mortgage bankers association

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 6, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Mortgage deal closer

With a deadline looming today for state officials to sign onto a landmark multibillion-dollar settlement to address foreclosure abuses, the Obama administration is close to winning support from crucial states that would significantly expand the breadth of the deal.  The biggest remaining holdout, California, has returned to the negotiating table after a four-month absence, a change of heart that could increase the pot for mortgage relief nationwide to $25 billion from $19 billion.  Another important potential backer, Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman of New York, has also signaled that he sees progress on provisions that prevented him from supporting it in the past.  The potential support from California and New York comes in exchange for tightening provisions of the settlement to preserve the right to investigate past misdeeds by the banks, and stepping up oversight to ensure that the financial institutions live up to the deal and distribute the money to the hardest-hit homeowners.

The settlement would require banks to provide billions of dollars in aid to homeowners who have lost their homes to foreclosure or who are still at risk, after years of failed attempts by the White House and other government officials to alter the behavior of the biggest banks.  The banks — led by the five biggest mortgage servicers, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — want to settle an investigation into abuses set off in 2010 by evidence that they foreclosed on borrowers with only a cursory examination of the relevant documents, a practice known as robo-signing. Four million families have lost their homes to foreclosure since the beginning of 2007.  If banks fall short of the multibillion-dollar benchmarks set out for principal reduction and other benefits for homeowners, they will have to pay the difference plus a penalty of up to 40% directly to the federal government, according to Mr. Madigan.  The settlement, if all states participate, will also include $3 billion to lower the rates of mortgage holders who are current. Banks will get more credit for reducing principal owed and helping families keep their homes, and less for short sales or taking losses on loans that were likely to go bad, like those that were severely delinquent.

102% tax?

James Ross, 58, is a founder and managing member of Rossrock, a Manhattan-based private investment firm that focuses on commercial real estate and distressed commercial mortgages.  “I realize I am very fortunate, and in fact I am a member of the 1%,” Mr. Ross wrote in an email. His résumé is studded with elite institutions: Yale, Columbia Law School and stints at the law firms Cravath, Swaine & Moore in New York, and Holland & Hart in Denver. Since his company fits the category of private equity, he has even carried interest.  Yet Mr. Ross told me that he paid 102% of his taxable income in federal, state, and local taxes for 2010.  “My entire taxable income, plus some, went to the payment of taxes,” Mr. Ross said. “This does not include real estate taxes, sales taxes, and other taxes I paid for 2010.” When he told friends and family, they were “astounded,” he said.

That doesn’t mean Mr. Ross pays more in taxes than he earns. His total tax as a percentage of his adjusted gross income was 20%, which is much lower than mine.  That’s because Mr. Ross has so many itemized deductions. Since taxable income is what’s left after itemized deductions like mortgage interest, charitable contributions, and state and local taxes are subtracted, it will nearly always be smaller than adjusted gross income and demonstrates how someone can pay more than 100% of taxable income in tax. Mr. Ross must hope that his interest expense will pay off down the road and generate some capital gains.  Still, all of Mr. Ross’s itemized deductions are money out of his pocket, which is why he’s had to draw on his savings to pay his taxes. Robert Willens, a tax expert and New York attorney, made the argument that taxable income, therefore, may be a better basis for measuring the tax burden.  Mr. Ross’s plight illustrates something that came through in nearly every response and cuts across nearly all income levels: The disparities of the tax code don’t just pit rich against poor or middle class. It taxes people within the same income brackets at grossly unequal rates.  “I cannot help but reflect on the unfairness of the current tax regime,” Mr. Ross wrote. “Why should I pay 102% of my taxable income in taxes when others, with far greater wealth than mine, pay a fraction of that?”

Bulk sales begin soon

The government is starting to shed foreclosed, single-family homes it owns — by selling them in bulk to investors, who would turn them into rental properties.  Officials, however, are saying only that test sales will occur “in the near-term” with a focus on the areas hardest hit by foreclosures. They declined to comment beyond a news release they issued.  The test comes after the government in summer 2011 asked for proposals on what to do with more than 90,000 foreclosed properties it then held. The government typically sells foreclosed properties one at a time, but officials specifically asked for ways to move homes in bulk because of the size of the backlog.  About 4,000 groups or individuals submitted ideas on how the government could unload the properties. After The Enquirer filed a Freedom of Information Act request, the government released a list of 423 companies, groups and individuals that submitted responsive proposals, but no details on their proposals.

The test sale of the foreclosures and conversion of them into rental housing is being supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The agency has acted since 2008 as the federal conservator for Fannie and Freddie, which are public companies although they were created by Congress.  In a news release Wednesday, the finance agency said “Fannie Mae will offer for sale pools of various types of assets including rental properties, vacant properties and non-performing loans” under the test. It also asked investors to pre-qualify to participate in the test.  The investors will be required “to rent the purchased properties for a specified number of years.” FHFA officials hope the rental period will “provide relief for local housing markets that continue to be depressed by the volume of foreclosed properties, and provide additional rental options to certain markets.”

To qualify, investors will have to show the financial wherewithal to buy the assets, sufficient experience and knowledge to bear the risks and manage of the investment and agree to “keep certain information about the REO (real estate) and related matters confidential.”  Nationwide, the 83,000 homes currently up for sale and potential conversion into rental units are among more than 200,000 foreclosures of all kinds that the government holds, apparently making it the nation’s largest owner of foreclosed properties. The 200,000 is almost a third of foreclosed properties across the nation.  Moving the backlog would get them off the books of the Federal Housing Administration. It also would clear the books of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which buy mortgages, bundle them and then sell mortgage-backed securities to investors.  The FHA, Fannie and Freddie became owners of the properties as hundreds of thousands of owners defaulted on their mortgages during the real estate meltdown.  Clearing the backlog would limit the loss to taxpayers, who already have bailed out Fannie and Freddie at a cost of $169 billion and counting. The losses are expected to total $220 billion to $311 billion by the end of 2014, according to latest projections in December by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Greece misses another deadline

Greece let yet another deadline slip on Monday for responding to painful terms for a new EU/IMF bailout, as German Chancellor Angela Merkel made clear Europe’s patience is wearing thin over drawn-out negotiations among its feuding political leaders.  Failure to strike a deal to secure the 130 billion euro ($170 billion) rescue risks pushing Athens into a chaotic debt default which could threaten its future in the euro zone.  Merkel turned up the heat, saying Athens had to come to terms with the “troika” of lenders – the European Commission, European Central Bank and IMF – to get the funds it needs to meet big debt repayments in March.  Greek political leaders, positioning themselves for a likely general election in April, have baulked at accepting another package of deeply unpopular wage and pension reductions, job cuts and tougher tax enforcement measures.

US Treasury prices pared gains notched in today’s European session that were a response to the lack of a political agreement in Greece to make reforms necessary to avoid default. Limiting gains, traders are preparing for the government’s quarterly refunding auctions, which will include sales of 10-year notes and 30-year bonds . Yields on 10-year notes, which move inversely to prices, fell 1 basis point to 1.92%. “Treasurys are modestly higher as discord among Greek coalition members over the terms of the second bailout raises the threat of default and has sent the euro and European stocks lower,” said bond strategists at RBS Securities. “We have a very quiet week of economic data up ahead and the market’s focus will be on the Treasury refunding auctions which begin tomorrow.”

New FHA standards increase Ginnie Mae risk

The Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) recently announced plans to tighten its standards for approving lenders will increase prepayment risks for investors who own Ginnie Mae-back securities, say analysts at Barclays Capital.  The agency’s plans to eliminate the consideration of a lender’s compare ratio when deciding whether to streamline-refinance its loans will accelerate refinancing activity, they say, causing higher prepayment speeds, and, in turn, reduce investor profits.  The compare ratio is the serious delinquency rate of all loans originated by a lender during a two-year period relative to the average of all lenders operating in the same region. Higher coupon and seasoned loans have a weaker credit and greater default risks, therefore, streamline-refinancing them could lift ratio passed 150%. And if it does, the lender could lose the ability to originate FHA-backed loans.  The change is part of a larger attempt by the FHA to protect its Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, which many say is in danger of requiring a multibillion dollar government bailout.

Disregarding a lender’s compare ratio calculation creates an incentive for streamline-refinancing higher-risk borrowers, analysts say. This will speed up Ginnie Mae prepayments, particularly on higher coupons and pre-2009 originations since these have the worst credit quality.  “That said, we expect the effect on speeds to be modest,” they say. “We believe that this plan will be implemented and has the potential to raise GNMA speeds by a few CPR.”  The effect should be even less for pre-2010 vintages because their much better credit quality suggests they have not been constrained by the compare ratios.

Data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) suggest that the compare ratios of most national lenders are now significantly below the 150% threshold.  In December, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan, said as a result of an October analysis by an independent actuary of FHA’s insurance fund, HUD plans to announce how it will address premium prices in its fiscal year 2013 budget proposal.  Since then, Congress has enacted a 10 basis-point increase to the FHA annual mortgage-insurance-premium, and President Barack Obama has called on the FHA to shoulder a larger role in helping responsible home owners and the housing market.  “Given the circumstances, we think more changes to the FHA program could be in the works, and since the budgetary proposal should be released over the next few weeks, the timing is peculiar,” they said. “Therefore, Ginnie Mae faces heightened risks in the near term.”

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top

Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-

foreclosure expert, he oversees more than

100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing

and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns

portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit

properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,

running 4 different offices, supporting over

420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help

thousands of investors make money in the

biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices

closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of

$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and

seminar leader for current trends and hot topics

in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and

Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 2, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Foreclosure deal deadline postponed

The deadline for states to decide whether to join a proposed nationwide foreclosure settlement with banks was delayed to Feb. 6 from Feb. 3, the Iowa Attorney General’s Office said. States were given more time to evaluate the proposal, which may total $25 billion, after at least one asked for a delay, Geoff Greenwood, a spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, said yesterday in a phone interview. Miller is helping to lead negotiations. State and federal officials have been negotiating an agreement with mortgage servicers that would provide mortgage relief to homeowners and set requirements for how banks conduct foreclosures.

State officials are reviewing the agreement with Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Ally Financial Inc., and are being asked to sign on. Greenwood declined to name the state that asked for more time or comment on state support for the deal. Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto said in a Jan. 27 letter to Miller, the Justice Department and US Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan that she needed answers to 38 questions to evaluate the deal. The deadline was changed as Oregon Attorney General John Kroger said today in a statement that he would sign on to the settlement, joining Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, who also supports it. Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden has said he won’t sign on to the settlement.

Job cuts jump in January

The number of job cuts announced by employers jumped 28% in January, led by retailers and financial firms, according to the latest report by global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Still, job losses announced last month were the lowest on record for a January, the month that typically sees the greatest number of layoffs, the firm said. Employers last month said they planned to cut 53,486 positions, compared with 41,785 job cuts announced in December. The January job cuts were 39% higher than during the same period a year earlier, when employers said they planned 38,519 cuts. Retailers and financial firms saw the greatest cuts, losing 12,426 and 7,611 jobs, respectively.

Challenger said the retail job losses were not related to seasonal hiring, and instead were the result of restructurings, store closings, and other cost-cutting measures. The financial sector saw the most job losses since September, when 31,167 cuts were announced. Challenger noted that most of those layoffs came from. Government job cuts continued to dwindle for a second straight month, with just 3,021 layoffs announced in January. “Of course, it is far too early to say whether we will continue to see low job-cut figures in government. It is highly unlikely, considering that many cities and states continue to struggle with budget deficits,” Challenger said in a statement. “And, then there is the federal level of government, which remains under intense pressure to cut costs. As a result, we expect government layoffs to be heavy again this year.”

LPS – house prices slow decline

Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS),  today announced that its LPS Applied Analytics division updated its home price index (LPS HPI) with residential sales concluded during November 2011. The LPS HPI summarizes home price trends nationwide by tracking sales each month in more than 13,500 ZIP codes. Within each ZIP code, the LPS HPI tracks five price levels from low to high. “Since the post-bubble drop in home prices eased in January of 2009, we’ve generally seen that prices for homes in the lowest 20% of local markets in the metropolitan areas covered by the LPS HPI now differ by more than the highest 20% from their levels 10 years ago,” said Kyle Lundstedt, managing director of LPS Applied Analytics. “In those metropolitan areas where lowest-priced homes have increased in value, the differences between the high and low ends of the market have usually shrunk; where they have decreased in value, the differences have grown.”

The LPS HPI national average home price for transactions during November 2011 was $199,000 – a decline of 0.6% during the month relative to October 2011, reaching a price level not seen since October 2002 (Figure 1, Table 1). This is the fifth consecutive month of price decreases. The partial data available for December suggests further price declines of approximately 0.8%. LPS reported partial data from November transactions in its December release, which proved a reasonable indicator for November’s performance: it showed a preliminary 0.5% estimated decline, compared to the 0.6% for the full month’s data. LPS HPI average national home prices continue the downward trend begun after the market peak in June 2006, when the total value of US housing inventory covered by the LPS HPI stood at $10.8 trillion. Since that peak, the value has declined 30.6% to $7.5 trillion. During the period of most rapid price declines, from June 2007 through December 2008, the LPS HPI national average home price dropped $56,000 from $282,000, which corresponds to an average annual decline of 13.8%. Since December 2008, prices have fallen more slowly, interrupted by brief seasonal intervals of rising prices. During this period of more slowly declining prices, the national average home price has fallen approximately $26,000 from $226,000.

The November national average price is down 3.4% from the average price at the beginning of the year. Home prices in November were consistent with the seasonal pattern that has been occurring since 2009. Each year, prices have risen in the spring, but have reverted in autumn to a downward trend that has not only erased the gains, but has led to an average 4.4% annual drop in prices to date. The national average home price has declined 4.8% over the most recent year to November 2011. Price changes were largely consistent across the country during November, increasing in 13% of the ZIP codes in the LPS HPI. Higher-priced homes had somewhat smaller declines: 0.55% for the top 20% of homes (prices above $311,000), compared to 0.60% for the bottom 20% (below $100,000). The highest-priced homes, the top 1% (prices above $839,000), declined 0.47%.

Claims and productivity both easing

New US claims for unemployment benefits fell last week, a government report showed today, pointing to more healing in the nations battered jobs market. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 367,000, the Labor Department said. The prior week’s figure was revised up to 379,000 from the previously reported 377,000. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 375,000. Claims have been lower than 400,000 for eight of the last 10 weeks, holding below a level associated with labor market healing. The four-week moving average for initial claims, a trend measure that smooths out volatility, fell 2,000 to 375,750. A Labor Department official said there was nothing unusual in the state-level data and that no state had been estimated. Job growth has gained momentum in recent months and the unemployment rate dropped to a near three-year low of 8.5% in December. The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid fell 130,000 to 3.437 million in the week ended January 21, the lowest since September 2008. Economists had forecast so-called continuing claims at 3.55 million. The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits rose 100,392 to 3.022 million in the week ended January 14, the latest week for which data is available. A total of 7.67 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, little changed from the prior week.

Meanwhile, productivity increased at a 0.7% annual rate, the Labor Department said today. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast productivity, which measures hourly output per worker, rising at a 0.8% rate. Productivity rose at a 1.9% pace in the third quarter. Over the entire year, productivity rose 0.7%, the slowest since 2008. Hourly compensation rose at a 1.9% rate in the last three months of the year after contracting in the previous two quarters. That is well below the US inflation rate, with consumer prices rising 3.0% in the 12 months through December. Subdued wage growth supports the US Federal Reserve’s view of a low inflation environment. This likely gives the US central bank more room to try to boost growth and tackle stubbornly high unemployment. Though productivity has slowed after growing rapidly as the economy emerged from the 2007-09 recession, businesses have maintained the bulk of the gains made during the recovery. Businesses, estimated to be sitting on a cash pile of about $2 trillion, continue to hold the line on costs. Unit labor costs rose at a 1.2% rate in the fourth quarter. Economists had expected fourth-quarter unit labor costs would increase at a 0.8% rate.

WSJ – GOP discusses Obama’s mortgage plan

President Barack Obama, in announcing a program to help struggling homeowners refinance their mortgages, is betting this plan will fare better than his administration’s earlier efforts to fix the housing market. But House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) questioned why this program would work when others have failed. “One more time? One more time? How many times have we done this?” he asked reporters. “I don’t know why anyone would think that this next idea is going to work.” He added that the previous programs have led to a delay in “the clearing of the market,” or letting housing prices hit bottom by allowing foreclosures to happen more rapidly. Republicans see additional government intervention as doing little to improve the housing situation. Mitt Romney, the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination, said in October that the government should not try to stop foreclosures but let the housing market “hit the bottom.” He has argued that Mr. Obama’s housing policies have failed.

The government already has programs that allow some homeowners who are current on their payments to refinance at lower interest rates, even if they owe more than their homes are worth or wouldn’t otherwise qualify. Those programs are limited to borrowers with mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The latest proposal would extend that option to all homeowners, allowing borrowers who are current on payments to refinance into new loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration. That requires congressional approval, partly because it would cost money. Economists said the latest proposal—at least on paper—is more ambitious than previous plans because it would allow more borrowers to qualify. Until now, policy makers and elected officials have been hesitant to take bolder steps because the political will simply isn’t there, analysts said. Many of those solutions would mean spending more money or forcing banks and investors to take bigger losses. Instead, policy makers tried to steer a middle course. Many have worried that rewarding irresponsible behavior would create a “moral hazard” that might encourage more defaults.

The hitch is that the programs were designed to make sure they didn’t help borrowers who took on more debt than they could afford. And that “made these programs very complicated,” said David Stevens, chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Association who spent two years as a top Obama administration housing official. Using the FHA to refinance at-risk borrowers isn’t a new idea. The Bush administration and Congress passed a program in 2008 called for Hope for Homeowners that also employed the agency to refinance at-risk homeowners. It included many restrictions and resulted in just a few hundred refinanced loans. The Obama administration rolled out a similar initiative without Congress two years ago. It resulted in around 700 refinances. “The banks decided not to participate,” said Peter Swire, a former housing adviser to Mr. Obama. “So now the administration is looking for another way to achieve the same goals.”

US still risks recession

In the United States, the manufacturing sector grew at its fastest pace in seven months in January as new orders improved, but Jim Walker, Founder and Managing Director of independent research firm, Asianomics, said that the US economy is going to face a slowdown this year owing to fiscal tightening.

“There’s going to be a significant slowdown in fiscal expenditure in the US, they’re going to have to control the fiscal side much more as the year goes on,” he said. On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to freeze wages for federal civilian workers until 2013, a move that will save taxpayers $26 billion. According to Walker, pullbacks in government spending will cut between 1 and 1.5% from US GDP in 2012. Walker also believes corporate investment is likely to slow after the federal depreciation allowance expired at the end of 2011. In a report for clients released in December, Walker said there was a 55% chance of a US recession.

He also argued that US consumers were due for another “period of reckoning”, despite improving consumer confidence and spending numbers. He listed a litany of reasons: “Home prices are still falling (on a mild deflation path), equity prices are still off their highs of the year, household credit outstanding is still contracting, real hourly compensation growth is still negative, employment growth is still sub par – and up until November – consumer confidence was fast approaching the recession lows of 2008.” Walker is much more bearish on Europe, which he says is destined for a recession, with GDP contracting 2 to 5% in 2012. He expects further monetary easing from global central banks, which he says will boost precious metals, most notably silver. But he says investors should short the Euro and avoid industrial metals such as copper, which will suffer from a global downturn.

Atlanta lags in housing recovery

Housing prices continue to fall nationwide, despite a few modest signs of improvement. But not all markets are equal. A sprawling Southern metropolis, Atlanta has become one of the biggest laggards in the economic recovery. In November, prices of single-family homes were down close to 12% compared with a year earlier, the largest decline among major metropolitan areas, according to data released on Tuesday in the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller Home Price Index. Home prices regionally are now below their levels of 2000, making Atlanta one of only four metro areas to have experienced such a slide. The price of entry-level housing in the area — the lowest tier of the market, valued at just under $96,600 — fell by close to a third last year.

Even though the national economy shows signs of strengthening, the beleaguered housing market remains a significant drag on the recovery. Across a group of 20 metropolitan areas measured by S&P/Case-Shiller, prices of single-family homes were 3.7% lower in November compared with a year earlier, with average prices at their 2003 levels. Economists say prices are unlikely to hit a nadir until at least late spring. Tom Porcelli, chief United States economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York, projects that average prices could slip by as much as 5% nationally this year because of the large amount of distressed properties for sale and a shortage of buyers. Although Mr. Porcelli describes a “generally better outlook on housing” than he has over the last few years, he added, “we still have a long way to go.”

The reasons for Atlanta’s housing woes are both representative of the nation’s troubles and special to this former boomtown, where housing appreciated handsomely, though not to the lofty heights of Las Vegas, Miami and New York. Where the region once attracted thousands of prospective home buyers drawn by plentiful jobs and more affordable living, that influx has dwindled. Local unemployment, at 9.2%, is slightly higher than the national rate, in part because one in every four jobs lost was connected to real estate, a much higher rate than in the rest of the country. Those jobs have yet to return, while even people with work are having trouble qualifying for loans. The region, plagued by mortgage fraud and developers who dotted the exurban landscape with large luxury homes that never sold, is inundated with foreclosed properties. In fact, Atlanta has the most government-owned foreclosed properties for sale of any large city, according to the Federal Reserve.

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top

Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-

foreclosure expert, he oversees more than

100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing

and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns

portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit

properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,

running 4 different offices, supporting over

420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help

thousands of investors make money in the

biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices

closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of

$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and

seminar leader for current trends and hot topics

in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and

Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 1, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Foreclosures drawing private equity

Private equity firms are jumping into distressed housing as the US government plans to market 200,000 foreclosed homes as rentals to speed up the economic recovery.  GTIS Partners will spend $1 billion by 2016 acquiring single-family homes to manage as rentals, Thomas Shapiro, the fund’s founder said. That followed announcements this month that GI Partners, a Menlo Park private equity fund, expects to invest $1 billion, and Los Angeles-based Oaktree Capital Management LP will spend $450 million on similar housing.  “It’s a massive market,” Shapiro said in a telephone interview from New York. “We’re starting to see this as a billion dollar opportunity to buy rental housing.” Increasing rentals may reduce lenders’ losses on foreclosed and surrendered properties and curb declines in home prices, according to a Federal Reserve study Chairman Ben S. Bernanke sent to Congress on Jan. 4. Private equity funds began focusing on these investments in September, after the administration asked for proposals to sell the government’s inventory of foreclosed homes — about half of all houses seized from delinquent borrowers.

Private sector gains 170,000 jobs

The private sector created 170,000 jobs in January, boosted again by a surge in service-sector employment, according a report from ADP and Macroeconomic Advisors.  With economists looking for signs of life in the jobs market, the ADP number was close to consensus estimates and likely sets the stage for solid though not overwhelming overall growth when the government releases its monthly report Friday.  The private payrolls report showed service jobs growing by 152,000 in January, after rising a revised 241,000 in December.  Goods-producing jobs rose 18,000 while manufacturing added 10,000 and construction gained 2,000 for the month.  The total number of private sector jobs created is a substantial dropoff from December’s report that showed a revised 292,000, revised down from 325,000.  The Labor Department on Friday is expected to report nonfarm payrolls growth of 159,000 and an unchanged unemployment rate of 8.5%, according to StreetAccount estimates. Economists sometimes use the ADP numbers to adjust their projected unemployment estimates.  ADP’s numbers have been running on average 10,000 more than the government, though that number swelled to 92,000 in December, raising caution that seasonal distortions could be influencing the payroll firm’s figures.

November home prices down 3.7% from previous year

The average price of a single-family home fell again in November, with decreases in 19 of the 20 largest metropolitan areas during the month, according to the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller index.  The ratings agency’s 20-city composite index and 10-city index both declined 1.3% from a month earlier. The larger, benchmark index drop 3.7% from November 2010 and the 10-city index for November was 3.6% lower than the year earlier.  S&P said both indices are one-third lower than the peak in the summer of 2006 and home prices are now at levels last seen in the middle of 2003.  Atlanta home prices for November were nearly 12% lower than the prior year, while Detroit at 3.8% and Washington with a 0.5% gain are the only metropolitan areas to post annual increases. Home prices in Atlanta, Las Vegas, Seattle and Tampa, Fla., all reached new lows in November, according to S&P/Case-Shiller.  “Despite continued low interest rates and better real GDP growth in the fourth quarter, home prices continue to fall,” said David Blitzer, chairman of the S&P index committee.  He said Phoenix, one of the hardest-hit areas in recent years, was the only MSA to post an increase in prices from October with a 0.6% gain.  “Annual rates were little better as 18 cities and both composites were negative,” Blitzer said. “The trend is down and there are few, if any, signs in the numbers that a turning point is close at hand.”  Analysts with Toronto-based Capital Economics agreed and said “there are still no signs that house prices are on the verge of turning around,” as the Case-Shiller indices fell for the seventh month in a row.  “But things should be different in six months’ time, when the recent rises in home sales will have helped to put a floor under prices,” the analysts said.

California is broke

California needs to come up with more than $3 billion to avoid burning through its cash by March, according to the state controller, who urged borrowing and delaying some payments.  “Assuming no additional revenue loss, erosion of borrowable internal funds, or significant spikes in spending, $3.3 billion of cash solutions are needed to address California’s liquidity needs during this period,” State Controller John Chiang said in a letter to the chairman and vice chairman of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee released on Tuesday.  Chiang said California does not need to issue IOUs again as it did during a cash crunch in 2009 or delay tax refunds, noting he has developed a plan with the state treasurer’s office and the state’s finance department that would postpone some payments and borrow from external sources and from state accounts to bolster the state’s cash.  “It is not an ideal solution, but it is the best way to manage the challenge without relying on IOUs or delaying tax refunds — actions that can disrupt the delivery of essential public services and slow California’s economic recovery,” Chiang said.  Senator Mark Leno, chairman of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, said he expects the Senate and Assembly by the end the week will approve borrowing from state funds. Leno said he expects the internal borrowing will raise approximately $850 million.  Chiang noted California’s dwindling cash reflects revenue coming in below forecast in the state’s budget and spending exceeding expectations.

MBA – mortgage applications down

Mortgage applications decreased 2.9% from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending January 27, 2012.  The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, decreased 2.9% on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 9.0% compared with the previous week.  The Refinance Index decreased 3.6% from the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 1.7% from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index increased 17.1% compared with the previous week and was 4.3% lower than the same week one year ago.  The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 4.11%.  The four week moving average is up 2.48% for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 4.22% for the Refinance Index.

The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 80.0% of total applications from 81.3% the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity increased to 5.6% from 5.3% of total applications from the previous week.  “The Federal Reserve surprised the market last week by indicating that short-term rates were likely to stay at their current low-levels until the end of 2014.  Longer-term treasury rates dropped in response, and mortgage rates for the week were down slightly as a result,” said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics.  Fratantoni continued, “Although total application volume dropped on an adjusted basis relative to last week, refinance volume remains high, with survey participants reporting that the expanded Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) contributed to roughly 10% of their refinance activity.”  In December 2011, Connecticut had the largest increase in refinance applications, increasing by 80.1% from November. Maine saw a 30.8% increase in applications for home purchase, which was the largest state-increase in applications for home purchase. Only 12 states had a decrease in home purchase activity in December, while every state in the US saw an increase in refinance volume.

Europe on life support

The European Central Bank (ECB) has saved the euro zone from a heart attack, but its members face a long convalescence, made worse by the insistence that fiscal starvation is the right remedy for feeble patients.  Last week’s downgrading of its forecasts by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) shows the dangers. The IMF now forecasts a recession in the euro zone this year, with a decline of 0.5 per cent in overall gross domestic product (GDP).  GDP is forecast to fall sharply in Italy and Spain, and stagnate in France and Germany. This is a terrible environment for countries seeking to cut fiscal deficits. Forecasts are far from satisfactory for other high-income countries. But the euro zone is the most dangerous part of the world economy: only there do we see important governments — Italy and Spain — menaced by a loss of creditworthiness.

Elsewhere, governments of high-income countries can continue to support their economies, largely because they possess a central bank and an adjustable exchange rate. This combination has given them the ability to run large fiscal deficits. In post-crisis conditions, such deficits are both the natural counterpart and the principal facilitator of necessary private sector deleveraging.  The euro zone has no such internal mechanisms. When private external financing dried up, as happened to a number of countries, affected members needed both financing — in the short run — and a mechanism for adjusting their external accounts — in the longer run — other than via deep slumps.  The euro zone lacks both capacities. It has turned out, as a result, to have limited ability to cope with the global financial disease. As Donald Tsang, chief executive of Hong Kong, remarked in Davos: “I have never been as scared as I am now.” Astute observers have a sense that little stands between them and a wave of sovereign and banking defaults inside the euro zone, with ghastly global repercussions.

Olick – refinancing to go through FHA

“After announcing during his State of the Union address a new government refinance program for, ‘responsible’ but ‘underwater’ borrowers with privately held mortgages, President Obama is expected to detail the plan today.  It will go through the government mortgage insurer, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and could cost between 5 and 10 billion dollars, according to senior administration officials.  The cost of the program, officials say, would be covered by a tax on major lenders, which is likely to make it a no-go in Congress.  It would cover closing fees for borrowers and additional risk to the FHA, which doesn’t insure new loans where the borrower owes more than the home is worth.  Critics will also argue that the FHA, which now has an inordinately, historically large share of the mortgage market, is in no position to take on any more risk. The FHA could be considered ‘underwater’ itself, guaranteeing about $1 trillion in mortgages but sitting on just a $1.2 billion dollar cushion to cover losses.  To that end, officials say they could create a separate fund for these loans, not the regular mutual mortgage insurance fund (MMI). This would be a special risk fund, designed to handle high losses.  ‘In this program we’re talking about extraordinary circumstances,’ says Brian Chappelle of Potomac Partners. ‘People have played by the rules, they made payments in addition to the fact that their house is underwater, they’re paying excessively high rates. It’s a unique homeowner, not somebody looking for a handout.’

To be eligible, borrowers would have to be current on their mortgages, not having missed a payment in at least six months. They need a credit score (FICO) above 580, must be employed, and must have a conforming loan (between $271,050 and $729,750 depending on their location). No appraisal would be necessary, according to officials.  Estimates are that the plan could help 3.5 million borrowers in addition to the 11 million expected to qualify for the existing refinance program for those with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans (HARP). The one sticking point could be the mortgage insurance premiums charged by the FHA. If rolled into the loan, they would put a borrower further underwater.  ‘To use taxpayer dollars to bail out the few who are current and don’t need payment assistance but are underwater is ludicrous and worsens their equity position,’ says JT Smith of Aristar Funding.  The plan would also require lenders to write down the value of the loan if it exceeded 140% of the value of the home. Administration officials say the trade-off for lenders is they get rid of a risky loan.

On the flip side, the government would then be backing that same risky loan, but officials argue they would offset some of that risk because in order to get closing fees paid, the borrower has to agree to use the lower interest rate savings on the refinance to pay off principal balance.  The plan faces many headwinds, first and foremost being Congressional approval; borrowers and lenders would also have to agree to all the requirements, as this is not an automatic plan but a voluntary, borrower-initiated deal. It would also rile Wall Street, as hundreds of thousands of loans could ‘pre-pay,’ which means the bondholders lose.  ‘Some say it undermines the value of existing [mortgage] securities, so they would build a premium in,’ notes Chappelle. That could make future loans for other Americans more expensive.”

US to charge European traders

US authorities are preparing to charge four former Credit Suisse employees with criminal and civil fraud related to write-downs on subprime mortgage derivatives at the height of the financial crisis, sources familiar with the matter said.  Credit Suisse will not be charged in the matter, which is being investigated by federal prosecutors and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the sources said.  The four people to be charged were former Credit Suisse traders who were fired, another source said, but it was unclear when and for what reason.  The suspected illegal conduct took place roughly four years ago, the source said, adding that the bank had been cooperating with officials.  The investigation stems from $2.85 billion in write-downs that Credit Suisse took on collateralized debt obligations in 2008, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.  Credit Suisse revealed those CDO losses in early 2008, and blamed them on a group of rogue traders – who the bank said had deliberately mispriced securities – and on a failure of internal controls.  Credit Suisse, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the SEC and Manhattan US attorney Preet Bharara declined to comment on the matter.

WSJ – housing’s firmer foundation

The Case-Shiller index is closely watched for a reason. It was quicker than a US government price index to show just how bad things were as housing came off the rails in 2007.  But right now, the connection between what the S&P/Case-Shiller index says and what is actually going on with housing may be lukewarm at best.  The difference: The Federal Housing Finance Agency index includes only homes with mortgages guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while the Case-Shiller index includes those backed by jumbo and subprime mortgages.  Many homes that were backed by subprime mortgages are now being sold in foreclosure. They aren’t in nearly as good condition as when they were last bought, and are selling for less than if they had been properly maintained. Because the Case-Shiller index is based on repeat sales, such homes may be biasing it downward.  Moreover, the Case-Shiller index is based on a three-month average of sales, so its November level includes transactions that were completed in October and September. Consider that it takes about two months between a sale and a closing (often longer with mortgage hassles these days), and you are talking about deals agreed on in the summer, when recession fears filled the air. Things now look better. Home prices probably do, too.

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin January 25, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Foreclosures fell 12% in California, but…

The number of California homes entering foreclosure in the fourth quarter fell 11.9% from the same period in 2010 to the second-lowest level over the last four years, said DataQuick, a real estate information firm in San Diego. A total of 61,517 notices of default, which are filed to initiate foreclosures, were recorded on California properties during the fourth quarter. That was a 13.7% drop from the third quarter of 2011.  Some economists say California and other states will probably see an increase in foreclosure actions as banks deal more aggressively with seriously delinquent mortgages. That increase probably will push home prices lower.  Default notice filings fell sharply in December, particularly those involving loans from Bank of America and Bank of New York Mellon, and helped drag down the overall quarterly numbers. Average daily filings on behalf of Bank of New York Mellon dropped 75% from November to December; filings on behalf of Bank of America dropped 50%, Wells Fargo 20% and JPMorgan Chase 13%, DataQuick said Tuesday.  The number of homes taken back through the foreclosure process also fell, by 11.8% from a year earlier to 31,260.

The majority of the loans entering the foreclosure process in the fourth quarter were made in 2005 to 2007, when poor lending practices by major institutions were rampant.  Californian homeowners were a median nine months behind on their payments when they received a notice of default from their lender. Among the state’s largest counties, mortgages in San Francisco, Marin and San Mateo counties were the least likely to go into foreclosure. Homes were most likely to enter the foreclosure process in Sacramento, San Joaquin and Stanislaus counties, according to DataQuick.  In Southern California, the number of default notices filed on properties fell 10.2% from a year earlier, and the number of homes taken back by banks fell 11%.  Many foreclosures were delayed in 2011 as banks worked through issues surrounding mortgage servicing and foreclosure. Settlement negotiations among attorneys general, federal agencies and the mortgage industry over foreclosure and mortgage servicing abuses dragged on through most of last year.

Analysts attributed the delays to the uncertainty over the outcome of those talks. If a deal is struck among the parties and new foreclosure processes by banks are put in place, some analysts say the foreclosure machinery could ramp up again.  Those negotiations continue to inch forward but could still fall apart. State attorneys general have received drafts of the deal with the banks, a $25-billion settlement that would overhaul foreclosure and mortgage servicing practices, according to two people familiar with the negotiations who aren’t authorized to speak publicly.  A key component to any strong deal would be California’s participation. State Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris, who must make that decision for the Golden State, has not said whether she will sign on. Harris walked away from talks with the banks last year, saying they were asking for too much release from liability, but since then certain provisions have been added to the deal with the aim of getting her back to the table.  Yesterday the Center for Responsible Lending gave the proposed $25-billion deal a tentative thumbs up, calling it “an important step forward in addressing foreclosure abuses.” The nonpartisan advocacy group noted that the deal would “provide an important template for ways banks can use principal reduction to reduce unnecessary foreclosures and put the country back on a path to economic recovery.”

GOP says Obama economic plan is a failure

President Barack Obama has resorted to “extremism” with stifling, anti-growth policies and has tried dividing Americans, not uniting them, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels said Tuesday in the formal Republican response to the president’s State of the Union address.  He took particular aim at Obama’s efforts in recent months to raise taxes on the rich and castigate them. “No feature of the Obama presidency has been sadder than its constant effort to divide us, to curry favor with some Americans by castigating others,” Daniels said, according to excerpts of his remarks released before he and Obama spoke. “As in previous moments of national danger, we Americans are all in the same boat.”  “The extremism that stifles the development of homegrown energy, or cancels a perfectly sane pipeline that would employ tens of thousands, or jacks up consumer utility bills for no improvement in either human health or world temperature, is a pro-poverty policy,” Daniels said.

Obama has halted work on the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from western Canada to Texas’ Gulf Coast. Republicans say the project would create thousands of jobs, a claim opponents say is overstated. The administration has also pursued policies aimed at reducing pollution and global warming.  Daniels said Republicans prefer “a passionate pro-growth approach that breaks all ties and calls all close ones in favor of private sector jobs that restore opportunity for all and generate the public revenues to pay our bills.”  Even before Obama spoke, Republicans in the Capitol and on the campaign trail accused him of three years of higher spending, bigger government and tax increases that have left the economy stuck in a ditch.  “This election is going to be a referendum on the president’s economic policies,” which have worsened the economy, said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. “The politics of envy, the politics of dividing our country is not what America is all about.”

Olick – more plans from the president

“After several largely ineffective programs to help troubled borrowers and after fruitless attempts at budging the hard-line conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, President Obama is proposing a brand new refinance program for borrowers who are current on their mortgages, regardless of who owns their loan; the catch is that this one has to go through Congress.  ‘I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks,’ the President announced in his State of the Union address.  Unlike previous efforts in the refinance space, including a recently revamped and expanded government program for borrowers who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth, this plan would not be limited to those with loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to senior administration officials. The two mortgage giants own or guarantee about half of the nation’s mortgages. It would be open to all borrowers current on their loans.

The Obama administration is offering precious few details, promising more in the coming weeks, but several sources say the plan is to ask Congress to allow the government mortgage insurer, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), to back refinances of underwater mortgages. No estimates were given as to how many borrowers such a plan could potentially help, only that this would be a voluntary, borrower-initiated plan, and not a blanket refinance of all borrowers.  The costs, according to administration officials, would be modest, and the President would request that a portion of his financial crisis responsibility fee offset any of those costs, so there would be no addition to the federal debt.  ‘A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust,’ Mr. Obama added.  Loan servicers could be faced with a flood of applications and could have to add resources to handle it all, but officials say the opportunity to generate revenues from the refinances would be incentive enough. Still many servicers have balked at the idea of mass refinancing, as the new loans could present more risk and less reward.

The idea is to remove the barriers and ‘frictions’ that have kept many borrowers out of refinancing to historically low rates. Some of those include high levels of negative equity, loan level price adjustments, loan origination dates, put-backs on loans that default, and borrower qualifications.  Then there is the very basic problem of politics. Whatever the details of the plan are, Republicans, despite the fact that they have been calling for more refinances, are unlikely to hand President Obama a popular victory on the eve of a presidential election. They may also oppose anything that makes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bigger, when the two are allegedly winding down.”

Americans lead in debt reduction

Americans are cutting their debt faster than other countries and could already be halfway through the deleveraging process, setting the stage for the nation’s economic recovery, says a new report from McKinsey Global Institute.  However, even when U.S. consumers finish deleveraging, they probably won’t be as powerful an engine of global growth as they were before the crisis, warns the report.  According to McKinsey analysts, deleveraging happens in two stages: First, the private sector reduces debt, while economic growth is negative or minimal and government debt rises; then, growth rebounds and supports gradual government deleveraging.  “Somewhat surprisingly, given the amount of concern over the U.S. economy, we find that the United States is furthest along in private-sector debt reduction and closest to beginning the second phase of deleveraging,” says the report.  “The remaining obstacles for its return to growth are its unsettled housing market and its failure to lay out a credible medium-term plan for public debt reduction,” concludes the report.

Since the financial crisis, U.S. household debt has fallen by $584 billion, or 15 percentage points relative to disposable income, which is more than in any other country.  At this pace, Americans could reach sustainable debt levels by the middle of 2013.  The report also found that since the 2008-2009 financial crisis the world’s ten largest developed economies have seen their total debt increase, primarily due to growing government debt.  The U.S., South Korea and Australia are the only countries that have seen a decline in the ratio of total debt to GDP during that time period.  Moreover, the United Kingdom and Spain are deleveraging at a much slower pace, and it could take another decade until their private-sector debt returns to the pre-bubble levels.  In the United States, most of the private-sector deleveraging has happened in the financial sector, where debt relative to GDP had declined to $6.1 trillion from $8 trillion, levels not seen since 2000.

MBA – mortgages down 5%

Mortgage applications decreased 5.0 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending January 20, 2012.  The results include an adjustment to account for the Martin Luther King holiday.  The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, decreased 5.0 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index decreased 13.8 percent compared with the previous week.  The Refinance Index decreased 5.2 percent from the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 5.4 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 9.7 percent compared with the previous week and was 6.5 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 4.12 percent.  The four week moving average is up 0.47 percent for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 4.85 percent for the Refinance Index.  The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 81.3 percent of total applications from 82.2 percent the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 5.3 percent from 5.6 percent of total applications from the previous week.  In December 2011, among refinance borrowers, 56.6 percent of applications were for fixed-rate 30-year loans, 24.3 percent for 15-year fixed loans, and 5.3 percent for ARMs.  The share of refinance applications for “other” fixed-rate mortgages with amortization schedules other than 15 and 30-year terms was 13.8 percent of all refinance applications. The share for 30-year fixed increased from the previous month while the 15-year fixed, ARM and the “other” fixed category shares decreased from last month.

Markets down on possible Obama re-election

So far, the presidential election has not impacted stocks, but that could change if Mitt Romney appears unlikely to make it as the GOP nominee.  For the past two days, Romney’s vulnerability to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has been the talk of trading rooms.  Gingrich beat Romney handily in the South Carolina primary Saturday, the second of three early contests that Romney lost. But the volatile Gingrich is not viewed as a strong candidate to beat President Obama.  “Obama’s gone from 50 percent probability to 55 percent on Intrade,” said Dan Clifton, Strategas head of policy research. “This week he just kind of exploded once Gingrich won in South Carolina. The Intrade market is saying there’s a much greater chance of President Obama being re-elected.”  Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, is by far the preferred candidate on Wall Street, where many disagree with Obama’s policies and have been stung by what they call “class warfare.”  “I don’t think it’s fully reflected in the market yet. The market is drifting. There’s a mild degree of anxiety, and that’s really because it’s overbought. Is there a gentle longing for a smoke-filled room? Yeah. There’s some yearning for that,” said Art Cashin, UBS director of floor operations.  The S&P 500 broke its five-day winning streak Tuesday, finishing 1 point lower at 1314, but it is up 4.5 percent since the start of the year.  Analysts believe if Romney loses the Florida primary next Tuesday, he will have a hard time stopping Gingrich’s momentum.

Huffington post – Romney on mortgages

Finally, a presidential candidate came out and honestly addressed the biggest problem in our economy, the enormous debt overhang in our mortgage market. A few days ago, Mitt Romney was at a forum in Florida talking about foreclosures, and his comments were actually refreshingly honest about our housing and banking situation and the need for a debt write-down.  We’re just so overleveraged, so much debt in our society, and some of the institutions that hold it aren’t willing to write it off and say they made a mistake, they loaned too much, we’re overextended, write those down and start over. They keep on trying to harangue and pretend what they have on their books is still what it’s worth.  Mitt Romney was pointing out that the banks are carrying debt on their books at inflated values. When was the last serious politician to make that point, openly? There’s more.  In some cases, if the debt is not in something you can service, it’s like you have to move on and start over away from those debts. It’s helpful if you get an institution that’s willing to work with you, but if you don’t you have no other option.

Romney is now saying that if you can’t pay your debts and your lending institution won’t work with you, walk away. Perhaps this isn’t so surprising, though, as Romney is an expert in debt restructuring. This is actually just common business sense.  And finally, he offered a real solution to the mortgage debt crisis.  “The banks are scared to death, of course, because they think they’re going to go out of business… They’re afraid that if they write all these loans off, they’re going to go broke. And so they’re feeling the same thing you’re feeling. They just want to pretend all of this is going to get paid someday so they don’t have to write it off and potentially go out of business themselves.  This is cascading throughout our system and in some respects government is trying to just hold things in place, hoping things get better… My own view is you recognize the distress, you take the loss and let people reset. Let people start over again, let the banks start over again. Those that are prudent will be able to restart, those that aren’t will go out of business. This effort to try and exact the burden of their mistakes on homeowners and commercial property owners, I think, is a mistake.”

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com