mortgage bankers association

Fannie and Freddie Servicer Response Timelines on Preforeclosure Sales

When evaluating a borrower’s request for Fannie Mae’s Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) program or the non-HAFA program for Fannie Mae preforeclosure sales, servicers must comply within the response times described in Servicing Guide Announcement SVC-2012-07,  Changes to Servicer Response Times and the Preforeclosure Sale Process  and outlined in the table below.  Servicers must document the mortgage servicing loan file for validation of compliance with these response timelines.

Fannie Mae HAFA – Servicer Evaluation of Borrower Response Package (BRP)

-  Within 3 business days of receipt of the BRP – The servicer must acknowledge receipt of the BRP to the borrower either verbally or in writing.

-  Within 5 business days of receipt of the BRP – If the servicer determines that documentation is missing, the servicer must send an Incomplete Information Notice to the borrower.

- Within 5 business days of a decision but in no event more than 30 calendar days after receipt of a complete BRP – The servicer must send an Evaluation Notice to the borrower.  If the servicer determines a HAFA Short Sale is the most appropriate foreclosure alternative, the HAFA Short Sale Agreement (Form 184) and the HAFA Request for Approval of Short Sale without Short Sale Agreement (Form 185) should be included with the Evaluation Notice.

Within 30 calendar days after receipt of the complete BRP but in no event more than 60 days after receipt of the complete BRP – If the servicer is unable to fully evaluate the

borrower for a HAFA, including preparation of the Form 184 and Form 185, an extension of 30 calendar days is permitted as long as the servicer provides weekly verbal or written status updates to the borrower. All communication must be documented in the mortgage loan servicing file.  The servicer must send the Evaluation Notice no later than 60 days after receipt of the complete BRP. 

- Within 14 calendar days after return of a fully executed Form 184 – The servicer must allow the borrower 14 calendar days to return a fully-executed Form 184 with required documentation.

- Within 10 calendar day extension of return of fully executed Form 184 – If necessary, the servicer may allow the borrower up to 10 additional calendar days to complete the Form 184 submission.

-  Within 10 business days of receipt of the Form 185 – The servicer must respond with a decision of approval or denial. 

*If the offer results in net proceeds equal to or greater than the minimum acceptable net proceeds (MANP), the servicer must approve the short sale.  

*If the offer does not result in net proceeds equal to or greater than MANP, the servicer must provide a counteroffer with the denial.  

* The MANP should not be disclosed to the borrower. 

- 5 business days after communicating a counteroffer – The servicer must request a response from the borrower on the purchaser’s decision of a counteroffer.

- Within 10 business days after receipt of revised offer – The servicer must respond with a decision on a revised offer from the borrower. 

*If the offer results in net proceeds equal to or greater than the MANP, the servicer must approve the short sale.  

*If the offer does not result in net proceeds equal to or greater than the MANP, the servicer may provide a counteroffer with the denial.  

*The MANP should not be disclosed to the borrower.

Fannie Mae’s Non-HAFA Preforeclosure Sale – Prior to Receipt of a Preforeclosure Sale Offer

-  Within 3 business days of receipt of the BRP – The servicer must acknowledge receipt of the BRP to the borrower either verbally or in writing.

-  Within 5 business days of receipt of the BRP – If the servicer determines that documentation is missing, the servicer must send an Incomplete Information Notice to the borrower.

-  Within 5 business days of a decision but in no event more than 30 calendar days after receipt of a complete BRP – The servicer must send an Evaluation Notice to the borrower. The Evaluation Notice should include the approved model language provided on eFannieMae.com.

Fannie Mae’s Non-HAFA Preforeclosure Sale – Preforeclosure Sale Offer Received with a BRP

-  Within 3 business days of receipt of the offer  The servicer must acknowledge receipt of a short sale offer. 

-  Within 5 business days of receipt of the offer  If the servicer determines that documentation is missing, the servicer must send an Incomplete Information Notice to the borrower.

-  Within 5 business days of a decision but in no event more than 30 calendar days after receipt of a complete BRP – The servicer must respond to the short sale offer with approve, approve with conditions, deny with counteroffer, or “still under review.”

-  5 business days after communicating a counteroffer If the response is “deny with counteroffer,” the servicer must request a response from the borrower on the purchaser’s decision of a counteroffer.

-  Within 10 business days after receipt of revised offer  The servicer must ensure that revised offers are evaluated within time frames that enable a decision to be communicated to the borrower within 10 business days after receipt of the revised offer.

-  30 calendar days after receipt of the BRP  If the servicer responds with “still under review,” an extension of 30 calendar days is permitted as long as the servicer provides weekly verbal or written status updates.   All communication must be documented in the mortgage loan servicing file.

-  Within 60 calendar days of receipt of the BRP and offer – The servicer must respond with a final decision.

Economic growth flat

Gross domestic product (GDP) expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate, the Commerce Department said on Friday in its advance estimate, moderating from the fourth quarter’s 3 percent rate.  While that was below economists’ expectations for a 2.5 percent pace, a surge in consumer spending took some of the sting from the report. However, growth was still stronger than analysts’ predictions early in the quarter for an expansion below 1.5 percent. Although the details were mixed, the GDP report offered a somewhat better picture of growth compared with the fourth quarter, when inventory building accounted for nearly two thirds of the economy’s growth. In the first quarter, demand from consumers took up the slack.  Consumer spending which accounts for about 70 percent of U.S. economic activity, increased at a 2.9 percent rate – the fastest pace since the fourth quarter of 2010. That compared to a 2.1 percent rise in the fourth quarter.  Business spending fell at a 2.1 percent pace after rising 5.2 percent in the fourth quarter.

Excluding inventories, GDP is rose at a 1.6 percent rate. In the fourth quarter, the comparable figure was just 1.1 percent.  Elsewhere, growth in the first quarter was held back by a another drop in government defense spending, which confounded expectations for a strong rebound. An increase in exports was offset by a rise imports, causing trade to have virtually no impact on growth. Separately, civilian employment costs rose more modestly by 0.4 percent during the first quarter, primarily because growth in benefits slowed after a sharp rise in last year’s fourth quarter, Labor Department data showed on Friday.  The gain in employee costs was slightly lower than the 0.5 percent rise forecast by analysts surveyed by Reuters. Costs had increased 0.5 percent in the final three months of 2011.  Benefit costs, which account for 30 percent of compensation, grew by 0.5 percent in the first quarter after a sharp 0.7 percent rise in last year’s fourth quarter.  Wages and salaries – the other 70 percent of costs – were up 0.5 percent in the first three months this year, a pickup from the 0.3 percent gain posted in last year’s closing quarter.

Olick – foreclosures return

“Big jumps in foreclosure activity in cities like Pittsburgh, Indianapolis, New York and Raleigh pushed the national numbers higher in the first three months of this year, according to a new report from RealtyTrac, an online foreclosure sales and data company.  A majority of U.S. housing markets posted a quarterly increase in foreclosure activity, although the numbers are still down from a year ago.  ‘First quarter metro foreclosure trends were a mixed bag,’ said Brandon Moore, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac, adding that the increase in the number of cities seeing a quarterly jump is, ‘an early sign that long-dormant foreclosures are coming out of hibernation in many local markets.’ Tracking foreclosure activity is a tricky business right now, as the system has been roiled with problems left over from the so-called ‘robo-signing’ foreclosure paperwork scandal.  The five largest banks signed a $25 billion settlement agreement earlier this year, requiring them to do more modifications and write down principal on some troubled loans. While some expected foreclosure numbers to surge, as states that require a judge in the foreclosure process finally start pushing the documents through again, but more recent data has shown the opposite. As banks work on saving more loans or doing foreclosure alternatives, like short sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or deeds for rent programs, the final foreclosure numbers are falling. New mortgage delinquencies are also falling, thanks to a slowly improving jobs picture.

Still, inventories of properties in the foreclosure process are still abnormally high, and some of the usual markets are the culprits. Stockton and Modesto, California still have the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, while Las Vegas dropped to the eighth spot, with foreclosure activity down 61 percent from a year ago. The Phoenix market is also improving, although still in the top ten list of foreclosure rates.  Just over 7 percent of U.S. loans were in some stage of delinquency in March, and 4.14 percent were in the foreclosure process, according to a new report from Lender Processing Services. The delinquency number is down almost 9 percent from a year ago, but the foreclosure inventory is fairly flat, down 1.6 percent from a year ago, but up slightly from the previous month. 5.6 million properties are still in some stage of delinquency or foreclosure. These numbers, negative home equity, and still-tight credit are the largest impediments to a robust recovery in the housing market.”

Treasury Secretary wants to open markets to China

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Thursday the United States was willing to open up its markets to China and give it more access to U.S. technologies if Beijing made progress on issues that concern the United States.  Also Thursday, a top GOP lawmaker pressed the Obama administration to increase pressure on China to make currency and trade reforms.  The comments came ahead of the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue meetings in Beijing next week. “We are willing to continue to make progress on these issues, but our ability to do so will depend in part on how much progress we see from China on issues that are important to us,” Geithner said. He repeated that China’s currency, the yuan, needed to appreciate more rapidly and pledged that the United States would continue to push aggressively for fair treatment of U.S. companies doing business with China.  Rep. Dave Camp, chairman of the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, urged the administration to negotiate an investment treaty with China and to press the world’s second-largest economy to make reforms.  “Plain and simple, we cannot allow China to continue its unacceptable trade practices,” the Michigan Republican said in a speech, referring to longstanding barriers to U.S. exports and the widespread piracy and counterfeiting of U.S. goods.  “The litany of China’s trade distorting policies is deeply troubling and cannot be allowed to stand,” Camp said. “In addition, we should pursue a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) with China.”  Camp’s call for the United States to begin talks with China on a treaty comes one week before Geithner and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton travel to Beijing for high-level talks.

Remodelling Market Index (RMI) flat

Due to a recently discovered computer coding error, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) has revised the RMI going back to 2006. The error had slightly reduced the true values of the overall index, as well as its two major components. The revisions generally show a one point or less quarterly increase, with quarter-to-quarter patterns remaining relatively unchanged. Some of the subcomponents experienced larger revisions but in a counteracting fashion, so that the impact on the primary indicators was muted.  Remodeling activity remained relatively flat in the first quarter of 2012, as the Remodeling Market Index (RMI) compiled by the National Association of Home Builders decreased one point to 47 from the upwardly revised 48 in the previous quarter.  The overall RMI combines ratings of current remodeling activity with indicators of future activity. An RMI below 50 indicates that more remodelers report market activity is lower (compared to the prior quarter) than report it is higher.

In the first quarter, the RMI component measuring current market conditions dropped one point to 49, while the component measuring future indicators of remodeling business fell two points to 44.  “We are seeing that the demand for remodeling work has been pulled forward because of a mild winter,” said NAHB Remodelers Chairman George “Geep” Moore Jr., GMB, CAPS, GMR and owner/president of Moore-Built Construction & Restoration Inc. in Elm Grove, La. “That is why many remodelers reported lower numbers for future activity.”  The three components measuring current market conditions moved in different directions in the first quarter: major additions remained even at 44; minor additions rose one point to 52; and maintenance and repair dropped four points to 51. Two of the four components measuring future market indicators decreased: backlog of remodeling jobs dropped four points to 43 and appointments for proposals fell five points to 45. Meanwhile, calls for bids rose one point to 47 and amount of work committed for the next three months remained even at 42.  Regionally, remodeling market conditions in the West increased three points to 47, while the other three regions showed declines: the Northeast to 48 (from 55), the Midwest to 50 (from 52) and the South to 46 (from 49).

June 15 is the short sale day

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the nation’s two largest mortgage backers, will implement their new short sale guidelines on June 15. The changes require mortgage servicers to make a decision within 30 days of receiving a short sale offer. They also must consider requests for pre-approved short sales within that same timeframe.  If the lender needs more than 30 days, it must give borrowers weekly status updates and a decision within 60 days of the initial application. This extension gives lenders more time to determine the value of the property or to get the approval of a mortgage insurer.  The moves are aimed at streamlining the short sale process, which often takes months to complete. Faster response times could help thousands of homeowners. Short sale transactions can get so complicated that many prospective buyers won’t even consider making an offer on a short sale property. And many of those who bid often walk away from the offer because lenders take so long to make a decision.  ”Short sales are more complex than routine home sales since they may involve multiple parties and long-distance negotiating,” said Tracy Mooney, a Freddie Mac senior vice president. The new rules “are intended to help make the decision process more transparent and timely.”

Banks have also caught on to the benefit of approving short sales. Foreclosures take more time for the bank to recoup their money, and it costs upwards of $50,000 to process a foreclosure. But in the wake of the robosigning scandal, banks are more apt to help and even encourage a homeowner to pursue via a short sale.  In addition to the benefits of the bank, the homeowner comes out much better in the long run.  Along with a new home, their credit has been salvaged to a respectable level as opposed to letting a home go due to foreclosure. With a foreclosure it can take up to seven years for your credit to show signs of improvement.

Jobless claims stay high, jobs stall

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 388,000, the Labor Department said today. The prior week’s figure was revised up to 389,000 from the previously reported 386,000.  The four-week moving average for new claims, a closely followed measure of labor market trends, rose 6,250 to 381,750, its highest since the week that ended Jan. 7.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast new claims falling to 375,000 last week. The reading was the latest example of fizzling momentum in the labor market recovery. New claims fell sharply during early winter but the improvement has largely stalled in recent weeks.  The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid rose 3,000 to 3.315 million in the week ended April 14.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits fell 45,930 to 2.73 million in the week ended April 7, the latest week for which data is available.  A total of 6.68 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 87,160 from the prior week.  Employers added 120,000 new jobs to their payrolls in March, the least since October, after averaging 246,000 jobs per month over the prior three months.  Many economists believe a mild winter boosted payrolls growth earlier in the year and view recent stagnation as payback for those gains.

Foreclosures up in half of all American cities

More than half of US major cities showed an increase in foreclosures since the end of last year, according to RealtyTrac.  Mortgage servicers put a freeze on the process in 2010 to correct affidavit problems and resolve investigations from federal regulators and the state attorneys general. A $25 billion settlement approved in March brought new standards and relief requirements for struggling homeowners.  As servicers adjusted, foreclosures began to increase in different areas of the country during the first quarter.  Filings increased in 26 of 50 largest cities, led by Pittsburgh, where foreclosures jumped 49% from the previous three months.  Some cities still showed continued declines from the end of last year. Filings dropped 28% in Portland, Ore. and fell 26% in Las Vegas. Servicers put Vegas filings on pause since a new state law took effect bringing new affidavit requirements and stronger enforcement for violations. As a result, Stockton,

California held the highest metro foreclosure rate in the first quarter, where one in every 60 homes received a filing.  Vegas dropped all the way to eighth on a 61% decline from the first three months of last year, but it wasn’t the only city with filings well below year-ago levels.  Of the 50 major cities, 33 reported filings were down from the first quarter of 2011. Vegas showed the largest drop over that time, followed by a 53% decrease in Seattle and a 51% drop in Austin, Texas.  “First quarter metro foreclosure trends were a mixed bag,” said Brandon Moore,CEO of RealtyTrac. “While the majority of metro areas continued to show foreclosure activity down from a year ago, more than half reported increasing foreclosure activity from the previous quarter — an early sign that long-dormant foreclosures are coming out of hibernation in many local markets.”

Fed doing more harm than good?

The Federal Reserve is doing more harm to the US economy than good by keeping interest rates artificially low and continuing its “monetary medicine”, Peter Boockvar, portfolio manager and equity strategist at Miller Tabak said.  “Bernanke has put the US economy over the past bunch of years into monetary Fantasyland,” Boockvar said today. “When you have rates at zero, when you have an expanded balance sheet of about $3 trillion, the economy is not real.”  Boockvar’s comments followed the Fed’s policy statement on Wednesday that it would hold its key interest rate near zero. The Fed also indicated the economy would have to improve before it changes its policy. A 9-1 vote accompanied the statement, which renewed the pledge to keep rates low through 2014.  Boockvar said the Fed’s policy of keeping rates at zero misallocates capital and does not create a firm foundation for growth because “the cost of money is artificial.  It’s on monetary medicine, painkillers you can say,” he said. “The Fed to me is an impediment, not a boost, and they should just stop what they are doing.”  The Fed’s quantitative easing or bond-buying over the past several years has coincided with gains in stock markets, but it has also stoked fears of inflation and worries the Fed won’t be able to exit without causing turmoil in the bond markets and a jump in interest rates.  “At some point, the extraordinary policy (of bond buying) has to be reversed and it’s going to be a complete mess when it happens,” Boockvar said. “If they (the Fed) think they’re going to do it orderly, I have a big problem with that belief.”

NAR – recovery is here!

Pending home sales increased in March and are well above a year ago, another signal the housing market is recovering, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR).  The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, rose 4.1% to 101.4 in March from an upwardly revised 97.4 in February and is 12.8% above March 2011 when it was 89.9.  The data reflects contracts but not closings.  The index is now at the highest level since April 2010 when it reached 111.3.  The PHSI in the Northeast slipped 0.8% to 78.2 in March but is 21.1% above March 2011.  In the Midwest the index declined 0.9% to 93.3 but is 16.9% higher than a year ago.  Pending home sales in the South rose 5.9% to an index of 114.1 in March and are 10.6% above March 2011.  In the West the index increased 8.7% in March to 108.0 and is 9.0% above a year ago.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist and incorrigible optimist, said 2012 is expected to be a year of recovery for housing.  Of course, he said that about 2010 and 2011 as well, but who’s counting?  “First quarter sales closings were the highest first quarter sales in five years.  The latest contract signing activity suggests the second quarter will be equally good, ” he said.  “The housing market has clearly turned the corner.  Rising sales are bringing down inventory and creating much more balanced conditions around the county, which means home prices will be rising in more areas as the year progresses.”

Olick – noisy numbers or recovery?

“The spring housing numbers aren’t coming in along expectations.  That can’t be, right?  Unemployment has been easing, mortgage delinquencies falling, and affordability is off the charts. That means housing should be bouncing back with verve and vigor this Spring, except it’s not.  It’s not crashing again, it’s just bouncing along a bottom, which means the recovery, as we’ve been warning all along, becomes increasingly local.  Let’s look at some data out this week:  Sales of new homes dropped, but only after a large upward revision in February. That of course leads everyone to blame the weather.  S&P/Case-Shiller’s home price index reached new lows, but the amount of the annual drop was smaller than the previous month, so that’s an improvement, sort of.  Mortgage applications fell, even as the rate on the thirty year fixed hit a new low on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s weekly survey. Refis fell hard and purchase applications rose a little, although the four week moving average is down.  Zillow.com reports that home values rose from February to March (0.5%), ‘marking the largest monthly increase since May 2006, before home values peaked.’ That led analysts there to exclaim the headline: ‘Majority of Markets Covered by Zillow Home Value Forecast to Hit Bottom by Late 2012.’  Trulia.com released a report which mixes three indicators, construction starts, existing home sales and delinquency and foreclosure rates in order to gauge the housing recovery. Apparently it slipped backward in March ‘after a few strides forward.’  Then Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said, ‘The ongoing weakness in the housing market still represents a headwind to economic recovery.’

No wonder economists at Freddie Mac concluded in its April forecast that the data are, ‘noisy.’ Then they too blamed it all on the weather.  So what are we to think, and how are we to play housing, here at the almost, sort of, bottom in some markets but not in others?  ‘Investor demand will drive many markets this spring and summer,’ says David Stiff, chief economist at Fiserv. ‘This means that, at the moment, the MBA purchase application index is a less reliable predictor of sales activity.’  Stiff says he thinks the housing market has bottomed out, but that won’t be obvious until next year. He also makes clear that the recovery will be driven by investors, and investors largely buy in the lower cost markets.  The one truth I heard in all the heated talk of housing today came from CNBC’s Jim Cramer, with whom I often disagree. He said, ‘aggregate numbers make you no money.’ He was talking specifically about housing.”

Foreclosure backlog looms

RealtyStore has completed a new study of the foreclosure status in three major housing markets, finding the amount of pending listings exceeds the amount of active foreclosures listed for sale by a margin of over 2 to 1. This shadow inventory of foreclosed homes illustrates the significant overhang of foreclosure listings that are anticipated to be unleashed on the housing in the wake of resolving the so-called foreclosure robo-signing situation in late 2010. The study was conducted for Cook County, IL (including metro Chicago), Miami-Dade County, FL (including metro Miami) and Maricopa County, AZ (including metro Phoenix).  Foreclosure counts in each location were tabulated by owner, including bank or lender owned homes, foreclosures owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and HUD homes. Although Arizona had previously been one of the hardest hit areas for foreclosure activity, Cook County, IL shows a near equal total amount of foreclosed homes. Miami-Dade foreclosures number at roughly half the count of either other market.

The breakdown of active foreclosure listings vs pending, or shadow inventory, foreclosures listings was consistent across each market surveyed. On average, 29% of total foreclosures across the counties are currently listed for sale. Cook County, IL foreclosures were most heavily represented with active listings, with 32% of its foreclosures presently being marketed to buyers, and 68% of foreclosures pending listing. Maricopa County, AZ foreclosure listings for sale represent only 25% of recorded foreclosures in the county, with 75% of local foreclosures yet to be listed for re-sale. Miami-Dade, FL currently offers 29% of its total foreclosures on the market for re-sale, with 71% of its foreclosure inventory awaiting listing on the market.  According to RealtyStore, median list prices of foreclosures for sale in Cook, Maricopa and Miami-Dade counties continue to run below average home prices. Cook County foreclosures are listed at a median price of just $72,650 and an average price of $95,997. Miami-Dade foreclosures list at a median price of $106,900 and average $145,059, while Maricopa lists foreclosed homes slightly higher with a median of $109,900 and the average foreclosure listed at a price of $168,744.

The foreclosure median list prices come in at 56% and 42% below the median sales prices of single-family homes selling in metro-Chicago and Miami, respectively, as reported by the NAR in Q4, 2011. Metro-Phoenix posts a smaller price gap at 7%, suggesting foreclosure saturation may be peaking in Maricopa County.  Individual foreclosure listings continue to cover all portions of the pricing spectrum, ranging from as low as $5,900 for a single family foreclosed home in Chicago, IL to as high as a foreclosed estate in Paradise Valley, AZ listed at $5,700,000.

Jobless claims up

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits slipped 2,000 to a seasonally adjusted 386,000, the Labor Department said. But the prior week’s figure was revised up to 388,000 from the previously reported 380,000.  The four-week moving average for new claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends, rose 5,500 to 374,750.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 370,000 last week.  The claims data covered the week for April’s nonfarm payrolls survey. The four-week average of new applications rose marginally between the March and April survey periods, suggesting not much change in labor market conditions.  Employers added 120,000 new jobs to their payrolls in March, the least since October, after averaging 246,000 jobs per month over the prior three months. Most economists have viewed the pull-back in job growth as payback after the weather-induced gains in the previous months.  The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid rose 26,000 to 3.30 million in the week ended April 7.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits fell 19,419 to 2.78 million in the week ended March 31, the latest week for which data is available.  A total of 6.77 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 187,807 from the prior week.

CoreLogic – First Quarter 2012 Multifamily Applicant Risk Index Report

CoreLogic today announced that CoreLogic SafeRent, provider of the nation’s leading suite of screening and risk management services designed for the multifamily housing industry, released its first quarter 2012 multifamily applicant risk (MAR) index report. The first quarter MAR Index value increased one point from the fourth quarter 2011 and three points from a year ago, indicating an increase in national renter credit quality and slightly better applicant pool.  The MAR Index for first quarter 2012 is based exclusively on applicant traffic credit quality scores from the CoreLogic SafeRent statistical lease screening model (Registry ScorePLUS) and is updated quarterly to provide property owners and managers with a benchmark against which to evaluate their applicant credit quality trends against market based MAR Index trends. This comparison indicates the relative strength of their property portfolio to attract and secure applicants with higher credit quality and an increased likelihood of fulfilling lease obligations.

When comparing applicants for one- versus two-bedroom units, the first quarter 2012 MAR Index is slightly higher for one-bedroom units at 102, compared with 101 for two-bedroom units.  Regionally, the South and Midwest reflected the lowest MAR Index, each with values of 98, a one point increase from the fourth quarter 2011. The Northeast continues to maintain the highest MAR Index with a value of 111.  The three Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) with the steepest decreases in the MAR Index were Cincinnati-Middletown, Ohio, Ky., Ind.; Columbus, Ohio; and Birmingham-Hoover, Ala.; each with decreases of three points. The three MSAs with the greatest increases in the MAR Index were Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Ill., Ind., Wis.; Denver-Aurora, Colo.; and Salt Lake City, Utah; each with increases of four points. 

Understanding the Multifamily Applicant Risk Index (MAR Index)

The MAR Index is published quarterly by CoreLogic SafeRent. It provides trends of national and regional traffic credit quality scores whereby a lower index value indicates an applicant pool with a higher risk of not fulfilling lease obligations. A MAR Index value of 100 indicates that market conditions are equal to the national mean for the index’s base period of 2004. A MAR Index value greater than 100 indicates market conditions with reduced average risk of default relative to the index’s base period mean. A value less than 100 indicates market conditions with increased average risk of default relative to the index’s base period mean. The MAR Index is derived from the statistical screening model from CoreLogic SafeRent, which is the multifamily industry’s only screening model that is both empirically derived and statistically validated. The statistical screening model was developed from historical resident lease performance data to specifically evaluate the potential risk of a resident’s future lease performance. The model generates scores for each applicant indicating the relative risk of the applicant not fulfilling lease obligations. A lower score indicates a more risky applicant.

BOA tops estimates

Bank of America (BOA) reported lower first-quarter profit as the second-largest US bank took accounting charges related to its debt, but results topped analysts’ estimates as credit quality improved.  The bank reported charges of $4.8 billion related to changes in the value of its debt, partially offset by gains of $3.4 billion from equity investments and debt-related transactions.  Excluding debt valuation adjustments, it earned 31 cents a share.  First-quarter net income was $653 million, or 3 cents a share, down from $2.05 billion, or 17 cents per share, a year earlier.  Revenue declined to $22.3 billion from $26.9 billion.  The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank took a loan-loss provision of $2.4 billion, compared with $3.8 billion a year ago.  In its capital markets operations, Bank of America reported sales and trading revenue of $3.8 billion, up from $1.5 billion in the fourth quarter but down from $4.6 billion a year ago.

California foreclosure reform moves forward

Seven bills reforming some foreclosure rules passed committees in the California state legislature this week.  The bills were introduced in February. One set of bills extends protections to tenants, giving them 90 days before eviction after the foreclosure sale of the property. Another increases penalties to banks that fail to maintain blighted homes.  Servicers would be required to provide documentation to the borrower establishing its right to foreclose before the filing first step in the process, under other passed bills. Evidence of ownership and chain of title must also be shown to the borrower.  Two other bills charge servicers a $25 fee for every notice of default recording. The money will fund investigations for California AG Kamala Harris. Another piece of legislation passed by committee allows Harris to convene a grand jury to investigate financial crimes in different jurisdictions.  “All Californians have been impacted by the toll the mortgage and foreclosure process has taken on our neighborhoods,” Harris said. “Our California Homeowner Bill of Rights will provide relief for homeowners, tenants and communities. I thank the authors and supporters of these important bills.”

Foreclosure squatters beware

The golden age for foreclosure squatters may soon be coming to an end now that the $26 billion mortgage settlement has been approved.

The settlement, agreed to by the nation’s five largest mortgage lenders, is expected to speed up the foreclosure process by providing stricter guidelines for the banks to follow when repossessing homes.  The banks involved include Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, Wells Fargo and Ally Financial.  Many foreclosures have been in limbo since fall 2010 following the so-called robo-signing scandal, when banks allowed employees to sign off on thousands of foreclosure documents a month with little verification.  Lenders hit the pause button on foreclosures because they “were afraid that anything they did would be under a microscope,” said Eric Higgins, a professor of business at Kansas State University.  As a result, borrowers who were seriously delinquent on their loans have been able to stay in their homes for months or even years without making a single payment. Nationwide, the average time it takes to foreclose on a home — from the first missed payment to the final bank repossession — stretched to 370 days during the first quarter, almost twice as long as it took five years ago, according to Daren Blomquist, the marketing director at RealtyTrac. 

In some states, delinquent borrowers have been squatting in their homes much longer. In Florida, the average time was 861 days, and in New York it was 1,056 days — close to three years.  “Perhaps a million foreclosures could have been pursued last year but weren’t,” said Rick Sharga, executive vice president for real estate investment company, Carrington Holdings.  But that’s all about to change, he said. “We’re going to see an increase in the speed of foreclosures and a higher number of foreclosure starts.”  In fact, there are indications that the pace of foreclosures are already starting to pick up.

While overall foreclosure activity was down during the first quarter, filings were up 10% in the 26 states where foreclosures must undergo court scrutiny, according to RealtyTrac.  It was in these judicial states that the processing of foreclosures slowed the most following news of the robo-signing scandal, said Blomquist.  Many banks in these states stopped filing foreclosures unless they were extremely confident it would pass muster in the court. (In non-judicial states, foreclosures are reviewed by a trustee, which is a third party such as a title company and less likely to parse every legal document).  But now lenders can move more confidently, said Brandon Moore, RealtyTrac’s CEO.  In the judicial state of Indiana, for example, foreclosure filings were up 45% year-over year. And in Florida, they were up by almost 26%, according to RealtyTrac.  “The dam may not burst in the next 30 to 45 days, but it will eventually burst, and everyone downstream should be prepared for that to happen — both in terms of new foreclosure activity and new short sale activity,” Moore said in a statement.  The resulting flood could bring home prices down even further — yet another impetus for the banks to clear out their foreclosure pipeline as quickly as possible, said Kansas State’s Higgins.  Then, industry thinking is, the housing market would be able to get back to normal and home prices could eventually find their true value. Some industry analysts, such as the chief economist for listing site Zillow, Stan Humphries, are predicting that could happen as soon as the end of the year.  Zillow estimates that home values nationwide will fall another 3.7% by the end of 2012, and that price will likely bottom out by early 2013.  Should home prices hit a bottom then stabilize, it would push many potential buyers off the fence, according to Mike Fratantoni, a vice president at the Mortgage Bankers Association. House hunters would no longer be afraid of investing in assets that were losing money.  “The market is already on the verge of turning the corner on prices and this will help,” said Fratantoni.

Inflation up

The Labor Department said on Friday its Consumer Price Index increased 0.3% after advancing 0.4% in February. That was in line with economists’ expectations.  Outside the volatile food and energy category, inflation pressures appeared to be modest. Core CPI edged up 0.2% after gaining 0.1% in February.  The US Federal Reserve has said it will probably hold interest rates super low into 2014 to help the economy, which is limping back from the 2007-2009 recession.  Amid recent signs of weakness in the labor market, investors are betting the Fed could unleash further monetary stimulus to boost growth, although comments by Fed officials this week suggested the central bank is on hold as it waits to see whether the recovery gains traction.  Last month, overall inflation was pushed up by gasoline prices, which rose 1.7%. That was a much more mild increase than the 6% gain in February.  But electricity prices fell 0.8%, the steepest decline since June.  Food prices climbed 0.2% last month.  Overall consumer prices rose 2.7% year-on-year, down from a reading of 2.9% in February.  In the 12 months to March, core CPI increased 2.3% after rising 2.2% in February. This measure has rebounded from a record low of 0.6% in October.

Wells Fargo has record earnings

Wells Fargo, the largest mortgage lender in the US, reported record earnings in the first quarter.  The San Francisco-based bank earned $4.2 billion, or 75 cents per share, a 10% increase from the $3.8 billion profit one year prior.  Revenue jumped to $21.6 billion in the first quarter from $20.6 billion last year. It’s the highest quarterly revenue in more than two years, the bank said.  Wells still held nearly $2 billion in provision for credit losses at the end of the first quarter. It did release $400 million from its loan loss reserve, compared to a $600 million release in the previous three months.  Wells Chief Financial Officer Tim Sloan said he expects expenses to drop by as much as $700 million in the second quarter. Roughly $100 million in expenses during the first quarter came from consent orders signed with federal regulators last spring to settle mortgage servicing issues.  Mortgage originations totaled $129 billion in the first three months of 2012, up significantly from $75 billion in the same period last year and up from $121 billion in the last quarter of 2011.  The bank did say 15% of the originations during the first quarter were workouts under the Home Affordable Refinancing Program.  Demand is also increasing at Wells. The bank reported $188 billion in mortgage applications as of the end of the quarter, up 20% from the previous three months.

New bubble

According to Citigroup economist Steven Wieting health care is the next big bubble looming in the distance.  And to make matters all the more worrisome, his analysis suggests it’s like nothing we’ve seen before.  “It’s not a single asset price that’s about to pop (like housing) and it doesn’t have a cyclical component,” he said.  Rather, “It’s a fundamental bubble that will have a large impact on the economy.”  Wieting says the trouble is spiraling health care costs that are growing at a fast and furious pace, a pace that will become all but impossible to support.  “Ultimately there will be a price to pay” he says.  With the lion’s share of health care costs shouldered by companies and governments, he thinks the rising costs will ultimately hit budgets.  “We’ll either have to raise taxes or increase budget deficits in order to finance it. And it will crowd out other things. Already we’re starting to see it impact education and infrastructure spending.”  Going forward, Wieting tells us areas in health care that will be hardest hit are areas that operate at high margins. Those companies will probably see their margins squeezed.

DSNews.com – strategic default here to stay

With reports that around 20% of mortgages are underwater, about 46% of bank risk professionals surveyed by FICO expect to see the volume of strategic defaults in 2012 exceed 2011 levels.  “After five years of a brutal housing market, many people now view their homes more objectively and with less sentimentality,” said Dr. Andrew Jennings, chief analytics officer at FICO and head of FICO Labs. “Regardless of legal or ethical issues around strategic defaults, lenders must account for this risk when they evaluate mortgage applications in declining markets. Many homeowners who find themselves upside down on mortgages in the future are likely to consider strategic default as an acceptable exit strategy.”  Combined with concerns over strategic default are disconcerting results about consumer priorities. Only 29% of bankers said the current generation of homeowners considers their mortgage to be their most important credit obligation, while 49% said its not a priority. 

Even with this discouraging data, 53% of survey respondents expect to see the housing market improve by the end of 2012, compared to 24% who said the market would deteriorate.  Also, 64.8% of respondents think mortgage delinquencies will decrease or stay the same, an 11.3% increase from the previous quarter.  “If job creation continues, banks will be more likely to embrace mortgage lending once again. A healthy job market is essential for improving the quality of mortgage applications and reducing default risk,” said Jennings.  Most respondents, 56%, expect demand for residential mortgage credit to exceed supply over the next six months. A similar majority, 53%, project demand for the supply of credit for mortgage refinancing surpass supply.  The survey included responses from 263 risk managers at banks throughout the US in February 2012 and was a joint effort between FICO, provider of analytics and decision management technology, and the Professional Risk Managers’ International Association, a nonprofit that works to define and implement the best practices of risk management through education.