Freddie and Fannie join the short sale hurrah
In an effort to make the short sale process more transparent, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are updating their timelines and also requiring servicers to provide weekly updates when decisions take more than 30 days after the receipt of a complete application for a short sale under the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA) initiative or Freddie Mac’s traditional requirements. All decisions must be made within 60 days. Today’s announcement marks the newest part of the Servicing Alignment Initiative (SAI) Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae launched in 2011 at the direction of their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to set consistent servicing and delinquency management requirements. Last year Freddie Mac completed 45,623 short sales, a 140% increase since the housing crisis began.
Facts:
- Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s new short sale timelines require servicers to make a decision within 30 days of receiving either 1) an offer on a property under Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s traditional short sale program or 2) a completed Borrower Response Package (BRP) requesting consideration for a short sale under HAFA or Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s traditional short sale program. (BRPs are standardized assistance applications developed as part of the Servicing Alignment Initiative.)
- If more than 30 days are needed, borrowers must receive weekly status updates and a decision no later than 60 days from the date the complete BRP is received. This will help servicers who may need more time to obtain a broker price opinion or a private mortgage insurer’s approval on a BRP or property offer.
- In the event a servicer makes a counteroffer, the borrower is expected to respond within five business days. The servicer must then respond within 10 business days of receiving the borrower’s response.
- Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will use the new timelines to evaluate servicer compliance with the SAI and its own servicing requirements.
- Freddie Mac completed 45,623 short sales in 2011, a 140% increase since 2009. Overall, Freddie Mac has also helped more than 615,000 distressed borrowers avoid foreclosure since the housing crisis began.
Whitney reverses call on Citigroup
Meredith Whitney, who made the prescient call in 2007 that Citigroup would cut its dividend, has now upgraded the very stock that brought her celebrity status among equity analysts during the credit crisis. Shares of Citigroup yesterday rallied as news of the upgrade to a “hold” from “underperform” spread beyond Whitney’s direct clients. The stock is up 34% so far on the year. “C shares continue to trade well below tangible book value (70%), despite relatively lower mortgage and European exposures than its large-cap bank brethren,” wrote Whitney, who founded Meredith Whitney Advisory Group in 2009. “On the capital question, we believe C will handily make its capital target of +8% by the end of 2012.” Whitney had a “Sell” or “Underperform” rating on Citigroup since starting coverage on the stock at her new firm in April 2009. At the end of October 2007, while working for Oppenheimer & Co., Whitney made waves by predicting that Citigroup might have to cut its dividend payout to raise capital. The call drew the scorn of the company and fellow analysts, but turned out to be right after Citigroup cut its dividend in January of 2008 as more of the subprime mortgage securities that Whitney had warned about went sour on the company.
Mortgage applications up
Mortgage applications increased 6.9% from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending April 13, 2012. The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 6.9% on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 6.5% compared with the previous week. The Refinance Index increased 13.5% from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 11.2% from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 10.4% compared with the previous week and was 13.9% lower than the same week one year ago. The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 1.60%. The four week moving average is down 0.52% for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 2.36% for the Refinance Index. The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 75.2% of total applications from 70.5% the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 5.3% from 5.5% of total applications from the previous week.
“Renewed concerns about sovereign debt in Europe led to a drop in rates last week, with the 30-year rate tying our survey low, reached in early February. Refinance activity picked up in response, increasing 13.5% for the week. Participants in our survey indicated that about 32% of this refinance volume was for HARP loans,” said Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s Chief Economist and SVP of Research and Education. “While purchase activity declined sharply for the week, this was mostly due to a 23% drop in applications for FHA purchase loans. This drop follows big increases in the demand for FHA loans over several weeks in anticipation of the FHA mortgage insurance premium increases that went into effect last week. This was the largest weekly drop in the government purchase index since the expiration of the first-time homebuyer tax credit in May 2010. The demand for conventional purchase loans was down only slightly.” The average loan size of all loans for home purchase in the US was $233,381 in March 2012, up from $225,463 in February 2012. The average loan size for a refinance was $214,593, down from $222,048 in February. The largest purchase loans were made in the Pacific region at $ 337,227. The largest refinance loans were also made in the Pacific region at $ 290,711.
Spain bail-out; not if – when
Economic experts watching Spain don’t know how much money will be needed or precisely when, but some are near certain that Madrid will eventually seek a multi-billion euro bailout for its banks, and perhaps even for the state itself. Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has repeatedly said Spain doesn’t need or want an international bailout, and the European Union, which along with the IMF has already rescued Greece, Ireland and Portugal, also dismisses such talk. But economists believe that Spanish banks will have to turn to the euro zone’s rescue fund, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), for help in covering losses caused by a property market crash which has yet to end. Madrid is likely to hold out for some time. “The underlying picture in Spain is dramatic, but is it dramatic in the way that it needs a bailout package tomorrow? No,” Brzeski said. “But if you look ahead, let’s say the next six months, I would not be surprised if they (the banks) have to get some kind of European support.” Market concerns about the euro zone’s fourth largest economy have deepened in the past week. Yields on the government’s 10-year bonds, which reflect the risk investors attach to owning Spanish debt, have risen above 6%, a level that has proved a trigger point for other troubled euro zone countries. At the moment the EU is backing Madrid. Jean-Claude Juncker, who chairs the Eurogroup of euro zone finance ministers, said Spain was taking the necessary steps to get its economy back on track, despite a recession and unemployment at 24%.
“As I look at my screen and Spain 10-year yields are up at 6% – things are starting to get worrying again,” said Peter Westaway, chief economist for Europe at Vanguard, an investment management firm overseeing $1.8 trillion in assets. “If they go up to 6.5 to 7%, that could become very problematic, and if Italy started to go back above Spain again, then that would be really serious.” Spain has one thing on its side. It has already raised nearly half the 86 billion euros it needs to borrow from financial markets this year, sucking up some of the 1 trillion euros of cheap three-year loans that the European Central Bank has pumped into the euro zone banking sector. This means the government could hang on for months before having to turn to the EU for help with its own funding needs. However, that still leaves the banks. One of the critical “unknowables’ for Spain is just how bad a situation its banks are in. The Spanish housing market, once a driver of the economy, has been in turmoil for more than four years, but prices still haven’t fallen as much as economists think is needed to squeeze the air out of the bubble. Only when prices have bottomed will assessors be able to calculate how just much bad mortgage debt is sitting on the banks’ balance sheets, and therefore how much extra capital the sector requires to return it to health.
Olick – a tale of two housing markets
The numbers are in, the analysts are out, and given the volatility of this particular economic indicator, the spin is at full speed: “Good News on Housing Permits More Than Offsets the Bad News on Starts”— HIS Global Insight; “Housing Starts Decline Again” – Capital Economics; “March Multifamily Starts Down; Permits Continue Upward Trend”— KBW; “March Construction Numbers Aren’t As Bad as They Look”— Trulia.com; “Housing Starts Lacking Consumer Confidence” — Sageworks Inc. Here’s the problem: We are living a tale of two housing markets, single and multi-family. Depending on what kind of builder or investor you are, you’re going to see the housing starts numbers differently. Let’s weed through it first: Total starts fell 5.8%, driven by a nearly 20% drop in multi-family. Single family was essentially flat month-to-month. But remember, multi-family is a very volatile number and can swing 20-30% monthly due to large local projects. Yes, they are both ahead from last year, but 2011 was the worst year in the history of US home building. “The further fall in housing starts in March means that about a third of the past year’s improvement in homebuilding has now been undone. But the continued rise in building permits is an encouraging sign which suggests that housing starts will improve again later this year,” writes Paul Diggle at Capital Economics.
Building permits are always seen as a better indicator of construction, or at least more dependable and less influenced by weather. Single family permits dropped 3.5% month to month, but multi-family surged ahead 24% to the highest level in four years. “The pickup in multifamily construction is taking place most noticeably in the South and West—again, not a big surprise—since 46 of the 50 fastest-growing metro-area populations from 2010 to 2011 were in the South or West, according to the Census Bureau,” writes IHS Global Insight’s Patrick Newport. Clearly we’re still seeing big demand in the multi-family sector, but single family is still faltering. “Single family is more of a restocking issue,” said Morgan Stanley’s Oliver Chang on CNBC. “In order to meet baseline demand, they [builders] have to build.” Chang says real growth in single family demand just isn’t there, due to a still tightening credit market. On the flip side, he claims that distressed housing has stabilized and distressed home prices have bottomed; that’s because investors largely use cash.
So if there’s all this demand for single family rentals, and investors are rushing to get in, is there still enough demand for all this multi-family construction? “Bottom line, with the secular decline in home ownership, multi-family construction will be where it’s at for a few years but still only make up about 30% of total starts. Single family starts still have the intense competition with foreclosures and now rent seekers,” writes Peter Boockvar of Miller Tabak. So why, as we asked yesterday after the disappointing builder sentiment report, did single family starts, permits and sentiment rise through the fall and the winter only to slam on the breaks? Newport calls that one a “head scratcher,” and adds, “If the builders have gotten ahead of the game, single-family construction will go through a demoralizing slowdown later this year.”
Is gold headed down?
For the past decade, gold has been an incredible investment, rising from under $300 per ounce to as high as $1,900 per ounce before retreating to around $1,650 in recent trading. For the bulls, gold’s recent drop is nothing more than a temporary setback on its inexorable march toward $2,000 and beyond. The case for gold rests primarily on factors familiar to anyone who’s even remotely familiar with the metal: easy money from central banks around the world and rising demand from emerging economies, notably China and India. But all good things must come to an end and Yoni Jacobs, chief investment strategist at Chart Prophet, believes gold’s best days are behind it. In fact, Yoni believes there’s a bubble in precious metals that’s about to collapse as detailed in his book, Gold Bubble: Profiting from Gold’s Impending Collapse. While tipping his hat to the bullish arguments and sympathetic to reasons why people own gold, Jacobs says the metal’s inability to rally despite Europe’s ongoing crisis and renewed tensions in the Middle East are negative signs. “The froth is coming off,” he says.
Technically, the strategist cites heavy volume during gold’s sell-off last September and the negative divergence between gold and gold miners as warning signs. In the past six months, the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is down 20% while the Gold ETF (GLD) is essentially flat. Furthermore, gold is vulnerable to the global economic slowdown, he says, noting China just reported its slowest quarter in three years. Finally, Jacobs cites “over-speculation” in gold, its “parabolic increase” in recent years, the “mass publicity” the metal has received, and the extreme emotions of its advocates as signs of it being in bubble territory. Based on historical trends and technical patterns, Jacobs predicts gold will fall below the key $1,000 per ounce level on its way to the $700 area. He recommends shorting the GLD or GDX or buying out-of-the-money puts on gold as a way to profit from gold’s demise.
WSJ – GOP Senators say no to write-downs
Two US Senate Republicans are urging the Treasury Department to cancel its plans to subsidize debt forgiveness for troubled homeowners, saying the money would be better off reducing the federal debt. In a letter sent Tuesday to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Sens. David Vitter (R., La.) and Jim DeMint (R., S.C.) criticized an Obama administration plan to encourage mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce borrowers’ loan balances. Earlier this year, the administration announced it would use money from the 2008 financial industry rescue to encourage those write-downs. The letter adds further heat to an intense political debate over whether the two government-controlled companies should reverse their policy and allow loan write-downs. The two companies, which buy up loans and package them into investments, and their federal regulator have been facing pressure from Democrats and the Obama administration, which want to see write-downs. Republicans, however, are concerned that doing so will encourage borrowers to intentionally default. In their letter, Messrs. Vitter and DeMint also argue that big banks that hold second mortgages such as home equity loans will benefit from write-downs. The plan “will pay off the mega banks with taxpayer cash in exchange for reducing the principal balance on some mortgages,” the lawmakers wrote. “We write to urge you, on behalf of the taxpayers, to reconsider and, instead, return this money to the Treasury to pay down the national debt.”
