Posts tagged as:

mortgage

Mortgage deal closer

by admin on February 7, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 6, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Mortgage deal closer

With a deadline looming today for state officials to sign onto a landmark multibillion-dollar settlement to address foreclosure abuses, the Obama administration is close to winning support from crucial states that would significantly expand the breadth of the deal.  The biggest remaining holdout, California, has returned to the negotiating table after a four-month absence, a change of heart that could increase the pot for mortgage relief nationwide to $25 billion from $19 billion.  Another important potential backer, Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman of New York, has also signaled that he sees progress on provisions that prevented him from supporting it in the past.  The potential support from California and New York comes in exchange for tightening provisions of the settlement to preserve the right to investigate past misdeeds by the banks, and stepping up oversight to ensure that the financial institutions live up to the deal and distribute the money to the hardest-hit homeowners.

The settlement would require banks to provide billions of dollars in aid to homeowners who have lost their homes to foreclosure or who are still at risk, after years of failed attempts by the White House and other government officials to alter the behavior of the biggest banks.  The banks — led by the five biggest mortgage servicers, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — want to settle an investigation into abuses set off in 2010 by evidence that they foreclosed on borrowers with only a cursory examination of the relevant documents, a practice known as robo-signing. Four million families have lost their homes to foreclosure since the beginning of 2007.  If banks fall short of the multibillion-dollar benchmarks set out for principal reduction and other benefits for homeowners, they will have to pay the difference plus a penalty of up to 40% directly to the federal government, according to Mr. Madigan.  The settlement, if all states participate, will also include $3 billion to lower the rates of mortgage holders who are current. Banks will get more credit for reducing principal owed and helping families keep their homes, and less for short sales or taking losses on loans that were likely to go bad, like those that were severely delinquent.

102% tax?

James Ross, 58, is a founder and managing member of Rossrock, a Manhattan-based private investment firm that focuses on commercial real estate and distressed commercial mortgages.  “I realize I am very fortunate, and in fact I am a member of the 1%,” Mr. Ross wrote in an email. His résumé is studded with elite institutions: Yale, Columbia Law School and stints at the law firms Cravath, Swaine & Moore in New York, and Holland & Hart in Denver. Since his company fits the category of private equity, he has even carried interest.  Yet Mr. Ross told me that he paid 102% of his taxable income in federal, state, and local taxes for 2010.  “My entire taxable income, plus some, went to the payment of taxes,” Mr. Ross said. “This does not include real estate taxes, sales taxes, and other taxes I paid for 2010.” When he told friends and family, they were “astounded,” he said.

That doesn’t mean Mr. Ross pays more in taxes than he earns. His total tax as a percentage of his adjusted gross income was 20%, which is much lower than mine.  That’s because Mr. Ross has so many itemized deductions. Since taxable income is what’s left after itemized deductions like mortgage interest, charitable contributions, and state and local taxes are subtracted, it will nearly always be smaller than adjusted gross income and demonstrates how someone can pay more than 100% of taxable income in tax. Mr. Ross must hope that his interest expense will pay off down the road and generate some capital gains.  Still, all of Mr. Ross’s itemized deductions are money out of his pocket, which is why he’s had to draw on his savings to pay his taxes. Robert Willens, a tax expert and New York attorney, made the argument that taxable income, therefore, may be a better basis for measuring the tax burden.  Mr. Ross’s plight illustrates something that came through in nearly every response and cuts across nearly all income levels: The disparities of the tax code don’t just pit rich against poor or middle class. It taxes people within the same income brackets at grossly unequal rates.  “I cannot help but reflect on the unfairness of the current tax regime,” Mr. Ross wrote. “Why should I pay 102% of my taxable income in taxes when others, with far greater wealth than mine, pay a fraction of that?”

Bulk sales begin soon

The government is starting to shed foreclosed, single-family homes it owns — by selling them in bulk to investors, who would turn them into rental properties.  Officials, however, are saying only that test sales will occur “in the near-term” with a focus on the areas hardest hit by foreclosures. They declined to comment beyond a news release they issued.  The test comes after the government in summer 2011 asked for proposals on what to do with more than 90,000 foreclosed properties it then held. The government typically sells foreclosed properties one at a time, but officials specifically asked for ways to move homes in bulk because of the size of the backlog.  About 4,000 groups or individuals submitted ideas on how the government could unload the properties. After The Enquirer filed a Freedom of Information Act request, the government released a list of 423 companies, groups and individuals that submitted responsive proposals, but no details on their proposals.

The test sale of the foreclosures and conversion of them into rental housing is being supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The agency has acted since 2008 as the federal conservator for Fannie and Freddie, which are public companies although they were created by Congress.  In a news release Wednesday, the finance agency said “Fannie Mae will offer for sale pools of various types of assets including rental properties, vacant properties and non-performing loans” under the test. It also asked investors to pre-qualify to participate in the test.  The investors will be required “to rent the purchased properties for a specified number of years.” FHFA officials hope the rental period will “provide relief for local housing markets that continue to be depressed by the volume of foreclosed properties, and provide additional rental options to certain markets.”

To qualify, investors will have to show the financial wherewithal to buy the assets, sufficient experience and knowledge to bear the risks and manage of the investment and agree to “keep certain information about the REO (real estate) and related matters confidential.”  Nationwide, the 83,000 homes currently up for sale and potential conversion into rental units are among more than 200,000 foreclosures of all kinds that the government holds, apparently making it the nation’s largest owner of foreclosed properties. The 200,000 is almost a third of foreclosed properties across the nation.  Moving the backlog would get them off the books of the Federal Housing Administration. It also would clear the books of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which buy mortgages, bundle them and then sell mortgage-backed securities to investors.  The FHA, Fannie and Freddie became owners of the properties as hundreds of thousands of owners defaulted on their mortgages during the real estate meltdown.  Clearing the backlog would limit the loss to taxpayers, who already have bailed out Fannie and Freddie at a cost of $169 billion and counting. The losses are expected to total $220 billion to $311 billion by the end of 2014, according to latest projections in December by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Greece misses another deadline

Greece let yet another deadline slip on Monday for responding to painful terms for a new EU/IMF bailout, as German Chancellor Angela Merkel made clear Europe’s patience is wearing thin over drawn-out negotiations among its feuding political leaders.  Failure to strike a deal to secure the 130 billion euro ($170 billion) rescue risks pushing Athens into a chaotic debt default which could threaten its future in the euro zone.  Merkel turned up the heat, saying Athens had to come to terms with the “troika” of lenders – the European Commission, European Central Bank and IMF – to get the funds it needs to meet big debt repayments in March.  Greek political leaders, positioning themselves for a likely general election in April, have baulked at accepting another package of deeply unpopular wage and pension reductions, job cuts and tougher tax enforcement measures.

US Treasury prices pared gains notched in today’s European session that were a response to the lack of a political agreement in Greece to make reforms necessary to avoid default. Limiting gains, traders are preparing for the government’s quarterly refunding auctions, which will include sales of 10-year notes and 30-year bonds . Yields on 10-year notes, which move inversely to prices, fell 1 basis point to 1.92%. “Treasurys are modestly higher as discord among Greek coalition members over the terms of the second bailout raises the threat of default and has sent the euro and European stocks lower,” said bond strategists at RBS Securities. “We have a very quiet week of economic data up ahead and the market’s focus will be on the Treasury refunding auctions which begin tomorrow.”

New FHA standards increase Ginnie Mae risk

The Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) recently announced plans to tighten its standards for approving lenders will increase prepayment risks for investors who own Ginnie Mae-back securities, say analysts at Barclays Capital.  The agency’s plans to eliminate the consideration of a lender’s compare ratio when deciding whether to streamline-refinance its loans will accelerate refinancing activity, they say, causing higher prepayment speeds, and, in turn, reduce investor profits.  The compare ratio is the serious delinquency rate of all loans originated by a lender during a two-year period relative to the average of all lenders operating in the same region. Higher coupon and seasoned loans have a weaker credit and greater default risks, therefore, streamline-refinancing them could lift ratio passed 150%. And if it does, the lender could lose the ability to originate FHA-backed loans.  The change is part of a larger attempt by the FHA to protect its Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, which many say is in danger of requiring a multibillion dollar government bailout.

Disregarding a lender’s compare ratio calculation creates an incentive for streamline-refinancing higher-risk borrowers, analysts say. This will speed up Ginnie Mae prepayments, particularly on higher coupons and pre-2009 originations since these have the worst credit quality.  “That said, we expect the effect on speeds to be modest,” they say. “We believe that this plan will be implemented and has the potential to raise GNMA speeds by a few CPR.”  The effect should be even less for pre-2010 vintages because their much better credit quality suggests they have not been constrained by the compare ratios.

Data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) suggest that the compare ratios of most national lenders are now significantly below the 150% threshold.  In December, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan, said as a result of an October analysis by an independent actuary of FHA’s insurance fund, HUD plans to announce how it will address premium prices in its fiscal year 2013 budget proposal.  Since then, Congress has enacted a 10 basis-point increase to the FHA annual mortgage-insurance-premium, and President Barack Obama has called on the FHA to shoulder a larger role in helping responsible home owners and the housing market.  “Given the circumstances, we think more changes to the FHA program could be in the works, and since the budgetary proposal should be released over the next few weeks, the timing is peculiar,” they said. “Therefore, Ginnie Mae faces heightened risks in the near term.”

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top

Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-

foreclosure expert, he oversees more than

100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing

and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns

portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit

properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,

running 4 different offices, supporting over

420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help

thousands of investors make money in the

biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices

closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of

$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and

seminar leader for current trends and hot topics

in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and

Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }

Foreclosures drawing private equity

by admin on February 1, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 1, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Foreclosures drawing private equity

Private equity firms are jumping into distressed housing as the US government plans to market 200,000 foreclosed homes as rentals to speed up the economic recovery.  GTIS Partners will spend $1 billion by 2016 acquiring single-family homes to manage as rentals, Thomas Shapiro, the fund’s founder said. That followed announcements this month that GI Partners, a Menlo Park private equity fund, expects to invest $1 billion, and Los Angeles-based Oaktree Capital Management LP will spend $450 million on similar housing.  “It’s a massive market,” Shapiro said in a telephone interview from New York. “We’re starting to see this as a billion dollar opportunity to buy rental housing.” Increasing rentals may reduce lenders’ losses on foreclosed and surrendered properties and curb declines in home prices, according to a Federal Reserve study Chairman Ben S. Bernanke sent to Congress on Jan. 4. Private equity funds began focusing on these investments in September, after the administration asked for proposals to sell the government’s inventory of foreclosed homes — about half of all houses seized from delinquent borrowers.

Private sector gains 170,000 jobs

The private sector created 170,000 jobs in January, boosted again by a surge in service-sector employment, according a report from ADP and Macroeconomic Advisors.  With economists looking for signs of life in the jobs market, the ADP number was close to consensus estimates and likely sets the stage for solid though not overwhelming overall growth when the government releases its monthly report Friday.  The private payrolls report showed service jobs growing by 152,000 in January, after rising a revised 241,000 in December.  Goods-producing jobs rose 18,000 while manufacturing added 10,000 and construction gained 2,000 for the month.  The total number of private sector jobs created is a substantial dropoff from December’s report that showed a revised 292,000, revised down from 325,000.  The Labor Department on Friday is expected to report nonfarm payrolls growth of 159,000 and an unchanged unemployment rate of 8.5%, according to StreetAccount estimates. Economists sometimes use the ADP numbers to adjust their projected unemployment estimates.  ADP’s numbers have been running on average 10,000 more than the government, though that number swelled to 92,000 in December, raising caution that seasonal distortions could be influencing the payroll firm’s figures.

November home prices down 3.7% from previous year

The average price of a single-family home fell again in November, with decreases in 19 of the 20 largest metropolitan areas during the month, according to the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller index.  The ratings agency’s 20-city composite index and 10-city index both declined 1.3% from a month earlier. The larger, benchmark index drop 3.7% from November 2010 and the 10-city index for November was 3.6% lower than the year earlier.  S&P said both indices are one-third lower than the peak in the summer of 2006 and home prices are now at levels last seen in the middle of 2003.  Atlanta home prices for November were nearly 12% lower than the prior year, while Detroit at 3.8% and Washington with a 0.5% gain are the only metropolitan areas to post annual increases. Home prices in Atlanta, Las Vegas, Seattle and Tampa, Fla., all reached new lows in November, according to S&P/Case-Shiller.  “Despite continued low interest rates and better real GDP growth in the fourth quarter, home prices continue to fall,” said David Blitzer, chairman of the S&P index committee.  He said Phoenix, one of the hardest-hit areas in recent years, was the only MSA to post an increase in prices from October with a 0.6% gain.  “Annual rates were little better as 18 cities and both composites were negative,” Blitzer said. “The trend is down and there are few, if any, signs in the numbers that a turning point is close at hand.”  Analysts with Toronto-based Capital Economics agreed and said “there are still no signs that house prices are on the verge of turning around,” as the Case-Shiller indices fell for the seventh month in a row.  “But things should be different in six months’ time, when the recent rises in home sales will have helped to put a floor under prices,” the analysts said.

California is broke

California needs to come up with more than $3 billion to avoid burning through its cash by March, according to the state controller, who urged borrowing and delaying some payments.  “Assuming no additional revenue loss, erosion of borrowable internal funds, or significant spikes in spending, $3.3 billion of cash solutions are needed to address California’s liquidity needs during this period,” State Controller John Chiang said in a letter to the chairman and vice chairman of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee released on Tuesday.  Chiang said California does not need to issue IOUs again as it did during a cash crunch in 2009 or delay tax refunds, noting he has developed a plan with the state treasurer’s office and the state’s finance department that would postpone some payments and borrow from external sources and from state accounts to bolster the state’s cash.  “It is not an ideal solution, but it is the best way to manage the challenge without relying on IOUs or delaying tax refunds — actions that can disrupt the delivery of essential public services and slow California’s economic recovery,” Chiang said.  Senator Mark Leno, chairman of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, said he expects the Senate and Assembly by the end the week will approve borrowing from state funds. Leno said he expects the internal borrowing will raise approximately $850 million.  Chiang noted California’s dwindling cash reflects revenue coming in below forecast in the state’s budget and spending exceeding expectations.

MBA – mortgage applications down

Mortgage applications decreased 2.9% from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending January 27, 2012.  The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, decreased 2.9% on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 9.0% compared with the previous week.  The Refinance Index decreased 3.6% from the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 1.7% from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index increased 17.1% compared with the previous week and was 4.3% lower than the same week one year ago.  The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 4.11%.  The four week moving average is up 2.48% for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 4.22% for the Refinance Index.

The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 80.0% of total applications from 81.3% the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity increased to 5.6% from 5.3% of total applications from the previous week.  “The Federal Reserve surprised the market last week by indicating that short-term rates were likely to stay at their current low-levels until the end of 2014.  Longer-term treasury rates dropped in response, and mortgage rates for the week were down slightly as a result,” said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics.  Fratantoni continued, “Although total application volume dropped on an adjusted basis relative to last week, refinance volume remains high, with survey participants reporting that the expanded Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) contributed to roughly 10% of their refinance activity.”  In December 2011, Connecticut had the largest increase in refinance applications, increasing by 80.1% from November. Maine saw a 30.8% increase in applications for home purchase, which was the largest state-increase in applications for home purchase. Only 12 states had a decrease in home purchase activity in December, while every state in the US saw an increase in refinance volume.

Europe on life support

The European Central Bank (ECB) has saved the euro zone from a heart attack, but its members face a long convalescence, made worse by the insistence that fiscal starvation is the right remedy for feeble patients.  Last week’s downgrading of its forecasts by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) shows the dangers. The IMF now forecasts a recession in the euro zone this year, with a decline of 0.5 per cent in overall gross domestic product (GDP).  GDP is forecast to fall sharply in Italy and Spain, and stagnate in France and Germany. This is a terrible environment for countries seeking to cut fiscal deficits. Forecasts are far from satisfactory for other high-income countries. But the euro zone is the most dangerous part of the world economy: only there do we see important governments — Italy and Spain — menaced by a loss of creditworthiness.

Elsewhere, governments of high-income countries can continue to support their economies, largely because they possess a central bank and an adjustable exchange rate. This combination has given them the ability to run large fiscal deficits. In post-crisis conditions, such deficits are both the natural counterpart and the principal facilitator of necessary private sector deleveraging.  The euro zone has no such internal mechanisms. When private external financing dried up, as happened to a number of countries, affected members needed both financing — in the short run — and a mechanism for adjusting their external accounts — in the longer run — other than via deep slumps.  The euro zone lacks both capacities. It has turned out, as a result, to have limited ability to cope with the global financial disease. As Donald Tsang, chief executive of Hong Kong, remarked in Davos: “I have never been as scared as I am now.” Astute observers have a sense that little stands between them and a wave of sovereign and banking defaults inside the euro zone, with ghastly global repercussions.

Olick – refinancing to go through FHA

“After announcing during his State of the Union address a new government refinance program for, ‘responsible’ but ‘underwater’ borrowers with privately held mortgages, President Obama is expected to detail the plan today.  It will go through the government mortgage insurer, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and could cost between 5 and 10 billion dollars, according to senior administration officials.  The cost of the program, officials say, would be covered by a tax on major lenders, which is likely to make it a no-go in Congress.  It would cover closing fees for borrowers and additional risk to the FHA, which doesn’t insure new loans where the borrower owes more than the home is worth.  Critics will also argue that the FHA, which now has an inordinately, historically large share of the mortgage market, is in no position to take on any more risk. The FHA could be considered ‘underwater’ itself, guaranteeing about $1 trillion in mortgages but sitting on just a $1.2 billion dollar cushion to cover losses.  To that end, officials say they could create a separate fund for these loans, not the regular mutual mortgage insurance fund (MMI). This would be a special risk fund, designed to handle high losses.  ‘In this program we’re talking about extraordinary circumstances,’ says Brian Chappelle of Potomac Partners. ‘People have played by the rules, they made payments in addition to the fact that their house is underwater, they’re paying excessively high rates. It’s a unique homeowner, not somebody looking for a handout.’

To be eligible, borrowers would have to be current on their mortgages, not having missed a payment in at least six months. They need a credit score (FICO) above 580, must be employed, and must have a conforming loan (between $271,050 and $729,750 depending on their location). No appraisal would be necessary, according to officials.  Estimates are that the plan could help 3.5 million borrowers in addition to the 11 million expected to qualify for the existing refinance program for those with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans (HARP). The one sticking point could be the mortgage insurance premiums charged by the FHA. If rolled into the loan, they would put a borrower further underwater.  ‘To use taxpayer dollars to bail out the few who are current and don’t need payment assistance but are underwater is ludicrous and worsens their equity position,’ says JT Smith of Aristar Funding.  The plan would also require lenders to write down the value of the loan if it exceeded 140% of the value of the home. Administration officials say the trade-off for lenders is they get rid of a risky loan.

On the flip side, the government would then be backing that same risky loan, but officials argue they would offset some of that risk because in order to get closing fees paid, the borrower has to agree to use the lower interest rate savings on the refinance to pay off principal balance.  The plan faces many headwinds, first and foremost being Congressional approval; borrowers and lenders would also have to agree to all the requirements, as this is not an automatic plan but a voluntary, borrower-initiated deal. It would also rile Wall Street, as hundreds of thousands of loans could ‘pre-pay,’ which means the bondholders lose.  ‘Some say it undermines the value of existing [mortgage] securities, so they would build a premium in,’ notes Chappelle. That could make future loans for other Americans more expensive.”

US to charge European traders

US authorities are preparing to charge four former Credit Suisse employees with criminal and civil fraud related to write-downs on subprime mortgage derivatives at the height of the financial crisis, sources familiar with the matter said.  Credit Suisse will not be charged in the matter, which is being investigated by federal prosecutors and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the sources said.  The four people to be charged were former Credit Suisse traders who were fired, another source said, but it was unclear when and for what reason.  The suspected illegal conduct took place roughly four years ago, the source said, adding that the bank had been cooperating with officials.  The investigation stems from $2.85 billion in write-downs that Credit Suisse took on collateralized debt obligations in 2008, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.  Credit Suisse revealed those CDO losses in early 2008, and blamed them on a group of rogue traders – who the bank said had deliberately mispriced securities – and on a failure of internal controls.  Credit Suisse, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the SEC and Manhattan US attorney Preet Bharara declined to comment on the matter.

WSJ – housing’s firmer foundation

The Case-Shiller index is closely watched for a reason. It was quicker than a US government price index to show just how bad things were as housing came off the rails in 2007.  But right now, the connection between what the S&P/Case-Shiller index says and what is actually going on with housing may be lukewarm at best.  The difference: The Federal Housing Finance Agency index includes only homes with mortgages guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while the Case-Shiller index includes those backed by jumbo and subprime mortgages.  Many homes that were backed by subprime mortgages are now being sold in foreclosure. They aren’t in nearly as good condition as when they were last bought, and are selling for less than if they had been properly maintained. Because the Case-Shiller index is based on repeat sales, such homes may be biasing it downward.  Moreover, the Case-Shiller index is based on a three-month average of sales, so its November level includes transactions that were completed in October and September. Consider that it takes about two months between a sale and a closing (often longer with mortgage hassles these days), and you are talking about deals agreed on in the summer, when recession fears filled the air. Things now look better. Home prices probably do, too.

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }

Foreclosures fell 12% in California, but…

by admin on January 25, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin January 25, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Foreclosures fell 12% in California, but…

The number of California homes entering foreclosure in the fourth quarter fell 11.9% from the same period in 2010 to the second-lowest level over the last four years, said DataQuick, a real estate information firm in San Diego. A total of 61,517 notices of default, which are filed to initiate foreclosures, were recorded on California properties during the fourth quarter. That was a 13.7% drop from the third quarter of 2011.  Some economists say California and other states will probably see an increase in foreclosure actions as banks deal more aggressively with seriously delinquent mortgages. That increase probably will push home prices lower.  Default notice filings fell sharply in December, particularly those involving loans from Bank of America and Bank of New York Mellon, and helped drag down the overall quarterly numbers. Average daily filings on behalf of Bank of New York Mellon dropped 75% from November to December; filings on behalf of Bank of America dropped 50%, Wells Fargo 20% and JPMorgan Chase 13%, DataQuick said Tuesday.  The number of homes taken back through the foreclosure process also fell, by 11.8% from a year earlier to 31,260.

The majority of the loans entering the foreclosure process in the fourth quarter were made in 2005 to 2007, when poor lending practices by major institutions were rampant.  Californian homeowners were a median nine months behind on their payments when they received a notice of default from their lender. Among the state’s largest counties, mortgages in San Francisco, Marin and San Mateo counties were the least likely to go into foreclosure. Homes were most likely to enter the foreclosure process in Sacramento, San Joaquin and Stanislaus counties, according to DataQuick.  In Southern California, the number of default notices filed on properties fell 10.2% from a year earlier, and the number of homes taken back by banks fell 11%.  Many foreclosures were delayed in 2011 as banks worked through issues surrounding mortgage servicing and foreclosure. Settlement negotiations among attorneys general, federal agencies and the mortgage industry over foreclosure and mortgage servicing abuses dragged on through most of last year.

Analysts attributed the delays to the uncertainty over the outcome of those talks. If a deal is struck among the parties and new foreclosure processes by banks are put in place, some analysts say the foreclosure machinery could ramp up again.  Those negotiations continue to inch forward but could still fall apart. State attorneys general have received drafts of the deal with the banks, a $25-billion settlement that would overhaul foreclosure and mortgage servicing practices, according to two people familiar with the negotiations who aren’t authorized to speak publicly.  A key component to any strong deal would be California’s participation. State Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris, who must make that decision for the Golden State, has not said whether she will sign on. Harris walked away from talks with the banks last year, saying they were asking for too much release from liability, but since then certain provisions have been added to the deal with the aim of getting her back to the table.  Yesterday the Center for Responsible Lending gave the proposed $25-billion deal a tentative thumbs up, calling it “an important step forward in addressing foreclosure abuses.” The nonpartisan advocacy group noted that the deal would “provide an important template for ways banks can use principal reduction to reduce unnecessary foreclosures and put the country back on a path to economic recovery.”

GOP says Obama economic plan is a failure

President Barack Obama has resorted to “extremism” with stifling, anti-growth policies and has tried dividing Americans, not uniting them, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels said Tuesday in the formal Republican response to the president’s State of the Union address.  He took particular aim at Obama’s efforts in recent months to raise taxes on the rich and castigate them. “No feature of the Obama presidency has been sadder than its constant effort to divide us, to curry favor with some Americans by castigating others,” Daniels said, according to excerpts of his remarks released before he and Obama spoke. “As in previous moments of national danger, we Americans are all in the same boat.”  “The extremism that stifles the development of homegrown energy, or cancels a perfectly sane pipeline that would employ tens of thousands, or jacks up consumer utility bills for no improvement in either human health or world temperature, is a pro-poverty policy,” Daniels said.

Obama has halted work on the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from western Canada to Texas’ Gulf Coast. Republicans say the project would create thousands of jobs, a claim opponents say is overstated. The administration has also pursued policies aimed at reducing pollution and global warming.  Daniels said Republicans prefer “a passionate pro-growth approach that breaks all ties and calls all close ones in favor of private sector jobs that restore opportunity for all and generate the public revenues to pay our bills.”  Even before Obama spoke, Republicans in the Capitol and on the campaign trail accused him of three years of higher spending, bigger government and tax increases that have left the economy stuck in a ditch.  “This election is going to be a referendum on the president’s economic policies,” which have worsened the economy, said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. “The politics of envy, the politics of dividing our country is not what America is all about.”

Olick – more plans from the president

“After several largely ineffective programs to help troubled borrowers and after fruitless attempts at budging the hard-line conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, President Obama is proposing a brand new refinance program for borrowers who are current on their mortgages, regardless of who owns their loan; the catch is that this one has to go through Congress.  ‘I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks,’ the President announced in his State of the Union address.  Unlike previous efforts in the refinance space, including a recently revamped and expanded government program for borrowers who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth, this plan would not be limited to those with loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to senior administration officials. The two mortgage giants own or guarantee about half of the nation’s mortgages. It would be open to all borrowers current on their loans.

The Obama administration is offering precious few details, promising more in the coming weeks, but several sources say the plan is to ask Congress to allow the government mortgage insurer, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), to back refinances of underwater mortgages. No estimates were given as to how many borrowers such a plan could potentially help, only that this would be a voluntary, borrower-initiated plan, and not a blanket refinance of all borrowers.  The costs, according to administration officials, would be modest, and the President would request that a portion of his financial crisis responsibility fee offset any of those costs, so there would be no addition to the federal debt.  ‘A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust,’ Mr. Obama added.  Loan servicers could be faced with a flood of applications and could have to add resources to handle it all, but officials say the opportunity to generate revenues from the refinances would be incentive enough. Still many servicers have balked at the idea of mass refinancing, as the new loans could present more risk and less reward.

The idea is to remove the barriers and ‘frictions’ that have kept many borrowers out of refinancing to historically low rates. Some of those include high levels of negative equity, loan level price adjustments, loan origination dates, put-backs on loans that default, and borrower qualifications.  Then there is the very basic problem of politics. Whatever the details of the plan are, Republicans, despite the fact that they have been calling for more refinances, are unlikely to hand President Obama a popular victory on the eve of a presidential election. They may also oppose anything that makes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bigger, when the two are allegedly winding down.”

Americans lead in debt reduction

Americans are cutting their debt faster than other countries and could already be halfway through the deleveraging process, setting the stage for the nation’s economic recovery, says a new report from McKinsey Global Institute.  However, even when U.S. consumers finish deleveraging, they probably won’t be as powerful an engine of global growth as they were before the crisis, warns the report.  According to McKinsey analysts, deleveraging happens in two stages: First, the private sector reduces debt, while economic growth is negative or minimal and government debt rises; then, growth rebounds and supports gradual government deleveraging.  “Somewhat surprisingly, given the amount of concern over the U.S. economy, we find that the United States is furthest along in private-sector debt reduction and closest to beginning the second phase of deleveraging,” says the report.  “The remaining obstacles for its return to growth are its unsettled housing market and its failure to lay out a credible medium-term plan for public debt reduction,” concludes the report.

Since the financial crisis, U.S. household debt has fallen by $584 billion, or 15 percentage points relative to disposable income, which is more than in any other country.  At this pace, Americans could reach sustainable debt levels by the middle of 2013.  The report also found that since the 2008-2009 financial crisis the world’s ten largest developed economies have seen their total debt increase, primarily due to growing government debt.  The U.S., South Korea and Australia are the only countries that have seen a decline in the ratio of total debt to GDP during that time period.  Moreover, the United Kingdom and Spain are deleveraging at a much slower pace, and it could take another decade until their private-sector debt returns to the pre-bubble levels.  In the United States, most of the private-sector deleveraging has happened in the financial sector, where debt relative to GDP had declined to $6.1 trillion from $8 trillion, levels not seen since 2000.

MBA – mortgages down 5%

Mortgage applications decreased 5.0 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending January 20, 2012.  The results include an adjustment to account for the Martin Luther King holiday.  The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, decreased 5.0 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index decreased 13.8 percent compared with the previous week.  The Refinance Index decreased 5.2 percent from the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 5.4 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 9.7 percent compared with the previous week and was 6.5 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 4.12 percent.  The four week moving average is up 0.47 percent for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 4.85 percent for the Refinance Index.  The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 81.3 percent of total applications from 82.2 percent the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 5.3 percent from 5.6 percent of total applications from the previous week.  In December 2011, among refinance borrowers, 56.6 percent of applications were for fixed-rate 30-year loans, 24.3 percent for 15-year fixed loans, and 5.3 percent for ARMs.  The share of refinance applications for “other” fixed-rate mortgages with amortization schedules other than 15 and 30-year terms was 13.8 percent of all refinance applications. The share for 30-year fixed increased from the previous month while the 15-year fixed, ARM and the “other” fixed category shares decreased from last month.

Markets down on possible Obama re-election

So far, the presidential election has not impacted stocks, but that could change if Mitt Romney appears unlikely to make it as the GOP nominee.  For the past two days, Romney’s vulnerability to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has been the talk of trading rooms.  Gingrich beat Romney handily in the South Carolina primary Saturday, the second of three early contests that Romney lost. But the volatile Gingrich is not viewed as a strong candidate to beat President Obama.  “Obama’s gone from 50 percent probability to 55 percent on Intrade,” said Dan Clifton, Strategas head of policy research. “This week he just kind of exploded once Gingrich won in South Carolina. The Intrade market is saying there’s a much greater chance of President Obama being re-elected.”  Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, is by far the preferred candidate on Wall Street, where many disagree with Obama’s policies and have been stung by what they call “class warfare.”  “I don’t think it’s fully reflected in the market yet. The market is drifting. There’s a mild degree of anxiety, and that’s really because it’s overbought. Is there a gentle longing for a smoke-filled room? Yeah. There’s some yearning for that,” said Art Cashin, UBS director of floor operations.  The S&P 500 broke its five-day winning streak Tuesday, finishing 1 point lower at 1314, but it is up 4.5 percent since the start of the year.  Analysts believe if Romney loses the Florida primary next Tuesday, he will have a hard time stopping Gingrich’s momentum.

Huffington post – Romney on mortgages

Finally, a presidential candidate came out and honestly addressed the biggest problem in our economy, the enormous debt overhang in our mortgage market. A few days ago, Mitt Romney was at a forum in Florida talking about foreclosures, and his comments were actually refreshingly honest about our housing and banking situation and the need for a debt write-down.  We’re just so overleveraged, so much debt in our society, and some of the institutions that hold it aren’t willing to write it off and say they made a mistake, they loaned too much, we’re overextended, write those down and start over. They keep on trying to harangue and pretend what they have on their books is still what it’s worth.  Mitt Romney was pointing out that the banks are carrying debt on their books at inflated values. When was the last serious politician to make that point, openly? There’s more.  In some cases, if the debt is not in something you can service, it’s like you have to move on and start over away from those debts. It’s helpful if you get an institution that’s willing to work with you, but if you don’t you have no other option.

Romney is now saying that if you can’t pay your debts and your lending institution won’t work with you, walk away. Perhaps this isn’t so surprising, though, as Romney is an expert in debt restructuring. This is actually just common business sense.  And finally, he offered a real solution to the mortgage debt crisis.  “The banks are scared to death, of course, because they think they’re going to go out of business… They’re afraid that if they write all these loans off, they’re going to go broke. And so they’re feeling the same thing you’re feeling. They just want to pretend all of this is going to get paid someday so they don’t have to write it off and potentially go out of business themselves.  This is cascading throughout our system and in some respects government is trying to just hold things in place, hoping things get better… My own view is you recognize the distress, you take the loss and let people reset. Let people start over again, let the banks start over again. Those that are prudent will be able to restart, those that aren’t will go out of business. This effort to try and exact the burden of their mistakes on homeowners and commercial property owners, I think, is a mistake.”

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }

2012 to be the best year for short sales?

by admin on January 24, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin January 24, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

2012 to be the best year for short sales?

The Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Act of 2007 allows an income tax exemption for a homeowner whose mortgage debt is partly or entirely forgiven by a bank.  It’s set to expire Dec. 31, 2012.  Matt Alegi, a partner with the Potomac law firm Shulman Rogers and chair of the firm’s residential real estate practice group, says the tax break has meant a savings in the tens of thousands of dollars for individuals.  Typically, if someone were to have $150,000 forgiven by the bank, Alegi says, “you just made another $150,000 of income for tax purposes in that year.”  So, say someone makes $50,000 but had $150,000 forgiven by the bank. That person is now paying taxes on a $200,000 income, and included in a much higher tax bracket.  The loss of the relief will plunge homeowners further into debt, Alegi says.

He also thinks the expiration of the Debt Forgiveness Act will have an impact on short sales themselves. Homeowners could try to push the short sale through this year to take advantage of the tax break.  Alegi believes there will be strong lobbying to extend the tax break. If it isn’t extended, the appeal of a short sale could greatly diminish for the homeowner.  To take advantage of the Debt Relief Act, you need to fall under very specific guidelines outlined by the IRS.  For example, the debt forgiven is only for primary residences and the debt must have been used to buy, build or substantially improve your principal residence and be secured by that residence.  Alegi says homeowners who spent the forgiven money on education or other bills do not qualify.

Gridlock an Obama strategy?

When President Obama outlines his goals for 2012 during Tuesday’s State of the Union address, he shouldn’t expect a lot of cooperation from Republicans, senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said yesterday.  “With the Obama economy established now…unemployment is still at 8 ½%,” McConnell said. “It didn’t work, and we’re not interested in doing more of the things that don’t work.”  He said Obama was “AWOL” last year on his bus tour when Republicans wanted to tackle tax reform and entitlements, and he expects more of the same this year.   “He was not involved whatsoever,” McConnell said. “So I’m not optimistic, frankly, that in an election year that he’s likely to be any more engaged than he was last year.”  What’s more, he thinks the logjam in the nation’s capital is part of Obama’s agenda.  “That’s his strategy…to demonize Congress, to complain because he can’t continue to get everything he wants, like he did the first two years,” he said. “It’s all about his re-election and not about the country.”  One thing that McConnell thinks will get done is the payroll tax cut extension, which was extended for only two months in December when Congress couldn’t come to an agreement.  “We’ll be back at trying to figure out how to do that for the balance of the year and how to pay for it,” he said. “We don’t want to add to the deficit.”

What the $25 billion bank deal means

According to an Associated Press report, five major banks — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial — and US state attorneys general could adopt the agreement within weeks. It’s expected President Barack Obama will mention new developments in the negotiations in his State of the Union address today.  A settlement between the banks and the states doesn’t mean homeowners who lost their homes to foreclosure will get them back. In fact, they’re unlikely to benefit much at all financially, though the total financial settlement could be as high as $25 billion.  What’s worse is the settlement does not apply to loans held by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Since Fannie and Freddie own about half of all US mortgages – or 31 million US home loans – that means a lot of homeowners who have been hurt by the banks’ deceptive foreclosure practices won’t be getting much-needed assistance.  Nearly 11 million people – one in four homeowners – owe more than their home is worth. According to current guidelines, these underwater homeowners have few options and little chance at refinancing.  Here’s how the settlement could shape up:

-  $17 billion would go toward reducing the principal balance struggling homeowners owe on their mortgages.

-  $5 billion would be put into a reserve account for various state and federal programs. A portion of this money would cover the $1,800 checks that would be sent to homeowners affected by deceptive practices. Only about 750,000 Americans, or half of the households who might be eligible for assistance under the deal, will likely receive checks.

-  About $3 billion would be used to help homeowners refinance at 5.25%, far below current mortgage interest rates.

If the proposed settlement terms are accepted, roughly 1 million of these homeowners could see the principal amount of their mortgages reduced by an average of $20,000. That’s good news for some, but bad news for the other 10 million homeowners who would like to claim a principal reduction but won’t qualify.  The better news is this settlement has the potential to reshape long-standing lending guidelines and make things easier for at-risk and underwater homeowners across the board. But critics say it doesn’t do enough. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) tells the Associated Press: “Wall Street is again trying to pass the buck. Instead of criminal prosecutions, we’re talking about something that’s not more than a slap on the wrist.”  Some states have disagreed over what to offer banks, with states like New York, Delaware, Nevada and Massachusetts arguing banks should not be “protected from future civil liability.” The deal will not fully release banks from future criminal lawsuits by individual states, and a few of those states’ attorneys general have already promised to pursue their own investigations.  Bank officials have argued few, if any, foreclosures wrongfully took place as a result of documentation issues. Ally Financial CEO Michael Carpenter has been among the most vocal, claiming the company found no instances of wrongful foreclosure after its own internal audit. Carpenter has said he will fight the government in court if need be.

US Treasurys edge higher after Greek setback

US Treasurys edged higher today, after euro zone finance ministers rejected an offer by private creditors to restructure Greek debt, keeping alive fears of a default.  Benchmark 10-year note’s yield was at 2.06%, compared with 2.058% in late US trade on Monday. The yield rose as high as 2.094% on Friday, its highest since early December. The 30-year bond yield was at 3.14%.  Demand for safe-haven US debt was further boosted after a report rekindled fears that Portugal, seen as the second most risky country in the euro zone, could be the next potential default candidate after Greece.  Further dousing optimism, Germany denied a report that it was ready to boost the combined firepower of the euro zone’s rescue funds to 750 billion euros ($979 billion).  During its two-day policy meeting starting on Tuesday the Federal Reserve is expected to push out expectations on when it will next raise interest rates until at least 2014, and the meeting will also be closely watched for any hints of new QE, which analysts expect would focus on mortgage-backed bonds.  The Treasury Department will sell four-week bills and two-year notes later in the day. The Treasury will sell a total of $99 billion in new two-year, five-year, and seven-year notes this week.

Mortgage writedowns to cost taxpayers $100 billion

Forgiving mortgage debt on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans would cost the taxpayer-funded companies almost $100 billion, their regulator said.   The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) said that as of June 30, the companies guaranteed nearly 3 million mortgages on single- family homes that are underwater, or worth less than the loans they secure.  “FHFA estimates that principal forgiveness for all of these mortgages would require funding of almost $100 billion,” FHFA Acting Director Edward J. DeMarco said in a Jan. 20 letter to Representative Elijah Cummings, a Maryland Democrat who had threatened to subpoena the information. The FHFA posted the letter on its website today.  Nearly 80% of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac borrowers with negative equity were current on their payments, DeMarco said.

DeMarco, whose agency was created by Congress to minimize losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and is independent of President Barack Obama’s administration, has maintained that principal forgiveness would increase the size of the government’s bailout of the companies, which have cost taxpayers more than $153 billion since they were taken under government control in 2008.  The agency compared the cost of principal forgiveness to the companies’ current practice of forbearance, which allows delinquent borrowers to defer payments.  “Given that any money spent on this endeavor would ultimately come from taxpayers and given that our analysis does not indicate a preservation of assets for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (FMCC) substantial enough to offset costs, an expenditure of this nature at this time would, in my judgment, require congressional action,” he said.

WSJ – EU tries to revive Greek talks

European Union finance ministers today piled pressure on Greece and its private-sector creditors to do more to ensure that a proposed deal to restructure Greece’s private-sector debt will be enough to put the country back on a firm fiscal footing.  The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the euro zone’s four triple-A-rated countries-—Germany, the Netherlands, Finland and Luxembourg—are pushing for a low average interest rate on new bonds to be issued as part of the restructuring, in order to ensure the government can pay its debts in the future.  But as they were heading to a meeting Tuesday, EU finance ministers also urged Greece to implement tough austerity and structural reforms and provide more written assurances to its partners that it would commit to its pledges before further aid can be released.  Austrian Finance Minister Maria Fekter said she’s “not pleased” with progress so far. “We’re sending a very direct message to Greece that the community expects more, also in terms of structural reform,” she told reporters. “We’re not pleased and only when there’s a written message on the table in front of us, can further assistance be discussed.”

Greece’s debt restructuring is planned to take the form of a bond exchange in which creditors holding some €200 billion ($260.32 billion) in debt would swap their securities for new instruments with half the face value. The key sticking point is how much interest the new bonds should pay.  The restructuring is part and parcel of the second bailout program for Greece amounting to €130 billion. Without this loan, Greece will default on a €14.4 billion bond maturing March 20.  But talks in Athens with the Institute of International Finance, which represents the majority of Greece’s private-sector creditors, have dragged on for three weeks and stalled over the weekend. Private-sector creditors said in a final offer that they won’t accept an average interest rate of less than 4%.  The IMF voiced concerns yesterday that the deal being discussed by Greece and the creditors would leave the country with a higher-than-expected debt burden in the years ahead, people familiar with the matter said.  That sets up a difficult choice: press bondholders to accept more losses, or accept that Greece’s peers and the IMF will have to kick in more support.

Olick – foreclosure investors a double edged sword

“The best and most expeditious way to clear the vast inventory of foreclosed properties weighing down today’s housing market is to get more investors in and sell them these properties at bulk discounts.  That’s what the Obama administration and Federal regulators are currently considering for the thousands of homes currently owned by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA.  While big private equity funds are still largely in a very tedious deal-making stage with banks or waiting on the sidelines for a government program, smaller individual investors are getting in. Nearly 23% of home purchases in December were by investors, according to a new survey from Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance. That is a slight increase from November, but the share has remained largely unchanged for the past year.  What has changed dramatically is how many of these investors are using all-cash…74% according to the survey, which also found that, ‘cash buyers are able to bid significantly lower—and successfully—on many properties because they offer a shorter and more reliable closing timeline.’ That is precisely what mortgage servicers want.

‘While investor bids may not be the first offers accepted, they often end up winning properties after other homebuyers are eliminated because of mortgage approval or timeline problems,’ according to the survey authors. ‘Appraisals below the contracted price are a common reason for mortgage denials. Most mortgage financing timelines are now in excess of 30 days.’  There has been a lot of concern among industry analysts that bulk foreclosure sales would push home prices down further, but it appears that is already happening, as investors usually offer 10-20% below list price, while first time home buyers and current homeowners are generally offering list. If the offers are competitive, cash will prevail.”

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }

Foreclosures to take longer

by admin on January 16, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin January 16, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Foreclosures to take longer

Reviews of hundreds of thousands of foreclosure cases ordered by regulators last year will take months longer to complete than first expected, according to documents filed with federal banking regulators.  The delays could postpone compensation for some homeowners harmed by improper foreclosure actions.  The reviews cover foreclosure actions in 2009 and 2010 by the nation’s 14 largest mortgage servicers, which handle payments for about 65% of US mortgages. They are required by enforcement orders announced by federal regulators in April.  Under the deadlines set in April, the reviews — which are being done by independent consultants hired by servicers — should have been completed this month.  But reviews of Bank of America’s (BOA) foreclosure cases could take until November, a letter that BOA’s consultant filed with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) indicates. BOA is the nation’s largest mortgage servicer, and the Promontory Financial Group is its consultant.  JPMorgan Chase’s consultant, Deloitte & Touche, indicated it may need about the same amount of time, according to its letter.

Review time frames have lengthened for other servicers, too, because the detail, scope and complexity of the reviews weren’t fully known in April, says OCC spokesman Bryan Hubbard.  Some companies may finish before others. Some may beat the timelines in their letters. Some deadlines may get longer, Hubbard says.  The OCC says servicers should not wait until all reviews are done to compensate homeowners.  While 4 million cases are eligible for reviews, consultants will sample only some for errors such as unlawful foreclosures and excessive fees.  Borrowers who faced a foreclosure action on their primary home by one of the 14 servicers in 2009 or 2010 are eligible for reviews. Anyone eligible who asks for a review by the April 30 deadline will get one, the OCC says.

Consumer sentiment up

The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan preliminary January reading on its overall index of consumer sentiment rose to 74.0 from 69.9 in December for the fifth month of gains and the highest level since May 2011.  The report topped expectations of 71.5 and was in contrast to December’s weaker-than-expected retail sales reported on Thursday.  Thirty-four% of consumers polled in the consumer confidence survey said they had heard of recent job gains, a record high in the survey’s history and well above December’s 21%.  “The data suggest a stronger consumer spending outlook, rising to about a 2.1% gain in 2012,” survey director Richard Curtin said in a statement.  But consumers still lacked confidence in government economic policies with the majority rating policies unfavorably for the sixth month in a row.  Americans also remained dour on their personal finances with just 24% expecting their finances to improve in January, slightly below 25% last month.  The survey’s barometer of current economic conditions rose to the highest since February at 82.6 from 79.6, while its gauge of consumer expectations gained to 68.4 from 63.6.

2013 for housing recovery?

A poll of 23 economists and analysts found a consensus for no change in the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index in 2012, compared with a median 0.3% decline that was forecast in the last poll in November.  Many say that a recovery in the housing market is a key requirement for any vigorous rebound in the world’s largest economy. The spectacular collapse in US housing, which sent average prices plummeting by a third, was the trigger for the 2008-09 financial crisis and subsequent recession.  The meager 1.5% gain expected in 2013 will offer little comfort to the millions of Americans trapped in negative equity — owing more to their mortgage lender, and in some cases much more, than their houses are worth.  “I think we are seeing stabilization, but unfortunately it’s stability at the bottom,” said Lindsey Piegza, economist at FTN Financial, describing the grinding halt to several years of relentless price declines.  The average price of a US home is currently around where it was nine years ago, and the most recent data, from October, showed price declines still accelerating.

The market is still under pressure from an excess of homes up for sale. Fifteen of 20 respondents said monthly foreclosures should subside this year, while five didn’t see any let-up until 2013.  Among 20 respondents, 15 said they expect foreclosures to ease some time this year, while five said it would not happen until 2013.  Gains in home sales and new home construction in November, and recent improvement in homebuilder sentiment, added only a touch of optimism at the end of last year.  Still, while the gain expected over the next two years is tiny compared with the more than 30% plunge from the peak in 2006, it is still a more cheery outlook than in some other parts of the world.  A recent Reuters poll predicted British home prices, which have not dropped anywhere near as far as they have in the US, will slip 1.7% this year. In China, they are expected to fall 10 to 20%.

Excess regulations hamper economy

Regulatory policies are badly undermining the economic objectives of governments around the globe by hampering bank activity, JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon said in a conference call discussing fourth-quarter earnings Friday morning.  “Regulatory policy is completely contradictory to government objectives,” Dimon said, citing restrictions on trading and new capital regulations as regulatory sources of slower economic growth.  Dimon said that although regulators have provided additional clarity on new capital rules, the clarifications are have demonstrated that the capital rules are “bad.”  He noted that higher capital requirements have made risk weighting even more important for banks. Under international capital standards, different kinds of bank assets receive different capital treatment, a practice known as risk weighting.

Dimon also criticized the so-called Volcker rule banning proprietary trading. He warned that if the rule is not carefully crafted, it could limit not just prop trading but market making.  “The United States has the widest and deepest and most transparent capital markets in the world,” Dimon said. “And the most liquid.   If you lose liquidity because you lose market making, you cost investors money.”  He said that pension funds, retirees, and other large investors could lose out if restrictions on trading go too far.  “We have to be very careful that we don’t destroy that [market making] as we try to limit — put a fair limit — on proprietary trading,” Dimon said.

Fitch downgrades Merrill mortgage securities

Fitch Ratings downgraded four classes of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust securities certificates backed by commercial real estate because the underlying loans are expecting losses.  At the same time, 17 classes of loans in the same series of securities were affirmed by the ratings giant.  Fitch specifically classified 76 loans as mortgages of concern. About 25 of those 76 are specially serviced loans.  The entire loan pool subjected to the downgrade had an aggregate principal balance of $2.2 billion at the end of December, compared to $2.5 billion at issuance.  Of those loans in special servicing, 16 are real-estate owned, three are in foreclosure, another three are delinquent and 1% are current.  One of the largest contributors to the expected losses in the pool is a three-story office building in Scottsdale, Ariz. The loan was moved into special servicing in October of 2009 when a large tenant that fully occupied one of the buildings terminated its lease and vacated the premises. As of mid-last year, the building’s occupancy rate stood at 62%.  A hotel located in Tampa, Fla., also is contributing to uncertainty over the pool of loans with a special servicer saying it would like to pursue a foreclosure.

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************
Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }