Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin December 6, 2011
Forward this e-mail to your friends!
Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/
*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>
http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>
http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
************************************************************
Foreclosures down in Colorado
According to a report re-leased Tuesday by the Colorado Division of Housing, foreclosure auction sales in Colorado’s metropolitan counties were up 7.9 percent in November compared to November of last year. Foreclosure sales in Larimer County rose 47 percent in November compared to a year ago but filings dropped 37 percent. Overall, sales and filings dropped in Larimer County in the first 11 months of the year compared to the same time frame in 2010. However, comparing the first 11 months of this year to the same period last year, foreclosure filings were down 28.6 percent through November while foreclosure auction sales were down 20.7 percent. New foreclosure filings fell year over year during November with total filings dropping 21.7 percent from 2,932 filings in November 2010 to 2,296 filings in November of this year. Foreclosure auction sales increased during the same period from 1,195 to 1,290. From October 2011 to November 2011, foreclosure filings fell 2.3 percent, and foreclosure sales at auction rose 37.5 percent.
Foreclosure auction sales through November fell year over year from 2010’s 11n-month total of 18,728 to 14,854 during the same period this year. Foreclosure filings were also down through November, falling to 23,556 filings year-to-date this year from last year’s 11-month total of 32,982. Year-to-date through November, the counties with the largest decreases in foreclosure filings, year-over-year, were Mesa County and Denver County, where filings decreased by 35.2 percent and 32.2 percent, respectively. Pueblo County reported the smallest decline in filings with a decrease of 12.5 percent from the first 11 months of 2010 to the same period this year. All counties surveyed reported year-over-year decreases in foreclosure filings. For the first 11 months of this year, all counties also showed decreases in foreclosure auction sales when compared to the same period last year.
The counties with the largest decreases in foreclosure auction sales, year-over-year, were Broomfield County and Adams County, where auction sales decreased by 40.3 percent and 27.0 percent, respectively. Pueblo County reported the smallest decline in auction sales with a decrease of 9.1 percent from the first eleven months of 2010 to the same period this year. The county with the highest rate of foreclosure sales during November was Adams County with a rate of 681 households per foreclosure sale. Mesa County came in second with 792 households per foreclosure sale. The lowest rate was found in Boulder County where there were 3,402 households per foreclosure sale.
Mr. Geithner goes to Germany
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner arrived in Germany on Tuesday for a three-day blitz of euro zone officials to urge them to take decisive action to backstop their currency union and resolve a crushing debt crisis. Geithner will press French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the new leaders of Spain and Italy and Germany’s finance minister to agree at a crucial European Union summit on Friday to take steps that will give markets confidence that no euro zone countries will default, and that the region’s banks will stay solvent. Geithner has made several trips to Europe in recent months as U.S. concerns over the crisis grow and, judging by comments from both him and President Barack Obama, the Treasury Secretary may add to a growing chorus calling for the European Central Bank to take more decisive action to resolve the crisis.
The need for action was underscored by Standard & Poor’s warning on Monday that 15 of the 17 euro zone countries now face an unprecedented mass downgrade if they fail to reach a satisfactory agreement at the Brussels summit—all the way up to AAA-rated Germany and France. The Federal Reserve joined with the European Central Bank and others in action to ease dollar funding strains a week ago and Obama and Geithner have both pointed to the option of the ECB backstopping European governments and the banking system. That idea is viewed by many economists as the key to any comprehensive solution to the crisis, but resisted by Germany.
Olick – why are cancellations even higher?
“For the past several months, Realtors across the nation have been reporting an ever-increasing number of cancelled existing home sale contracts. The latest Realtors Confidence Index now puts the cancellation rate at 20 percent, way up from the historical norm of around four to six percent. ‘On-time settlements were reported as declining from 65 percent to 47 percent,’ according to the Realtors. It’s not why you think, or at least not why I thought. Inability to get a mortgage was reported by just 9 percent of respondents to the Realtor survey. Bigger issues were failed inspections, buyers with cold feet and adverse economic conditions. I’m sure appraisals figured in there as well. It begs the question then, if these are just delays or true cancellations?
Anecdotally, I was doing a report on a residential street in Northwest DC last week, an area that is still holding its own and didn’t lose much in the housing crash. I was standing in front of a ‘For Sale’ sign, when the Realtor from the sign came out of the house. She wanted to know what we were saying about the neighborhood, concerned of course that there were any signs of cracking. I assured her there were not, but asked about the house she was selling. The Realtor told me it was actually under contract, after about 35 days on the market. I asked why there was no ‘under contract’ sign, which used to be so commonplace before the ‘sold’ sign goes up. She said they hadn’t had the inspection yet, although the house looked, at least from the outside, to be in very good condition. When I asked if she worried about that, her answer was, ‘You never know these days.’ Apparently the jitters are widespread, even in one of the nation’s most secure housing markets.
With so much of the current housing market comprised of distressed property sales, and with the Realtors unable to capture so much of that share in their data, uncertainty is certainly understandable if not mandated. I read a report today citing Barclay’s analyst Stephen Kim of Barclays Capital, who is upgrading builders and raising price targets on the premise that we will see a housing ‘rebound’ in 2012. ‘In the absence of a government homebuyer incentive, prices for non-distressed home sales have stabilized for almost a year. In our opinion, this is the most important trend in the housing industry right now,’ notes Kim. ‘We are amazed at how little attention it has been getting from the media and the Street. This stability on the part of non-distressed prices has occurred despite a very high share of distressed activity and continued declines in overall prices.’
I’m not sure where he’s getting that stabilization. CoreLogic reported home prices in September, excluding distressed sales, fell 1.1 percent in September. Their chief economist Mark Fleming cites a supply and demand imbalance and adds, ‘Distressed sales remain a significant share of homes that do sell and are driving home prices overall.’ We obviously have to be very careful reading today’s housing market tea leaves. There are so many different indicators and so many different entities reporting these indicators, that it’s often hard to find out what’s really going on. That’s why I always go back to the Realtors on the front lines. They are telling us that this market, distressed or not, is skittish and undependable. A 20 percent cancellation rate for existing sales is shocking and does not suggest a rebound on the horizon. At best, I’m looking for simple stabilization.”
Euro down against dollar
The euro edged lower on Tuesday, as traders reacted to news that Standard & Poor’s (S&P) put 15 euro-zone countries on a negative “credit watch” late in the prior session. The euro traded at $1.3369 compared with $1.3386 in North American trade late Monday. The dollar index, which measures the U.S. unit against a basket of major rivals, traded at 78.702 compared with 78.654 late Monday. The move by S&P killed a risk rally that had been fueled in part by a pledge by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy to quickly seek a new treaty that would automatically impose sanctions on violators of the euro zone’s fiscal rules. The warning applied to triple-A Germany and France and all other euro members other than Cyprus, which was already on negative watch, and Greece, whose CC rating already implies a high probability of default.
Toll Brothers Q4 profits down 70%
Luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers said Tuesday its fourth-quarter profit fell about 70% to $15 million, or 9 cents per share, compared to $50.5 million, or 30 cents per share, a year earlier. The homebuilder said its profit drop is attributed to inventory and joint venture write-downs, as well as debt retirement charges. In addition, the firm enjoyed a significant tax benefit in the fourth-quarter of 2010, which buoyed last year’s 4Q income. The company said without the charges, fourth-quarter pretax income would have hit $33.9 million, up from $18.1 million last year. On the other hand, the firm’s overall fourth-quarter revenue grew to $427.8 million from $402.6 million last year. For its entire 2011 fiscal year, which ended Oct. 31, the company earned $39.8 million, or 24 cents per share, compared with a loss of $3.4 million, or 2 cents a share, for fiscal year 2010. The Horsham, Pa.-based homebuilder experienced another positive in the fourth quarter with home building deliveries hitting $427.8 million and growing to 757 units, compared to $402.6 million and 700 units, a year earlier. The average fourth-quarter contract price for a Toll Brothers home hit $606,000, up from $565,000 last year, suggesting values are going up in the high-priced home segment. In the fourth quarter, the firm signed contracts worth $390 million, up 24% from last year.
It’s Obama’s tone, not taxes, says tycoon
Leon Cooperman, a 68-year-old Wall Street veteran, says he is for higher taxes on the wealthy. He would happily give up his Social Security checks. He voted for Al Gore in 2000. He says the special treatment of investment gains, or so-called carried interest, for private equity and hedge fund managers is “ridiculous.” He says he even sympathizes, at least to some extent, with the Occupy Wall Street protesters. And yet, Mr. Cooperman, a man with a rags-to-riches background who worked at Goldman Sachs for more than 25 years in the 1970s and 1980s before starting his own hedge fund, Omega Advisors, which has minted him an estimated $1.8 billion fortune, is waging a campaign against President Obama.
Last week, in a widely circulated “open letter” to President Obama that whizzed around e-mail inboxes of Wall Street and corporate America, Mr. Cooperman argued that “the divisive, polarizing tone of your rhetoric is cleaving a widening gulf, at this point as much visceral as philosophical, between the downtrodden and those best positioned to help them.” He went on to say, “To frame the debate as one of rich-and-entitled versus poor-and-dispossessed is to both miss the point and further inflame an already incendiary environment.” The letter comes as President Obama is planning to give a speech on Tuesday in Osawatomie, Kan., about the economy and the middle class, following in the path of President Theodore Roosevelt, who campaigned a century ago in that very city against the wealthy and big business. Mr. Cooperman’s complaint has less to do with the substance of taxing the wealthy than it does the president’s choice of words in promoting it, an emphasis that he says is “villainizing the American Dream.” While many executives have complained about what they perceive as the president’s antibusiness bent, Mr. Cooperman’s letter has gained credibility and attention in political and business circles because of his own seemingly liberal stances on taxes and the like. He said, in an interview, that he had been deluged with hundreds of e-mails and phone calls about the letter, “99.9 percent of it positive.”
Mr. Cooperman, who recently signed the Giving Pledge, Bill Gates’s and Warren Buffett’s effort to press the world’s billionaires to give away at least half of their wealth, said he felt he came into his money honestly and said proudly, “I spend more than 25 times on charity what I spend on myself.” Asked whether he had received any response from the president for his letter, he replied with a chuckle, “I’m not optimistic I’ll hear from him.”
New Jersey foreclosures wait for deliberations
Hundreds of New Jersey foreclosure cases are waiting in the wings for the state’s Supreme Court to issue what will be a landmark decision in the Garden State. Legal scholars suggest lenders are waiting to see what the court will do with the U.S. Bank National Association. Guillaume case before moving forward with thousands of pending foreclosures. The issue in the case causing lenders to pause is the question of whether a foreclosure notice is made invalid because the lender filed a notice of intent to foreclose with the servicer listed on the notice instead of the lender. In the original complaint, the Guillaume’s argue the lender, U.S. Bank NA, violated the Fair Foreclosure Act by not including the lender’s information in a spot that ended up containing contact information for the servicer. Linda Fisher, a professor at Seton Hall Law School who has been following the case, said the foreclosure process is “kicked off by filing the notice of intent to foreclose.” Fisher filed an friend-of-the-court brief with the New Jersey Supreme Court in support of the Gillaumes’ claim. Fisher says the intent to foreclose form has 24 data points, including the name of the lender and contact information for the lender.
The Guillaumes, who challenged the foreclosure on several fronts, initially claimed the lender “violated the FFA because although the notice of intent to foreclose listed plaintiff as the holder of the note, it did not list plaintiff’s address, but rather, listed the address and telephone number” of the servicer. An appellate court ruled for the lender and against the plaintiffs saying “directing the Guillaumes to contact ASC (or the servicer) fulfilled the purpose of the notice provision under the FFA — making the debtor aware of the situation, and how and who to contact to either cure the default or raise potential disputes.” But the case now awaits the New Jersey Supreme Court decision, causing some lenders to pause before launching foreclosures.
Fisher said the initial notice of intent to foreclose claimed the servicer was the lender and the holder of the obligation. Later in the case, the issue became the fact that the lender’s name was listed but with the servicer’s address. “The banks are contending it is OK to enter only the name of the servicer,” Fisher said. “The Guillaumes are saying the servicer is not a substitute for the lender because the statute is quite clear, and it specifically mentions inclusion of the name of the lender.” Banks are likely delaying some of their foreclosure actions in the state because they want to know how the Supreme Court will rule on this limited issue, Fisher contends. A rule against the lender’s argument could mean banks will have to review their intent to foreclose notices. Fisher said if it turns out that Guillaume forces the 24 data points to be filled out perfectly, banks will have to retrace their filing steps to ensure they don’t end up facing sanctions.
LPS – house price declines across the board
Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS) today announced that its LPS Applied Analytics division updated its home price index (LPS HPI) with residential sales concluded during September 2011. The LPS HPI summarizes home price trends nationwide by tracking sales each month in more than 13,500 ZIP codes. Within each ZIP code, the LPS HPI tracks five price levels from low to high. “Home prices in September were consistent with the seasonal pattern that has been occurring since 2009,” explained Kyle Lundstedt, managing director for LPS Applied Analytics. “Each year, prices have risen in the spring, but revert in autumn to a downward trend that has not only erased the gains, but has led to an average 3.7 percent annual drop in prices to date. The partial data available for October suggests a further approximate decline of 1.1 percent. Partial data from last month proved to be a good indicator for September’s performance: it showed a preliminary 1.1 percent estimated decline, compared to the 1.2 percent as shown by the full-month’s data.”
The LPS HPI national average home price for transactions during September was $202,000 – a decline of 1.2 percent for the month. As in previous years, this decline follows a 0.9 percent decline during August. The September national average price is down 1.8 percent from the average price at the beginning of the year. LPS HPI average national home prices continue the downward trend begun after the market peak in June 2006, when the total value of U.S. housing inventory covered by the LPS HPI stood at $10.6 trillion. The value has declined 30.2 percent since that peak to $7.56 trillion. During the period of most rapid price declines, from June 2007 through December 2008, the LPS HPI national average home price dropped $56,000 from $282,000, which corresponds to an average annual decline of 13.8 percent.
Since December 2008, prices have fallen more slowly, interrupted by brief seasonal intervals of rising prices. During this period of more slowly declining prices, the national average price has fallen approximately $24,000 from $226,000. This corresponds to an average annual decline of 3.7 percent. The national average home price has declined 4.4 percent over the most recent year to September 2011. Price changes were consistent across the country during September, declining in all ZIP codes in the LPS HPI. Higher-priced homes had somewhat smaller declines: -1.2% percent for the top 20 percent of homes (prices above $317,000), compared to -1.4 percent for the bottom 20 percent (below $102,000).
See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin
**************
Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.
http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com
(subscribe to this newsletter)
*************************************************
About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.
* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month
* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties
* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!
* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!
* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building
* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
