Olick – short sales up, prices down
“Buyer traffic is strong, supply of homes for sale is low, and yet home prices continue to defy the usual formula, falling again in March. Prices usually rise as supply shrinks, but demand is still too low to make those historical ‘norms’ compute, not to mention that the type of supply available is largely distressed. Foreclosures and short sales accounted for 47.7% of sales, in a three month running average measured by Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance. That’s the 25th month in a row that distressed sales have topped 40% of the market. ‘With nearly half of the market being distressed, we’re a long way from a return to a normal market,’ said Thomas Popik, research director at Campbell Surveys. ‘Agents responding to our survey say that homeowners with well-maintained properties in good locations are very reluctant to list at today’s prices. That’s why inventory is low–and also why forced REO and short sales are such a big proportion of the remaining market.’ Home prices for non-distressed properties fell 5.7% in March year-over-year, according to the survey. Prices for ‘damaged’ REO (bank-owned properties) fell 5.7% and for move-in ready REO fell 2.5% during the same period. The real sticker shock is in short sales. Prices of those homes fell 14.3% from March of 2011.
Short sales have been ramping up of late, as banks attempt to comply with the so-called ‘robo-signing’ mortgage settlement. Those are part of the losses the banks are required to take in the $25 billion deal. Over the past six months, short sales have moved from 17.8% of all sales to 19.9%, according to the Campbell/IMF survey. They now represent the number one segment for distressed properties. That share is likely to grow, as the conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), last week announced it was directing the two mortgage giants to ‘develop enhanced and aligned strategies for facilitating short sales, deeds-in-lieu and deeds-for-lease in order to help more homeowners avoid foreclosure.’ It includes a requirement that mortgage servicers review and respond to short sale requests within thirty days. Lengthy timelines have long been the biggest complaint in the short sale sector.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hold hundreds of thousands of distressed loans, and accelerating the process will surely move the numbers up quickly, although the rules don’t go into effect until June 1. The FHFA is requiring the two make final decisions on these sales within 60 days. Previously, short sales could take up to a year and even beyond, with buyers often dropping out in frustration. ‘This could put short-term downward pressure on home prices, as short sales by their nature occur more quickly than foreclosures,’ writes Jaret Seiberg, analyst at Guggenheim Partners. ‘That could raise questions about the status of the housing recovery, which could be negative for those with housing exposure. That would include homebuilders, mortgage lenders and mortgage insurers.’ On the plus side, short sales tend to sell at higher prices than foreclosures. It appears, however, that regardless of the FHFA edict, banks are already ramping up the short sales. Some began doing so in the aftermath of the robo-signing scandal, as foreclosures stalled. Even now, foreclosures falling as short sales rise. The good news is that sales of distressed properties are rising, but the headlines will likely focus more on the falling prices, than the much-needed clearing of these homes.”
No QE expectations
Wall Street is not expecting additional quantitative easing (QE) from the Federal Reserve at its meeting this week but increasingly believes in the Fed’s promise to keep interest rates low until late 2014, according to the latest CNBC Fed Survey. Just a third of the 53 economists, fund managers, and strategists who responded to the CNBC survey see additional QE from the Fed in the next 12 months, unchanged from the March survey. And just a quarter expect Operation Twist to be extended beyond its expiration in June. The survey found that 49% now believe the Fed will keep interest rates “exceptionally low” through late 2014, up from just 40% in March. The same percentage, however, disagree, showing that while there has been improvement, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has not yet made believers of all investors. James Paulsen of Wells Capital Management called on the Fed “to move beyond its crisis mindset and appropriately normalize policy to reflect the maturation of the US economic cycle from crisis to recovery. Failure to do so soon risks creating another crisis — an inflation crisis!” In fact, 42% of respondents agreed with the statement that the Fed’s forecast that it will keep interest rates low through 2014 is a mistake that could undermine the Fed’s credibility; 38% said it’s a good decision that has helped drive down interest rates.
Home prices drop
Home prices dropped in February in most major US cities for a sixth straight month, a sign that modest sales gains haven’t been enough to boost prices. The Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller home-price index shows that prices dropped in February from January in 16 of the 20 cities it tracks. The steepest declines were in Atlanta, Chicago and Cleveland. Prices rose in Phoenix, San Diego and Miami. They were unchanged in Dallas. The declines partly reflect typical offseason sales. The month-to-month prices aren’t adjusted for seasonal factors. Still, prices fell in 15 of the 20 cities in February compared with the same month in 2011. That indicates that the housing market remains far from healthy despite the best winter for sales in five years.
Bloom – economy stuck in “Death Valley”
Having raised hopes of a self-sustaining recovery, the US economy has disappointed and finds itself stuck in “Death Valley”, says David Bloom, the global head of the FX strategy team at HSBC. He believes the data is neither weak enough to guarantee a third round of quantitative easing nor strong enough to convince the market the Federal Reserve is about to end its extraordinary measures. “At this stage the economy worsened markedly, eventually leading the Fed to its commitment to keep rates low for an extended time period. The point is that we are now neither at the stage where the economy has deteriorated markedly, nor are we seeing the economy improve to the extent where the Fed is certain not to add stimulus” said Bloom in a research note. With the market looking for clues on what the Fed will do next when Ben Bernanke holds a press conference on Wednesday, Bloom believes euro/dollar is stuck in a tight range as a game of chicken and egg is played out in the euro zone. “We have the uncertainty of the French and Greek elections and the recent blow-out in Spanish bond yields. Meanwhile, the ECB (European Central Bank) is sending out signals that it is reluctant to engage in another LTRO (long-term refinancing operation). Once again a game of chicken is being played out in the euro zone,” said Bloom. So until we get confirmation of which direction the US economy is heading into or evidence that investors are negative on the euro area as a whole and not just Spain, Bloom believes the euro will remain on the sidelines despite volatility elsewhere.
WSJ – ready for another Dodd-Frank spat?
Get ready for another spat over Dodd-Frank mortgage lending rules. It’s been more than a year since regulators unveiled the first set of proposed (and yet-to-be completed) mortgage rules resulting from the 2010 financial overhaul law. Now a new consumer regulator is hashing out a separate rule that will define what kind of loans mortgage lenders will be able to make. At issue is a part of the Dodd-Frank law, known as the “qualified mortgage” rule. It is designed to protect consumers from the kind of risky lending practices that shook the financial system in 2008.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), also created by the Dodd-Frank law, has the difficult task of completing these rules, which were initially proposed by the Federal Reserve last year. The idea is to provide an incentive for the industry to make safer loans, and ensure that they lenders consider a borrower’s ability to repay the loan. Loans made under the qualified-mortgage standard will receive a degree of protection from lawsuits, though the level of that shield is a matter of intense debate. In a speech last week, Raj Date, the consumer bureau’s deputy director, gave some broad outlines of the consumer bureau’s thinking: “We want to ensure that consumers are not sold mortgages they do not understand and cannot afford. We want to minimize compliance burden where possible, in part through the careful definition of those lower-risk “qualified mortgages.” We want to ensure that, as the market stabilizes over time, every segment of prudent loans has the benefit of sufficient investor appetite and a competitive market.”
It’s a daunting challenge, given that the mortgage-lending market has contracted since the housing market went bust. Mortgage lenders have tightened their standards dramatically, eliminating most of the problem loans that helped cause the housing market’s woes. Many argue that tight lending is hampering the economic recovery, so a misstep by the CFPB could harm the housing market further. The Dodd-Frank law mandates that the mortgage rule exclude certain exotic varieties of loans that fed the housing boom — such as “option” adjustable-rate mortgages, which only require low minimum payments and allow the principal balance to increase, and “interest-only” loans, which don’t require principal payments for several years.
Other pieces are much less clear. One key issue that’s been debated in policy circles is how much limits the mortgage rule should place on the amount of debt that consumers can take on. One joint proposal between an industry group and three consumer organizations attempts to solve this problem. It says that qualified mortgages should automatically include any loans made to borrowers who are spending no more than 43% of their pretax income on all debt, including home loans, credit card debt and car loans. Loans could be allowed up to a 50% debt-to-income ratio if the borrower’s housing costs only comprise 31% of income, or if the borrower demonstrates stable income or cash reserves.
Still, it remains to be seen whether the consumer bureau will accept this approach. And many in the lending and real estate industry say they are worried that the regulator will enact requirements that could crimp lending. One big concern, particularly for small lenders, is that the rule will lack the industry’s top priority — a shield against lawsuits for loans that meet guidelines set out by the consumer bureau. Without those legal protections “lending is going to become more conservative,” said Bill Cosgrove, chief executive of Union National Mortgage Co. in Strongsville, Ohio. “That is a problem. It’s a problem for the housing recovery.” Richard Cordray, the consumer bureau’s director, told lawmakers last month that the legal protections sought by the industry wouldn’t necessarily choke off lawsuits, although reducing litigation is one of the bureau’s goals. “We don’t want this to be punted into the courts,” Mr. Cordray said. Consumer groups say they aren’t trying to spark a barrage of lawsuits against the mortgage industry. Instead, they argue that the threat of litigation will give lenders an incentive to comply with the new lending rules.
