expected to cut fewer jobs than the first because it covers a smaller, more efficient part of the bank.  At the end of March, Bank of America had about 278,700 employees worldwide.

Olick – renter nation

“More Americans are renting homes, and fewer are owning them; it’s not as if this is news to anyone who follows the US housing market, but a new report from the Census Bureau today really put an historical exclamation point on the trend.  The share of US household renting reached a fifteen year high, and home ownership reached a 15-year low. Funny how those numbers travel together.  34.6% of households were renters in the first quarter of this year, and that number is climbing, as lack of credit or sufficient down payment keeps Americans young and old from becoming home owners. Rental vacancies are therefore falling, the lowest rate out West, where foreclosures have run the highest during this housing crash. That is also where investors are rushing in to buy foreclosed properties and put them up for rent. Single family homes for rent, in fact, surpassed multi-family units, taking 52% of the $3 trillion rental market, according to CoreLogic.

Both rental and homeowner vacancies are down, which is a general positive for the housing market, because empty houses are a blight on communities. ‘The vacancy rates will only decline if household formation is increasing or units are being destroyed,’ notes ISI Group’s Stephen East.  While banks have bulldozed some foreclosed properties here and there, the practice is by no means popular or widespread. That should mean that household formation is increasing, which is generally a product of an improving jobs picture. Younger Americans who have been living together or with their parents may finally be getting into their own homes, more likely into rentals, but at least they’re forming their own households. That is thanks to a small drop in the unemployment rate among 25-34 year olds to its lowest rate in three years. The home ownership rate now stands at 65.4%, down a full percentage point from a year ago, and down from just over 69% at the peak in 2004.  Since the recession began, growth in overall new households has been about 50% short of trend lines, according to analysts at Goldman Sachs. While household formation is rebounding for single or un-related Americans, formation among families is still waning; that may be due to the types of homes they need, i.e. larger, single-family homes. It thus stands to reason that pent-up demand will show itself first in single family rentals in the future and less in multi-family. No wonder investors are flooding the foreclosure market.”

No more easing?

Two top Federal Reserve officials — one with a dovish, employment-focused bent, and the other a self-avowed inflation hawk — yesterday both said they see no need for the US central bank to ease monetary policy any further.  But the comments, from San Francisco Fed President John Williams and Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher, do not mean they believe the central bank should quickly move to raise rates, which it has kept near zero for more than three years.  The economy grew at a 2.2% pace last quarter, down from its 3% growth rate in the final three months of the year. Recent economic data, including a gauge of business activity in the US Midwest, signal growth may slow further this quarter.  “I don’t think we are ready to exit yet,” Fisher, an inflation hawk, told Reuters at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles.  Fisher said he would oppose the extension of Operation Twist, the Fed bond-buying program that is set to end in June, but stopped short of calling for outright monetary tightening.  “We’ll have to see how the year works out,” he said.

US home ownership sets new record – down

The US homeownership rate fell to the lowest level in 15 years in the first quarter as borrowers lost homes to foreclosure and tighter inventory and credit kept buyers off the market.  The rate dropped to 65.4% from 66% in the fourth quarter and fell a full percentage point from a year earlier, the Census Bureau said in a report today. That is the lowest level since the first quarter of 1997, and down from a record 69.2% in June 2004.  Mounting foreclosures are displacing borrowers, while a lack of inventory has kept home sales from accelerating amid record affordability, the National Association of Realtors reported April 19. Stricter mortgage standards are also limiting purchases as rental demand surges, said Paul Diggle, property economist with Capital Economics Ltd. in London.  “Although house prices and mortgage rates have fallen to a level that makes buying preferable to renting, ongoing problems accessing mortgage credit are preventing many households from taking advantage,” he wrote in a note today.  The US apartment vacancy rate fell to 4.9% in the first quarter, an 11-year low, according to New York-based Reis Inc. (REIS).  The vacancy rate for rental homes was 8.8% in the first quarter, compared with 9.7% a year earlier, the Census Bureau said in today’s report.

Of the estimated 132.6 million US homes, 18.5 million, or 13.9%, were vacant in the first quarter. A year earlier, about 19 million homes were vacant, according to the report. That includes homes for sale or rent or held off the market, and vacation properties used seasonally.  The ownership rate may drop below 64% by the end of 2015 and stay there for years, Scott Simon, the mortgage bond head of Pacific Investment Management Co. in Newport Beach, California, said in an e-mail today.  “It will be lower by 2017,” he said. “It will be lower in 2020.”  About 6 million borrowers will lose their properties in the next five years because of inability to pay, creating 4 million new rental households, Simon said in an April 24 interview on Bloomberg Television.  The homeownership rate fell 3 percentage points from a year earlier to 61.4% in the first quarter for people aged 35 to 44, the biggest drop of any age group. The Northeast had the biggest regional decline, with the ownership rate falling 1.4 percentage points to 62.5%. The West had the lowest ownership rate at 59.9%, down 1 percentage point from a year earlier. 

The US homeownership rate rose to a record in 2004 when President George W. Bush, running for re-election, called for expanding home-loan availability to create an “ownership society.” The current rate of 65.4% matches the average since 1965, when the Census Bureau began reporting the figures, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.  Home prices fell 3.5% in February from a year earlier and are 35% below their July 2006 peak, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index of 20 US cities. The average rate for a 30-year fixed loan was 3.88% last week and reached 3.87% in February, the lowest level in at least four decades, according to Freddie Mac.  About 2.37 million homes were listed for sale in March, a and 6.3 month supply and down 22% from a year earlier, the Realtors association said on April 19. A six-month supply is considered a healthy market, according to the group.

When evaluating a borrower’s request for Fannie Mae’s Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) program or the non-HAFA program for Fannie Mae preforeclosure sales, servicers must comply within the response times described in Servicing Guide Announcement SVC-2012-07,  Changes to Servicer Response Times and the Preforeclosure Sale Process  and outlined in the table below.  Servicers must document the mortgage servicing loan file for validation of compliance with these response timelines.

Fannie Mae HAFA – Servicer Evaluation of Borrower Response Package (BRP)

-  Within 3 business days of receipt of the BRP – The servicer must acknowledge receipt of the BRP to the borrower either verbally or in writing.

-  Within 5 business days of receipt of the BRP – If the servicer determines that documentation is missing, the servicer must send an Incomplete Information Notice to the borrower.

- Within 5 business days of a decision but in no event more than 30 calendar days after receipt of a complete BRP – The servicer must send an Evaluation Notice to the borrower.  If the servicer determines a HAFA Short Sale is the most appropriate foreclosure alternative, the HAFA Short Sale Agreement (Form 184) and the HAFA Request for Approval of Short Sale without Short Sale Agreement (Form 185) should be included with the Evaluation Notice.

Within 30 calendar days after receipt of the complete BRP but in no event more than 60 days after receipt of the complete BRP – If the servicer is unable to fully evaluate the

borrower for a HAFA, including preparation of the Form 184 and Form 185, an extension of 30 calendar days is permitted as long as the servicer provides weekly verbal or written status updates to the borrower. All communication must be documented in the mortgage loan servicing file.  The servicer must send the Evaluation Notice no later than 60 days after receipt of the complete BRP. 

- Within 14 calendar days after return of a fully executed Form 184 – The servicer must allow the borrower 14 calendar days to return a fully-executed Form 184 with required documentation.

- Within 10 calendar day extension of return of fully executed Form 184 – If necessary, the servicer may allow the borrower up to 10 additional calendar days to complete the Form 184 submission.

-  Within 10 business days of receipt of the Form 185 – The servicer must respond with a decision of approval or denial. 

*If the offer results in net proceeds equal to or greater than the minimum acceptable net proceeds (MANP), the servicer must approve the short sale.  

*If the offer does not result in net proceeds equal to or greater than MANP, the servicer must provide a counteroffer with the denial.  

* The MANP should not be disclosed to the borrower. 

- 5 business days after communicating a counteroffer – The servicer must request a response from the borrower on the purchaser’s decision of a counteroffer.

- Within 10 business days after receipt of revised offer – The servicer must respond with a decision on a revised offer from the borrower. 

*If the offer results in net proceeds equal to or greater than the MANP, the servicer must approve the short sale.  

*If the offer does not result in net proceeds equal to or greater than the MANP, the servicer may provide a counteroffer with the denial.  

*The MANP should not be disclosed to the borrower.

Fannie Mae’s Non-HAFA Preforeclosure Sale – Prior to Receipt of a Preforeclosure Sale Offer

-  Within 3 business days of receipt of the BRP – The servicer must acknowledge receipt of the BRP to the borrower either verbally or in writing.

-  Within 5 business days of receipt of the BRP – If the servicer determines that documentation is missing, the servicer must send an Incomplete Information Notice to the borrower.

-  Within 5 business days of a decision but in no event more than 30 calendar days after receipt of a complete BRP – The servicer must send an Evaluation Notice to the borrower. The Evaluation Notice should include the approved model language provided on eFannieMae.com.

Fannie Mae’s Non-HAFA Preforeclosure Sale – Preforeclosure Sale Offer Received with a BRP

-  Within 3 business days of receipt of the offer  The servicer must acknowledge receipt of a short sale offer. 

-  Within 5 business days of receipt of the offer  If the servicer determines that documentation is missing, the servicer must send an Incomplete Information Notice to the borrower.

-  Within 5 business days of a decision but in no event more than 30 calendar days after receipt of a complete BRP – The servicer must respond to the short sale offer with approve, approve with conditions, deny with counteroffer, or “still under review.”

-  5 business days after communicating a counteroffer If the response is “deny with counteroffer,” the servicer must request a response from the borrower on the purchaser’s decision of a counteroffer.

-  Within 10 business days after receipt of revised offer  The servicer must ensure that revised offers are evaluated within time frames that enable a decision to be communicated to the borrower within 10 business days after receipt of the revised offer.

-  30 calendar days after receipt of the BRP  If the servicer responds with “still under review,” an extension of 30 calendar days is permitted as long as the servicer provides weekly verbal or written status updates.   All communication must be documented in the mortgage loan servicing file.

-  Within 60 calendar days of receipt of the BRP and offer – The servicer must respond with a final decision.

Economic growth flat

Gross domestic product (GDP) expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate, the Commerce Department said on Friday in its advance estimate, moderating from the fourth quarter’s 3 percent rate.  While that was below economists’ expectations for a 2.5 percent pace, a surge in consumer spending took some of the sting from the report. However, growth was still stronger than analysts’ predictions early in the quarter for an expansion below 1.5 percent. Although the details were mixed, the GDP report offered a somewhat better picture of growth compared with the fourth quarter, when inventory building accounted for nearly two thirds of the economy’s growth. In the first quarter, demand from consumers took up the slack.  Consumer spending which accounts for about 70 percent of U.S. economic activity, increased at a 2.9 percent rate – the fastest pace since the fourth quarter of 2010. That compared to a 2.1 percent rise in the fourth quarter.  Business spending fell at a 2.1 percent pace after rising 5.2 percent in the fourth quarter.

Excluding inventories, GDP is rose at a 1.6 percent rate. In the fourth quarter, the comparable figure was just 1.1 percent.  Elsewhere, growth in the first quarter was held back by a another drop in government defense spending, which confounded expectations for a strong rebound. An increase in exports was offset by a rise imports, causing trade to have virtually no impact on growth. Separately, civilian employment costs rose more modestly by 0.4 percent during the first quarter, primarily because growth in benefits slowed after a sharp rise in last year’s fourth quarter, Labor Department data showed on Friday.  The gain in employee costs was slightly lower than the 0.5 percent rise forecast by analysts surveyed by Reuters. Costs had increased 0.5 percent in the final three months of 2011.  Benefit costs, which account for 30 percent of compensation, grew by 0.5 percent in the first quarter after a sharp 0.7 percent rise in last year’s fourth quarter.  Wages and salaries – the other 70 percent of costs – were up 0.5 percent in the first three months this year, a pickup from the 0.3 percent gain posted in last year’s closing quarter.

Olick – foreclosures return

“Big jumps in foreclosure activity in cities like Pittsburgh, Indianapolis, New York and Raleigh pushed the national numbers higher in the first three months of this year, according to a new report from RealtyTrac, an online foreclosure sales and data company.  A majority of U.S. housing markets posted a quarterly increase in foreclosure activity, although the numbers are still down from a year ago.  ‘First quarter metro foreclosure trends were a mixed bag,’ said Brandon Moore, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac, adding that the increase in the number of cities seeing a quarterly jump is, ‘an early sign that long-dormant foreclosures are coming out of hibernation in many local markets.’ Tracking foreclosure activity is a tricky business right now, as the system has been roiled with problems left over from the so-called ‘robo-signing’ foreclosure paperwork scandal.  The five largest banks signed a $25 billion settlement agreement earlier this year, requiring them to do more modifications and write down principal on some troubled loans. While some expected foreclosure numbers to surge, as states that require a judge in the foreclosure process finally start pushing the documents through again, but more recent data has shown the opposite. As banks work on saving more loans or doing foreclosure alternatives, like short sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or deeds for rent programs, the final foreclosure numbers are falling. New mortgage delinquencies are also falling, thanks to a slowly improving jobs picture.

Still, inventories of properties in the foreclosure process are still abnormally high, and some of the usual markets are the culprits. Stockton and Modesto, California still have the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, while Las Vegas dropped to the eighth spot, with foreclosure activity down 61 percent from a year ago. The Phoenix market is also improving, although still in the top ten list of foreclosure rates.  Just over 7 percent of U.S. loans were in some stage of delinquency in March, and 4.14 percent were in the foreclosure process, according to a new report from Lender Processing Services. The delinquency number is down almost 9 percent from a year ago, but the foreclosure inventory is fairly flat, down 1.6 percent from a year ago, but up slightly from the previous month. 5.6 million properties are still in some stage of delinquency or foreclosure. These numbers, negative home equity, and still-tight credit are the largest impediments to a robust recovery in the housing market.”

Treasury Secretary wants to open markets to China

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Thursday the United States was willing to open up its markets to China and give it more access to U.S. technologies if Beijing made progress on issues that concern the United States.  Also Thursday, a top GOP lawmaker pressed the Obama administration to increase pressure on China to make currency and trade reforms.  The comments came ahead of the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue meetings in Beijing next week. “We are willing to continue to make progress on these issues, but our ability to do so will depend in part on how much progress we see from China on issues that are important to us,” Geithner said. He repeated that China’s currency, the yuan, needed to appreciate more rapidly and pledged that the United States would continue to push aggressively for fair treatment of U.S. companies doing business with China.  Rep. Dave Camp, chairman of the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, urged the administration to negotiate an investment treaty with China and to press the world’s second-largest economy to make reforms.  “Plain and simple, we cannot allow China to continue its unacceptable trade practices,” the Michigan Republican said in a speech, referring to longstanding barriers to U.S. exports and the widespread piracy and counterfeiting of U.S. goods.  “The litany of China’s trade distorting policies is deeply troubling and cannot be allowed to stand,” Camp said. “In addition, we should pursue a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) with China.”  Camp’s call for the United States to begin talks with China on a treaty comes one week before Geithner and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton travel to Beijing for high-level talks.

Remodelling Market Index (RMI) flat

Due to a recently discovered computer coding error, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) has revised the RMI going back to 2006. The error had slightly reduced the true values of the overall index, as well as its two major components. The revisions generally show a one point or less quarterly increase, with quarter-to-quarter patterns remaining relatively unchanged. Some of the subcomponents experienced larger revisions but in a counteracting fashion, so that the impact on the primary indicators was muted.  Remodeling activity remained relatively flat in the first quarter of 2012, as the Remodeling Market Index (RMI) compiled by the National Association of Home Builders decreased one point to 47 from the upwardly revised 48 in the previous quarter.  The overall RMI combines ratings of current remodeling activity with indicators of future activity. An RMI below 50 indicates that more remodelers report market activity is lower (compared to the prior quarter) than report it is higher.

In the first quarter, the RMI component measuring current market conditions dropped one point to 49, while the component measuring future indicators of remodeling business fell two points to 44.  “We are seeing that the demand for remodeling work has been pulled forward because of a mild winter,” said NAHB Remodelers Chairman George “Geep” Moore Jr., GMB, CAPS, GMR and owner/president of Moore-Built Construction & Restoration Inc. in Elm Grove, La. “That is why many remodelers reported lower numbers for future activity.”  The three components measuring current market conditions moved in different directions in the first quarter: major additions remained even at 44; minor additions rose one point to 52; and maintenance and repair dropped four points to 51. Two of the four components measuring future market indicators decreased: backlog of remodeling jobs dropped four points to 43 and appointments for proposals fell five points to 45. Meanwhile, calls for bids rose one point to 47 and amount of work committed for the next three months remained even at 42.  Regionally, remodeling market conditions in the West increased three points to 47, while the other three regions showed declines: the Northeast to 48 (from 55), the Midwest to 50 (from 52) and the South to 46 (from 49).

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the nation’s two largest mortgage backers, will implement their new short sale guidelines on June 15. The changes require mortgage servicers to make a decision within 30 days of receiving a short sale offer. They also must consider requests for pre-approved short sales within that same timeframe.  If the lender needs more than 30 days, it must give borrowers weekly status updates and a decision within 60 days of the initial application. This extension gives lenders more time to determine the value of the property or to get the approval of a mortgage insurer.  The moves are aimed at streamlining the short sale process, which often takes months to complete. Faster response times could help thousands of homeowners. Short sale transactions can get so complicated that many prospective buyers won’t even consider making an offer on a short sale property. And many of those who bid often walk away from the offer because lenders take so long to make a decision.  ”Short sales are more complex than routine home sales since they may involve multiple parties and long-distance negotiating,” said Tracy Mooney, a Freddie Mac senior vice president. The new rules “are intended to help make the decision process more transparent and timely.”

Banks have also caught on to the benefit of approving short sales. Foreclosures take more time for the bank to recoup their money, and it costs upwards of $50,000 to process a foreclosure. But in the wake of the robosigning scandal, banks are more apt to help and even encourage a homeowner to pursue via a short sale.  In addition to the benefits of the bank, the homeowner comes out much better in the long run.  Along with a new home, their credit has been salvaged to a respectable level as opposed to letting a home go due to foreclosure. With a foreclosure it can take up to seven years for your credit to show signs of improvement.

Jobless claims stay high, jobs stall

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 388,000, the Labor Department said today. The prior week’s figure was revised up to 389,000 from the previously reported 386,000.  The four-week moving average for new claims, a closely followed measure of labor market trends, rose 6,250 to 381,750, its highest since the week that ended Jan. 7.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast new claims falling to 375,000 last week. The reading was the latest example of fizzling momentum in the labor market recovery. New claims fell sharply during early winter but the improvement has largely stalled in recent weeks.  The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid rose 3,000 to 3.315 million in the week ended April 14.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits fell 45,930 to 2.73 million in the week ended April 7, the latest week for which data is available.  A total of 6.68 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 87,160 from the prior week.  Employers added 120,000 new jobs to their payrolls in March, the least since October, after averaging 246,000 jobs per month over the prior three months.  Many economists believe a mild winter boosted payrolls growth earlier in the year and view recent stagnation as payback for those gains.

Foreclosures up in half of all American cities

More than half of US major cities showed an increase in foreclosures since the end of last year, according to RealtyTrac.  Mortgage servicers put a freeze on the process in 2010 to correct affidavit problems and resolve investigations from federal regulators and the state attorneys general. A $25 billion settlement approved in March brought new standards and relief requirements for struggling homeowners.  As servicers adjusted, foreclosures began to increase in different areas of the country during the first quarter.  Filings increased in 26 of 50 largest cities, led by Pittsburgh, where foreclosures jumped 49% from the previous three months.  Some cities still showed continued declines from the end of last year. Filings dropped 28% in Portland, Ore. and fell 26% in Las Vegas. Servicers put Vegas filings on pause since a new state law took effect bringing new affidavit requirements and stronger enforcement for violations. As a result, Stockton,

California held the highest metro foreclosure rate in the first quarter, where one in every 60 homes received a filing.  Vegas dropped all the way to eighth on a 61% decline from the first three months of last year, but it wasn’t the only city with filings well below year-ago levels.  Of the 50 major cities, 33 reported filings were down from the first quarter of 2011. Vegas showed the largest drop over that time, followed by a 53% decrease in Seattle and a 51% drop in Austin, Texas.  “First quarter metro foreclosure trends were a mixed bag,” said Brandon Moore,CEO of RealtyTrac. “While the majority of metro areas continued to show foreclosure activity down from a year ago, more than half reported increasing foreclosure activity from the previous quarter — an early sign that long-dormant foreclosures are coming out of hibernation in many local markets.”

Fed doing more harm than good?

The Federal Reserve is doing more harm to the US economy than good by keeping interest rates artificially low and continuing its “monetary medicine”, Peter Boockvar, portfolio manager and equity strategist at Miller Tabak said.  “Bernanke has put the US economy over the past bunch of years into monetary Fantasyland,” Boockvar said today. “When you have rates at zero, when you have an expanded balance sheet of about $3 trillion, the economy is not real.”  Boockvar’s comments followed the Fed’s policy statement on Wednesday that it would hold its key interest rate near zero. The Fed also indicated the economy would have to improve before it changes its policy. A 9-1 vote accompanied the statement, which renewed the pledge to keep rates low through 2014.  Boockvar said the Fed’s policy of keeping rates at zero misallocates capital and does not create a firm foundation for growth because “the cost of money is artificial.  It’s on monetary medicine, painkillers you can say,” he said. “The Fed to me is an impediment, not a boost, and they should just stop what they are doing.”  The Fed’s quantitative easing or bond-buying over the past several years has coincided with gains in stock markets, but it has also stoked fears of inflation and worries the Fed won’t be able to exit without causing turmoil in the bond markets and a jump in interest rates.  “At some point, the extraordinary policy (of bond buying) has to be reversed and it’s going to be a complete mess when it happens,” Boockvar said. “If they (the Fed) think they’re going to do it orderly, I have a big problem with that belief.”

NAR – recovery is here!

Pending home sales increased in March and are well above a year ago, another signal the housing market is recovering, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR).  The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, rose 4.1% to 101.4 in March from an upwardly revised 97.4 in February and is 12.8% above March 2011 when it was 89.9.  The data reflects contracts but not closings.  The index is now at the highest level since April 2010 when it reached 111.3.  The PHSI in the Northeast slipped 0.8% to 78.2 in March but is 21.1% above March 2011.  In the Midwest the index declined 0.9% to 93.3 but is 16.9% higher than a year ago.  Pending home sales in the South rose 5.9% to an index of 114.1 in March and are 10.6% above March 2011.  In the West the index increased 8.7% in March to 108.0 and is 9.0% above a year ago.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist and incorrigible optimist, said 2012 is expected to be a year of recovery for housing.  Of course, he said that about 2010 and 2011 as well, but who’s counting?  “First quarter sales closings were the highest first quarter sales in five years.  The latest contract signing activity suggests the second quarter will be equally good, ” he said.  “The housing market has clearly turned the corner.  Rising sales are bringing down inventory and creating much more balanced conditions around the county, which means home prices will be rising in more areas as the year progresses.”

Olick – noisy numbers or recovery?

“The spring housing numbers aren’t coming in along expectations.  That can’t be, right?  Unemployment has been easing, mortgage delinquencies falling, and affordability is off the charts. That means housing should be bouncing back with verve and vigor this Spring, except it’s not.  It’s not crashing again, it’s just bouncing along a bottom, which means the recovery, as we’ve been warning all along, becomes increasingly local.  Let’s look at some data out this week:  Sales of new homes dropped, but only after a large upward revision in February. That of course leads everyone to blame the weather.  S&P/Case-Shiller’s home price index reached new lows, but the amount of the annual drop was smaller than the previous month, so that’s an improvement, sort of.  Mortgage applications fell, even as the rate on the thirty year fixed hit a new low on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s weekly survey. Refis fell hard and purchase applications rose a little, although the four week moving average is down.  Zillow.com reports that home values rose from February to March (0.5%), ‘marking the largest monthly increase since May 2006, before home values peaked.’ That led analysts there to exclaim the headline: ‘Majority of Markets Covered by Zillow Home Value Forecast to Hit Bottom by Late 2012.’  Trulia.com released a report which mixes three indicators, construction starts, existing home sales and delinquency and foreclosure rates in order to gauge the housing recovery. Apparently it slipped backward in March ‘after a few strides forward.’  Then Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said, ‘The ongoing weakness in the housing market still represents a headwind to economic recovery.’

No wonder economists at Freddie Mac concluded in its April forecast that the data are, ‘noisy.’ Then they too blamed it all on the weather.  So what are we to think, and how are we to play housing, here at the almost, sort of, bottom in some markets but not in others?  ‘Investor demand will drive many markets this spring and summer,’ says David Stiff, chief economist at Fiserv. ‘This means that, at the moment, the MBA purchase application index is a less reliable predictor of sales activity.’  Stiff says he thinks the housing market has bottomed out, but that won’t be obvious until next year. He also makes clear that the recovery will be driven by investors, and investors largely buy in the lower cost markets.  The one truth I heard in all the heated talk of housing today came from CNBC’s Jim Cramer, with whom I often disagree. He said, ‘aggregate numbers make you no money.’ He was talking specifically about housing.”

RealtyStore has completed a new study of the foreclosure status in three major housing markets, finding the amount of pending listings exceeds the amount of active foreclosures listed for sale by a margin of over 2 to 1. This shadow inventory of foreclosed homes illustrates the significant overhang of foreclosure listings that are anticipated to be unleashed on the housing in the wake of resolving the so-called foreclosure robo-signing situation in late 2010. The study was conducted for Cook County, IL (including metro Chicago), Miami-Dade County, FL (including metro Miami) and Maricopa County, AZ (including metro Phoenix).  Foreclosure counts in each location were tabulated by owner, including bank or lender owned homes, foreclosures owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and HUD homes. Although Arizona had previously been one of the hardest hit areas for foreclosure activity, Cook County, IL shows a near equal total amount of foreclosed homes. Miami-Dade foreclosures number at roughly half the count of either other market.

The breakdown of active foreclosure listings vs pending, or shadow inventory, foreclosures listings was consistent across each market surveyed. On average, 29% of total foreclosures across the counties are currently listed for sale. Cook County, IL foreclosures were most heavily represented with active listings, with 32% of its foreclosures presently being marketed to buyers, and 68% of foreclosures pending listing. Maricopa County, AZ foreclosure listings for sale represent only 25% of recorded foreclosures in the county, with 75% of local foreclosures yet to be listed for re-sale. Miami-Dade, FL currently offers 29% of its total foreclosures on the market for re-sale, with 71% of its foreclosure inventory awaiting listing on the market.  According to RealtyStore, median list prices of foreclosures for sale in Cook, Maricopa and Miami-Dade counties continue to run below average home prices. Cook County foreclosures are listed at a median price of just $72,650 and an average price of $95,997. Miami-Dade foreclosures list at a median price of $106,900 and average $145,059, while Maricopa lists foreclosed homes slightly higher with a median of $109,900 and the average foreclosure listed at a price of $168,744.

The foreclosure median list prices come in at 56% and 42% below the median sales prices of single-family homes selling in metro-Chicago and Miami, respectively, as reported by the NAR in Q4, 2011. Metro-Phoenix posts a smaller price gap at 7%, suggesting foreclosure saturation may be peaking in Maricopa County.  Individual foreclosure listings continue to cover all portions of the pricing spectrum, ranging from as low as $5,900 for a single family foreclosed home in Chicago, IL to as high as a foreclosed estate in Paradise Valley, AZ listed at $5,700,000.

Jobless claims up

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits slipped 2,000 to a seasonally adjusted 386,000, the Labor Department said. But the prior week’s figure was revised up to 388,000 from the previously reported 380,000.  The four-week moving average for new claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends, rose 5,500 to 374,750.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 370,000 last week.  The claims data covered the week for April’s nonfarm payrolls survey. The four-week average of new applications rose marginally between the March and April survey periods, suggesting not much change in labor market conditions.  Employers added 120,000 new jobs to their payrolls in March, the least since October, after averaging 246,000 jobs per month over the prior three months. Most economists have viewed the pull-back in job growth as payback after the weather-induced gains in the previous months.  The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid rose 26,000 to 3.30 million in the week ended April 7.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits fell 19,419 to 2.78 million in the week ended March 31, the latest week for which data is available.  A total of 6.77 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 187,807 from the prior week.

CoreLogic – First Quarter 2012 Multifamily Applicant Risk Index Report

CoreLogic today announced that CoreLogic SafeRent, provider of the nation’s leading suite of screening and risk management services designed for the multifamily housing industry, released its first quarter 2012 multifamily applicant risk (MAR) index report. The first quarter MAR Index value increased one point from the fourth quarter 2011 and three points from a year ago, indicating an increase in national renter credit quality and slightly better applicant pool.  The MAR Index for first quarter 2012 is based exclusively on applicant traffic credit quality scores from the CoreLogic SafeRent statistical lease screening model (Registry ScorePLUS) and is updated quarterly to provide property owners and managers with a benchmark against which to evaluate their applicant credit quality trends against market based MAR Index trends. This comparison indicates the relative strength of their property portfolio to attract and secure applicants with higher credit quality and an increased likelihood of fulfilling lease obligations.

When comparing applicants for one- versus two-bedroom units, the first quarter 2012 MAR Index is slightly higher for one-bedroom units at 102, compared with 101 for two-bedroom units.  Regionally, the South and Midwest reflected the lowest MAR Index, each with values of 98, a one point increase from the fourth quarter 2011. The Northeast continues to maintain the highest MAR Index with a value of 111.  The three Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) with the steepest decreases in the MAR Index were Cincinnati-Middletown, Ohio, Ky., Ind.; Columbus, Ohio; and Birmingham-Hoover, Ala.; each with decreases of three points. The three MSAs with the greatest increases in the MAR Index were Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Ill., Ind., Wis.; Denver-Aurora, Colo.; and Salt Lake City, Utah; each with increases of four points. 

Understanding the Multifamily Applicant Risk Index (MAR Index)

The MAR Index is published quarterly by CoreLogic SafeRent. It provides trends of national and regional traffic credit quality scores whereby a lower index value indicates an applicant pool with a higher risk of not fulfilling lease obligations. A MAR Index value of 100 indicates that market conditions are equal to the national mean for the index’s base period of 2004. A MAR Index value greater than 100 indicates market conditions with reduced average risk of default relative to the index’s base period mean. A value less than 100 indicates market conditions with increased average risk of default relative to the index’s base period mean. The MAR Index is derived from the statistical screening model from CoreLogic SafeRent, which is the multifamily industry’s only screening model that is both empirically derived and statistically validated. The statistical screening model was developed from historical resident lease performance data to specifically evaluate the potential risk of a resident’s future lease performance. The model generates scores for each applicant indicating the relative risk of the applicant not fulfilling lease obligations. A lower score indicates a more risky applicant.

BOA tops estimates

Bank of America (BOA) reported lower first-quarter profit as the second-largest US bank took accounting charges related to its debt, but results topped analysts’ estimates as credit quality improved.  The bank reported charges of $4.8 billion related to changes in the value of its debt, partially offset by gains of $3.4 billion from equity investments and debt-related transactions.  Excluding debt valuation adjustments, it earned 31 cents a share.  First-quarter net income was $653 million, or 3 cents a share, down from $2.05 billion, or 17 cents per share, a year earlier.  Revenue declined to $22.3 billion from $26.9 billion.  The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank took a loan-loss provision of $2.4 billion, compared with $3.8 billion a year ago.  In its capital markets operations, Bank of America reported sales and trading revenue of $3.8 billion, up from $1.5 billion in the fourth quarter but down from $4.6 billion a year ago.

California foreclosure reform moves forward

Seven bills reforming some foreclosure rules passed committees in the California state legislature this week.  The bills were introduced in February. One set of bills extends protections to tenants, giving them 90 days before eviction after the foreclosure sale of the property. Another increases penalties to banks that fail to maintain blighted homes.  Servicers would be required to provide documentation to the borrower establishing its right to foreclose before the filing first step in the process, under other passed bills. Evidence of ownership and chain of title must also be shown to the borrower.  Two other bills charge servicers a $25 fee for every notice of default recording. The money will fund investigations for California AG Kamala Harris. Another piece of legislation passed by committee allows Harris to convene a grand jury to investigate financial crimes in different jurisdictions.  “All Californians have been impacted by the toll the mortgage and foreclosure process has taken on our neighborhoods,” Harris said. “Our California Homeowner Bill of Rights will provide relief for homeowners, tenants and communities. I thank the authors and supporters of these important bills.”

 Mortgage servicing provider Lender Processing Services reported in early March that US foreclosure starts jumped 28% in January.  More conclusive national data is not yet available. But watchdog group, 4closurefraud.org which helped uncover the “robo-signing” scandal, says it has turned up evidence of a large rise in new foreclosures between March 1 and 24 by three big banks in Palm Beach County in Florida, one of the states hit hardest by the housing crash.  Although foreclosure starts were 50% or more lower than for the same period in 2010, those begun by Deutsche Bank were up 47% from 2011. Those of Wells Fargo’s rose 68% and Bank of America’s, including BAC Home Loans Servicing, jumped nearly seven-fold — 251 starts versus 37 in the same period in 2011. Bank of America said it does not comment on data provided by other sources. Wells Fargo and Deutsche Bank did not comment. 

Housing experts say localized warning signs of a new wave of foreclosure are likely to be replicated across much of the United States.  Online foreclosure marketplace RealtyTrac estimated that while foreclosures dropped slightly nationwide in February from January and from February 2011, they rose in 21 states and jumped sharply in cities like Tampa (64%), Chicago (43%) and Miami (53%).  RealtyTrac CEO Brandon Moore said the “numbers point to a gradually rising foreclosure tide as some of the barriers that have been holding back foreclosures are removed.”

One big difference to the early years of the housing crisis, which was dominated by Americans saddled with the most toxic subprime products — with high interest rates where banks asked for no money down or no proof of income — is that today it’s mostly Americans with ordinary mortgages whose ability to meet payment have been hit by the hard economic times.  “The subprime stuff is long gone,” said Michael Redman, founder of 4closurefraud.org. “Now the folks being affected are hardworking, everyday Americans struggling because of the economy.”

Crackdown on tax havens

As regulators clamp down on money flows around the globe, governments, even those that prided themselves on the strength of their secrecy laws, like Switzerland, are facing pressure to share banking information and change their policies.  Now, private banks and wealth managers are scrambling to convert so-called black money — assets that have not been disclosed — into accounts that are above board.  The shift may provide opportunities for the industry. As more funds become legitimate, analysts say financial institutions will be able to sell extra wealth management products to affluent people and enter markets that had previously been off limits.  “There’s much less black money now than three years ago,” said Jean Schaffner, head of the Luxembourg tax practice at the law firm Allen & Overy. “It’s in the banks’ interests for clients to come forward with their money.”  For decades, Western governments tolerated offshore tax havens, places where the wealthy could park millions away from the gaze of their domestic authorities. Switzerland, in particular, developed a reputation as a place where the wealthy could rely on secrecy laws.  But the tide began to turn in 2008, particularly after the financial crisis prompted many governments to act in concert.  As Switzerland and other locales tightened their financial controls, many people initially flocked to other tax havens like Singapore and Hong Kong, which still offer some of the world’s most secret accounts. But these places, too, are facing new pressures.

NAHB – 101 improving housing markets

The list of housing markets showing measurable improvement expanded slightly to include 101 metropolitan areas in April, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/First American Improving Markets Index (IMI), released today. Thirty-five states (including the District of Columbia) are now represented by at least one market on the list. The index identifies metropolitan areas that have shown improvement from their respective troughs in housing permits, employment and house prices for at least six consecutive months. The 101 markets on the April IMI represent a net gain of two from March, with 13 metros being added and 11 markets slipping from the list while 88 markets retained their places on it. Among the new entrants, areas as diverse as Rome, Ga.; Coeur d’Alene, Idaho; Greenville, N.C.; Brownsville, Texas; St. George, Utah; and Huntington, W.Va., are now represented on the IMI.  The IMI is designed to track housing markets throughout the country that are showing signs of improving economic health. The index measures three sets of independent monthly data to get a mark on the top improving Metropolitan Statistical Areas.

The three indicators that are analyzed are employment growth from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, house price appreciation from Freddie Mac, and single-family housing permit growth from the US Census Bureau. NAHB uses the latest available data from these sources to generate a list of improving markets. A metropolitan area must see improvement in all three areas for at least six months following their respective troughs before being included on the improving markets list.  A complete list of all 101 metropolitan areas currently on the IMI, and separate breakouts of metros newly added to or dropped from the list in April, is available at: www.nahb.org/imi.

Job improvement slows

US payrolls rose far less than expected in March, keeping the door open for further monetary policy support from the Federal Reserve, even as the unemployment rate fell to a three-year low of 8.2%.  Employers added 120,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department said on Friday, the smallest increase since October.  Economists polled by Reuters had expected nonfarm employment to increase 203,000 and the unemployment rate to hold at 8.3%.  The slowdown in employment growth last month likely reflected the fading boost from unseasonably warm winter weather. It supported the caution on the labor market from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke last week.  Bernanke expressed doubts the recent job gains could be sustained, and March’s weak report was in line with expectations that economic growth slowed to an annual pace of 2% in the first quarter from the 3% rate in the October-December period. 

The weakness in hiring last month was concentrated in the vast private services sector, which added only 90,000 after increasing payrolls by 204,000 in February. Retail employment fell dropped 33,800 after falling 28,600 the prior month.  Construction hiring fell 7,000, the second straight monthly decline. Temporary help fell 7,500 after rising 54,900 in February.  However, manufacturing enjoyed another month of strong job gains, with factories adding 37,000 new positions, helped by carmakers trying to meet pent-up demand for motor vehicles. Factory jobs increased by 31,000 in February.  Government employment edged down 1,000 after rising 7,000 in February. Despite the weak employment gains last month, average hourly earnings rose 5 cents.  The workweek dipped to 34.5 hours from 34.6 hours in February.

WSJ – Fed in favor of the banks’ foreclosure-rental approach

Last month, Bank of America Corp. announced a plan to allow homeowners at risk of foreclosure to hand over deeds to their houses and sign leases that will let them rent the houses back from the bank at a market rate.  In addition, Fannie Mae is selling 2,500 homes in eight metropolitan areas around the country. The government-controlled mortgage firm is selling the $320 million portfolio to investors, who would be required to turn them into rental properties.  The Federal Reserve set out new polices for banks that decide to rent out foreclosed homes, endorsing a strategy for managing the huge number of distressed properties that have piled up during the housing bust. The central bank said in a six-page policy statement Thursday that the Fed’s regulations permit the rental of foreclosed properties to tenants “in light of the extraordinary market conditions that currently prevail.” The policy clarified that banks that would otherwise be required to sell off the properties more quickly can turn to rental as a strategy. 

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and other central bank officials have spoken publicly about the need to encourage banks to rent out foreclosures. “With home prices falling and rents rising, it could make sense in some markets to turn some of the foreclosed homes into rental properties,” Mr. Bernanke said in a February speech.  The central bank said that banks holding large numbers of foreclosures should establish detailed policies for renting foreclosures, including a process to determine whether the properties are safe to occupy and meet local building code requirements.  The Fed said banks should set up criteria by which properties are picked to be rental properties. The banks should establish plans that “describe the general conditions under which the organization believes a rental approach is likely to be successful,” the central bank said.

A consumer-advocate group said in a report Wednesday that a study of foreclosed properties found that banks have higher standards for properties they own in wealthy, predominantly white, neighborhoods than low-income ones, raising a new civil-rights challenge against the mortgage industry.  The report by the National Fair Housing Alliance examined more than 1,000 foreclosed properties in nine cities: Atlanta; Baltimore; Dallas; Dayton, Ohio; Miami; Oakland, Calif., Philadelphia; Phoenix and Washington, D.C.  “This report offers evidence that banks responsible for peddling unsustainable loans to communities of color and triggering our current foreclosure crisis are continuing to damage those communities by failing to properly maintain and market the properties they own,” Shanna L. Smith, the housing alliance’s chief executive, said in a statement. The group said it is planning legal action against two banks, which it didn’t name.  The group and four of its members scrutinized foreclosed properties for problems like broken windows, trash, water damage and unkempt lawns.  The report found that properties in minority neighborhoods were 42% more likely to have shoddy maintenance than those in majority-white neighborhoods. Trash and other debris were 34% more likely to be found in foreclosures in minority neighborhoods than in white ones.

Jobless claims down this week

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits fell 6,000 to a seasonally adjusted 357,000, the lowest level since April 2008, the Labor Department said today.  The prior week’s figure was revised up to 363,000 from the previously reported 359,000. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast a claims reading of 355,000 for last week.  The four-week moving average for new claims, a measure of labor market trends, declined 4,250 to 361,750.  The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid fell 16,000 to 3.338 million in the week ended March 24, the lowest since August 2008.  A total of 7.05 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during the week ended March 17 under all programs, down 107,760 from the prior week.

WSJ – ownership gains appeal

Climbing rents for apartments are combining with a continued decline in home prices to push once-reluctant home buyers into finally taking the plunge, say economists and real-estate agents, helping what appears to be a good start to the housing industry’s all-important spring selling season.  Average apartment rents rose by 2.7% last year while the national vacancy rate dropped below 5% for the first time since 2001, according to a quarterly survey to be released Wednesday by Reis Inc., a real-estate research firm.  The broad and sustained growth of the apartment market contrasts sharply with an uneven and tentative housing recovery. During the first quarter, average apartment rents rose and vacancy rates fell in all 82 metropolitan areas tracked by Reis, when compared with a year ago.  The largest rent increases came in San Francisco and San Jose, Calif., which saw increases of 5.9% and 4.9%, respectively. Even boom-to-bust Las Vegas, which has struggled with falling rents in previous quarters, saw average rent rise 1.8% from a year earlier.  Such increases are one reason why analysts at Zelman & Associates believe 2012 will be the first year since 2005 when the share of apartment renters that moves out to buy a house increases from the previous year. “The equation of renting versus owning is becoming much more favorable for owning,” said Ivy Zelman, the firm’s chief executive. Unless the economy worsens, there is little sign that rent growth will slow until hundreds of thousands of new apartment units currently under construction hit the market over the next few years.

Easier to pay down debt

Timely repayments improved on all 11 of the consumer loan categories tracked by the American Bankers Association (ABA) in the final quarter of last year, the first time that has happened since 2004, according to the organization’s chief economist.  The ABA said delinquency rates still remain high as the economy slowly recovers but the fourth quarter showed a marked improvement from the prior quarter in consumers’ ability to make payments on auto loans, credit cards and other debts.  It does not, however, track delinquency rates for traditional mortgage payments.  The broad delinquency category that tracks eight types of loans fell to 2.49% from 2.59%.  Delinquencies on payments for credit cards provided by a bank fell to 3.17% from 3.25%.  The delinquency rate for home equity loans fell to 4.08% from 4.12%.

FHFA to decide on write downs in April

Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) head Edward DeMarco said the agency will likely make a decision regarding mortgage principal forgiveness sometime in April.  DeMarco, in a speech Wednesday before the Boston Security Analysts Society, said the FHFA continues to evaluate added incentives from the Treasury Department to write down loan principal under the Home Affordable Modification Program.  The Treasury announced in January that it would triple those incentive payments for mortgage investors, and Freddie Mac CEO Charles “Ed” Haldeman signaled the change could push the government-sponsored enterprises to cut mortgage principal.  But DeMarco continued his wary stance toward write-downs Wednesday, and said principal forbearance “produces the same, lower monthly payment.” That’s the main reason to modify a loan, he said.  More than three in four “deeply underwater” borrowers on the GSEs’ books are current on their loans, DeMarco said.  “Indeed, we have found that payment reduction, not loan-to-value, is the key indicator of success in loan modification,” DeMarco said in prepared remarks. “If the borrower remains successful in this modified loan, this approach preserves for taxpayers an ultimate recovery on the debt.”

Others, including many House and Senate Democrats, want DeMarco to go forward with write-downs, while the less patient have called for his ouster.  Thirty senators, in a letter Wednesday, asked DeMarco to revise how the FHFA conducts its principal reduction analysis. The FHFA’s previous report, which said write-downs would cost the GSEs $100 billion, had “several critical flaws,” they said.  “We seek an accurate analysis, but not a particular result,” the senators said in the letter. “Conducting an accurate analysis of this issue is not only part of your responsibility as conservator to conserve taxpayer assets, but also part of your statutory responsibility to maximize assistance for homeowners to minimize foreclosures.”  Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., who is the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, came out in defense of DeMarco, questioning Democrats’ own efforts.  “Democrats should stop blaming FHFA for their failure to craft bipartisan legislation to address the housing crisis,” Shelby said in an emailed statement. “FHFA has refinanced over 10 million mortgages since 2009. What have the Senate Democrats accomplished during that same time frame?”

As many as 1.25 million of America’s least cared for homes are headed for auction after a year-long probe into foreclosure practices kept them off the market.  Sales of repossessed properties probably will rise 25% this year from 1 million in 2011, according to Moody’s Analytics Inc. Prices for the homes could drop as much as 10% because they deteriorated as they were held in reserve during investigations by state officials resolved in February, according to RealtyTrac Inc. That month, 43% of foreclosures were delinquent for two or more years, from a 21% share in 2010, according to Lender Processing Services Inc. in Jacksonville, Florida.  “The longer a foreclosed home is in the mill, the bigger the losses,” said Todd Sherer, who manages distressed mortgage investments for Dalton Investments LLC, a Los Angeles-based hedge fund that oversees $1.5 billion. “We have a bulge of these properties coming through the system.”  Homes stockpiled less than a year sell for about 35% below the value set by lenders, according to a March 15 report by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. At two years, the loss is close to 60%. A surge of cheap foreclosures may erode prices in the broader real estate market, even as the economy expands and residential building increases, said Karl Case, one of the creators of the S&P/Case-Shiller home-price index.

Small business lending down

Lending to small business in the United States barely grew in February, supporting the view that economic growth was lackluster at the start of the year.  The Thomson Reuters/PayNet Small Business Lending Index, which measures the overall volume of financing to US small businesses, edged up to 98.3 in February from 98.2 a month earlier, PayNet said today.  Borrowing rose 14% from a year earlier, the lowest 12-month growth rate since September.  “It’s pretty uninspired,” PayNet founder Bill Phelan said in an interview. “We see this faltering as a sign that there’s caution on the part of small business owners.”  Economists forecast US economic growth slowed in the first quarter to around 2 to 2.5%, down from a 3% annual rate in the previous quarter. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said last month growth needs to accelerate to bring down the country’s 8.3% jobless rate.  The December and January readings for PayNet’s lending index were both revised downward.  PayNet tracks borrowing by millions of small US businesses, and the index is correlated with changes in US gross domestic product a quarter or two in the future.

LPS – mortgage monitor

The latest Mortgage Monitor report released by Lender Processing Services, Inc. (NYSE: LPS) shows that February foreclosure starts and sales reversed course, declining on a month-over-month basis after January’s sharp increase in activity. Foreclosure starts were down 15% from the month prior, with sales down 19% for the same period. Foreclosure sales decreased in both judicial and non-judicial foreclosure states, dropping 22 and 19% month-over-month respectively in February.  The LPS mortgage performance data showed that, while January’s increase in foreclosure sales was most pronounced in loans held on bank portfolios, the February drop was broad-based across all investor classes. Even accounting for the decrease in foreclosure sales, national pipeline ratios continue to decline off their peaks, but still differ sharply by region. As of the end of February, the average pipeline ratio in judicial states stood at 84 months, as compared to 33 months in non-judicial states. Pipeline ratios continue to be most pronounced in the Northeast, particularly in New York and New Jersey, where average pipelines remain at 846 and 772 months respectively.  The February mortgage performance data also showed that continued declines in new problem loan rates support improved delinquency rates nationwide. Seasonal patterns are also evident in cures from delinquency, with increased cure rates across almost all categories of delinquent loans. Additionally, first-time foreclosures remained stable as repeat foreclosures saw an 8% month-over-month decrease. At the same time however, new mortgage originations remain depressed, continuing a four-month decline.

As reported in LPS’ First Look release, other key results from LPS’ latest Mortgage Monitor report include: 

Total US loan delinquency rate:​  7.57 %​

Month-over-month change in delinquency rate:​  -5.0 %​

Total US foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate:​  4.13 %​

Month-over-month change in foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate:​  -0.5 %​

States with highest percentage of non-current* loans:​  FL, MS, NV, NJ, IL​

States with the lowest percentage of non-current* loans:​  MT, AK, WY, SD, ND​

 *Non-current totals combine foreclosures and delinquencies as a% of active loans in that state.
Notes:
(1) Totals are extrapolated based on LPS Applied Analytics’ loan-level database of mortgage assets.
(2) All whole numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand.

Auto sales up

The auto industry looks set to ride the appeal of smaller cars to its best monthly performance in almost four years.  The consulting firm LMC Automotive predicts US sales of new cars and trucks reached 1.37 million last month, up 6% from March of 2011 and the highest number since May of 2008. Industry analysts say sales could run at an annual rate of 14.1 million to 14.5 million vehicles, continuing a strong performance in January and February.   Some companies could break sales records.  Chrysler Group was the first automakers to report sales Tuesday. Its US sales jumped 34% in March on strong sales of Fiat small cars and Chrysler sedans.  It was the best month for the company in four years as consumers grow confident enough in the economic recovery to buy new cars.  Chrysler says Fiat sales hit 3,712, compared to just 500 last March when the car was first on the market. The subcompact Fiat is growing in popularity as new dealerships open and fuel prices rise.  Sales of Chrysler’s 200 and 300 sedans each doubled over last March. Both cars have recently been revamped and have better fuel economy than previous models, which is attracting new buyers.  Jeep brand sales rose 36% on the strength of the Jeep Grand Cherokee.  Incentives on trucks also helped lure buyers in March. Chrysler said its Ram pickup sales were up 23% over last March. General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. also were expected to report big gains in truck sales.

Olick – housing “paralysis?”

“In an unexpected reversal, both newly started foreclosures and finalized foreclosures dropped precipitously in February.  So-called foreclosure starts fell 15.2% month-to-month. Foreclosure sales, the final stage of the process (not sales of already bank-owned properties) fell 19% month-to-month, according to a new report from Lender Processing Services.  Most had expected both starts and sales to ramp up, following the $25 billion dollar settlement between five of the nation’s largest banks and state attorneys general and federal agencies over the now infamous ‘robo-signing’ scandal. The drop in finalized foreclosures was nationwide, in states where a judge is involved in the process as well as in non-judicial states.  ‘For both foreclosure starts and sales, we’re finding that so far, the sustained increase isn’t there, though we do see sporadic ‘bursts’ of activity,’ says Herb Blecher of LPS Applied Analytics. ‘These are sometimes focused around particular investors (i.e., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac foreclosure starts) and may reflect seasonal trends, loss-mitigation activities, legislative impacts, or other operational factors. We can’t say specifically what those bursts correlate to, because we just don’t see that in the data.’

This sudden stall, however, if prolonged, could lead to an overall drop in home sales, given that foreclosures are such a large share of the market. That has at least one well-known analyst warning of more problems ahead for housing.  ‘Through relentless meddling with delusions that ‘foreclosures are bad,’ they effectively destroyed the macro housing market,’ says California-based mortgage analyst Mark Hanson, referring to government intervention in the housing market. ‘Contrary to popular thinking, the eradication of foreclosures will lead this housing market into paralysis, not recovery.’  Hanson claims that the lack of ready and available distressed supply, ‘portends big trouble’ for the overall housing market, but more pointedly for California, Nevada and Arizona, where distressed supply and sales are the bulk of the market.  ‘It will soon become apparent that ‘foreclosure prevention’ was one of the biggest housing and finance policy blunders of all time. That’s because it circumvented interest rate policy in part aimed at household de-leveraging, kicked the problem forward and spread it out over many more years.’  The drop in foreclosure starts and sales is likely due to the big banks trying to modify more loans under the settlement agreement, and in some cases dropping loan principal. Some of the modifications, claims Hanson, are even more ‘exotic’ than the loans borrowers defaulted from in the first place, like 2% interest-only loans, 40 year amortizations, 33% forbearance, and five-year fixed rate loans. This as more than 11 million borrowers (22% of homeowners with a mortgage) owe more on that mortgage than their homes are currently worth, so-called ‘underwater.’  ‘Legacy borrowers are now more levered than ever,’ worries Hanson.

Distressed sales, which include foreclosures and short sales (when the home is sold for less than the value of the mortgage) now make up just over one third of all existing home sales nationally, according to the National Association of Realtors, but more than half of all sales in California and other states hardest hit by the housing crash. Investors are rushing in to buy up all these properties, hoping to cash in on what is fast becoming an historic rental market.  In an effort to entice large investors to buy more properties and rent them out, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, recently launched a pilot program, offering 2,500 foreclosed properties on the GSE’s books for sale in bulk discount deals. Bank of America also just announced a program to turn troubled borrowers into renters, offering deeds in lieu of foreclosure to borrowers who would like to stay in their homes.  Both bulk sales and an intensified drive to modify more troubled loans will drain the supply of distressed properties on the market, leaving little for individual investors and first time home buyers with cash. They had been helping to put a floor on home prices, by increasing competition in the space. With the non-distressed market still running far behind normal volumes, a dramatic surge in non-distressed sales would have to occur to make up for the drop in distressed sales.  Given how many homeowners are stuck in place due to negative equity, and with home prices still falling annually, not to mention still-weak consumer sentiment in housing, that surge is highly unlikely.”

Irony – Obama warns against “radical” GOP budget

In an election-year pitch to middle-class voters, President Barack Obama is denouncing a House Republican budget plan as a “Trojan horse,” warning that it represents “an attempt to impose a radical vision on our country” that would hurt the pocketbooks of working families.  Obama, in a speech to newspaper executives, is sharply criticizing a $3.5 trillion budget proposal pushed by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., which passed on a near-party-line vote last week and has been embraced by GOP presidential hopefuls. The plan has faced fierce resistance from Democrats, who say it would gut Medicare, slash taxes for the wealthy and lead to deep cuts to crucial programs such as aid to college students and highway and rail projects.  “It’s a Trojan horse. Disguised as deficit reduction plan, it’s really an attempt to impose a radical vision on our country,” Obama said in excerpts of his speech released Tuesday. “It’s nothing but thinly veiled social Darwinism.”  Ryan’s proposal aims to lower the deficit and the size of government while offering sharply lower tax rates in return for eliminating many popular tax breaks.

WSJ – write-downs get a new push

The Obama administration’s offer to subsidize write-downs of mortgage-loan balances for some heavily indebted homeowners is putting the federal regulator who oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a bind by forcing the agency to rethink its long-held opposition.  For years, the federal regulator overseeing the taxpayer-backed mortgage-finance giants has resisted calls to have the firms cut loan balances, often referred to as principal write-downs. But in recent weeks he has come under intense pressure to change course, especially now that the US Treasury is offering to split the cost.  In an interview this past week, Edward DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said while he’s still skeptical about the benefit of principal reductions, “we said all along, if money came from another source, we’d have to reconsider our position.” He says his agency will make a decision by mid-April.  The offer by the Treasury Department to help pay for principal write-downs has put Mr. DeMarco in a tough spot: He’s consistently argued that his mandate to reduce losses at the firms means putting the narrow interests of the firms ahead of broader housing market policy. The Treasury’s subsidies could reduce those costs, but don’t change his underlying doubts about whether principal reductions are good policy.

Fannie and Freddie back roughly half of the 11 million mortgages where borrowers owe more than the homes are worth. But any principal forgiveness program would be targeted to a small percentage of underwater borrowers—those owing at least 125% of the value of their property and who are behind on their mortgage payments. Economists who have studied the issue say the proposal could reach about 300,000 homeowners.  The newly offered incentives come from unspent housing-aid funds, which in turn came from the $700 billion bank rescue that Congress passed in 2008. The upshot is that even if write-downs reduce the cost to Fannie and Freddie, they don’t necessarily change taxpayers’ costs.  “It’s like overdrawing one account and pulling out a fresh new checkbook,” said Tim Rood, a former Fannie Mae executive and managing director at the Collingwood Group, a housing-finance consultancy.

JP Morgan exec is fined $750,000

One of London’s most prominent bankers was fined 450,000 pounds ($720,000) on Tuesday for passing on inside information in a case that will embarrass his employer JP Morgan Cazenove and which marks a new resolve by authorities to target high-profile figures.  Top dealmaker Ian Hannam resigned to fight the fine imposed by the Financial Services Authority in relation to 2008 emails that contained information about a his client, oil company Heritage Oil.  The former special forces soldier and engineer is the fifth person to be fined this year by the British regulator, which had previously been accused of ineffectiveness.  JP Morgan informed staff in an internal memo of Hannam’s resignation from his position as JP Morgan’s Global Chairman of Equity Capital Markets, after two decades at the firm.  The case is a fresh blow for the reputation of investment banking, as Hannam joins the list of big names targeted by the regulator, which is seeking to clamp down on market abuse and insider dealing.  Hannam’s fine, detailed in a decision notice dated February 27, is among the largest levied against an individual for market abuse, though it is dwarfed by the 3.6 million pounds hedge fund investor David Einhorn incurred earlier this year over trading abuses.