Smart Real Estate News & Commentary by Chris McLaughlin July 26, 2011
Forward this e-mail to your friends!
Then they can subscribe directly at the following link:
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com/
*** Join Chris’ Facebook Fan Page–>
http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
*** Follow Chris on Twitter–>
http://www.twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
************************************************************
Home prices slightly up in May
The housing market showed signs of life again in May. Home prices rose for the second consecutive month following an eight-month slide. Prices for an index of 20 major metro areas increased 1% compared with April, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index. The 10-city index rose 1.1% month-over-month. David Blitzer, a spokesman for S&P, was cautious in detailing the index gains. “While the monthly data were encouraging, most [metro areas] and both composites fared poorly in annual terms,” he said. “The 10-City Composite was down 3.6% and the 20-City Composite was down 4.5% in May 2011 versus May 2010.” Prices are also still off more than 32% from their highs, set in July, 2006 and hover at about the same level they were in mid-2003.. Blitzer attributed much of the home price increase for May to seasonal effects. Spring is the hottest time of year for home buying and the added demand usually drives prices higher. Taking those seasonal factors into account, the 10-city showed a gain of just 0.1%.
President complains about GOP, GOP answers back
President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner delivered rival debt ceiling/deficit plans to the nation on Monday evening in back-to-back speeches explaining the current state of the debt debate and its impact on Americans. And though they may not have intended it this way, the message of unwillingness to compromise in Washington sounded out loud and clear. Months of increasingly tense negotiations have failed to bring a deal that can win approval from all of the necessary players — the Republican-led House, Democratic-led Senate and the White House. The talks initially involved a broad deficit-reduction plan intended to reduce the mounting gap between how much the government spends and how much revenue it collects.
On Monday, Democratic and Republican congressional leaders unveiled separate new proposals that the other side quickly rejected, demonstrating the cavernous partisan divide that exists. Both plans — one by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, and the other by House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican — provide a path to raise the debt ceiling through the end of 2012, but they differ in scope and over key components involving requirements for future congressional action. Obama immediately endorsed the Reid plan. Boehner’s plan would require two separate votes by Congress. The first would approve approximately $1.2 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade while raising the debt ceiling through the end of 2011, two GOP leadership aides told CNN. Any failure on the part of Congress to enact the mandated spending reductions would trigger automatic across-the-board budget cuts. The second vote would raise the debt limit through 2012, but only if Congress approves a series of major tax reforms and entitlement changes outlined by a bipartisan committee composed of Senate and House members.
Boehner’s plan, while allowing a total debt-ceiling increase of roughly $2.6 trillion, also would require both a House and Senate vote on a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution between October 1 and the end of the year.
This plan is “less than perfect,” Boehner said, but “reflects bipartisan negotiations” conducted with Senate Democrats over the weekend. Democrats are vehemently opposed to the idea of holding more than one vote to raise the debt limit through the 2012 election, arguing that such a requirement is politically unrealistic and could prove to be economically destabilizing. Republicans want to lock in long-term tax and spending changes, and argue that Obama is trying to avoid politically tough decisions in a presidential election year.
In his response to Obama’s speech, House Speaker John Boehner said the president’s proposals fail to deal with the fundamental problem: that the nation spends more than it takes in. “The sad truth is that the president wanted a blank check six months ago, and he wants a blank check today,” Boehner said. “That is just not going to happen.”
MBA – wants amendments to Dodd-Frank
On Friday, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) filed a comment letter with the Federal Reserve on the Board’s proposed rule that would implement amendments to the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) under the Dodd-Frank Act to establish Ability to Repay/Qualified Mortgage (QM) requirements. In the letter, MBA’s President and CEO David H. Stevens reiterates MBA’s support for the establishment of an ability to repay requirement for mortgage loans and emphasizes the importance of a final rule that provides unambiguous definitions and means of compliance. According to MBA, clear “bright line” requirements will ensure the availability of sustainable mortgage credit to the widest array of qualified borrowers at affordable costs. MBA strongly believes that any final rule must:
1. Structure the QM as a legal safe harbor with specific product features, documentation and underwriting requirements that may be more extensive than the requirements proposed in order to ensure the availability of sustainable, affordable mortgage credit to the widest array of qualified mortgage borrowers;
2. Significantly adjust the limit on points and fees in the QM alternatives proposed to ensure the availability of credit and address several other major concerns; and
3. Provide a well-defined QM safe harbor that will serve as an alternative to the proposed QRM. The right QM definition will incentivize the origination of sustainable mortgages and, thus, serve the interests of investors as well as borrowers and invite private capital back to the market.
Ford has bad Q2
Ford Motor Co. said today that in Q2 it earned $2.4 billion, or 59 cents per share, down 8% from $2.6 billion, or 61 cents per share, a year earlier. The company warned last month that its profit could slip, citing investments in future products. Worldwide sales were up 7%, but the company spent more on raw materials like steel and copper and on product development. In Asia, Ford reported a pretax profit of just $1 million, down $112 million as it invests in new plants and products. Ford wants to introduce five new cars in India and 10 cars in China in the next four years. The company currently controls less than 3% of the market in both India and China. In addition to the slew of new cars in Asia, the company is in the midst of an expensive overhaul of its flagging Lincoln luxury brand in the US It also plans to introduce the hybrid-only C-Max minivan in the US early next year.
Without one-time items, including $110 million for employee reductions, Ford would have earned $2.9 billion, or 65 cents per share. That beat analysts’ forecast of 60 cents per share. The company projects that annual US sales will be in the lower end of its 13 million to 13.5 million forecast. Ford was able to command higher prices for its cars and trucks in the US, partly because of tight supplies of vehicles after the earthquake. For the second quarter, revenue rose 13 percent to $35.5 billion. Analysts polled by FactSet had forecast revenue of $32.15 billion. Ford paid off $2.6 billion in debt during the quarter. The company now has $14 billion in debt, down from $16.6 billion in the same quarter a year ago, a legacy of its 2006 decision to borrow $23 billion to restructure the business. Ford hopes its steady reduction in debt will convince ratings agencies to return the company to investment-grade status, which would make it cheaper to borrow money.
Olick – mortgage interest deduction and the government
It’s not like the housing market needs any more headwinds, so here’s the government potentially giving us another: The mortgage interest deduction is back in big play in the budget deal. It never exactly came off the table, but the bigger the budget deal, the more likely the mortgage deduction will take a bigger hit. Right now, home loan borrowers can deduct the amount of interest they pay on their mortgages from their taxable income. This goes for principal residences and second homes. The interest deduction is capped at the first million dollars of debt on the home. For home equity loans it’s capped at $100,000 in debt. The deduction costs the US Treasury about $100 billion a year. There are proposals now to either reduce the cap to $500,000 and/or to eliminate the deduction on second homes. Eliminating the deduction on second homes would save about $15 billion, and reducing the cap to $500,000 would save another $15 billion, according to economist William Wheaton at MIT. 10.5% of existing home sales in June were of homes over $500,000 according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
Then there’s the idea from the President’s bipartisan commission of turning the interest deduction into a 12 percent credit, limited to $500,000 in mortgage debt, only on primary residences. That could save the Treasury $65 billion. Obviously all this hits the middle class, urban borrowers the hardest because they’re the ones with homes in the $500,000 to $1 million range. Realtors, home builders, investors, vacation home owners, even politicians hate these proposals, because they take money out of their pockets and because they provide a strong disincentive to buy a home right now. Then again, others argue that it just fosters over-borrowing, as potential homeowners see the deduction as making the loan less than it really is, which it doesn’t. Interesting, in Canada, they don’t have a mortgage interest deduction on personal residences, but they do on investment properties; this makes a lot more sense to me, as it is a business expense. It also fosters investment in housing, which is precisely what the US could use more of right now. Of course if the US government defaults on its debt, the housing/mortgage markets will have a lot bigger issues to deal with than the potential loss of a tax deduction; like, say, mortgage rates going through the roof.
See you at the top!
Chris McLaughlin
**************
Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2010.
All Rights Reserved.
http://www.shortsalesriches.com
http://www.shortsalescoach.com
http://www.sixfigurebpo.com
http://www.reomillionaireclub.com
http://www.youtube.com/shortsalesriches
http://www.smartrealestatenews.com
(subscribe to this newsletter)
*************************************************
About the author:
Chris McLaughlin is widely known as America’s top
Real Estate Attorney and Investment Consultant.
* As the top Florida foreclosure and pre-
foreclosure expert, he oversees more than
100 short sale & REO closings each month
* Long-time authority on real estate investing
and rapid reselling of distressed homes. Owns
portfolio of nearly 150 high-value, high-profit
properties
* Owner of one of Florida’s largest Real Estate firms,
running 4 different offices, supporting over
420 agents, uniquely positioning him to help
thousands of investors make money in the
biggest market opportunity ever!
* In 2010, Chris’ 4 Central Florida real estate offices
closed 2,786 sides for a closed sales volume of
$392,912,927!
* Highly sought-after speaker, consultant, and
seminar leader for current trends and hot topics
in Real Estate Investing, Entrepreneurship, and
Wealth Building
* Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/mclaughlinchris
* Join my Facebook Fan Page: http://www.mclaughlinchris.com
