Nationwide housing affordability hit a new record high for a second consecutive quarter in the first three months of this year, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index (HOI), released today. Yet tight lending conditions continue to pose a major obstacle to many prospective home buyers.  The latest HOI data reveal that 77.5% of all new and existing homes that were sold in this year’s first quarter were affordable to families earning the national median income of $65,000.  This beats the previous record set in the final quarter of 2011, when 75.9% of homes sold were affordable to median-income earners.  The most affordable major housing market in this year’s first quarter was Indianapolis-Carmel, Ind., where 95.8% of homes sold during the period were affordable to households earning the area’s median family income of $66,900.

Also ranking among the  most affordable major housing markets in respective order were Dayton, Ohio; Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla.; Modesto, Calif.; Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Mich.; and Buffalo-Niagara Falls, N.Y.; the latter two of which tied for fifth place.  Among smaller housing markets, Cumberland, Md.-W.Va. topped the affordability chart for the first time in this year’s first quarter. There, 99% of homes sold during the first quarter were affordable to families earning the area’s median income of $53,000. Other smaller housing markets at the top of the index include Fairbanks, Alaska; Wheeling, W.Va.; Kokomo, Ind.; and Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, Iowa-Ill., respectively.  In New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-N.J., which retained the title of the least affordable major housing market for a 16th consecutive quarter, just 31.5% of homes sold in the first three months of this year were affordable to those earning the area’s median income of $68,200. 

Other major metros at the bottom of the affordability chart included San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, Calif.; Honolulu; Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif.; and Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, Calif., respectively.  Ocean City, N.J., was the least affordable smaller housing market on the list, with 45.9% of homes sold in the first quarter affordable to families earning the median income of $71,100. Other small metros at the bottom of the list included Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Calif.; San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, Calif.; Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, Calif.; and Laredo, Texas.

HP ponders 25,000 job cuts

Hewlett-Packard is considering cutting its workforce by 8 to 10%, or a minimum of 25,000 jobs, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, as newly installed CEO Meg Whitman strives to return the storied Silicon Valley institution to growth.  The job cuts, which could include retirements, are under discussion but have not yet been finalized, several people familiar with the situation told Reuters. The sources did not elaborate on a time frame or other details.  HP, which employs more than 300,000 people across the globe, could announce the layoffs as soon as next week when it unveils quarterly results, said the sources, who asked to remain anonymous because the plan has not been made public.  Analysts have been expecting job cuts in the wake of Whitman’s plan to merge the company’s personal computer and printer divisions.

NAR – need more short sales

In a letter sent today to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the US Department of the Treasury, National Association of Realtors (NAR) responded to the agencies’ recent request for input and offered its recommendations for selling REO properties held by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration.  In its letter, NAR urged the agencies to create an advisory board as they explore new options for selling foreclosed properties to ensure that efficiently disposing of agency REO properties will minimize taxpayer losses and reduce the negative effects that distressed properties have on local real estate markets. 

To prevent further REO inventory increases, NAR recommended that the agencies take more aggressive steps to modify loans and, when a family is absolutely unable keep their home, to quickly approve reasonable short sale offers that allow families to avoid foreclosure. NAR President Ron Phipps said that while federal programs have been put into place to help keep families in their homes, many of these have fallen short of expectations, and advocated that those resources be applied toward modifying loans and expediting short sales, which are typically less costly than foreclosure.  “Loan modifications keep families in their home and reduce defaults, while short sales keep homes occupied, helping stabilize neighborhoods and home values,” Phipps said. “Expanding resources and ensuring the use of already allocated funds for pre-foreclosure efforts is the best opportunity to reduce taxpayer costs and creates more positive outcomes for homeowners and their communities.”

Greece dissolves Parliament, gold down

Greece’s Parliament is to be dissolved so new elections can be held June 17.  The move Friday comes after an inconclusive election left squabbling politicians unable to form government, deepening the country’s political crisis and jeopardizing its membership in Europe’s joint currency.  In a symbolic move Thursday, the 300 legislators elected May 6 were sworn in for just one day. A caretaker government has been appointed to lead Greece until the new election but it can’t make any binding decisions.  The political turmoil comes at a critical time. Greece must make more cutbacks next month to get new funds from its international bailout, which has kept the country afloat since May 2010.  Greece’s credit rating was reduced one level on concerns the country won’t be able to muster the political support needed to sustain its membership in the euro area as leaders began campaigning ahead of a second national vote in six weeks. Moody’s Investors Service lowered debt ratings at 16 Spanish banks, citing economic weakness and the government’s mounting budget strain. It follows Moody’s May 14 downgrade of 26 Italian banks and its Feb. 13 cut of Spain’s sovereign debt.

Gold dropped, headed for its third weekly decline, on signs that Europe’s crisis is worsening as concern grew about the health of Spanish banks and Fitch Ratings downgraded Greece’s credit rating, curbing demand for the metal.

Gold for immediate delivery fell as much as 0.4% to $1,568.03 an ounce and was at $1,570.68 at 2:49 p.m. in Singapore. The metal climbed 2.3% yesterday, paring this week’s loss to 0.5%. June-delivery bullion declined as much as 0.5% to $1,567.80 on the Comex in New York.  “The fact that people are worried about European banks again is likely to have a broader, more depressing effect across all markets,” said Nick Trevethan, senior commodities strategist at Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. in Singapore. “Even though it broke away from other assets yesterday, gold is still very much traded in line with risk.”

Housing bottom in 2013?

US home prices could drop another 7.8% before reaching bottom next year, Fitch Ratings said in a report released Thursday.   A Fitch report from director Stefan Hilts forecasts steady economic growth and inflation levels that are close to 3% annually. The combination of the two could cause prices to reach bottom by next year, leading the market into a slow recovery, analysts with the firm said.  “The economy continues to grow with economic indicators on a positive trajectory and pointing to a recovery,” Fitch said. “But struggles remain. High unemployment, a declining labor force, stagnant wages, and a large delinquent inventory across many parts of the country are slowing the recovery’s momentum.”  States like Arizona and Michigan, which were hit with hefty price declines, are starting to see a turnaround, Fitch asserted.

Arizona saw small quarterly gains for the first time in two years in the most recent report and Michigan is beginning to stabilize, the study suggested.  While those markets stabilize, prices are falling in the Northeast as inventory backlog starts to move onto the market. Fitch says New Jersey and New York alone have watched prices drop 10% and 7%, respectively, over the past five quarters. The ratings giant expects further drops in those states in the coming months.  The state of Georgia also became an interesting case study for Fitch, with the ratings giant reporting that home prices in the state are now 32% lower than 2000 levels. However, Georgia is very much a divided state with the affluent northern suburbs of Atlanta and central city area holding onto their values and the overall economy collapsing to the city’s south.

Bank of America (BOA) is offering some struggling homeowners payments of up to $30,000 if they sell their homes in a short sale and avoid ending up in foreclosure.  Under the plan, Bank of America will offer homeowners so-called relocation payments of between $2,500 and $30,000 if they sell their home in a short sale. In short sale deals, the sale price of the home is less than what the seller owes the bank.  The bank first tested the payments in a pilot program in Florida last fall. Under that initiative, Bank of America paid up to $20,000 to borrowers who sold their homes in short sales.  Chase started a similar initiative in late 2010 that pays as much as $35,000 to short sellers. Wells Fargo has also paid five-figure incentives to short sellers or to owners who turned over their deeds to the bank.  BOA said it has completed 200,000 short sales over the past two years. These sales are generally more cost effective for banks than foreclosures. By avoiding foreclosure, the lenders get distressed properties back from delinquent borrowers more quickly, which helps them to avoid property tax payments, maintenance expenses and legal fees that can build up for months, even years, as foreclosures work through the system.

In addition, the incentives help guarantee the homes will return to the lenders in better condition. Foreclosed properties are often poorly maintained, even sometimes sabotaged, by angry former owners, making them worth far less to the banks.  During the last three months of 2011, foreclosures sold for an average of about $150,000, according to RealtyTrac. Meanwhile, short sales sold for an average of about $185,000.  To qualify for Bank of America’s relocation payments, borrowers must obtain pre-approval on sale prices for their homes. The sale must begin by the end of 2012 and close by September 26, 2013.  The exact compensation is determined case-by-case based on a calculation that involves the home’s value, mortgage balance and other factors.  Borrowers can call 877-459-2852 to find out if they may be eligible for the program.

Business inventories up

The Commerce Department said inventories increased 0.3% to a record $1.58 trillion, after rising 0.6% in February.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast inventories rising 0.4%.  Inventories are a key component of gross domestic product and March’s report was the latest to suggest the government could lower its 2.2% growth estimate for the first quarter.  Data on wholesale and manufacturing inventories released last week indicated a slower pace of restocking in March than the government had assumed in its initial first-quarter GDP estimate published last month.  Inventories in March were held back by declining stocks for furniture and building materials. Automobile inventories rose 1.2% in March after rising 1.4% the previous month.  Inventories excluding autos, which is used to calculate GDP, ticked up 0.1% after rising 0.2% in February.  Business sales increased 0.6% to a record $1.24 trillion in March, after rising 0.7% the prior month. At March’s sales pace it will take 1.27 months for businesses to clear shelves, down from 1.28 months in February.

MBA – refinance applications up

Mortgage applications increased 9.2% from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending May 11, 2012.   The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 9.2% on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 8.7% compared with the previous week.  The Refinance Index increased 13.0% from the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 2.4% from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 2.4% compared with the previous week and was 1.0% lower than the same week one year ago. The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 1.77%.  The four week moving average is up 1.57% for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 1.88% for the Refinance Index.

The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 74.9% of total applications from 72.1% the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 5.4% from 5.7% of total applications from the previous week.  “A flare up of the sovereign debt troubles in Europe once again led investors to flee to the safety of US Treasury securities last week.  As a result, mortgage rates have reached new lows in our survey, and refinancing application volumes picked up substantially as a result,” said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics.    “Survey participants indicated that this was not due primarily to HARP volume – the HARP share of refinances fell to 28% of refinance applications, down relative to last week and last month, when the share was just above 30% in April.  The increase in refinance activity last week was concentrated in the conventional sector, which was up around 14% for the week, while government refinance applications were up only 4%.”  During the month of April, the investor share of applications for home purchase was at 5.7%, unchanged from March.  The Pacific region has the largest investor share of applications for home purchase at 9.5%. In addition, the share of purchase mortgages for second homes decreased to 5.7% in April from 5.8% in March.

Gold enters bear market

Gold entered a so-called bear market, dropping for a fourth day, after Greek leaders failed to form a government, increasing speculation that the country may quit the euro and driving the Dollar Index (DXY) to a record advance.  Immediate-delivery gold lost as much as 0.7% to $1,533 an ounce, more than 20% below its all-time high last September and fulfilling the common definition of the market slump. That’s the cheapest since Dec. 29. The precious metal traded at $1,535.75 at 2:01 p.m. in Singapore.  A second Greek vote will be held, possibly next month, as gridlock followed a May 6 ballot in which voters rejected the austerity program that underpins the country’s bailout accords. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble called the new election a referendum on whether Greece stays in the euro.  “It’s a risk-off environment,” Peter Hickson, head of commodities research at UBS AG, said in a Bloomberg Television interview. “People are concerned about liquidity and they’re going to take security in the US dollar.”

Since peaking at $1,921.15 an ounce last year, spot bullion has exceeded the 20% decline twice before, in both September and December, and is 1.8% lower in 2012 after gaining for the past 11 years.  June-delivery bullion lost as much as 1.6% to $1,532.70 an ounce in New York, declining more than 20% from its record. Futures have also dropped into a bear market twice since reaching the record last year.  The Dollar Index, a six-currency gauge, climbed for a 14th day, the longest winning run since its inception in 1973. The euro dropped to $1.2699, the weakest since Jan. 17.  Holdings in gold-backed exchange-traded products fell 0.1% to 2,379.367 metric tons yesterday, according to data tracked by Bloomberg. Investor George Soros increased his holdings in the SPDR Gold Trust in the first quarter, while John Paulson maintained his stake, filings showed yesterday.  Spot gold’s so-called 14-day relative strength index dropped to 21.07, below the level of 30 that some analysts regard as signaling a rebound. One ounce of gold bought as much as 56.0702 ounces of silver today, the most since Jan. 9, according to Bloomberg data.

Olick – foreclosures down – a bad thing?

“A new report came out [yesterday] with a curious headline: ‘Foreclosure Activity Declines, Hurting Investors.’ I read it twice. You would think declines in foreclosure activity would be a good thing, that is, would help, not hurt. Not in this bizarre housing market. The report is from Foreclosure Radar, a foreclosure sales and analytics website.  Foreclosure starts, the first stage in the foreclosure process, fell in April in the hardest hit states of California, Arizona and Nevada, according to Foreclosure Radar. California saw the steepest slide, with Notice of Default filings down nearly 16% from a year ago and nearly 70% from the peak in March of 2009.  Foreclosure sales (sales of these properties at the courthouse steps, not sales of already bank-owned, or REO, properties) also declined, as the investor share of these purchases soared to a record high. ‘Nevada investors purchased more than 50% of foreclosure sales for the first time at 50.7%,’ according to the Foreclosure Radar report. ‘The low number of sales, combined with a record% purchased on the courthouse steps, left very little to become Bank Owned (REO). This further depletes the inventory of Bank Owned homes, as REO sales continue to outpace the addition of new inventory.’

Why all the declines? Unfortunately it’s not an overall improvement in the housing market, nor an increasing ability of borrowers to stay current on their mortgage payments.  ‘Instead we are seeing unprecedented government intervention into the foreclosure process, leaving underwater homeowners in limbo, while stealing opportunity from investors and first-time buyers,’ says Foreclosure Radar CEO Sean O’Toole, who cites new legislation in Nevada which brought foreclosure activity to a near halt, and similar pending legislation in California. ‘The reality is that these laws don’t solve anything, as they fail to address the real problem—negative equity – while instead they punish real estate professionals, homebuyers, and investors far more than the banks they were aimed at,’ argues O’Toole.  The recent $25 billion mortgage servicing settlement between the nation’s five largest lenders, state attorneys general and the US Department of Justice, has sent servicers back to the drawing board on many thousands of delinquent loans and loans that were already in the foreclosure process. Bank of America alone has suspended 200,000 foreclosure actions, as it offers principal reduction modifications to comply with its $11 billion share of the settlement.

Government and private sector programs are both trying to mitigate the foreclosure crisis, but as the rental market shows no sign of cooling off, investors are increasingly arguing that these troubled mortgages should be allowed to run their course through to foreclosure. That of course benefits investors but ignores the human toll inflicted on so many desperate American families. But again, as O’Toole argues, we’re doing none of these homeowners any good by keeping them in homes in which they will likely never see any equity; underwater borrowers are effectively renting already anyway, not to mention that they are stuck in place because they can’t sell.  Government intervention in the mortgage market, be it foreclosure mitigation, subsidized refinancing, or artificially low interest rates will not abate in an election year because politics always trump fundamental economics. What’s so interesting this year is that while politicians have consistently vilified investors throughout the housing crash, they need them now more than ever to help clear the distressed homes from the market and provide much needed rental housing.  At some point even the politicians will have to look past who did or did not act ‘responsibly’ during the run-up to the housing crash and focus on who has the best chance of setting things right again.”

First shots fired in the debt-ceiling debate

Republican speaker John Boehner vowed yesterday that the House will not wait until after November elections to find a way to avoid a year-end “fiscal cliff” – and that House Republicans will, again, refuse to raise the national debt limit, unless Congress offsets the hike with spending cuts.  “Previous Congresses have encountered lesser precipices with lower stakes and made a beeline for the closest lame-duck escape hatch,” Mr. Boehner said, at a speech at a fiscal summit sponsored by the Peterson Foundation in Washington.  “Let me put your mind at ease. This Congress will not follow that path, not if I have anything to do with it.”  With Congress putting off its challenges until the lame-duck session between the November elections and the new year, it could be said that all of Capitol Hill is staring down a massive financial collision. Whether to extend the Bush tax cuts and the budget-slashing “sequester,” raise the debt ceiling, extend unemployment benefits and the payroll tax holiday, and fix payments to physicians from Medicare may all have to be resolved in only six short weeks if the Democrats get their way.  By contrast, Boehner aims to get to work before November elections, offering by far the most concrete plans to get to work ahead of the lame-duck session of any congressional leader. The House will hold votes on the expiring Bush tax cuts before the elections, he said. It will also put together a process for an “expedited” path to tax reform in the new year.  “If we do this right, we will never again have to deal with the uncertainty of expiring tax rates,” Boehner said.

WSJ – architectural billings index slips

After five months of positive readings, the Architecture Billings Index slipped back into negative territory during April, an indication that demand for design services declined.  The score for April was 48.4, compared with 50.4 in March. A score above 50 means billings increased. The index, compiled by the American Institute of Architects (AIA), is considered an early indicator of future construction, given that developers need designs before they build. AIA economist Kermit Baker said the volatility in the index isn’t surprising considering “the continued volatility in the overall economy.”  He also noted that weather patterns may have played a role in the latest reading. “Favorable conditions during the winter months may have accelerated design billings, producing a pause in projects that have moved ahead faster than expected,” he said.

The best inventory on the market in metro Detroit — where foreclosures and short sales account for 36% of the listings — attracts multiple bids and pushed the median sales price to $70,000 last month, up 18.6% from $59,000 in April 2011, according to Realcomp, a Farmington Hills-based multiple listing service.  Its members reported 4,351 closed sales in April, which is down by 2.2% from the 4,439 homes and condos that sold in the same month a year ago.  Sales gains were seen in Macomb County, up 8.9% to 922, and Oakland County, up 1.5% to 1,448. Pulling down the metro area results were Livingston County, with a 9.5% drop to 182 homes sold in April, followed by Wayne County, with a 9% decline to 1,789 home sales from 1,965 last April.  All four counties included in the metro Detroit stats — Livingston, Oakland, Macomb and Wayne — saw median sales price increases in April. Here’s the breakdown:

-  Livingston: $150,000, up 7.1% from $140,000.

-  Macomb: $72,500, up 13.3% from $64,000.

-  Oakland: $114,500, up 9% from $105,000.

-  Wayne: $38,000, up 27.1% from $29,900.

The Detroit area, which is defined as Detroit, Hamtramck, Harper Woods and Highland Park, saw median prices rise to $9,000, up 2.3% from a year ago, but sales dropped 22% to 539 in April.  Nearly half, or 48%, of sales last month were cash sales and homes were selling an average of three days faster with 87 days on market, Realcomp said.  Inventories dropped 18.3% in April to 26,896 homes for sale in the entire multiple listing service compared with 32,910 in April 2011. The MLS includes metro Detroit plus parts of the Thumb and Genesee County.

Retail sales up slightly

Sales at US retailers barely rose in April as the boost from an unseasonably warm winter faded, pointing to some loss of momentum in consumer spending early in the second quarter.  Retail sales edged up 0.1%, held back by a decline in receipts from building materials and clothing stores, the Commerce Department said on Tuesday. That was the smallest gain since December when sales were flat.  Other data showed manufacturing remained resilient, with a gauge of factory activity in New York state bouncing higher this month as new orders and shipments rose.  The New York Federal Reserve said its Empire State general business conditions index jumped to 17.09 in May from 6.56 in April, outpacing economists’ expectations of 8.50.  “Growth is there, but it’s not that convincing,” said David Sloan, senior economist at 4CAST in New York.  March’s sales were revised slightly down to show a 0.7% rise rather than the previously reported 0.8% increase. Economists polled by Reuters had expected retail sales to gain 0.2% last month.  In the 12 months to April, sales rose 6.4%.

Olick – Obama’s “responsible” homeowners

“As part of his ‘To Do List,’ President Barack Obama visited Val and Paul Keller on Friday. The White House described them as ‘responsible’ homeowners who owe more on their mortgage than their Nevada home is currently worth.  They owe $168,000 on their mortgage, but their Reno home is currently valued at $100,000.  The president is doing so to, ‘help demonstrate a concrete and tangible example as to why this broader push [to refinance] is so important not only for millions of Americans but for our economy,’ said Shaun Donovan, secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in a conference call with reporters before the event.  During that call, Donovan used the words ‘responsible homeowners’ more than a dozen times, in describing whom the administration’s proposed refinance programs should help.  It is not the Kellers’ fault that home prices in Reno are down 52% from the peak, right? The Kellers bought their house 14 years ago, and they have not been late on a mortgage payment, according to Donovan. They were able to take advantage of the newly expanded government refinance program through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for severely underwater borrowers, and they are in fact putting some of their savings on the monthly mortgage toward paying down principal.  But were they responsible? 

The Kellers bought their home before the height of the housing boom. The trouble I’m having understanding this whole scenario is that the median home price in Reno is actually 7% higher today than it was 14 years ago. If the Kellers had a ‘responsible’ loan, that would be a 30-year fixed, in which case they should have paid at least some principal on the loan over the last 14 years. And didn’t these ‘responsible’ borrowers, the Kellers, put some money down on the home?  We went looking: According to Washoe County records, the Kellers purchased their home in June 1998 for $127,000. So why do they have, according to the White House, a $168,000 mortgage?  White House officials now confirm to CNBC that the Kellers did a cash-out refinance in 2007, when their home had appreciated to $250,000. Again, it’s not illegal, but are these the ‘responsible’ borrowers that the administration is looking to help? They took out a $178,000 loan, using the $51,000 to pay down debt on the family construction business, so Paul could retire. Had they not taken that money out, and continued paying on the original mortgage, they would not be underwater today.  ‘This is a family, first and foremost, that has met their responsibility, remained on time with their mortgage and used their equity in their home in a way that so many Americans do, to send their kids to college, support a small business or save for retirement,’ said Donovan, whom we contacted after learning of the refinance. ‘They deserve the chance to benefit from these record low interest rates because they have met their responsibilities.’

Another administration official familiar with the Kellers’ case says the couple were responsible because despite the incredible runup in home prices, they did not take all the equity out of the house. ‘She did not use her home as an ATM in the sense that we saw during the crisis, because she didn’t cash out all of the equity leaving her no cushion. She had a 71% LTV (loan to value ratio), or 30% equity in her home. That is by almost any definition a very responsible position to be in,’ he added. In the past, Obama has criticized borrowers, who at the peak of the housing bubble, pulled money out, referring to it as using their house as an ATM.  LTV, Donovan and the other administration official claim, is not a minor issue. So it seems they are defining ‘responsible’ as a borrower who maintains an equity cushion in the house, even when that house price has nearly doubled in just eight years.  ‘This was truly 100 year flood, and so lots of people who had 20, 30, 40% equity in their homes now find themselves underwater,’ says the White House official, who also commends the Kellers for not walking away from their mortgage.”

Europe barely dodges formal recession

Stronger-than-expected growth in Germany was enough to help the European Union and the 17-nation eurozone avoid falling into recession for the second time since 2009 during the first three months of this year.  Initial readings on gross domestic product, the broadest measure of an economy’s health, released Tuesday showed Germany’s economy grew 0.5% in the first quarter, an improvement from the decline of 0.2% at the end of 2011.  The forecast had been for growth of only 0.1% for Germany, the continent’s largest economy, and there were some fears that it could report a drop in GDP for the second straight quarter, the common definition of an economy in recession.  The growth in Germany was enough to have GDP in the 27-nation EU and the 17-nation eurozone that uses the common currency both remain unchanged compared to the previous quarter, following a 0.3% decline on that basis at the end of last year. Economists had forecast that both would fall into recession with another quarter of falling GDP.

Decline in foreclosure activity in California hurting the market

The pace of foreclosures in California is slowing to a crawl, according to figures for the month of April compiled by foreclosure information company ForeclosureRadar Inc. of Discovery Bay.  In California, Notice of Default filings were down 69.8% from the peak in March 2009, and 15.8% from April 2011.  Foreclosure sales also declined, however, foreclosure investors purchased a record percentage of the limited inventory that was actually sold. California investors purchased 41.3% of foreclosure sales last month, the report says.  The low number of sales, combined with record% purchased on the courthouse steps left very little to become Bank Owned (REO). This further depletes the inventory of Bank Owned homes as REO sales continue to outpace the addition of new inventory, says ForeclosureRadar.

Despite investors purchasing a higher percentage of foreclosure sales, margins have rapidly declined in recent months. In California the discount between market value and winning bid have on average declined to 12.3%. This leaves investors who intend to resell their purchases with record low profits after eviction, repairs, and closing costs.  “Foreclosure declines would be wonderful news if they were being driven by a true market recovery in which hundreds of thousands were no longer unable to make payments, and millions were no longer upside down,” says Sean O’Toole, founder and CEO of Foreclosure Radar.  “That is not the reality today. Instead we are seeing unprecedented government intervention into the foreclosure process leaving underwater homeowners in limbo, while stealing opportunity from investors and first time buyers,” he says.  “California’s pending legislation, which is similar to laws we previously saw enacted in Nevada, will almost certainly bring foreclosure activity to a near halt there if passed. The reality is that these laws don’t solve anything as they fail to address the real problem – negative equity – while instead they punish real estate professionals, homebuyers, and investors far more than the banks they were aimed at.”

Fed governor Duke wants certainty

Federal Reserve Gov. Elizabeth Duke on Tuesday urged policymakers to finalize regulations and rules to provide more certainty for the housing market.   Establishing regulations and deciding on the future of government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will help reduce the uncertainty contributing to tight mortgage lending, Duke said in remarks prepared for a National Association of Realtors conference on Tuesday. She did not discuss monetary policy in her remarks.  “The most important solution that I am suggesting today is that policymakers move forward with the difficult decisions that will affect the future of the mortgage market,” Duke said. “If lenders tighten more than is warranted, it will hamper the recovery of the housing market and, in doing so, restrain economic growth.”  Duke did not make specific policy recommendations, but she stressed that questions around the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac must be resolved. More than three years after the government took the two mortgage giants into conservatorship, there still is no consensus about how they should be structured and what the government’s role should be, potentially discouraging private companies, Duke said.  “Private capital might be reluctant to enter the market until the future parameters of government support are resolved,” she said.

Duke did note some encouraging signs in the housing market, including a slowdown in the pace of home prices’ decline and an edging up in housing starts and permits. And she expressed confidence that as the economy slowly improves, some elements of the housing market will strengthen, as confidence increases.  Lenders seem to be reluctant now to make loans in part because of concerns over the higher cost of servicing delinquent loans and worries over regulations still being shaped, Duke said.  “Collectively, these uncertainties about the future are likely contributing significantly to the tight lending standards in the mortgage market today,” she said. The Federal Reserve will use its “best judgment to weigh the cost and availability of credit against consumer protection, investor clarity, and financial stability as it writes rules,” she said.  Duke stressed that lenders need clarity to shape business models and plan for the future.  “I don’t want to diminish the importance of any individual policy decision, but I do believe that the most important prescription for the housing market is for these decisions to be made and the path for the future of housing finance to be set,” she said.

NAHB – builder confidence up in May

Builder confidence in the market for newly built, single-family homes gained five points in May from a downwardly revised reading in the previous month to reach a level of 29 on the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI), released today. This is the index’s strongest reading since May of 2007.  Derived from a monthly survey that NAHB has been conducting for 25 years, the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index gauges builder perceptions of current single-family home sales and sales expectations for the next six months as “good,” “fair” or “poor.” The survey also asks builders to rate traffic of prospective buyers as “high to very high,” “average” or “low to very low.” Scores from each component are then used to calculate a seasonally adjusted index where any number over 50 indicates that more builders view conditions as good than poor.  Each of the index’s components rebounded from declines in the previous month. The component gauging current sales conditions and the component gauging traffic of prospective buyers each rose five points in May to 30 and 23, respectively, with the traffic component hitting its highest level since April of 2007. The component gauging sales expectations in the next six months rose three points to 34.  Three out of four regions registered improving builder sentiment in May. This included a six-point gain to 32 in the Northeast, and five-point gains to 27 and 28 in the Midwest and South, respectively. The West posted a two-point decline, to 29.

Residential Capital (ResCap), the besieged mortgage unit of Ally Financial, filed for bankruptcy.  “The action by ResCap will enable Ally to achieve a permanent solution to its legacy mortgage risks and put these issues behind us,” said Ally CEO Michael Carpenter. “This action, along with pursuing alternatives for the international businesses, will allow Ally to focus 100% of its energies on further strengthening its already leading US auto finance and direct banking franchises.”  Ally expects to take a $1.3 billion charge in the second quarter for the filing.  The parent bank said ResCap will continue servicing and originating home loans during the process.  In a separate announcement Monday, Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, a servicer based in Texas, paid $700 million to acquire $374 billion in mortgage servicing rights from ResCap. Included in the deal are $201 billion in primary servicing rights and $173 billion in subservicing contracts.  Ally executives said the prearranged plan will settle all existing and potential claims between Ally and ResCap along with actions from third parties.  Ally will make a $750 million cash injection into ResCap as part of the plan.

Nationstar, which is mostly owned by Fortress Investment Group, will also make a stalking-horse bid on the entire mortgage unit of $1.6 billion or 45% of the unpaid principal on loans owned by ResCap. This bid will serve as a benchmark for companies looking to buy ResCap or its assets.  A $150 million financial facility will be created for the bankruptcy as well.  Investors holding at least a 25% stake in 290 mortgage-backed securities issued by ResCap gave support to the action as part of a settlement. These bonds, out of the 392 total from ResCap, have an original principal balance of $164 billon.  The company will also set up a $130 million mortgage repurchase reserve to buy back defaulted loans from investors. It will replace the reserve originally held at Ally.  The Treasury Department held a 74% stake in Ally before the filing. The bank said it paid back an additional $5.5 billion Monday, to reduce the taxpayer interest in the company by one-third. After completing the bankruptcy, Ally said it would pay back another third.  Timothy Massad, assistant secretary for financial stability at the Treasury, supported the action today.  “We believe that by addressing the legacy mortgage liabilities at ResCap, the action taken today will put taxpayers in a stronger position to maximize the value of their remaining investment in Ally,” Massad said in a statement.

Stocks take a tumble

Stocks tumbled Monday, with the S&P 500 falling below its key 1350 milestone, as Greece’s failure to form a coalition government increased fears that the nation would leave the euro zone.  In Europe, Greece’s socialist leader Evangelos Venizelos said efforts to form a coalition government failed over the weekend. And with new elections in June becoming increasingly likely, investors worry that the debt-ridden nation may eventually be forced out of the euro zone.  Concerns over Greece’s exit pushed the 10-year Spanish bonds yields to the highest since last December.  European shares fell to 4-month lows, with the FTSEurofirst 300 index hitting its lowest point since early January, at 1,002.90 points.

Conservative mortgages have risks too

Could troubled mortgage-financing giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac become victims of their rediscovered conservative financial practices ?  Fannie Mae controls 51% of mortgages reported net income of $2.7 billion in 2012′s first quarter. This comes on the heels of Freddie Mac, its smaller sibling, reporting a $577 million profit.  Both companies improving financial conditions give some clues about the nation’s brighter housing market conditions. But with a big caveat.  Less significant declines in home prices and the expectation of stabilizing home prices. A recent Fiserv Case-Shiller report says that in the fourth quarter of 2011 home prices in 70 markets, representing 18% of the 384 metro areas were unchanged or had increased compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. In 32% of the markets (122 metro areas), the price declines were under 2%.  A decline in the Fannie’s inventory of foreclosed homes, as sales of lender-owned property (REO) exceeds new foreclosures. Some people think foreclosures might pick up again after the mortgage servicer settlement tied to the robo-signing scandal. But for-sale inventory conditions are tight, suggesting that the market can handle more foreclosure supply.  Furthermore, higher foreclosures may not be as big as feared since single-family serious delinquency rates in the Fannie Mae portfolio dropped from a peak rate of 5.47% in March 2010 to 3.67% in March 2012. While this improvement is due to loan modifications, short sales, and refinancing initiatives, a bigger factor is probably a shift by Fannie Mae to borrowers with better credit scores.

This introduces the caveat and points to a more holistic risk. Aggregate foreclosure inventories for Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, another government agency FHA and private label mortgage firms have been declining since 2010 Q3. That’s the good news. However, some would say that the risk in new mortgage origination has been “dumped” to FHA.  While Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are basically getting good results by “creaming” the mortgage market for higher average FICO-scores clients (763 for Fannie Mae), FHA is taking on all the credit risk. FHA is a government agency that finances first-time home buyers with poor credit and less down-payment cash. Its delinquencies and credit losses are rising. If home prices do not pick up, this could force FHA to go back to Congress for more support.  If FHA doesn’t get that help, the budding housing recovery upon which Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac depend so much could be jeopardized. First-time buyers, who are the FHA’s main clients, represent about one third of all buyers these days. It would be better if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loosen up their credit spigot a bit now that they are better off financially, and take some of the credit risk away from FHA to provide it with some relieve. Maybe that requires too much common sense, however.

JPMorgan – loss not life threatening

Although JPMorgan Chase suffered a trading loss of at least $2 billion due to a failed hedging strategy, it will not be life threatening to the bank, CEO Jamie Dimon said in an interview aired yesterday.  “This is a stupid thing that we should never have done but we’re still going to earn a lot of money this quarter so it isn’t like the company is jeopardized,” he said in an interview with NBC’s “Meet with Press.” “We hurt ourselves and our credibility, yes — and that you’ve got to fully expect and pay the price for that.”  In response to JPMorgan’s trading loss, the Securities and Exchange Commission has begun an investigation into the bank’s trades. Dimon said the company is also doing its own internal investigation.  “So we’ve had audit, legal, risk, compliance, all of our best people looking at all of that,” Dimon responded. “We know we were sloppy. We know we were stupid. We know there was bad judgment. We don’t know if any of that is true yet. But of course regulators should look at something like this. That’s their job.”  “We intend to fix it and learn from it and be a better company when it’s done,” he added.

Major foreclosure case set to start

The Florida Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments Thursday in a lawsuit that could undo hundreds of thousands of foreclosures and open up banks to severe financial liabilities in the state where they face the bulk of their foreclosure-fraud litigation.  The court is deciding whether banks who used fraudulent documents to file foreclosure lawsuits can dismiss the cases and refile them later with different paperwork.  The decision, which may take up to eight months to render, could affect hundreds of thousands of homeowners in Florida, and could also influence judges in the other 26 states that require lawsuits in foreclosures.  Of all the foreclosure filings in those states, sixty-three per cent, a total of 138,288, are concentrated in five states, according to RealtyTrac, an online foreclosure marketplace. Of those, nearly half are in Florida. In Congressional testimony last year, Bank of America, the US’s largest mortgage servicer, said that 70% of its foreclosure-related lawsuits were in Florida.  The case at issue, known as Roman Pino v. Bank of New York Mellon, stems from the so-called robo-signing scandal that emerged in 2010 when it was revealed that banks and their law firms had hired low-wage workers to sign legal documents without checking their accuracy as is required by law.

If the Supreme Court rules against the banks, “a broad universe of mortgages could be rendered unenforceable,” Coffey says. “The cost to the financial industry is difficult to estimate, but it could be substantial.”  For comparison, some legal experts point to the Massachusetts Supreme Court’s decision in January 2011 that ruled a foreclosure invalid because at the time of the foreclosure the bank couldn’t prove it had a valid assignment of mortgage — a similar issue to the one in the Pino case.  In the wake of the decision, hundreds of house titles in Massachusetts became void, says foreclosure attorney Tom Cox, who brought what was one of the first foreclosure fraud suits in the country.  “If the Florida court takes a strong stand, it sends a strong signal to the mortgage servicing industry in the rest of the country,” says Cox. Judges in other states could start penalizing banks with sanctions and overturning foreclosure suits, he says.

Gold down, dollar up

Gold futures, which saw modest losses during Asian trading hours, accelerated declines during European electronic trading Monday, as a push to the safety of the US dollar weighed on demand for metals.  Gold for June delivery (GCM2) dropped $12.90, or 0.8%, to $1,570.90 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange.  The soft start to the trading week came after the metal settled at its lowest level this year on Friday, as political turmoil in Europe prompted investors to flock to the US dollar over other asset classes.  Talks between potential coalition partners collapsed in Greece on Sunday, raising the likelihood of fresh elections and stirring fears about the future of the euro zone. Greece’s political turmoil.  Against the backdrop of European uncertainty, the dollar continued its climb higher on Monday, with the ICE dollar index, which measures the US unit against a basket of six other currencies, at 80.463, from 80.250 in late North American trading Friday.  A stronger greenback adds further pressure to dollar-priced commodities such as gold, as it drives up to cost of the metal for holders of other currencies.  The market brushed aside weekend news that the People’s Bank of China will lower the ratio of reserves banks must set aside as deposits at the central bank by a half percentage point. The move was came recent data showing a slowdown for the nation, which is a big user of natural resources.

WSJ – to buy or not to buy?

It’s been a scary few years for the housing market. But at some point, the nightmare has to end (please?). Is now the time? Should first-time home buyers consider jumping into the market?  After all, home prices have fallen 34% from their 2006 peak and mortgage rates are hovering at or near record lows.  On one side are those who argue that homes are more affordable than they have been in decades, based on how much monthly income a mortgage consumes and whether owning is less costly than renting.  An uptick in home buying by investors already is under way, they say—an indication that those who wait may miss out on a good buying opportunity.  On the other side, pessimists insist that the housing slump is far from over, and that prices will continue falling—perhaps as much as 20% or more.  Excess inventories, they say, are the problem, and some estimate it could be four years before the market absorbs all of that extra supply.  Eric Lascelles, the chief economist at money-management firm RBC Global Asset Management Inc., says this is a remarkable time to be a first-time home buyer. A. Gary Shilling, president of A. Gary Shilling & Co., an economic consulting firm in Springfield, N.J., says buying now is a terrible idea.

Eric Lascelles – Yes: It’s a Rare Opportunity

This could be the best time in a generation to be a first-time home buyer.  Investors get this. While households dither, investors ramped up their home buying by 64% across 2011. They understand that this is the mother of all buyer’s markets, and won’t last forever. The prospect of making a profit by flipping these properties is still rather distant, so they lay in wait for an eventual rebound and in the meantime make money by renting out their properties for more than the monthly mortgage payment.  Investors get this. While households dither, investors ramped up their home buying by 64% across 2011. They understand that this is the mother of all buyer’s markets, and won’t last forever. The prospect of making a profit by flipping these properties is still rather distant, so they lay in wait for an eventual rebound and in the meantime make money by renting out their properties for more than the monthly mortgage payment.  Could home prices fall further? Yes they could. The home-inventory overhang is still quite large and credit availability remains poor. Home prices are unlikely to bloom in earnest for quite some time. But inventories are finally shrinking and mortgage availability has at least stabilized, and if you wind up buying a house on sale for one-third off its fair value instead of discounted by 40%, you still got one heck of a deal.

A. Gary Shilling – No: The Fall Isn’t Over

Don’t buy your first house now unless you’re willing to lose 20% of its market value in the next several years. Maybe more.  It will take a 22% drop to return median single-family house prices to the trend identified by Robert Shiller of Yale University that stretches back to the 1890s and prevailed until the housing bubble began. (It adjusts for inflation and the tendency of houses to get bigger over time.) And corrections usually overshoot on the downside just as bubbles do on the upside.  The problem is excess inventories. They are the mortal enemy of prices, and we’ve calculated an excess of two million housing units, over and above normal working levels of inventories of new and existing homes. That is huge, considering that before the housing market collapsed, about 1.5 million new homes were being built annually, a figure that shrank to 568,000 in February. At current rates of housing starts and household formation, it will take four years to work off the excess inventory, plenty of time for those surplus houses to drag down prices. 

Our estimate of two million excess homes takes into account those on the market as well as hidden inventories, such as foreclosed homes not yet listed for sale and those withdrawn from the market because owners couldn’t stomach the bids they received. A US Census Bureau category that measures such hidden inventories has leapt by one million units since 2006.  Additionally, our inventory estimate doesn’t even include future foreclosures, some five million of which are waiting in the wings. The 49% drop in new foreclosures since the second quarter of 2009 is a mirage, and was partly due to the Obama administration pressuring mortgage lenders to try to modify troubled mortgages to keep people in their homes. (They were largely unsuccessful.)  Sure, the always optimistic National Association of Realtors tells you that based on mortgage rates, incomes and house prices, single-family houses have never been more affordable. But according to their index, that was also true in December 2008, and prices have fallen 9.2% since then. Ugh! Home prices may have dropped 34% since the peak in early 2006, but that doesn’t make them cheap if prices continue to decline.

The number of Federal Housing Administration-insured home loans entering foreclosure jumped in March after half the mortgages it modified to ease repayment terms were in default again a year or more later.  The FHA’s role in lending to first-time buyers with poor credit and limited cash expanded after the 2008 collapse of the mortgage market put it at the center of government efforts to revive housing. The FHA allows down payments as low as 3.5 percent for borrowers with a credit score of 580, below the 640 defined as subprime by the Federal Reserve.  n increase in FHA foreclosures may lead to further demands for stricter standards that could shut buyers out of the real estate market as it shows signs of stabilizing after a six-year slump. Mark Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, in a February report called for Congress to tighten the agency’s lending qualifications to protect taxpayers, who insure the loans. First-time homebuyers accounted for 33 percent of real estate sales in March, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Borrowers with mortgages for homes bought in 2010, the FHA’s peak lending year, now owe almost 7 percent more than their homes are worth if they used the minimum down payment, according to S&P/Case-Shiller home price index data. That year, the agency insured 1.1 million loans to purchase single-family homes, more than four times the total of 261,165 in 2007.  Lenders initiated foreclosures on 36,400 FHA-backed mortgages, twice the number in April 2011, according to Lender Processing Services. The increase for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans was 13 percent, the Jacksonville, Florida-based mortgage- data company said.  A Treasury Department study of modified government- guaranteed mortgages in the fourth quarter found that 49 percent were delinquent again after 12 months. The Treasury report analyzed a group of loans that was 80 percent FHA, 15 percent Veterans Administration mortgages and 5 percent Department of Agriculture rural home loans. The rate for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was 27 percent.  The share of government-guaranteed loans being paid on time dropped to 84.2 percent in the fourth quarter from 85.2 percent in the prior three months, the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said in its March 28 report. It was the third consecutive quarterly decline.  The U.S. housing market is showing signs of having hit a bottom after prices fell 35 percent since peaking in 2006. Values in 20 U.S. cities fell 3.5 percent in February, the smallest 12-month drop since February 2011, the S&P/Case-Shiller index showed last month. New homes sold at an annual pace of 328,000 in March, up 7.5 percent from a year earlier, the Commerce Department said.

Identity theft and tax fraud

After checking employment records, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) said it found more returns may have been sent to tax filers using stolen identities than the IRS initially estimated.  If the IRS does not do more to catch improper refunds, up to $26 billion could be refunded to identity thieves in the next five years, J. Russell George, head of TIGTA, told a congressional hearing on Tuesday. He said IRS may have issued $5.2 billion more in refunds through ID tax fraud than the agency had earlier estimated.  The IRS did not dispute the watchdog’s figures, but said estimates for ID theft tax fraud would be lower if updated to include new IRS practices, said Steven Miller, IRS deputy commissioner for services and enforcement.

MBA – mortgage applications up

Mortgage applications increased 1.7 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending May 4, 2012.  The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 1.7 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 2.0 percent compared with the previous week.  Increases to the seasonally adjusted Market Composite and Purchase indices were driven by increases in their Conventional components.  Application activity within the Government market decreased for both of these measures from last week.  Likewise, the Refinance Index increased 1.3 percent from the previous week, driven by a 1.8 percent increase to the Conventional Refinance Index, while the Government Refinance Index decreased 2.3 percent.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 3.4 percent from one week earlier, spurred by a 5.4 percent increase in the seasonally adjusted Conventional Purchase Index. The unadjusted Purchase Index increased 3.8 percent compared with the previous week and was 0.4 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 1.13 percent.  The four week moving average is down 0.82 percent for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 1.81 percent for the Refinance Index.  The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 72.1 percent of total applications from 72.6 percent the previous week.  This is the lowest refinance share since April 6, 2012.  The government purchase share decreased over the week from 37.0 percent to 35.8 percent of all purchase applications.  This is the lowest government purchase share since March 27, 2009.  The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) decreased to 4.01 percent from 4.05 percent, with points decreasing to 0.41 from  0.44 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.  This is the lowest 30-year fixed interest rate recorded in the history of the survey.   The effective rate decreased from last week.

Oil down

Oil fell for a sixth day in New York, the longest run of declines in almost two years, after crude stockpiles advanced in the U.S., the world’s largest consumer of the commodity.  Futures slid as much as 0.8 percent after dropping 8.6 percent in the past five days. U.S. inventories increased 7.8 million barrels last week to 378 million, the highest level since August 1990, the American Petroleum Institute said yesterday. A government report today may show supplies rose 2 million barrels, according to a Bloomberg News survey. Oil is poised to rebound as global refiners increase purchases, Societe Generale SA predicts.  “U.S. inventory levels are preventing oil having the traditional dead cat bounce after such a steep fall,” said Christopher Bellew, a senior broker at Jefferies Bache Ltd. in London, who predicts prices will rebound this month. “The lows we’ve seen this week will probably hold, and crude will likely rise as buying by funds and weakness in the dollar assist with a recovery.”  Crude for June delivery fell as much as 76 cents to $96.25 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange and was at $96.53 at 8:58 a.m. London time. It slipped 1 percent yesterday to $97.01, the lowest close since Feb. 6. Front-month prices are down 2.2 percent this year. The six-day decline is the longest since July 2010.  Brent for June settlement was at $112.50 a barrel, down 0.2 percent, on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange. The European benchmark contract’s premium to West Texas Intermediate was at $15.83, little changed from $15.72 yesterday.  The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries said its basket of crudes was at $109.58 a barrel yesterday, the first time the grades have fallen below $110 since Jan. 3.

WSJ – Freddie drops fee

In the latest bid to help homeowners hit by the housing crash, Freddie Mac, the U.S.-supported mortgage giant, is set to drop a fee associated with refinancing deeply underwater loans.  The firm plans to eliminate a fee of 0.5 percentage point, called a “cash adjustor,” on loans refinanced under the Home Affordable Refinance Program with balances greater than 125% of the property’s value, said Paul Mullings, a senior vice president at Freddie Mac. He spoke at a Mortgage Bankers Association conference on Monday.  Dropping the fee represents the latest sign that the government-sponsored enterprises and their regulator are determined to extend the reach of the refi program. Changes last year eliminated the loan-to-value cap and relieved banks of some liabilities that could arise with homeowners willing to default.  Freddie Mac had earlier this year dropped the cash adjustor on HARP refinancings for mortgages with loan-to-value ratios ranging from 105% through 125%, and encouraged the lenders to pass the savings to consumers. (The fee was created to help offset some of the increased risk seen in such refis.)

Where manufacturing is gaining

After hemorrhaging jobs during the recession , manufacturing has been one of the few bright spots, restoring 489,000 jobs since the beginning of 2010.  But there have been some significant geographic distinctions in that recovery, as well as some toppled assumptions, one of which is that factory jobs have steadily shifted from the Midwest to the South.  A new report from the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program shows that since the beginning of 2010, manufacturing employment has increased by 5.2 percent in the Midwest, while it has gone up by only 2.2 percent in the South.  Southern regions remain relatively strong in manufacturing, with eight metropolitan areas on that list. But the usual narrative of an inexorably declining Rust Belt seems not quite accurate – or at least for now.

“It’s possible that this bounce-back is just a bounce-back and won’t last,” said Howard Wial, an economist and fellow at the Brookings Institution who was one of the authors of the report. “But there is an opportunity for it to be more.”  The study also examined the clustering of manufacturing companies in particular regions. Very high-tech manufacturing companies are concentrated in the Northwest and West, for example, while chemical companies are found mostly in the South.  The authors indicated that most state and local governments do little to foster a thriving manufacturing industry when they offer tax breaks and other incentives to companies or pass right-to-work laws that tend to suppress wages. Instead, they say, governments should focus on research and development and work-force training aimed at specific manufacturing sectors.  Mr. Wial said that there was some evidence that manufacturing could make more of a comeback in the United States because labor costs are rising in developing countries and “many large companies are starting to reconsider the costs and benefits of offshoring.”

CoreLogic – Market Pulse

CoreLogic today released its May CoreLogic MarketPulse report. The monthly economic publication provides insight into the current and future health of the U.S. economic climate with particular focus on housing and mortgage metrics. CoreLogic Chief Economist Mark Fleming and Senior Economist Sam Khater authored the articles and commentary.  Key findings in the May MarketPulse Report include:

-  The national housing market is transitioning to more stability in sales and home prices, with reasonable inventory levels and a declining share of REO sales.

-  Short sales, modifications, and other foreclosure alternatives are playing a larger role than in years past, and the flow of new foreclosures is declining with an improving economy.

-  Mortgage performance is experiencing a slow and steady improvement as the 90+ day serious delinquency rate in March fell to 7.0 percent, the lowest rate since July 2009. “This decline in serious delinquency represents a significant reduction of approximately three quarters of a million borrowers,” said Fleming in the report.

-  Overall home sales activity continues to improve, with total sales eclipsing 410,000, up more than 20 percent from a year ago and the highest March sales rate since 2007.

-  While the national market continues to improve, it masks regional variation where some local markets are improving much more rapidly than others. The most improved markets from a year ago are Phoenix, Boise and Salt Lake City.

-  Home prices are at, or very close to, the bottom as the Memorial Day weekend approaches.

CoreLogic today released its March Home Price Index (HPI) report which shows that nationally home prices, including distressed sales, declined on a year-over-year basis by 0.6% in March 2012 compared to March 2011. On a month-over-month basis, home prices, including distressed sales, increased by 0.6% in March 2012 compared to February 2012, the first month-over-month increase since July 2011.  Excluding distressed sales, month-over-month prices increased for the third month in a row. The CoreLogic HPI also shows that year-over-year prices, excluding distressed sales, rose by 0.9% in March 2012 compared to March 2011. Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions.  “This spring the housing market is responding to an improving balance between real estate supply and demand which is causing stabilization in house prices,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic. “Although this has been the case in each of the last two years, the difference this year is that stabilization is occurring without the support of tax credits and in spite of a declining share of REO sales.”  “While housing prices remain flat nationally, in many markets tighter inventories are beginning to lift home prices,” said Anand Nallathambi, president and chief executive officer of CoreLogic. “This is true in Phoenix, New York and Washington, for example, which all reflect higher home price values than a year ago. A continuation of this trend will be good for our industry across US markets.”

Highlights as of March 2012

-  Including distressed sales, the five states with the highest appreciation were:  Wyoming (+5.9%), West Virginia (+5.3%), Arizona (+5.1%), North Dakota (+4.7%) and Florida (+4.5%).

-  Including distressed sales, the five states with the greatest depreciation were: Delaware (-10.6%), Illinois (-8.3%), Alabama (-8.0%), Georgia (-7.3%) and Nevada (-5.8%).

-  Excluding distressed sales, the five states with the highest appreciation were: Idaho (+5.4%), North Dakota (+5.1%), South Carolina (+4.7%), Montana (+3.5%) and Kansas (+3.4%).

-  Excluding distressed sales, the five states with the greatest depreciation were: Delaware (-7.6%), Alabama (-4.1%), Nevada (-3.9%), Vermont (-3.9%) and Rhode Island (-2.9%).

-  Including distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the national HPI (from April 2006 to March 2012) was -33.7%. Excluding distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the HPI for the same period was -24.5%.

-  The five states with the largest peak-to-current declines including distressed transactions are Nevada (-59.9%), Arizona (-48.6%), Florida (-48.1%), Michigan (-45.1%) and California (-42.7%).

-  Of the top 100 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) measured by population, 57 are showing year-over-year declines in March, eight fewer than in February.

Business confidence lackluster

While the National Federation of Independent Business’ Small Business Optimism Index rose two points in April to 94.5, the index is back to the same level it had been in February 2011.  “It’s positive from last month,” said NFIB chief economist William Dunkelberg. “But we’re in the same place as a year ago, so a whole year has gone by and we don’t go anywhere.”  In areas like capital outlays, indications are that while things are slowly improving, it’s “nothing to write home about,” said Dunkelberg. The Index now stands at 54%, far above the 44% in August 2010, but below the average rate of 60%.  “In the smallest businesses, we’re seeing improvement,” said Dunkelberg, “but it’s going on under the government’s radar. It will take a while before it registers” in the national picture, he said, pointing to the job creation number in particular. “Hopefully this time they will not deteriorate again.” and that’s pretty much the hope for all 10 categories in the index, many of which have, over the course of the past few years, seen ups and downs.  “We keep getting these head fakes, like last year, and we’re wondering if [the index] will do it again,” said Dunkelberg, referring to March 2011, when the survey took a dip, and then continued a downward trend throughout the spring and summer, only starting to rise again last October. “Last year, it kept getting worse; this time March took a dive, then came back.”

Regulations stifle mortgage market

Rulemakings will dominate the mortgage industry this year as the sector continues its “slow, bumpy road to recovery,” keynote speakers said as the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) secondary conference got into full swing Monday in New York City.  The rulemaking surrounding the Qualified Mortgage — or QM, repurchase requests, national servicing settlements and government-sponsored enterprise reform will dominate the year, said David Stevens, president and CEO of the MBA. But despite the attention to those four key areas, the MBA is tracking some 100 rulemakings in the Dodd-Frank Act.  Monday’s opening session was part feel-good, part dire warning as speakers struck a balance between the good and the bad in the current marketplace.  An opening video, for example, provided the feel-good atmosphere. It showed an MBA member’s recollections of his immigrant father buying a tract home in the New York burrough of Queens after World World II.

Mitch Kider, with Washington, D.C.-based law firm Weiner Brodsky Sidman Kider PC, recounted the reverence his father felt for the bank that provided the Federal Housing Administration loan that made it all possible.  “The people that work in this industry are working there because their heads and their hearts are in the right place,” he said. “As mortgage bankers, you are doing wonderful things for society.”  Stevens brought things back to earth by voicing borrower trepidation to buy homes, lender concern over burdensome regulations and investor mistrust of the process.  Borrowers, especially those on the margins, could be negatively impacted if the qualified mortgage rule — what he called “the holy grail of who gets access to a mortgage” — is too narrowly defined.  The need for more clarity in the system, for borrowers, lenders, mortgage servicers and investors, was a recurring theme from opening speakers.  On GSE reform, Stevens urged the industry do what it can without Congress, where he predicted a continued logjam.  “We need to take control of our own destiny,” he said.

Lewis Ranieri, chairman and founding partner of Ranieri Parnters, widely considered a pioneer of modern mortgage finance, said the industry must be aware of those would not be content to fix the capital market but who believe the capital markets “are not simply broken … but are profoundly the wrong thing to do.”  If it doesn’t stay aware, the industry may end of with a fundamental rewrite of the way it does business, where everything resides on the balance sheet, he said.  Two mortgage businesses came to him recently about a possible sale due to the tough regulatory environment, Ranieri said.  “I truly believe the future of our industry is decided in the next eight months,” he said. “There is a regulatory movement that isn’t just trying to fix, it’s trying to change.”  Richard Dorfman, managing director of the Securities Industry and Financial Market Association, or SIFMA, said it falls on the industry to define the issues in ways that resonate with consumers.  Instead of complaining that Dodd-Frank is a burden to the banks, regulations should be defined in ways that show how they limit mortgage access to potential homebuyers, for example, he said.  “Consumers must be served, and they can and will be served by this industry,” he said. “There is no doubt in my mind.”

Krugman’s ideas “reckless” and “silly”

The president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Richard Fisher, rejected the idea that higher inflation would spur the economy on Monday.  Saying the last thing businesses needed in this economy was uncertainty, Fisher sided with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in his public feud with Paul Krugman, the leftwing economist and New York Times columnist.  Called “The Battle of the Beards” by The Washington Post, the back-and-forth between the two economists began when Krugman called on the Fed to raise inflation targets, a move Bernanke called “reckless.”  “I would say that Ben Bernanke’s guilty of understatement. It would be more than reckless. It’s a silly thing to recommend,” Fisher said.  “I understand the argumentation from Krugman’s standpoint, from his perspective. He’s just trying to broaden the window to try to make things normal if we were to go below the 2% rate. That’s our long-term target. I believe we’re going to stick with it. I personally feel that this is something that is ultra-critical for our credibility.”

Olick – $150,000 off?

“A select group of struggling mortgage borrowers are about to get an offer that sounds too good to be true. Executives at Bank of America say they will begin mailing 200,000 letters offering certain customers mortgage principal reduction.  ‘If people get these things and toss them, they won’t be eligible,’ says Ron Sturzenegger, the Bank of America executive charged with providing solutions to borrowers in need of mortgage assistance.  But the offer is real, and eligible borrowers could get as much as $150,000 knocked off the balance of their mortgages. It is all part of the $25 billion settlement reached this year between federal and state agencies and the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers over fraudulent foreclosure document processing (so-called ‘robo-signing’).  Bank of America, in a deal with state attorneys general and the US Department of Justice, committed $11 billion to mortgage principal reduction, but executives say they will go beyond that if enough borrowers respond to their offer. Five thousand borrowers have already received a collective $700 million in principal reduction through a pilot program for those already in a modification negotiation. The 200,000 borrowers being targeted now may have already exhausted modification options or may have yet to contact the lender.

Executives say borrowers receiving the letters are eligible, but they still have to prove they qualify. In order to be eligible, a borrower must be 60 days late on the mortgage payment as of Jan. 31, 2012. The borrower has to owe more on the mortgage than the home is currently worth, commonly known as being ‘underwater’ on the mortgage, and the borrower’s loan must either be owned by Bank of America or serviced by Bank of America for an investor who is allowing the modifications.  In order to qualify for the modification, the borrower must answer the letter with full documentation of income, showing that under the terms of the modification they can still make the monthly payment. A borrower with no income would therefore not qualify. A borrower’s current monthly payment must be  more than 25% of gross income, and the borrower must show they are unable to afford that.  ‘If you can afford to make your monthly payment and are choosing not to, you will not get this principal modification,’ says Sturzenegger.  If the borrower qualifies, Bank of America will bring the monthly mortgage payment down to 25% of the borrower’s gross income. That could mean principal forgiveness well over $100,000, as there is no limit to the amount of the mortgage. If enough borrowers respond, it could cost Bank of America far more than it committed to in the settlement.  ‘Yes, we have the capability to go well beyond the $11 billion,’ adds Sturzenegger.

If the borrower qualifies, Bank of America will bring the monthly mortgage payment down to 25% of the borrower’s gross income. That could mean principal forgiveness well over $100,000, as there is no limit to the amount of the mortgage. If enough borrowers respond, it could cost Bank of America far more than it committed to in the settlement.  ‘Yes, we have the capability to go well beyond the $11 billion,’ adds Sturzenegger.  Bank executives say that before choosing which borrowers will get the offer, they performed a net present value test on each loan, making sure that the principal reduction modification would net Bank of America or the investor who owns the loan more than foreclosing on the home. ‘It has to be fair to the investor as well,’ says Sturzenegger.  Not all of the 200,000 borrowers who receive the letters are expected to respond. Executives say there is a level of fatigue among delinquent borrowers who have already received several notices or who may have gone through a failed modification process already. Some borrowers simply don’t want to stay in their homes, while others may think the offer is a scam.  ‘They have been contacted by a lot of other people, and this offer may appear too good to be true,’ says Sturzenegger.

That’s why Bank of America is sending the letters by certified mail and trying to make the language as simple as possible. A sample letter obtained by CNBC shows a bring red box in the top corner labeled, ‘IMPORTANT’ and simple language stating, ‘Qualifying customers may reduce their monthly payment by an average of 35%.’  Some 6,500 letters should be arriving in mailboxes across the country this week, with a wave of new letters going out every week until the end of the summer, when all 200,000 should have been mailed. Bank of America is staggering the mailings in order to handle the expected response. The bank has staffed up to handle the task, with 50,000 employees manning servicing desks, but the process will clearly take a lot of time. That’s why Bank of America has suspended any foreclosure actions against these 200,000 borrowers until the process is complete. There are currently 5.59 million US loans that are either delinquent or in the foreclosure process, according to Lender Processing Services. Bank of America services one million of those loans, but many of them are owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Their regulator, Edward DeMarco of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has yet to agree to principal reduction in loan modifications, despite harsh criticism from some lawmakers on Capitol Hill and increasing pressure from the White House.”

Consumer credit on the rise

US consumer credit shot up during March at the fastest rate since late 2001 as credit-card use, and student and car loans ballooned, data from the Federal Reserve showed yesterday.  Total consumer credit grew by $21.36 billion — more than twice the $9.8 billion rise that Wall Street economists surveyed by Reuters had forecast. That followed a revised $9.27 billion increase in outstanding credit February.  It was the largest surge in consumer credit for any month since November 2001, when it climbed by $28 billion, according to the Fed’s statistics.  The increase in March was concentrated in nonrevolving credit, which includes student and car loans. It climbed by $16.17 billion following a revised $11.62-billion gain in February.  Concern about student-loan levels has increased in an environment where newly graduating students face difficulty finding a job and keeping up on payments.  Congress is currently considering how to prevent a low interest rate for student loans from doubling on July 1 and is expected to find a way to do so, if only to avoid irritating young voters ahead of November’s presidential elections.  But so-called revolving, or credit-card debt, also gained strongly in March. It rose $5.18 billion in a sharp reversal from February when this category of credit use contracted by $2.35 billion.

NAHB – 100 markets on the improving list

The list of housing markets showing measurable and sustained improvement held virtually unchanged in May at 100, down from 101 in April, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/First American Improving Markets Index (IMI), released yesterday. The number of states represented on the list also held firm from the previous month, at 35 (including the District of Columbia).  The index identifies metropolitan areas that have shown improvement from their respective troughs in housing permits, employment and house prices for at least six consecutive months. While 83 metros held onto their previous places on the IMI and 17 new ones were added to the list in May, 18 metros dropped from the list, for a net loss of one. Metros newly added to the list in May include such geographically diverse places as Phoenix, Ariz.; Bowling Green, Ky.; Bend, Ore.; and Lubbock, Texas.  “The fact that there are 100 markets in 34 states and the District of Columbia represented on the improving list illustrates that all housing markets are local, and that the national headlines often don’t apply to what’s happening in a specific metropolitan area,” said NAHB Chairman Barry Rutenberg, a home builder from Gainesville, Fla. “In places where employment is firming up along with demand for new homes, the main factors weighing down the housing market continue to be access to credit (for both builders and buyers) and the difficulty of obtaining accurate appraisals on new construction.”

“The overall number of markets on the IMI continued to plateau this month, with more than a quarter of all US metros still showing signs of improvement,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Many of these are relatively small markets in terms of their population and building volume, which is why their improvement is barely registering on the national scale as of yet. Moreover, we are seeing some shifting of markets on and off the list primarily due to small seasonal house price changes in areas that have had flat, stable prices rather than a boom-and-bust cycle.”  “The fact that the number of improving metros continued to hold its own with 100 entries in May shows that there are many places across the country where confidence and consumers are returning to the housing market,” observed Kurt Pfotenhauer, vice chairman of First American Title Insurance Company.  The IMI is designed to track housing markets throughout the country that are showing signs of improving economic health. The index measures three sets of independent monthly data to get a mark on the top improving Metropolitan Statistical Areas. The three indicators that are analyzed are employment growth from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, house price appreciation from Freddie Mac, and single-family housing permit growth from the US Census Bureau. NAHB uses the latest available data from these sources to generate a list of improving markets. A metropolitan area must see improvement in all three areas for at least six months following their respective troughs before being included on the improving markets list.

Second-quarter pre-foreclosure sales jumped 19% from the previous quarter, suggesting more banks and distressed borrowers are searching for efficient ways to offload properties that are near foreclosure, RealtyTrac said. Third parties acquired 102,407 pre-foreclosures in the second quarter, while 162,680 bank-owned homes were sold in the same period. Pre-foreclosure sales are generally short sales and properties sold within the foreclosure process. As for who is nabbing up distressed and bank-owned properties, RealtyTrac said third parties acquired 265,087 homes classified as in foreclosure or bank-owned in the second quarter. That is up 6% from the revised first quarter figure and down 11% from the second quarter of last year. The average sales price for foreclosures or bank-owned properties hit $164,217 in 2Q, down less than one percent from 1Q and 5% from the second quarter of 2010.  The sales price for distressed real estate was 32% below the average sales price of homes not in foreclosure. States with the largest quarterly increase in pre-foreclosure home sales included Nevada, which experienced a 43% increase; Washington (39%), California (38%); and Texas (34%). The states with the highest number of foreclosure sales included Nevada, Arizona and California.

Budget Deficit Estimate Cut to $1.28 Trillion: CBO

The federal budget deficit will hit $1.28 trillion this year, down slightly from the previous two years, with even bigger savings to come over the next decade, according to congressional projections released Wednesday.  The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says budget deficits will be reduced by a total $3.3 trillion over the next decade, largely because of the deficit reduction package passed by Congress earlier this month. Nevertheless, the federal budget will continue to be awash in red ink for years to come. Even with the savings, budget deficits will total nearly $3.5 trillion over the next decade—more if Bush-era tax cuts scheduled to expire at the end of 2012 are extended.  There is more bad news in the report: CBO projects only modest economic growth over the next few years, with the unemployment rate falling only slightly by the end of 2012. The agency projects an unemployment rate of 8.5 percent for the last four months of 2012. The presidential election is in November of that year. 

“The United States is facing profound budgetary and economic challenges,” the new CBO report says. “With modest economic growth anticipated for the next few years, CBO expects employment to expand slowly.” Failure to pass a package would trigger $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts, affecting the Pentagon as well as domestic programs.  The new CBO report projects that the legislation will reduce deficits by a total of $2.1 trillion over the next decade. The agency also projects savings of $600 billion over the next decade from lower interest rates.

Diana Olick: Higher-End Housing Hits a Wall

Most of America won’t shed a tear for those who own higher-priced homes, especially given that the median home price in the nation has now fallen to just $174,000, but investors and homeowners alike should take note: Higher priced homes are taking a hit and the outlook for them is worse than the overall market.  That will have ramifications for recovery.  Despite the fact that just eight percent of US loans are currently jumbo, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, and that share will rise to just 10-12 percent when the conforming loan limit is lowered October 1st, high-end housing is already being hit harder than the overall market, which isn’t exactly doing so well itself. For one, weekly mortgage applications to purchase a home have been falling steadily, down 5.7 percent last week. But jumbo loan purchase applications fell 15 percent.

While sales of homes below $250,000 rose nearly 25 percent in July year over year according to the National Association of Realtors (June 2010 was the end of the home buyer tax credit, so July 2010 was artificially low, still….) sales of homes over $500,000 were basically flat.  Demand on the low end of the housing market is boosted by investors largely buying distressed properties; they either fix up and flip the homes or rent them out, waiting for the market to recover. Higher end homes have far fewer investors and may be more sensitive to a volatile stock market, as potential buyers are more likely to be invested there. Suffice it to say, we need all segments of the housing market pushing forward in order to get the full market back to health.

Markets not impacted by rise in jobless claims

Initial jobless claims rose last week, increasing by 5,000 filings for a total of 417,000 claims on a seasonally adjusted basis. That is up from the previous week’s revised figure of 403,500 claims. The Labor Department noted the numbers for the week ending Aug. 20 were impacted by 8,500 claims stemming from a labor dispute between the Communications Workers of America and Verizon Communications. Meanwhile, the advance seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate hit 2.9% for the week ending Aug. 13, a slight decrease from the previous week’s revised rate of 3% Despite recent volatility in the stock market, analysts with Econoday said Thursday the markets “are showing little reaction to the report, which outside of the Verizon strike, points to mildly improving conditions in the labor market.”

Pre-Foreclosure Short Sales Jump 19% in Second Quarter

Short sales shot up 19 percent between the first and second quarters, with 102,407 transactions completed during the April-to-June period, according to RealtyTrac. Over the same timeframe, a total of 162,680 bank-owned REO homes sold to third parties, virtually unchanged from the first quarter. RealtyTrac’s study also found that the time to complete a short sale is down, while the time it takes to sell an REO has increased. Pre-foreclosure short sales took an average of 245 days to sell after receiving the initial foreclosure notice during the second quarter, RealtyTrac says. That’s down from an average of 256 days in the first quarter and follows three straight quarters in which the sales cycle has increased.  Nationally, REOs had an average sales price of $145,211, a discount of nearly 40 percent below the average sales price of non-distressed homes. The REO discount was 36 percent in the previous quarter and 34 percent in the second quarter of 2010.  Together, REOs and short sales accounted for 31 percent of all U.S. residential sales in the second quarter, RealtyTrac reports. That’s down from nearly 36 percent of all sales in the first quarter but up from 24 percent of all sales in the second quarter of 2010.

For at least the last six months or so, a lot of people were talking about a “new wave” of foreclosures threatening to smother the U.S. housing market in gloom once again.  The reasoning was that because of the “robo-signing” scandal, and the subsequent foreclosure freezes, a huge number of foreclosures had been put on pause, and that the banks would eventually have to deal with their delinquent borrowers, and foreclosures would re-start in a big way.  According to data released this week by LPS Applied Analytics and CoreLogic, the waters are still relatively calm: no big waves on the horizon just yet.  LPS’s March “Mortgage Monitor” report shows that while foreclosure inventory remains near-historic highs, and newly started foreclosures are up 8.1% on a monthly basis, they’re still 31.1% below where they were in March 2011. Delinquencies are down 8.8%. The number of borrowers who are either in foreclosure, or 90 days behind on their mortgage payments is down, too, by 6.7%.

CoreLogic’s monthly foreclosure report, released Tuesday, has similar results.  March of this year saw 69,000 completed foreclosures, compared with 85,000 in March 2011, CoreLogic said. Delinquency rates remain unchanged, at their lowest levels since July 2009, in the thick of the financial crisis. And in some of the most troubled markets for foreclosures in the past, like Nevada, Arizona and California, delinquency rates are actually improving, a promising sign for the stability of those markets.  “What we’re seeing so far in the data, it doesn’t amount to a flood. There are regional bursts of activity here and there, but not that wave of foreclosures that people were expecting,” said Herb Blecher, senior vice president at LPS Applied Analytics.

One reason for the low numbers could be February’s $25 billion foreclosure-servicing settlement.  It requires banks to spend $17 billion to help homeowners, receiving different “credits” depending on the type of relief. About $10 billion of that amount must go towards writing down loan balances for borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure. Banks can also get credit for “short sales” — those that allow the borrower to sell the property for less than the total mortgage amount.  With all of this going on, it may take time for banks to sort through their books to figure out which borrowers are eligible for relief. As a result, one of the former believers in the looming foreclosure wave isn’t so sure anymore.  Of course, things could get worse. With millions of potentially troubled loans in the so-called “shadow inventory,” a big wave could always hit.  But for now, it’s fairly calm waters. Leave the Dramamine at home.

Job growth flat

April’s job report lived up to muted expectations, with the economy creating a meager 115,000 jobs during the month as the unemployment rate fell to 8.1 percent.  Job creation in the private sector was slightly better at 130,000, but overall the report painted a picture of a jobs market that had gotten a boost from unseasonably warm winter weather but now has cooled.  The service sector again accounted for most of the job creation, growing 101,000 while manufacturing added just 16,000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Governments cut a net 15,000 jobs for the month. The average work week was unchanged at 34.5 hours.  Though the headline number indicated job creation, the total employment level for the month actually fell 169,000. The disparity likely emanates from a drop in the labor force participation rate — or the level of Americans actively looking for jobs or otherwise employed — from 63.8 percent to 63.6 percent, its lowest level since December 1981.  The amount of discouraged workers swelled from 865,000 to 968,000, an increase of 12 percent. Those working part-time for economic reasons surged 181,000 to more than 7.8 million.  Temp jobs grew by 21,000 for April while retail added 29,000. Hospitality and leisure employment rose 20,000 — and is up 576,000 since February 2010 — while health care added 19,000.

Wall Street economists had been expecting the Bureau of Labor Statistics report to show 170,000 new jobs created and the unemployment rate holding steady at 8.2 percent.  The unemployment rate, which estimates the total percentage of jobless Americans but does not count those not actively looking for work, was last this low in January 2009, when President Obama took office. Total job creation, though, remains narrowly negative for the president and likely will be a contentious interview as Obama seeks a second term.  The miss in total job creation led to a negative reaction on Wall Street, with stock market futures indicating a lower open.  An alternative measure of unemployment which counts those who have stopped looking for work held steady at 14.5 percent.  Long-term unemployment remains a problem, though it eased somewhat in April. The total amount of those out of a job for more than 27 weeks dipped from 5.3 million to 5.1 million, while the average duration of unemployment fell from 39.4 weeks to 39.1 weeks.  “This remains a weak economy, and the job counts in March and April — which have come in at considerably below 200,000 per month — may perhaps continue right through the summer,” said Kathy Bostjancic, director of macroeconomic analysis at The Conference Board.

BOA downgrades could cost billions

Bank of America Corp (BOA) would have been required to post $5.1 billion in collateral under derivatives contracts as of March 31 if major ratings agencies had downgraded its debt by two notches, the bank said in a quarterly filing yesterday.  The bank’s estimate comes as one of three major ratings agencies, Moody’s Investors Service Inc, has said it’s considering a possible downgrade of the company’s long-term debt rating, as well as its banking subsidiary’s long-term and short-term debt ratings. Moody’s is reviewing 17 financial institutions with global capital markets operations.  Credit ratings are opinions on a company’s creditworthiness used by counterparties to determine its ability to repay loans and price the risk. Downgrades can also trigger counterparties to require banks to post additional collateral under derivatives contracts or to terminate contracts.  Moody’s is expected to conclude its review between early May and the end of June, according to the filing. The agency has offered guidance that a downgrade to the bank’s ratings, if any, would likely be one notch, the filing said.

A one-notch downgrade would have required the company to post $2.7 billion in collateral, the filing said. The bank’s estimates contemplate a downgrade by all three major ratings agencies and quantify the impact for a historical point in time.  In addition, under a one-notch downgrade of certain ratings, the derivative liability that would be subject to termination by counterparties was $3.3 billion as of March 31, against which Bank of America has already posted $2.5 billion of collateral, the filing said. Under a two-notch downgrade, the derivative liability subject to termination was an additional $5 billion, against which the bank has already posted $4.7 billion of collateral.

Obama to make drilling harder

The Obama administration wants to clamp down on shale gas drilling on public lands and set standards that proponents of tougher regulation hope will provide a blueprint for drilling oversight nationwide.  Industry sources said the Interior Department could propose a new rule on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, as early as today.  Fracking has been essential to unlocking the nation’s massive shale gas reserves, but critics argue that the practice has polluted water and hurt the environment.  The administration has said it supports shale oil and gas development, but has also called for strong oversight.  Administration officials have said they hope the rules could provide a template for states, which handle most of the regulation of fracking.  The Bureau of Land Management estimates that companies use the fracking technique on about 90 percent of wells drilled on federal lands.

Mortgage rates at record lows

Mortgage rates are continuing to plumb record lows, as signs of slowing economic growth raised doubts about the strength of the economic recovery.  Rates on the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 3.84% for the week ending May 3, down from 3.88% last week and 4.71% a year ago, according to the most recent Freddie Mac survey of conforming rates, released on Thursday.  Fifteen-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 3.07%, down from 3.12% last week and 3.89% a year ago. Rates on five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 2.85%, unchanged from last week and down from 3.47% a year ago. And one-year Treasury-indexed ARMs also hit a record low at 2.7%, down from 2.74% last week and 3.14% a year ago.  To obtain the rates, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage required payment of an average 0.8 point, while the 15-year fixed-rate mortgage and the 5-year ARM required an average 0.7 point. The 1-year ARM required an average 0.6 point. A point is 1% of the mortgage amount, charged as prepaid interest.

Two GOP congressmen:  no principal reductions

Two Republican Congressmen advised Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco to oppose principal reductions for GSE-backed loans.  The letter, submitted by House government oversight committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Rep. Patrick McHenry, came two days after Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and John Tierney, D-Mass., sent a letter to DeMarco in support of principal reduction.  In that letter, the Democratic congressmen pointed out Fannie Mae records show the GSE and its regulator approved and then quickly shut down a pilot principal forgiveness program in 2010 that could have saved the company approximately $410 million.  But Reps. Issa and McHenry conveyed a different message in their latest letter to DeMarco, saying FHFA “occupies a unique position in our system of government in which its independence rests upon the need for technical expertise free from coercive influences.”

Issa and McHenry said it was regretful DeMarco was caught in the middle, but urged him not to be bullied and to continue to recognize the potential cost of a principal reduction to taxpayers. They even cited a letter DeMarco previously sent to Rep. Cummings in which he estimated principal forgiveness on all first-lien underwater mortgages owned by the enterprises would require funding of nearly $100 billion to pay down the mortgages backing the homes. They also pointed out that DeMarco recently said the net cost of write-downs to the taxpayer could amount to $2.1 billion.  In addition, Issa and McHenry warned DeMarco about the prospect of using HAMP funds to subsidize the performance of principal reductions, writing that it “contravenes Congressional intent with respect to TARP and HAMP.”  The two congressmen also warned that such an action could turn into a back-door bailout for banks holding second liens on enterprise-owned or guaranteed properties.  ”As you know, the principal modification on a first-lien mortgage improves the position of a subordinate lien holder to the degree that the second lien is more likely to be repaid,” the congressmen wrote. “Even where the second lien is modified similar to the first lien, as in HAMP, the second lien holder benefits by sharing in any overall losses with the first lien holder.”  The pair claim such a set-up would allow second-lien holders to potentially recover more than they would have in a default.

Buying a home may never get any cheaper than this. Several housing experts are predicting that this year will be the last chance for bargain hunters to cash in on the best deals of the weak housing market.  With home prices down 34% nationally since 2006 and mortgage rates at historic lows, homes have never been more affordable — but it won’t stay this way for much longer.  Stuart Hoffman, chief economist for PNC Financial Services, said he expects home prices to flatten out by the third quarter and start climbing by next year.  A number of factors will help bolster the housing market, he said, including a decline in the number of foreclosures and continued job growth. In addition, homebuyers will have better access to mortgages as they get their finances in order and improve their credit scores. 

Some economists, like Trulia’s Jed Kolko, expect home prices to pick up even more quickly. Trulia’s data shows that the national average for asking prices already increased 1.4% in the first quarter of 2012, compared with the last three months of 2011.  “This is a strong indicator that we will start seeing home price indexes, like the S&P/Case-Shiller, start to report home price increases this summer,” he said.  Prospective homebuyers who’ve been sitting on the fence shouldn’t worry if they aren’t quite ready to make the leap. Analysts are predicting that the initial price gains will be modest, at least, in most markets.  Hoffman, for example, is forecasting a 2% increase in 2013 compared with 2012. Meanwhile David Stiff, chief economist for Fiserv, predicts that prices will turn in the last quarter of 2012 and will rise 4.2% for the 12 months through September 2013.

Job cuts up

Planned job cuts increased by 7.1% to 40,559 in April from March, the latest job cut report released by outplacement firm Challenger, Gray&Christmas showed today.  From the same month a year ago, job cuts were up 11.2% and so far this year the number of job cuts has increased by 9.8% to 183,653.  But despite the year-on-year increase, the monthly average in the first four months of this year is below the 12-month average of last year, the report pointed out.  April’s job cuts were led by the education sector, with a total of 9,027 planned cuts, up 142% from March as school districts continue to be under pressure to cut costs amid massive state and local budget deficits. But the pace of downsizing in the sector fell 32% from a year ago, the report added.  Consumer products companies have been the main job cutters for the year, having announced 20,134 planned job cuts through April, 257% more than the cuts announced by this point last year. 

“Even at its best, job creation is falling well short of what is needed to make a substantial dent in unemployment,” John Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said in a statement.  “While some would like to attribute the lack of hiring to uncertainty and regulatory roadblocks, the fact is that demand for goods and services simply has not reached a level that warrants accelerated hiring,” Challenger added.  He added that state and local governments, as well as the federal government, were still “in cost-cutting mode,” consumer spending remained soft and although business spending was improving, it was not nearly enough to make up for the shortfall in consumer and government spending.

LPS – foreclosures down

The March Mortgage Monitor report released by Lender Processing Services, Inc. shows that while March foreclosure starts increased a modest 8.1% since last month, overall, they were still down more than 31% year-over-year. Also in March, first-time foreclosure starts hit a five-month high. However, despite the increase, the number of first-time foreclosure starts in March was still far below those seen throughout much of 2011 and all of the previous three years.  As reported in LPS’ First Look, the national foreclosure inventory stayed relatively stable in March, remaining at the historically high levels maintained since the end of 2010. This national performance masks underlying differences between judicial states, where foreclosure inventory levels stand at 6.5%, and non-judicial states, where foreclosure inventory levels are more than 2.5 times lower at 2.45%.

The March data also showed that mortgage delinquencies have continued to decline, reaching their lowest level since August 2008, with seriously delinquent inventory (loans more than 90 days delinquent) declining in both judicial and non-judicial foreclosure states. Likewise, the rate of new problem loans (seriously delinquent loans that were current six months ago) continues to improve nationally, in both judicial and non-judicial states. At the same time, the LPS March mortgage performance data did show that foreclosure sales continued to behave somewhat erratically, dropping to their lowest level since December 2010, and most sharply in non-judicial states.  On the origination front, the data showed that February mortgage originations rebounded somewhat from their January lows, and that, despite slightly higher interest rates, prepayments increased in March. Mortgage prepayment activity – a key indicator of mortgage refinances – increased broadly, across all investor categories.

As reported in LPS’ First Look release, other key results from LPS’ latest Mortgage Monitor report include: 

Total US loan delinquency rate:​  7.09 % ​

Month-over-month change in delinquency rate:​  -6.3 %​

Total US foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate:​  4.14 %​

Month-over-month change in foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate:​  -0.1 %​

States with highest percentage of non-current* loans:​  FL, MS, NJ, NV, IL​

States with the lowest percentage of non-current* loans:​  MT, AK, SD, WY, ND​

*Non-current totals combine foreclosures and delinquencies as a% of active loans in that state.

Jobless claims down slightly

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 27,000 to a seasonally adjusted 365,000, the Labor Department said. That was the biggest weekly drop since early May last year.  The prior week’s figure was revised up to 392,000 from the previously reported 388,000. The four-week moving average for new claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends, edged up 750 to 383,500 – the highest level since December.  Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 380,000 last week.  The data has no bearing on the government’s closely watched employment report for April, to be released on Friday. Employers are expected to have added 170,000 new jobs to their payrolls last month, a step up from March’s 120,000 tally, according to a Reuters survey.  However, there is a downside risk to this forecast as initial claims were elevated for much of April. An independent survey on Wednesday showed private employers added only 119,000 jobs last month, the fewest in seven months, and well below economists’ expectations for a gain of 177,000 positions.  Nonfarm payrolls had averaged 246,000 jobs per month between December and February. Most economists have viewed the pull-back in job growth as payback after the weather-induced gains in the previous months.

The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid dropped 53,000 to 3.28 million in the week ended April 21.  The number of Americans on emergency unemployment benefits slipped 4,772 to 2.72 million in the week ended April 14, the latest week for which data is available. The number of people on extended benefits declined 57,528 to 354,883.  Nine states lost eligibility for extended benefits beginning that week and five others reduced the duration of emergency compensation.  A total of 6.60 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 85,523 from the prior week.

WSJ – Beazer homes surges in home sales

Beazer Homes USA Inc. reported a narrower fiscal-second-quarter loss Wednesday as the builder recorded a surge in home closings and sounded a hopeful note for the months ahead.  The Atlanta-based company, one of the largest home builders in the US, said its closings climbed 50% in the latest period to 844 homes. New orders, meanwhile, climbed 29% to 1,512 homes.  The results come as the US housing market has begun to show signs of emerging from the worst downturn in generations, albeit in fits and starts, as buyers get back into the game. With several home builders reporting increased sales and orders in recent weeks, many industry-watchers now think the hard-hit sector is set for a rebound.  “We remain hopeful, but cautious, about the prospects for a sustained market recovery, as a number of factors continue to pose challenges for prospective home buyers,” Chief Executive Allan Merrill said Wednesday in a statement accompanying the results.

For the quarter ended March 31, Beazer posted a loss of $39.9 million, or 51 cents a share, compared with a year-earlier loss of $53.8 million, or 73 cents a share.  The latest period included charges of $1.2 million for inventory impairments and $2.7 million tied to the refinancing of debt. The year-earlier period included charges of $17.8 million for inventory impairments.  Revenue surged 52% to $191.6 million. Analysts expected a loss of 43 cents a share on $192 million in revenue.  The average sales price rose to $224,700 from $216,300, while home-building gross margin narrowed to 10.9% from 12.4% in the prior year. Several of Beazer’s peers are seeing improved margins.  The builder’s cancellation rate rose to 22.5% from 20%, indicating more deals are unraveling before completion. “Given that most peers had declining cancellation rates, we were surprised” by the increase, wrote David Goldberg, a builder analyst with Credit Suisse, in a client note.

Retail slows

Retailers are reporting sales gains for April that show a slowdown in spending from the previous month as cooler weather, an early Easter and renewed worries about the economy dampened shoppers’ enthusiasm to buy.  As merchants report their sales figures Thursday, Costco Wholesale Corp. and Target Corp. posted gains that were smaller than Wall Street expected. Teen retailer Wet Seal Inc. posted a bigger-than-expected sales drop.  The figures are based on revenue at stores open at least a year. That metric is considered a key indicator of a retail health because it measures growth at established locations while excluding results from stores recently opened or closed.

Freddie earns $577 million

Freddie Mac reported net income of $577 million in the first quarter before it made a $1.8 billion dividend repayment to the Treasury Department.  The government-sponsored enterprise and one of the largest mortgage financiers in the country drew $19 million from the Treasury as part of its ongoing conservatorship bailout.  Net income for the quarter dropped from a $676 million gain one year ago because of higher derivative losses and lower net interest income.  Higher valuations of the mortgage bonds Freddie holds available for sale pushed total comprehensive income to $1.78 billion in the first quarter. The $1.8 billion repayment to the Treasury offset this total, forcing the remaining to be drawn from the government.  Freddie financed over $114 billion in mortgages during the first quarter, up from $105 billion one year ago.  Roughly 87% of its business was refinancing. More than 416,000 borrowers refinanced their Freddie-guaranteed home loan in the first three months of 2012, but the company said it is still too early to estimate how many will ultimately qualify for the expanded Home Affordable Refinance Program.

CoreLogic today released its National Foreclosure Report for March, which provides monthly data on completed foreclosures, foreclosure inventory and 90+ day delinquency rates. There were 69,000 completed foreclosures in March 2012 compared to 85,000 in March 2011 and 66,000* in February 2012. Through the first quarter of 2012, there were 198,000 completed foreclosures compared to 232,000 through the first quarter of 2011. Since the start of the financial crisis in September 2008, there have been approximately 3.5 million completed foreclosures.   Approximately 1.4 million homes, or 3.4% of all homes with a mortgage, were in the national foreclosure inventory as of March 2012 compared to 1.5 million, or 3.5%, in March 2011 and 1.4 million, or 3.4%, in February 2012. The number of loans in the foreclosure inventory decreased by nearly 100,000, or 6.0%, in March 2012 compared to March 2011.   

The share of borrowers nationally that were more than 90 days late on their mortgage payment, including homes in foreclosure and real estate owned (REO) assets, fell to 7.0% in March 2012 from 7.5% in March 2011, and remained unchanged from 7.0% in February 2012.  Also in March, the inventory of REO assets held by servicers nationwide grew more slowly than the pace of REO sales, as measured by the distressed clearing ratio.  The distressed clearing ratio is calculated by dividing the number of REO sales by the number of completed foreclosures. The higher the distressed clearing ratio, the faster the pace of REO sales relative to the pace of completed foreclosures.  The distressed clearing ratio for March 2012 was 0.81, up from 0.76 in February 2012.

 Highlights as of March 2012

-  The five states with the largest number of completed foreclosures for the 12 months ending in March 2012 were:  California (150,000), Florida (92,000), Michigan (62,000), Arizona (58,000) and Texas (57,000). These five states account for 49.1% of all completed foreclosures nationally.

-  The% of homeowners nationally who were more than 90 days late on their mortgage payments, including homes in foreclosure and REO, was 7.0% for March 2012 compared to 7.5% for March 2011, and 7.0% in February 2012.   

-  The five states with the highest foreclosure rates were:  Florida (12.1%), New Jersey (6.6%), Illinois (5.4%), Nevada (4.9%) and New York (4.9%).

-  The five states with the lowest foreclosure rates were:  Wyoming (0.7%), Alaska (0.8%), North Dakota (0.8%), Nebraska (1.1%) and South Dakota (1.4%).

-  Of the top 100 markets, measured by Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) population, 35 are showing an increase in the year-over-year foreclosure rate in March 2012, two more than in February 2012 when 33 of the top CBSAs were showing an increase in the year-over-year foreclosure rate.   

*February data was revised.  Revisions are standard, and to ensure accuracy CoreLogic incorporates newly released data to provide updated results.

BOA to cut 400 jobs

Bank of America (BOA) is planning to cut up to 400 jobs in its investment banking, corporate banking, and sales and trading units, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the situation.  An expected sale of the bank’s non-US wealth-management operations in Asia, Latin America, and Europe would eliminate up to 2,000 jobs, the Journal reported.  Reuters reported on April 17 that Bank of America was looking to sell its wealth-management units outside the US for as much as $3 billion.  BOA declined to comment on the Journal report.  Last spring, the bank announced a cost-cutting program called Project New BAC that aims to eliminate 30,000 consumer banking and technology jobs over the next few years.  The bank has said it expects to wrap up plans for the second phase of the program, which focuses on investment banking, commercial banking, and related support jobs in May. The second phase is expected to cut fewer jobs than the first because it covers a smaller, more efficient part of the bank.  At the end of March, Bank of America had about 278,700 employees worldwide.

Olick – renter nation

“More Americans are renting homes, and fewer are owning them; it’s not as if this is news to anyone who follows the US housing market, but a new report from the Census Bureau today really put an historical exclamation point on the trend.  The share of US household renting reached a fifteen year high, and home ownership reached a 15-year low. Funny how those numbers travel together.  34.6% of households were renters in the first quarter of this year, and that number is climbing, as lack of credit or sufficient down payment keeps Americans young and old from becoming home owners. Rental vacancies are therefore falling, the lowest rate out West, where foreclosures have run the highest during this housing crash. That is also where investors are rushing in to buy foreclosed properties and put them up for rent. Single family homes for rent, in fact, surpassed multi-family units, taking 52% of the $3 trillion rental market, according to CoreLogic.

Both rental and homeowner vacancies are down, which is a general positive for the housing market, because empty houses are a blight on communities. ‘The vacancy rates will only decline if household formation is increasing or units are being destroyed,’ notes ISI Group’s Stephen East.  While banks have bulldozed some foreclosed properties here and there, the practice is by no means popular or widespread. That should mean that household formation is increasing, which is generally a product of an improving jobs picture. Younger Americans who have been living together or with their parents may finally be getting into their own homes, more likely into rentals, but at least they’re forming their own households. That is thanks to a small drop in the unemployment rate among 25-34 year olds to its lowest rate in three years. The home ownership rate now stands at 65.4%, down a full percentage point from a year ago, and down from just over 69% at the peak in 2004.  Since the recession began, growth in overall new households has been about 50% short of trend lines, according to analysts at Goldman Sachs. While household formation is rebounding for single or un-related Americans, formation among families is still waning; that may be due to the types of homes they need, i.e. larger, single-family homes. It thus stands to reason that pent-up demand will show itself first in single family rentals in the future and less in multi-family. No wonder investors are flooding the foreclosure market.”

No more easing?

Two top Federal Reserve officials — one with a dovish, employment-focused bent, and the other a self-avowed inflation hawk — yesterday both said they see no need for the US central bank to ease monetary policy any further.  But the comments, from San Francisco Fed President John Williams and Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher, do not mean they believe the central bank should quickly move to raise rates, which it has kept near zero for more than three years.  The economy grew at a 2.2% pace last quarter, down from its 3% growth rate in the final three months of the year. Recent economic data, including a gauge of business activity in the US Midwest, signal growth may slow further this quarter.  “I don’t think we are ready to exit yet,” Fisher, an inflation hawk, told Reuters at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles.  Fisher said he would oppose the extension of Operation Twist, the Fed bond-buying program that is set to end in June, but stopped short of calling for outright monetary tightening.  “We’ll have to see how the year works out,” he said.

US home ownership sets new record – down

The US homeownership rate fell to the lowest level in 15 years in the first quarter as borrowers lost homes to foreclosure and tighter inventory and credit kept buyers off the market.  The rate dropped to 65.4% from 66% in the fourth quarter and fell a full percentage point from a year earlier, the Census Bureau said in a report today. That is the lowest level since the first quarter of 1997, and down from a record 69.2% in June 2004.  Mounting foreclosures are displacing borrowers, while a lack of inventory has kept home sales from accelerating amid record affordability, the National Association of Realtors reported April 19. Stricter mortgage standards are also limiting purchases as rental demand surges, said Paul Diggle, property economist with Capital Economics Ltd. in London.  “Although house prices and mortgage rates have fallen to a level that makes buying preferable to renting, ongoing problems accessing mortgage credit are preventing many households from taking advantage,” he wrote in a note today.  The US apartment vacancy rate fell to 4.9% in the first quarter, an 11-year low, according to New York-based Reis Inc. (REIS).  The vacancy rate for rental homes was 8.8% in the first quarter, compared with 9.7% a year earlier, the Census Bureau said in today’s report.

Of the estimated 132.6 million US homes, 18.5 million, or 13.9%, were vacant in the first quarter. A year earlier, about 19 million homes were vacant, according to the report. That includes homes for sale or rent or held off the market, and vacation properties used seasonally.  The ownership rate may drop below 64% by the end of 2015 and stay there for years, Scott Simon, the mortgage bond head of Pacific Investment Management Co. in Newport Beach, California, said in an e-mail today.  “It will be lower by 2017,” he said. “It will be lower in 2020.”  About 6 million borrowers will lose their properties in the next five years because of inability to pay, creating 4 million new rental households, Simon said in an April 24 interview on Bloomberg Television.  The homeownership rate fell 3 percentage points from a year earlier to 61.4% in the first quarter for people aged 35 to 44, the biggest drop of any age group. The Northeast had the biggest regional decline, with the ownership rate falling 1.4 percentage points to 62.5%. The West had the lowest ownership rate at 59.9%, down 1 percentage point from a year earlier. 

The US homeownership rate rose to a record in 2004 when President George W. Bush, running for re-election, called for expanding home-loan availability to create an “ownership society.” The current rate of 65.4% matches the average since 1965, when the Census Bureau began reporting the figures, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.  Home prices fell 3.5% in February from a year earlier and are 35% below their July 2006 peak, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index of 20 US cities. The average rate for a 30-year fixed loan was 3.88% last week and reached 3.87% in February, the lowest level in at least four decades, according to Freddie Mac.  About 2.37 million homes were listed for sale in March, a and 6.3 month supply and down 22% from a year earlier, the Realtors association said on April 19. A six-month supply is considered a healthy market, according to the group.