Posts tagged as:

real estate investing

Remodeling on a roll

by admin on March 28, 2012

MBA – applications up

The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of overall mortgage application activity, which includes both refinancing and home purchase demand, fell 2.7% in the week ended March 23.  The MBA’s gauge of loan requests for home purchases rose 3.3%, though the measure of refinancing applications dropped 4.6%.  The decline in refinancing was driven by a 12.0% drop in government refinance activity, while conventional applications fell just 3.4%, the report said.  The refinance share of total mortgage activity slipped to its lowest level since July of last year at 71.9% of applications from 73.4%.  Fixed 30-year mortgage rates jumped to their highest level since November to average 4.23%, up 4 basis points from 4.19%.  The survey covers over 75% of US retail residential mortgage applications, according to MBA.

As election nears, Obama considers strategic oil

The United States asked France to join it for a possible emergency oil stock release, the French Energy Minister said yesterday.  Asked by reporters after the weekly ministers’ meeting whether France would join a US-UK move to release strategic stocks, Eric Besson said: “It is the United States which has asked and France has welcomed favorably this hypothesis.”  Le Monde daily said on Wednesday, citing presidential sources, that France was in contact with Britain and the United States on a possible release of strategic oil stocks “in a matter of weeks” to push fuel prices down.  France is in contact with Britain and the United States on a possible release of strategic oil stocks “in a matter of weeks” to push  fuel prices down, Le Monde daily said on Wednesday, citing presidential sources.  France would join a UK-US cooperation on a release of strategic oil stocks that is expected within months, two British sources said earlier this month, in a bid to prevent fuel prices choking economic growth in a US election year.

Olick – remodeling on a roll

“America’s housing market is still struggling to find solid footing amid millions of delinquent loans and foreclosed properties.  But as the wider economy begins to strengthen, and Americans start to feel better about their current and future finances, they are dipping their toes back into the housing waters, in the form of remodeling.  ‘Residential remodeling this winter is as strong as it has been in more than five years. We expect residential remodeling to continue to grow throughout 2012,’ says Joe Emison of Texas-based BuildFax, a division of BUILDERRadius and creator of the BuildFax remodeling index.  Residential remodeling, as measured by building permits in January, were at an annual rate of, up 13% from December and 11% from a year ago, according to BuildFax. The index shows particular strength in the Midwest and the West.

Sales of foreclosed properties may be helping the numbers, as investors have swarmed the market, buying up distressed properties and turning them into rentals. Many of those properties have been either abandoned or vandalized and need at the very least basic refurbishing and at the most full renovations.  Great news for US companies that serve the remodeling market, and of course their stocks. Sherwin Williams, which gets 77% of its revenue from the US market, is trading at an all time high, going back to its IPO in 1964. Home Depot is seeing the best levels since April of 2002, and shares of Lowes are at a high not seen since 2007. Both get all of their revenue from US customers.  Others poised to profit: Weyerhaeuser, which takes about 65% of its revenue from US sales and of course US Gypsum, whose shares are up 103% in the last three months, United Rentals, which rents construction equipment, shares up 44% this year, and MASCO, which makes all kinds of building products.  This entire sector is exceptionally well placed because it can profit off not only distress in the overall housing market, but improvements in it as well.  As homebuyers trickle back in this spring, they will fuel further renovations, and as banks work through distressed loans and sell foreclosures off to investors, there will be ever more housework to be done.”

Supreme Court split along ideological lines

Sharp questioning by the Supreme Court’s conservative justices has cast serious doubt on the survival of the individual insurance requirement at the heart of President Barack Obama’s radical health care plan.  Arguments at the high court Tuesday focused on whether the insurance requirement “is a step beyond what our cases allow,” in the words of Justice Anthony Kennedy.  He and Chief Justice John Roberts are emerging as the seemingly pivotal votes.  Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito appeared likely to join with Justice Clarence Thomas to vote to strike down the key provision. The four Democratic appointees seemed ready to vote to uphold it.  “If the government can do that, what else can it” do? asked Scalia, referring to the individual mandate portion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.  The congressional requirement to buy health care insurance is the linchpin of the law’s aim to get medical insurance to an additional 30 million people, at a reasonable cost to private insurers and state governments. Virtually every American will be affected by the court’s decision on the law’s constitutionality, due this summer in the heat of the presidential and congressional election campaigns.

Scalia, as well as Roberts, Alito and Kennedy, pressed Solicitor General Donald Verrilli on whether people can be forced to buy things like cars, broccoli and burial insurance if the government can make them buy health insurance.  Kennedy at one point said that allowing the government mandate would “change the relationship” between the government and its citizens.  “Do you not have a heavy burden of justification to show authority under the Constitution” for the individual mandate? asked Kennedy, who is often the swing vote on cases that divide the justices along ideological lines.  Scalia repeatedly pointed out that the federal government’s powers are limited by the Constitution, with the rest left to the states and the people. “The argument there is that the people were left to decide whether to buy health insurance,” Scalia said.  Scalia and Roberts noted that the health care overhaul law would make people get insurance for things they may not need, like heart transplants or pregnancy services. “You can’t say that everybody is going to participate in substance abuse services,” Roberts said.  One demonstrator opposing the law wore a striped prison costume and held a sign, “Obama Care is Putting the US Tax Payer in Debtors Prison.”  Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, a former Republican presidential candidate, joined a tea party press conference of opponents of the law. Calling the law “the greatest expansion of federal power in the history of the country,” she said, “We are calling on the court today: Declare this law unconstitutional.”

Toll CEO optimistic

There are “encouraging” signs the high-end housing market is recovering in many US markets, Toll Brothers CEO Douglas Yearley said yesterday.  It’s been the “best spring in five years,” he said. In 2012 “our orders are up significantly and continue to be up significantly. I’m optimistic right now.”  He said that “25% of our communities have seen a price increase since Jan 1. That’s encouraging. There are places where we don’t have pricing power (but) we’re not dropping prices. We haven’t dropped prices in over a year.”  In New York, Toll has “huge pricing power. We’re raising prices every week,” he said, adding the company is diversifying into the urban high-end high-rise market including properties in parts of New York and Brooklyn and Hoboken.  In the corridor between Boston and Washington, D.C., which did not have the overhang from foreclosures and where Toll does 60% of its business, the market is strong, land is hard to find and “we have pricing power in many of those local markets.”  Phoenix is hot for housing, having gone from 14 to 16 months of supply down to four or five months. “In the last month, Phoenix is back in a big way,” Yearley said.  So is California — both the northern and southern parts of the state — where it’s also hard to find land, he said. The Carolinas, including the Raleigh area, are doing quite well as is the second-home market in Florida, which he said is “beginning to come back and we haven’t seen that in five years.”  Texas is booming, but the midwest, as well as parts of Nevada such as Las Vegas and Reno, are not, he said.  “We’re bumping along the bottom in certain locations but we’re clearly off the bottom in other locations,” Yearley said.

Gas prices up

The price of an average gallon of regular gas surpassed the $3.90 mark Wednesday, moving to within a dime of the $4 threshold.  The average price rose 1.3 cents to $3.911 in the latest daily survey conducted for the motorist group AAA. The price has risen for 19 consecutive days.  The current price compares to just below $3.70 a month ago, and just below $3.59 a year ago.  Gasoline averages more than $4 a gallon in 10 states and the District of Columbia. At $4.55 a gallon, Hawaii has the nation’s highest pump price.  Prices are less than a nickel away from $4 a gallon in Nevada and Wisconsin.  Wyoming has the nation’s lowest gas prices, averaging nearly $3.51 a gallon.  Gas prices have been rising on the back of soaring oil prices, which shot up in early 2012 amid fears that tensions with Iran could lead to an all-out war that causes a disruption in oil supplies. But the latest Lundberg Survey said gas prices may be peaking, as the price of crude oil has remained relatively steady in March.

WSJ – home prices fall, but at a slower pace

Home prices fell to new lows in January, but the rate of decline appeared to be easing, offering the latest hint that prices may be at or near a bottom.  Prices dropped 0.8% in the three-month period that ended in January, according to the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller index that tracks 20 US metro areas. While that lowered the index to levels not seen since the end of 2002, the monthly decline improved from a drop of 1.1% in December and 1.3% in November.  House prices tend to weaken during the winter months, when sales activity slows and the share of “distressed” home sales, such as foreclosures, rises. After adjusting for seasonal factors, prices were flat in January compared with December.  Compared with one year ago, home prices fell 3.8% in January. That also represented an improvement over the 4.1% year-over-year decline for December.

Yesterday’s report “adds to other evidence that the housing market is on the mend,” said Paul Dales, senior US economist for Capital Economics. “We expect that 2012 will go down in history as the year that the most severe house-price crash on record ended.”  Home prices fell to new lows in nine cities, led by Atlanta, which was down 14.8% from a year ago. But three cities posted year-over-year increases: Detroit (1.7%), Phoenix (1.3%) and Denver (0.2%).  On a seasonally adjusted basis, half of the 20 markets showed flat or increasing prices in January when compared with December. 

Housing markets face significant headwinds. Nearly 11 million homeowners owe more on their mortgages than their houses or apartments are worth, and more than one million homes could sell out of foreclosure this year, putting pressure on prices. Credit standards are tight and show few signs of easing, leaving housing markets with fewer buyers at a time when more will be needed to soak up the excess supply.  Any stabilization in home prices, however, could offer a big boost to fragile consumer psychology.  “When you ask people why are they in the market right now they tell you, ‘Because home prices have stopped falling in some sickening way,’” said Glenn Kelman, chief executive of Redfin Corp., a Seattle-based brokerage. “They worry they could lose a little bit, but there was a time you really had to close your eyes before signing an offer, and hope you weren’t going to lose 10% of your equity in 12 months.”  Inventories of homes for sale are down sharply from one year ago and sales of new and existing homes for the first two months of the year have posted sizable increases compared with one year ago.  Most economists anticipate total levels of home construction and sales will increase this year, leaving home prices as the last metric that hasn’t yet reached a bottom.

{ 0 comments }

Home prices declined almost 5% in 2011

by admin on February 3, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin February 3, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!
Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Home prices declined almost 5% in 2011

Home prices decreased 4.7% in 2011 compared to the year before, marking the fifth consecutive year-end decrease in the CoreLogic home price index. Excluding distressed sales, home prices decreased 0.9% last year, which CoreLogic said gives an indication “of the impact of distressed sales on home prices in 2011.” Home sales last year also show month-over-month declines. December showed the fifth consecutive monthly decline with a drop of 1.4%, but rose 0.2% when distressed sales were removed from the equation.

The December decline followed a much larger drop of 4.3% in November, compared to November 2010. “While overall prices declined by almost 5% in 2011, nondistressed prices showed only a small decrease. Until distressed sales in the market recede, we will see continued downward pressure on prices,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic. While national statistics may be bleak, a few states posted increases in the price of homes last year. Montana came in first with 4.4% appreciation with distressed sales included, followed by Vermont (+4%), South Dakota (+3.1%), Nebraska (+2.5%) and New York (+1.7%). Illinois had the biggest 2011 decline in prices, 11.3%, followed by Nevada at 10.6%. Nevada’s peak-to-current decrease stands at 60% (including distressed homes), compared with a national decrease of 33.7%.

Employment up

The pace of job creation surged in January, with the US economy generating 243,000 new positions while the unemployment rate dropped to 8.3%, according to government data released today. Both numbers were far better than consensus, which expected a growth of 150,000 jobs and a steady unemployment rate of 8.5%. The overall work week remained unchanged at 34.5 hours while wages rose an average of four cents an hour to $23.29. The closely watched labor-force participation number, which can skew the unemployment rate, fell to 63.7%, the lowest since May 1983. The number of those working part-time for economic reasons rose 1.2%. Job gains have been concentrated primarily in the service sector, particularly in retail and the food and beverage industries. Warehousing, manufacturing, mining and health care also have participated. True to form, services were responsible for 162,000 of the January swell, with manufacturing payrolls growing 50,000. Government cuts subtracted 14,000 from the total. The total number of unemployed fell below 13 million for the first time since February 2009, while the total amount of employed Americans rose to 141.6 million, an increase of 847,000 from December. The unemployment rate was last this low in February 2009. The so-called real unemployment rate, which measures discouraged workers as well and is referred to as the U-6, nudged lower to 15.1%.

Long-term unemployment, though, remains a problem, with the duration dropping from a near-record 40.8 weeks to 40.1 weeks. Also, the level of discouraged workers surged, rising 7% to its highest level since December 2010. Job growth remains one of the two missing pieces of the recovery puzzle, even though the rate has been on a steady trek lower. In December, the economy created 203,000 jobs and the unemployment rate slipped to 8.5%, well off its 10.1% cycle peak. The monthly jobs report generally draws considerable trader reaction, which as of late has been all negative.

Olick – rent vs own riles government policy

“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage giants under government conservatorship, together owned 182,212 foreclosed properties as of the end of September. While they aggressively market and sell these homes to investors and owner-occupants alike, the numbers are still too high; these number could go far higher, as foreclosures previously stalled by paperwork issues come back into process. That’s why the federal regulator overseeing the two is launching a bulk sale program, offering investors the chance to buy foreclosed properties at a discount, as long as those investors turn the properties into viable rentals for a specified number of years. ‘This rental period could provide relief for local housing markets that continue to be depressed by the volume of foreclosed properties, and provide additional rental options to certain markets,’ according to a release from the regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).

The FHFA launched the initial phase of pre-qualification. Investors must prove they have ‘(a) the financial wherewithal to acquire the assets; (b) sufficient experience and knowledge in financial and business matters to analyze and bear the risks of the investment opportunity; and (c) agreement to keep certain information about the REO [Real Estate Owned, i.e. bank owned] and related matters confidential.’ That last part is to keep the prices competitive as the market starts to improve. Giving investors the opportunity to help clear the massive amount of distress in the housing market is crucial. The inventory of foreclosed properties is large, getting larger, and making it impossible for the overall market to achieve price stability. Witness a report today from CoreLogic which shows that home prices in December fell 4.7% year-over-year including sales of distressed properties. Excluding those properties, home prices fell less than one%.

Some, however, think the program is a negative: ‘People are brainwashed to think foreclosures are a bad thing for the housing market. Perhaps four years ago when a million loans all went into default and Foreclosure at the same time but not today. Today, 1st timers and investors — with an insatiable appetite for foreclosures, REO resales, and short sales — are the bedrock of this housing market.’ – Mark Hanson, Mortgage Analyst

‘Foreclosed homes are already meeting strong demand from investors when they come to market. We think these buyers are willing to pay a relatively full price, as they know the specific locations, and a large number of buyers have the ability to bid on the individual homes (doesn’t require significant capital)… Additionally, it will be difficult/expensive for investors to scale up operations given the broad geographic dispersion of properties vs. more traditional rental units, potentially limiting participation.’ – Dan Oppenheim, Credit-Suisse

Oppenheim also asks a valid question as to why the government would offer discounts to large investors buying in bulk, but not to individual investors buying perhaps a single property. There are plenty of Americans out there salivating over incredibly low-priced homes; rental income could be as much of a boon to them as perhaps a tax cut or a refinance. It was interesting yesterday, during his speech touting a proposed new government mortgage refinance program, President Obama, caught up in the moment, exclaimed, ‘No more renting!’ Putting aside the public relations blunder that was, given the fact that the FHFA had announced its REO to rent program not two hours before, it just drove home the conflict our government has between what it thinks Americans want to hear and what our economic reality dictates.

A few simple facts: There is not enough buyer demand to meet the number of homes for sale. A huge number of the homes for sale are empty, foreclosed properties. Too many Americans either cannot afford to buy a home or do not have the credit necessary to finance a home. Too many Americans cannot afford to sell their current homes in order to move or step up to a larger home. Rental demand is therefore strong and getting stronger. While homeownership may be a tenet of the ‘American Dream,’ renting is today’s actuality for a growing number of Americans. Whether it is large investor bulk programs or single investor incentives, adding to rental supply, thereby lowering rents, while at the same time clearing the market of foreclosed properties is a win. It may not be as politically palatable as offering ‘responsible’ borrowers a veiled tax credit in the form of a mortgage refinance, but it is good medicine for what ails housing.”

Pension threat for market investors

It’s no secret that the financial crisis and resulting malaise has taken its toll on bank stocks, commodities and Treasury yields. But it may be have triggered another ripple – one that has gone somewhat unnoticed. Pension funds have become seriously underfunded. According to a recent report from Credit Suisse some of the nation’s largest companies owe their pensions more than 25% of their market cap (after taxes). Although the problem is complex, at its core is simple math. Many firms forecast returns of 8% annually, and that just hasn’t happened. This developing situation is potentially market moving because it could require companies to make larger contributions – much larger. And if contributions ‘do’ go up, the money will have to come from someplace on the balance sheet.

“A pension accounting change at UPS will result in $527 million after tax charge in 2011,” says Joe Terranova. “And Sunoco said they have to contribute $80 million into their pension funds.” In other words, the need to fund pensions could drag down profits and, in turn, share price. In fact, the pension liability at AK Steel was cited by BofA as a reason behind their recent decision to downgrade the stock to ‘Underperform’ from ‘Neutral.” “I think in 2012 it will be a recurring issue,” Terranova says. John Ehrhardt of Milliman confirms the thesis. He tells us that investors should expect record numbers of earnings charges in 2012. “Record low interest rates result in historically high liabilities and the only remaining lever may be employer contributions.” And according to Ehrhardt this may be just the tip of the iceberg. “These companies are going to need 20-30% returns to fill the kinds of gaps we’re talking about.”

WSJ – Ally financial swings to loss

Ally Financial Inc., the US government-owned auto lender, swung to a $250 million net loss in the fourth quarter after taking a charge for regulatory penalties stemming from foreclosure matters. The Detroit-based lender, which provides financing for General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC dealers and customers, continued to make money from its auto-lending operations, but the results were weighed down again by its mortgage unit, which is saddled with lawsuits over foreclosures and soured mortgage investments. The loss compares to a year-ago profit of $79 million. It had a core pretax loss, which reflects results from continuing operations before taxes and other expenses, of $24 million, down from $526 million. Excluding a $270 million foreclosure-related charge, core pretax income would have been $246 million.

“One of our key priorities remains aggressively addressing the risks related to the mortgage business and taking steps to protect the key franchises at Ally,” Michael Carpenter, the company’s chief executive, said in a statement. “This will be critical to advance plans to repay the US taxpayer.” Ally, which was formerly owned by GM, is one of at least five major mortgage servicers in discussions with state and federal regulators over a potential settlement of “robo-signing” and other alleged foreclosure offenses. Regulators are close to finalizing a deal worth as much as $25 billion that could also include Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. On Tuesday, Ally said it would record the $270 million charge in the fourth quarter for penalties from regulators and other government agencies related to foreclosure issues.

The charge was mainly related to its mortgage subsidiary, Residential Capital, which has been the subject of bankruptcy speculation for several months. The charge caused a temporary decline in ResCap’s tangible net worth below $250 million, breaching debt covenants of some of its lenders, Ally said. Ally has been trying to scale back its mortgage operations as it focuses on building up its auto business and online retail bank. In November, the company said it would significantly curtail its correspondent lending operations, which comprise the bulk of its mortgage originations.

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }

Washington state considers short sale protection

by admin on February 1, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin January 31, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!
Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Washington state considers short sale protection

Banks could soon be barred from pursuing deficiency judgments against Washington state borrowers after a short sale. A Senate committee in the Washington State Legislature will hold a hearing over H.B. 2718, which states that if a bank “writes off debt from the short sale, they can’t then subsequently collect this debt from the seller. The bill was modeled after similar action passed in Oregon last summer. The bill if passed does not require the lender to accept a short sale offer. It would go into effect with 90 days of being passed. According to a Washington Realtors alert put out late last week, a borrower would report the write off to the Internal Revenue Service and take a tax deduction for the loss. This same amount is also counted as taxable income for the seller. “Providing certainty and consumer protections for short sale sellers is critical in the current real estate market,” the trade group said. “Successful short sales often prevent foreclosures that would harm consumers, tax revenue and economic recovery.” After the Oregon bill took effect in June, REO numbers became choppy and then began to fall at the end of the year. In September, repossessed homes totaled 1,420, according to RealtyTrac. That number increased to 2,057 the following month then slid to 936 in November and 874 in December. Some of that could be due to seasonal trends. Most lenders put repossessions on hold during the holiday season, but the December total was down 29% from the same month one year earlier.

S&P warns of rate cuts over health costs
Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s warned it may downgrade “a number of highly rated” Group of 20 countries from 2015 if their governments fail to enact reforms to curb rising healthcare spending and other costs related to aging populations. Developed nations in Europe, as well as Japan and the United States, are likely to suffer the largest deterioration in their public finances in the next four decades as more elderly strain social safety nets, S&P said in a report. “Steadily rising healthcare spending will pull heavily on public purse strings in the coming decades,” S&P analyst Marko Mrsnik wrote in the report. “If governments do not change their social protection systems, they will likely become unsustainable.” If no reforms are adopted, healthcare-related credit downgrades would likely start within three years, eventually leading to an increase in the number of junk-rated countries as of 2020, the study showed.

Olick – US Treasury forcing principal forgiveness

“Late Friday the US Treasury Department announced a major expansion of its Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). The three-year-old program has been largely deemed unsuccessful, as it has provided just about 750,000 borrowers with permanent loan modifications. The initial expectation from government officials was that it would help three to four million borrowers. ‘Clearly the initial program erred on the side of making sure taxpayers were protected, but it didn’t do enough to help the overall economy,’ said Michael Barr, former Asst. Treasury Secretary for Financial Institutions and one of HAMP’s original architects. Now taxpayers will pony up the cash, as Treasury is tripling the financial incentives to lenders and opening the program up to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and investors in rental properties. The money would come out of TARP funds, i.e. from the taxpayers. We still don’t know if Fannie and Freddie will participate, since their conservator, the FHFA’s Ed DeMarco, has been actively fighting principal write down for years. A week ago he sent a letter to members of congress explaining the math behind his argument.

But the Treasury may be forcing DeMarco’s hand. He claimed that writing down mortgage principal would cost $4 billion more than the modifications that Fannie and Freddie are doing now. Those involve interest rate reduction and principal forbearance. The newly expanded HAMP, however, with its triple- sized cash incentives, would shore up that $4 billion hole. Funny how he mentioned that hole on Monday, and the Treasury announced the new plan Friday. ‘If he [DeMarco] doesn’t get to yes, then he has no political leg to stand on,’ says FBR’s Ed Mills, who estimates the enhanced program could add one million borrowers to its ranks. Mills says a ‘no’ from DeMarco would enable the Obama Administration to replace him, which it tried to do once before, only to be blocked by members of Congress. ‘It would be an appropriate response for him to do it,’ says Barr of DeMarco. ‘I do think they should participate.’ I asked Barr why the Treasury waited three years to use the TARP funds for principal reduction. The obvious answer is that this is presidential election year, and the housing market is still floundering, but Barr claims the Treasury was just being careful. ‘It’s a use of taxpayer funds, and you want to make sure you’re not providing more of an incentive than is required,’ he said. ‘One person’s successful program is another person’s bailout.’”

Treasury department stirs the pot

The Treasury Department is investigating a report that Freddie Mac, the mortgage giant, bet against homeowners’ ability to refinance their loans even as it was making it more difficult for them to do so, Jay Carney, the White House spokesman, said yesterday. ProPublica and National Public Radio reported that Freddie Mac, which maintained slightly tighter restrictions than Fannie on homeowners’ eligibility to refinance, had a multibillion-dollar investment whose value hinged on borrowers continuing to pay higher interest rates. Beginning in 2010, Freddie bought several billion dollars’ worth of “inverse floater” securities — essentially the interest-paying portion of a bundle of mortgages — for its investment portfolio while selling the far less risky principal portion. Fannie and Freddie are supposed to be decreasing the size of their investment portfolios. There is no evidence that Freddie tailored its refinancing standards to its investing strategy, but “inverse floaters” make less money if the loans they cover refinance to a lower interest rate. Freddie issued a statement yesterday defending its commitment to helping homeowners. “Freddie Mac is actively supporting efforts for borrowers to realize the benefits of refinancing their mortgages to lower rates,” it said. The company said refinancing accounted for 78% of its loan purchases in 2011.

HAMP 2.0
The expansion of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) by the Treasury Department is expected to benefit special mortgage servicers, mortgage insurers and nonagency mortgage-backed securities holders, while having no material effect on agency MBS, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods said yesterday. Previously, if a borrower’s first-lien monthly mortgage payment was lower than 31% of income, the borrower was ineligible for HAMP. Factoring other debts to the evaluation will expand the pool of borrowers who can now qualify for HAMP. Investors also were given new incentives for accepting principal write-downs, with the financial benefits for such an action increasing from a range of 6 to 21 cents on the dollar to 18 to 63 cents. The Obama administration also extended the HAMP program deadline through December 2013. “We believe that the more flexible debt-to-income ratio and the inclusion of some investor properties will have a positive impact on modification activity,” KBW analysts said in its research note. “The impact of the increased principal reduction incentives remains unclear.

While it should help the nonagency sector, the impact would be far greater if there was GSE participation. The response from FHFA on Friday afternoon suggests that the GSEs might not participate,” according to KBW analysts. The research firm expects the changes to have “no material impact on agency MBS prepayment speeds.” However, special servicers in the mortgage industry are expected to benefit from the modifications. Ocwen Financial Corp. earned $28.3 million in HAMP incentive fees in the first nine months of 2011, and KBW believes other firms also will benefit from an expanded HAMP program. Barclays Capital analysts also see the changes as having no significant impact on agency MBS. “The reason is that the vast majority of debt forgiveness will be on delinquent loans, which are typically already bought out of the agency MBS trust,” Barclays wrote. “The only effect might be from the moral hazard side: if underwater borrowers in agency MBS pools start going delinquent on purpose to qualify for debt forgiveness, speeds will obviously rise. But we think this is unlikely to have a significant effect on agency speeds.”

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }

2012 to be the best year for short sales?

by admin on January 24, 2012

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin January 24, 2012

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

2012 to be the best year for short sales?

The Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Act of 2007 allows an income tax exemption for a homeowner whose mortgage debt is partly or entirely forgiven by a bank.  It’s set to expire Dec. 31, 2012.  Matt Alegi, a partner with the Potomac law firm Shulman Rogers and chair of the firm’s residential real estate practice group, says the tax break has meant a savings in the tens of thousands of dollars for individuals.  Typically, if someone were to have $150,000 forgiven by the bank, Alegi says, “you just made another $150,000 of income for tax purposes in that year.”  So, say someone makes $50,000 but had $150,000 forgiven by the bank. That person is now paying taxes on a $200,000 income, and included in a much higher tax bracket.  The loss of the relief will plunge homeowners further into debt, Alegi says.

He also thinks the expiration of the Debt Forgiveness Act will have an impact on short sales themselves. Homeowners could try to push the short sale through this year to take advantage of the tax break.  Alegi believes there will be strong lobbying to extend the tax break. If it isn’t extended, the appeal of a short sale could greatly diminish for the homeowner.  To take advantage of the Debt Relief Act, you need to fall under very specific guidelines outlined by the IRS.  For example, the debt forgiven is only for primary residences and the debt must have been used to buy, build or substantially improve your principal residence and be secured by that residence.  Alegi says homeowners who spent the forgiven money on education or other bills do not qualify.

Gridlock an Obama strategy?

When President Obama outlines his goals for 2012 during Tuesday’s State of the Union address, he shouldn’t expect a lot of cooperation from Republicans, senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said yesterday.  “With the Obama economy established now…unemployment is still at 8 ½%,” McConnell said. “It didn’t work, and we’re not interested in doing more of the things that don’t work.”  He said Obama was “AWOL” last year on his bus tour when Republicans wanted to tackle tax reform and entitlements, and he expects more of the same this year.   “He was not involved whatsoever,” McConnell said. “So I’m not optimistic, frankly, that in an election year that he’s likely to be any more engaged than he was last year.”  What’s more, he thinks the logjam in the nation’s capital is part of Obama’s agenda.  “That’s his strategy…to demonize Congress, to complain because he can’t continue to get everything he wants, like he did the first two years,” he said. “It’s all about his re-election and not about the country.”  One thing that McConnell thinks will get done is the payroll tax cut extension, which was extended for only two months in December when Congress couldn’t come to an agreement.  “We’ll be back at trying to figure out how to do that for the balance of the year and how to pay for it,” he said. “We don’t want to add to the deficit.”

What the $25 billion bank deal means

According to an Associated Press report, five major banks — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial — and US state attorneys general could adopt the agreement within weeks. It’s expected President Barack Obama will mention new developments in the negotiations in his State of the Union address today.  A settlement between the banks and the states doesn’t mean homeowners who lost their homes to foreclosure will get them back. In fact, they’re unlikely to benefit much at all financially, though the total financial settlement could be as high as $25 billion.  What’s worse is the settlement does not apply to loans held by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Since Fannie and Freddie own about half of all US mortgages – or 31 million US home loans – that means a lot of homeowners who have been hurt by the banks’ deceptive foreclosure practices won’t be getting much-needed assistance.  Nearly 11 million people – one in four homeowners – owe more than their home is worth. According to current guidelines, these underwater homeowners have few options and little chance at refinancing.  Here’s how the settlement could shape up:

-  $17 billion would go toward reducing the principal balance struggling homeowners owe on their mortgages.

-  $5 billion would be put into a reserve account for various state and federal programs. A portion of this money would cover the $1,800 checks that would be sent to homeowners affected by deceptive practices. Only about 750,000 Americans, or half of the households who might be eligible for assistance under the deal, will likely receive checks.

-  About $3 billion would be used to help homeowners refinance at 5.25%, far below current mortgage interest rates.

If the proposed settlement terms are accepted, roughly 1 million of these homeowners could see the principal amount of their mortgages reduced by an average of $20,000. That’s good news for some, but bad news for the other 10 million homeowners who would like to claim a principal reduction but won’t qualify.  The better news is this settlement has the potential to reshape long-standing lending guidelines and make things easier for at-risk and underwater homeowners across the board. But critics say it doesn’t do enough. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) tells the Associated Press: “Wall Street is again trying to pass the buck. Instead of criminal prosecutions, we’re talking about something that’s not more than a slap on the wrist.”  Some states have disagreed over what to offer banks, with states like New York, Delaware, Nevada and Massachusetts arguing banks should not be “protected from future civil liability.” The deal will not fully release banks from future criminal lawsuits by individual states, and a few of those states’ attorneys general have already promised to pursue their own investigations.  Bank officials have argued few, if any, foreclosures wrongfully took place as a result of documentation issues. Ally Financial CEO Michael Carpenter has been among the most vocal, claiming the company found no instances of wrongful foreclosure after its own internal audit. Carpenter has said he will fight the government in court if need be.

US Treasurys edge higher after Greek setback

US Treasurys edged higher today, after euro zone finance ministers rejected an offer by private creditors to restructure Greek debt, keeping alive fears of a default.  Benchmark 10-year note’s yield was at 2.06%, compared with 2.058% in late US trade on Monday. The yield rose as high as 2.094% on Friday, its highest since early December. The 30-year bond yield was at 3.14%.  Demand for safe-haven US debt was further boosted after a report rekindled fears that Portugal, seen as the second most risky country in the euro zone, could be the next potential default candidate after Greece.  Further dousing optimism, Germany denied a report that it was ready to boost the combined firepower of the euro zone’s rescue funds to 750 billion euros ($979 billion).  During its two-day policy meeting starting on Tuesday the Federal Reserve is expected to push out expectations on when it will next raise interest rates until at least 2014, and the meeting will also be closely watched for any hints of new QE, which analysts expect would focus on mortgage-backed bonds.  The Treasury Department will sell four-week bills and two-year notes later in the day. The Treasury will sell a total of $99 billion in new two-year, five-year, and seven-year notes this week.

Mortgage writedowns to cost taxpayers $100 billion

Forgiving mortgage debt on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans would cost the taxpayer-funded companies almost $100 billion, their regulator said.   The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) said that as of June 30, the companies guaranteed nearly 3 million mortgages on single- family homes that are underwater, or worth less than the loans they secure.  “FHFA estimates that principal forgiveness for all of these mortgages would require funding of almost $100 billion,” FHFA Acting Director Edward J. DeMarco said in a Jan. 20 letter to Representative Elijah Cummings, a Maryland Democrat who had threatened to subpoena the information. The FHFA posted the letter on its website today.  Nearly 80% of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac borrowers with negative equity were current on their payments, DeMarco said.

DeMarco, whose agency was created by Congress to minimize losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and is independent of President Barack Obama’s administration, has maintained that principal forgiveness would increase the size of the government’s bailout of the companies, which have cost taxpayers more than $153 billion since they were taken under government control in 2008.  The agency compared the cost of principal forgiveness to the companies’ current practice of forbearance, which allows delinquent borrowers to defer payments.  “Given that any money spent on this endeavor would ultimately come from taxpayers and given that our analysis does not indicate a preservation of assets for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (FMCC) substantial enough to offset costs, an expenditure of this nature at this time would, in my judgment, require congressional action,” he said.

WSJ – EU tries to revive Greek talks

European Union finance ministers today piled pressure on Greece and its private-sector creditors to do more to ensure that a proposed deal to restructure Greece’s private-sector debt will be enough to put the country back on a firm fiscal footing.  The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the euro zone’s four triple-A-rated countries-—Germany, the Netherlands, Finland and Luxembourg—are pushing for a low average interest rate on new bonds to be issued as part of the restructuring, in order to ensure the government can pay its debts in the future.  But as they were heading to a meeting Tuesday, EU finance ministers also urged Greece to implement tough austerity and structural reforms and provide more written assurances to its partners that it would commit to its pledges before further aid can be released.  Austrian Finance Minister Maria Fekter said she’s “not pleased” with progress so far. “We’re sending a very direct message to Greece that the community expects more, also in terms of structural reform,” she told reporters. “We’re not pleased and only when there’s a written message on the table in front of us, can further assistance be discussed.”

Greece’s debt restructuring is planned to take the form of a bond exchange in which creditors holding some €200 billion ($260.32 billion) in debt would swap their securities for new instruments with half the face value. The key sticking point is how much interest the new bonds should pay.  The restructuring is part and parcel of the second bailout program for Greece amounting to €130 billion. Without this loan, Greece will default on a €14.4 billion bond maturing March 20.  But talks in Athens with the Institute of International Finance, which represents the majority of Greece’s private-sector creditors, have dragged on for three weeks and stalled over the weekend. Private-sector creditors said in a final offer that they won’t accept an average interest rate of less than 4%.  The IMF voiced concerns yesterday that the deal being discussed by Greece and the creditors would leave the country with a higher-than-expected debt burden in the years ahead, people familiar with the matter said.  That sets up a difficult choice: press bondholders to accept more losses, or accept that Greece’s peers and the IMF will have to kick in more support.

Olick – foreclosure investors a double edged sword

“The best and most expeditious way to clear the vast inventory of foreclosed properties weighing down today’s housing market is to get more investors in and sell them these properties at bulk discounts.  That’s what the Obama administration and Federal regulators are currently considering for the thousands of homes currently owned by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA.  While big private equity funds are still largely in a very tedious deal-making stage with banks or waiting on the sidelines for a government program, smaller individual investors are getting in. Nearly 23% of home purchases in December were by investors, according to a new survey from Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance. That is a slight increase from November, but the share has remained largely unchanged for the past year.  What has changed dramatically is how many of these investors are using all-cash…74% according to the survey, which also found that, ‘cash buyers are able to bid significantly lower—and successfully—on many properties because they offer a shorter and more reliable closing timeline.’ That is precisely what mortgage servicers want.

‘While investor bids may not be the first offers accepted, they often end up winning properties after other homebuyers are eliminated because of mortgage approval or timeline problems,’ according to the survey authors. ‘Appraisals below the contracted price are a common reason for mortgage denials. Most mortgage financing timelines are now in excess of 30 days.’  There has been a lot of concern among industry analysts that bulk foreclosure sales would push home prices down further, but it appears that is already happening, as investors usually offer 10-20% below list price, while first time home buyers and current homeowners are generally offering list. If the offers are competitive, cash will prevail.”

See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.
All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }

Florida, South Dakota foreclosures up

by admin on December 13, 2011

Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin December 9, 2011

Forward this e-mail to your friends!

Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/

*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>

http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>

http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

************************************************************

Florida, South Dakota foreclosures up

California-based CoreLogic said the rate of foreclosures in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater area among outstanding mortgage loans was 12.26% for September, an increase of 1.55 percentage points compared with September 2010, when the rate was 10.71%.  At the same time, the mortgage delinquency rate has increased.  During September, 16.73% of mortgage loans in the Tampa metro area were 90 days or more delinquent compared with 16.44% for the same period last year. That’s a 0.29 percentage point increase from the same month last year.  The foreclosure activity in Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater was higher than the national foreclosure rate of 3.48% in September. That’s an 8.78 percentage point difference.  Florida as a whole fared a little worse. In September, 17.38% of mortgages in the state were delinquent.  This data comes on the heels of another report from CoreLogic this week that showed Tampa Bay area home prices dropped 8.5% in October, compared with a year earlier.  The higher foreclosure rate could drag down sale prices further. The home-price decrease dropped less than 1% when distressed properties were excluded from the index, CoreLogic said. When troubled properties, such as short sales and bank-owned sales, were taken out of the data, prices declined just 0.9%, the report said.

CoreLogic says the rate of South Dakota foreclosures among outstanding mortgage loans for September is 1.4%, an increase from 1.11% in September 2010.  But the South Dakota rate sits more than 2 percentage points below the national foreclosure rate for September, which is 3.48%.  In Sioux Falls, the state’s largest city, the September foreclosure rate climbed to 1.48%, from 1.25% in September 2010. Two years earlier, the rate was below 1%.  The rate of mortgage delinquency in South Dakota decreased. In September, 2.63% of mortgage loans were 90 days or more delinquent, compared to 2.72% for the same period last year.

US trade deficit narrows

The US trade deficit narrowed in October to its lowest in 10 months, but imports from China hit a record high.  The trade gap totaled $43.5 billion, in line with a consensus estimate from analysts before the report. However, the Commerce Department revised its estimate of the September trade deficit to $44.2 billion from $43.1 billion.  As a result, the October trade gap narrowed 1.6% from September, instead of widening, as most analysts expected.  Both US imports and exports declined in October, in a possible sign of weakening demand in the US and abroad. Imports fell 1% to $222.6 billion, led by a $3.6 billion drop in industrial supplies and materials. The average price for imported oil fell for a fifth consecutive month to $98.84 per barrel, from its May peak of $108.70.  Despite the overall import decline, imports of capital goods and food, feeds and beverages increased to records in October.

Imports from China rose to a record $37.8 billion and imports from Japan increased to $12.3 billion, the highest since April 2008. US exports fell 0.8% to $179.2 billion, led by a $1.3 billion drop in industrial supplies and materials. The biggest monthly decline in that category was for non-monetary gold, which tumbled 25% to $3.5 billion. However, for the first 10 months of 2011, non-monetary gold exports totaled $27.8 billion, compared to $14.8 billion in the same period last year.  US exports to China increased to $9.7 billion, the highest since December.  The US trade gap with China was unchanged in October at $28.1 billion, but remained on track to surpass the annual record of about $272 billion set in 2010.

Olick – what are buyers putting down?

“Ask the Realtors, the Builders, even the Housing Reporters, and they’ll all tell you that the biggest impediments to housing’s recovery are higher credit underwriting standards.  Down payments are a big part of that, as most mortgage market experts will say you can’t get those great low rates today without putting down at least 20%, and more if you need a jumbo loan.  That’s why a new report from LendingTree listing the states with the highest and lowest average mortgage down payments was so surprising to me. It wasn’t the states, but the cash down.  New Jersey came in with the highest average, but that average was just 13.76%, according to LendingTree. North Dakota boasts the lowest average at 12.29%. Still both are well below the 20% we all complain about.  Granted FHA (Federal Housing Administration) loans, which due to the government insurance, require very low down payments, and while they rose to a very large share of the market during the worst years of the housing crash, they have since fallen back to an approximately 20% share of originations today.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac require at least 10% down, but then you have to pay private mortgage insurance to get the best rates.  ‘The reality is when you put less than 20% down, you have to pay for some kind of insurance to protect the lender from the higher risk that you’ll default…but private mortgage insurers these days aren’t always willing to do business with low down payments,’ notes a LendingTree spokesman.  If average down payments are this low, it raises concern over proposed mortgage industry regulation that would require a 20% down payment for a lender to be able to securitize and sell a loan fully into the marketplace. Lenders, like LendingTree, don’t like it.  ‘If Federal regulators were to adopt the proposed 20% down payment requirement, a majority of borrowers wouldn’t be able to meet the standard given the findings in this report,’ said Doug Lebda, founder and CEO of LendingTree.  But what if the average that LendingTree is reporting, isn’t what it appears to be?  ‘What we know is that 20-25% of mortgages nationwide carry down payments of 3.5% or less (FHA or VA) while most of the rest carry down payments of 20% or more (Fannie, Freddie and jumbo),’ notes Guy Cecala of Inside Mortgage Finance. ‘So an average of 12 or 14% is not impossible, but it doesn’t really mean that a lot of people are actually getting mortgages with those ‘average’ down payments.’  Don’t you just hate it when real math gets in the way of a good lobby?”

One holdout to new EU treaty

The European Union said Friday that 26 of its 27 member countries are open to joining a new treaty tying their finances together to solve the euro crisis. Only Britain remains opposed, creating a deep rift in the union.  In marathon overnight talks, the 17 countries that use the euro gradually persuaded nearly all the others to consider joining the new treaty they would create. Some of those countries may face parliamentary opposition to the treaty, which would allow for unprecedented oversight of national budgets.  “Except for one, all are considering participation,” EU President Herman Van Rompuy told reporters after the summit ended. “I’m optimistic because I know it is going to be very close to 27.”  A document released near the end of a high-stakes EU summit Friday said the leaders of nine of the 10 EU countries that don’t use the euro “indicated the possibility to take part in this process after consulting their parliaments where appropriate.”  ”This is the breakthrough to the stability union,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel told a press conference after the summit.

EU leaders expressed disappointment that Britain stayed out.  French President Nicolas Sarkozy blamed the split on British Prime Minister David Cameron.  “David Cameron made a proposal that seemed to us unacceptable, a protocol to the treaty that would have exonerated the United Kingdom from a great number of financial service regulations,” Sarkozy said shortly before dawn, after what he called a “difficult” dinner meeting had dragged through the night.  Cameron defended his stance.  “What was on offer is not in Britain’s interest so I didn’t agree to it,” he said. “We’re not in the euro and I’m glad we’re not in the euro. We’re never going to join the euro and we’re never going to give up this kind of sovereignty that these countries are having to give up.”

MBA – no compensation changes please!

The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) doesn’t want to see any changes to the mortgage servicing compensation.  In a letter to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) , the trade group said no one has made a compelling case for why the current model needs to be tweaked. MBA President and CEO David Stevens said the group agrees with the government that there is a need for improvements for all participants of the mortgage underwriting and securitization processes.  “However, we believe that any change to the current servicing compensation model is unnecessary to accomplish these goals,” he said.  In late September, the FHFA proposed two mortgage servicing compensation models.  The MBA believes dramatically changing residential servicing, origination, and secondary market operations serves no one, claiming “radical changes in any of the major structures underlying the existing TBA market could reduce liquidity in the TBA.”  “The world of residential mortgage servicing has undergone unprecedented stress over the course of the economic downturn,” Stevens said. “The current servicer compensation model is still the best approach and making radical changes, like the proposed ‘fee for service,’ will have dramatic impacts not just on originators, servicers and investors, but also on borrowers in both the costs they pay to get a mortgage and the support they receive from their servicers.”  The MBA prefers a cash reserve structure, which calls for deferring some existing fees to cover servicing costs for “catastrophic economic and default situations.”

See you at the top!

Chris McLaughlin

**************

Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2011.

All Rights Reserved.

http://www.shortsalesriches.com

http://www.shortsalescoach.com

http://www.sixfigurebpo.com

http://www.reomillionaireclub.com

http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches

http://www.smartrealestatenews.com

(subscribe to this newsletter)

*************************************************

About the author:

Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top

Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.

* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-

foreclosure expert, he oversees more than

100 short sale & REO closings each month

* Long-time authority on real estate investing

and rapid reselling of distressed homes.  Owns

portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit

properties

* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,

running 4 different offices, supporting over

420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help

thousands of investors make money in the

biggest market opportunity ever!

* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices

closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of

$392,912,927!

* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and

seminar leader for current trends and hot topics

in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and

Wealth Building

* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris

* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com

{ 0 comments }